Club PA 2.0 has arrived! If you'd like to access some extra PA content and help support the forums, check it out at patreon.com/ClubPA
The image size limit has been raised to 1mb! Anything larger than that should be linked to. This is a HARD limit, please do not abuse it.
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!
*sigh* You guys just don't get it. Well done on labeling people simply stating that faith is not the same thing as science as absolutists etc. Pot, meet kettle. All you had to do was say 'scientists … (View Post)
My emphasis. A scientist can have faith that a particular hypothesis will be proven, but that does not make faith the same thing as science. Science is the evaluation of the hy… (View Post)
Perfectly fair point, I just find it an interesting expression in game mechanics. Perhaps are more grounded exploration of faith vs skepticism would be a link with both morale and risk ta… (View Post)
1) The burden of proof is on the proposer of a hypothesis
2) There is a bit of an misunderstanding at work here about what Atheism is. Atheists aren't necessarily claimi… (View Post)
That some people don't follow up on claims of proofs does not change that science is concerned with assessing proofs, that faith is belief without proofs, and that these are not only not … (View Post)