Hmm, the idea of all of us ganking the same target is somewhat appealing. It'll limit the number of people the mafia can gank, because they'll have to use all 5 of themselves on the same target to have a chance at killing someone off. And it will limit the number of offshoot squads that can kill people. Unfortunately, it will make the game less crazyfunchaotic. Playing crazy versus playing smart, actually a tough decision.
Directly comparing games is silly; I would think a group kill if not two is most likely.
In any case, forming small gank squads may be useful at this point. However, please remember these are soft networks (unless you're masons) so providing too much information here can get our specials killed rather quickly.
The joke's on Kime, we're buffing and bluesparking him at the same time!
mafia tactic? If you don't want to risk putting it on one of you - make sure the buff is on someone who dies?
Peccavi's idea of ganking one seems solid. More kill control (slower games tend to benefit us) and everyone is protected. On the other hand soft networks that discuss can find out shit about people's preferences and what they turned up as.
So I wonder then, if we're behind that idea as a village, if we should publicly vote in a separate color (something meaningful to us) on who to go for. It would need to be public or it won't work at all.
Is there a maximum gank squad size that will benefit from protection?
The joke's on Kime, we're buffing and bluesparking him at the same time!
mafia tactic? If you don't want to risk putting it on one of you - make sure the buff is on someone who dies?
Peccavi's idea of ganking one seems solid. More kill control (slower games tend to benefit us) and everyone is protected. On the other hand soft networks that discuss can find out shit about people's preferences and what they turned up as.
Peccavi? He only mentioned it after the deepskyblue vote occurred. I suggested it all the way last night.
So I wonder then, if we're behind that idea as a village, if we should publicly vote in a separate color (something meaningful to us) on who to go for. It would need to be public or it won't work at all.Public gank vote is the perfect way to hide the mafia. Since they can do it and guarentee a kill for anyone not them.
Nice try commarade [color]Peccavi[/color]
The point of the big group gank is to prevent the mafia from being able to gank.
If 25 people are village and all try to gank Player X, the mafia can do nothing else but watch that player get ganked, since they will not have a more powerful gank than 5 and therefore will be unable to gank anybody.
If we spread out the ganks, they will likely gain an additional kill that we otherwise could have prevented. the group gank slows the amount of kills in the game down and still puts the majority of the vote power in the hands of the village aligned players.
Your vote against a person trying to organize the village leaves me highly suspicious of you Bedlam
Posts
Buff control is a key component to victory on the fields of justice.
Vote for who should take blue buff in !deepskyblue.
and Bedlam for day 1 vote.
Anyone fancy being part of the Gump Gank Squad? Our fists are rusty, and metallic
And kime is as good a buff target as any.
In addition, I am voting for facetious.
Twitch Stream
I'm guessing the gank is just like the evidence thing.
My guess is one or two of them might have a kill as an active ability.
The blue buff will benefit any champion. Clarification denied.
In any case, forming small gank squads may be useful at this point. However, please remember these are soft networks (unless you're masons) so providing too much information here can get our specials killed rather quickly.
!Bush:Layer
Bedlam and Kime.
The Black Hole of Cygnus X-1
Spoit
gah, can't edit vote posts.
kime
Spoit
kime
Bedlam
Team Magic Box Protection Squad Go!
Minimum daily post requirements? (Not from a cereal...)
The Black Hole of Cygnus X-1
mafia tactic? If you don't want to risk putting it on one of you - make sure the buff is on someone who dies?
Peccavi's idea of ganking one seems solid. More kill control (slower games tend to benefit us) and everyone is protected. On the other hand soft networks that discuss can find out shit about people's preferences and what they turned up as.
Is there a maximum gank squad size that will benefit from protection?
If so, how will the size of the party be split
I don't care so long as you vote.
You might d/c randomly though, LoL is known for that.
Don't make your team 4v5 it.
Peccavi? He only mentioned it after the deepskyblue vote occurred. I suggested it all the way last night.
Purple not purpose, Droid.
Nice try commarade Peccavi
Confusion will be my epitaph
Bet he uses energy and doesn't even need the mana
The point of the big group gank is to prevent the mafia from being able to gank.
If 25 people are village and all try to gank Player X, the mafia can do nothing else but watch that player get ganked, since they will not have a more powerful gank than 5 and therefore will be unable to gank anybody.
If we spread out the ganks, they will likely gain an additional kill that we otherwise could have prevented. the group gank slows the amount of kills in the game down and still puts the majority of the vote power in the hands of the village aligned players.
Your vote against a person trying to organize the village leaves me highly suspicious of you Bedlam
EDIT - Why did it break when I quoted...?