I still think the combat in the BG games is good, each encounter is kind of a puzzle with some RNG for certain outcomes, and going through them again isn't totally without enjoyment for me, though this is way more true of the second game than the first

I would very much like a version of Planescape: Torment that had most of the encounters removed, though

Poorochondriac wrote: »

Librarian's ghost wrote: »

I’ve played some good ass train board games.

Have you played some good-ass train games or some good ass-train games.

you a cop?

AOC, of course, is on point.

That a family had to lose a son, brother and father; that a teenage girl had to film and post a murder, that millions across the country had to organize and march just for George Floyd to be seen and valued is not justice.

And this verdict is not a substitute for policy change.

AOC is a member of Congress.

I still think about those games a lot, and especially the leap in class composition between the first and second.

in the first game you have a lot of options for essentially an ideal party without any real friction or any member who's bad at their job.

in the second the only character you're likely to have in a good-aligned party that really excels in their role is the one you make, the rest all have some huge disadvantage, or are evil and therefore a pain to keep around.

look at that plus the class kits and you can really see them chafing against the AD&D system. that the same studio made Dragon Age is both very interesting and very predictable.

They at least did that incredibly ill-conceived Kente cloth kneel

Librarian's ghost wrote: »

I’ve played some good ass train board games.

Have you played some good-ass train games or some good ass-train games.

I have been done with peloci for years. that's why it's annoying to hear republicans do their low brow criticisms of her because I don't like her either except for good reasons not stupid own the libs reasons