I may have to miss my draft. I know that people generally get screwed by the auto-draft unless they set up the player rankings carefully. I don't know what "carefully" means. What are the general guidelines for setting up rankings? Why does the auto-drafter sometimes draft a terrible unsigned middle reliever with the fourth pick when there are eighty-five great players left?
So obviously the method of ranking all players #1 to #500 and going with that is poor.
One thing I think is maybe set the best-ranked of each position in order with #1 through 12, then repeat with the second-best with 13 through 25 and so forth. Like:
#1 1B, #1 2B, #1 3B, #1 SS, #1 OF, #1SP, #1RP, #2 1B, #2 2B, #2 3B...
Another thing might be to take the best three or four guys at each position, and put the positions in order of where you normally get the most points:
#1 OF, #2 OF, #3 OF, #1 1B, #2 1B, #3 1B, #1 3B, #2 3B, #2 3B... and then repeat with #4 through #7 at each position.
Any advice?
Posts
Which has its own problems; the reason it does positional scarcity is because you don't want the reverse either - usually for fantasy, outfielders/1B/3B will have higher rankings (because it's all offensively based), and you'd wind up with a team of 20 left fielders and have to pick up a terrible SS later