Hrmm... I don't mind being single (azn has the sex drive of an eighty-three year old coffee table) but I find MacGuffin's post perplexing for the reason I outlined in post #1562.
Didn't see that. Your reasoning makes sense. GrimmyTOA
These Zealots we're hunting are presumably religious zealots. As such I would think they would want to promote monogamous couples rather than an island of intermingling singles.
These Zealots we're hunting are presumably religious zealots. As such I would think they would want to promote monogamous couples rather than an island of intermingling singles.
Well, it goes like this. Having couples around gives the village a power (albeit a pretty minor one). Removing that power aids the zealots. We should try to protect that power (unless there's some hidden benefit to the village being comprised only of singles). We can't protect that power forever, as the zealots only need to kill two people to break up the last remaining couples. However, we can make them use their kills to remove our couple-power from the game, as opposed to making things easy on them by doing it ourselves.
Hrmm... I don't mind being single (azn has the sex drive of an eighty-three year old coffee table) but I find MacGuffin's post perplexing for the reason I outlined in post #1562.
83 year old coffee tables have pretty high sex drives where I come from.
I think we're trying out B:L's attempt at a network which seems like a better use of the vote today than the EB wagon which is apparently based on a misunderstanding and flimsy reasoning.
Astraphobia, you're been randomly chosen from a group of highly suspicious people as my vote for the night!
Did anyone make a magenta vote yesterday? It seemed from the narration he randomly picked someone; was there a tie, or is someone always selected for the iced and split up votes?
Posts
Sorry for missing yesterday. Meant to make a post in the evening but I was at my girlfriend's place and got wrapped up in stuff*.
*
Didn't see that. Your reasoning makes sense.
GrimmyTOA
These Zealots we're hunting are presumably religious zealots. As such I would think they would want to promote monogamous couples rather than an island of intermingling singles.
naknaknaknaknak
Well, it goes like this. Having couples around gives the village a power (albeit a pretty minor one). Removing that power aids the zealots. We should try to protect that power (unless there's some hidden benefit to the village being comprised only of singles). We can't protect that power forever, as the zealots only need to kill two people to break up the last remaining couples. However, we can make them use their kills to remove our couple-power from the game, as opposed to making things easy on them by doing it ourselves.
Reasonable I suppose.
naknaknaknaknak
83 year old coffee tables have pretty high sex drives where I come from.
...unless...there is a vote trickle down, otherwise I will vote !TheLawinator
LoL: BunyipAristocrat
And becuase his High Judge campaign is better than mine.
WAAAAHOOOOOOOOOOO
SEVEN VOTES
GOGOGOGOGOGO
Show yourself ZEALOTS
and DEMONS
run that wagon with all your fear, whip that horse led on by a wordless vote
HAHAHAHA
Doxa
its sorta an agreement amongst them
have fun!
Vote Doxa, because B:L made a one worded post
You need a vice presidential pin, because you're meant for second place.
!ElementBrian
Element Brian
Element Brian
Astraphobia, you're been randomly chosen from a group of highly suspicious people as my vote for the night!
Did anyone make a magenta vote yesterday? It seemed from the narration he randomly picked someone; was there a tie, or is someone always selected for the iced and split up votes?
LoL: BunyipAristocrat
...It means I'm a suspect, right?
twitch.tv/tehsloth
I can has cheezburger, yes?
I think?
whats the count
visiblehowl it is.
Narration coming shortly.
Maximus is still alive?
...and apparently editing vote posts, for shame