The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Economics college class?

billwillbillwill Registered User regular
edited June 2010 in Help / Advice Forum
I've always been interested in economics, which is why I've signed up for Economics 102: Principles of Microeconomics as a summer course.

One thing in particular has me worried, though. I suck at math. All though school, while I would get straight A's in everything else, math class just ended in C's and D's. The last math class I took (Math 124) is the prerequisite for Economics 102. I took Math 124 almost two years ago. I literally don't remember anything from it, and I skated by with a C somehow.

It's not that I don't like math. When I've wanted to do it, I do quite well. I just tend to daydream when I'm bored, and that, coupled with my nonexistent study habits, equals bad grades on tests. I'm hoping that when I'm interested in the subject, the math part will be easy.

So here are my questions to you.

1) How much math is there in early level college economics classes (and later ones, for that matter)?

2) What kind of math is it? As in, I have a few weeks free before the class starts, and I'd like to brush up. What I should I study?

A few things are in my favor. I realize I'm going to have to change my study habits and study hard, which I am determined to do. Also, my math genius best friend is also taking the course, so I'll have him to study with.

Thanks!

I hate you and you hate me.
billwill on

Posts

  • HerkimerHerkimer Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    I don't recall intro to macro being terribly math heavy. A few equations, but nothing nuts

    Micro was slightly more math-y, but again, nothing too bad.

    As far as what type, basic algebra.

    of course, your course might be very different from how mine were. Up to the professor, I'd guess.

    Herkimer on
  • Free HotelFree Hotel Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Lower-level economics is algebra and a little bit of calculus (mostly just derivatives, and probably very basic ones). My introductory econ courses were more theory based (graphs, pictures) and it became more about the math in higher levels.

    In higher levels you would study econometrics, which is calculus/statistical methods.

    Free Hotel on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Basic algebra and a few graphs. Nothing too difficult.

    mooshoepork on
  • ZombiemamboZombiemambo Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Your bookstore might also have a sheet, it's like $6, that basically covers everything from a certain course (usually Math or any other hard science). You don't need to take Math again, just buy one of those and it should all come back to you.

    Zombiemambo on
    JKKaAGp.png
  • edited June 2010
    This content has been removed.

  • WildEEPWildEEP Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Agreed w/ thread. Its like 99% Graphs and charts.

    WildEEP on
  • ShogunShogun Hair long; money long; me and broke wizards we don't get along Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    I'm wondering what Microecon classes you guys took. My micro class was fairly tough but it wasn't an intro class. Tons of graphs and a fair amount of math. Its more conceptual but it was nothing like my previous econ classes.

    edit: upon thinking about it I realize the OPs class is 102 and mine was 367 so I guess it would be a higher level microecon course.

    Shogun on
  • elmoelmo Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Found that my microecon class was fairly math heavy, using a book by Perloff, the math consisted mostly of derivation, integration and differentiation(sp?), along with some formula juggling, nothing too difficult.

    Think they might have focused more on concepts and how the different markets operate and used math to show the concepts.

    If you read up on differentiating you should be set, id also look up Lagrange equations.

    elmo on
  • edited June 2010
    This content has been removed.

  • lunasealunasea Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Uhh...I don't really know about economics courses that you guys took but mine were all heavily calculus oriented. Keep in mind that I go to a prestigious university known for its econ department and I skipped the intro (101) classes with my AP's. Macro is generally going to be easier on the math part but I remember the Solow growth model and ISLM being a real bitch with derivatives. Either way, I don't think I ever completed an assignment and not had it have at least Algebra. Also, Econometrics is just regression.

    Edit: Fuck econometrics.

    lunasea on
  • HerkimerHerkimer Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    lunasea wrote: »
    Uhh...I don't really know about economics courses that you guys took but mine were all heavily calculus oriented.. Keep in mind that I go to a prestigious university known for its econ department and I skipped the intro (101) classes with my AP's.

    So did you see the part in the OP where he was asking about "Economics 102: Principles of Microeconomics"?

    yeah.

    Herkimer on
  • Mojo the AvengerMojo the Avenger Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    You don't need lagrange equations. Those are for intermediate micro, not principles.

    Mojo the Avenger on
  • CorcoranCadetCorcoranCadet Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    I have a double major, with one of my majors being in economics. It is from one of the major public universities in the country, and I graduated within the past four years. I only say this because I believe it will provide some perspective for you. As another note, I am not actually going to be utilizing the economics major in my profession, so take this with a grain of salt I guess.

    Economics is NOT math heavy. The majority of the classes offered in the ECON department have little to no math involved. I actually don't really enjoy math, so I am in a fairly similar situation to you. I just really liked economics. In most schools you will be able to get away with getting the major by taking courses that don't involve much math at all. Microeconomics involves some calculus and whatnot, but I was able to get a decent grade in it. Unless you end up taking econometrics or possibly some upper level industrial classes, you won't need it. What is really odd about all of this is that at the graduate level, economics is all about math. Economics departments in the United States today do not prepare you to get a graduate degree in economics. The majority of the Phd candidates at schools have degrees in a math related field or a double major in a math related field.

    The gist of my statement is: You will be fine in micro, even if you don't like math. If you choose your undergrad economics courses wisely, you can get away with little to no math.

    CorcoranCadet on
  • edited June 2010
    This content has been removed.

  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    IIRC the intro courses to Micro and Macro only require Algebra at the most. You don't get into heavier lifting math for econ until you're further into the degree plan. I recall statistics touching on pre-cal and calc level stuff, but you could look at calc for business majors as opposed to calc for engineers. And that's about as high in math as you need to go to get a BA in econ if you wanted to. IMO your degree will be more valuable if you got involved in econ courses that require more applied mathematics like econometrics in which you'll need stuff like linear algebra. Your experience may vary by school, and if you're doing a BS vs. a BA.

    Djeet on
  • thisisntwallythisisntwally Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    might be worth your while to brush up on indices.

    besides that, an intro macro class is pretty much all graphs and a hint of algebra.

    upper level stuff, as mentioned, can get pretty heavy into calculus and statistics, but this is largely dependent on which courses you take. you might just write a bunch of papers with negligible math involvement.

    thisisntwally on
    #someshit
  • The Crowing OneThe Crowing One Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Take the class.

    Do the work.

    You'll be fine.

    The Crowing One on
    3rddocbottom.jpg
  • NylonathetepNylonathetep Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    There's really not too much math in the Macro level. Macroeconomics are all theory base. You do have to deal with economics forumla and grahps. The forumlas don't require you to pug numbers in but basically how one factor of the economy is affecting other factors and their implications.

    You'll be seeing something like this

    Norminal GDP = C + I + G + (X-M) where C = Consumer consumption, I = Investment, G = Government Spending, X = export and M = Import. So any of these factors increasing will increase a country GDP.

    You'll need to do some simple calculations like calculating CPI (Comsumer Price Index), Money Multiplier (how the infusion of cash to a economy will increase the overall Money Supply in the economy) but that's about it.


    P.S All the Maths are in the microeconomics level. Avoid that if you really aren't good at math.

    Nylonathetep on
    714353-1.png
  • ronyaronya Arrrrrf. the ivory tower's basementRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Constrained optimization is the toughest math you will encounter for a fairly long while (i.e., find the maximum or minimum of a function given some constraints). It's not very difficult, though.

    Course approaches vary. Some undergraduate courses jump into the math of it immediately, right in the first week. Some other courses just allude to the intuition and depend on you to grok roughly how it works.

    If you can't handle the math, make sure you can find a source which can express economic ideas in an intuitive fashion. A course can introduce income effects rigorously by walking through the general case on n goods and proving that second-order conditions hold and so on, or it can introduce it by saying "a change in prices affects your income at the same time it affects the prices of what you buy".

    Likewise, for macro, a course might hand you the IS and LM equations and ask you to find monetary policy multiplier by finding the total derivative dY/dM. Another course might ask you to draw the three graphs involved and illustrate the multiplier due to a change. Whether this works for you really depends on how you think.

    As for what kind of math it is, constrained optimization is pretty much just calculus. Knowing how to take derivatives quickly is nice.

    ronya on
    aRkpc.gif
  • EggyToastEggyToast Jersey CityRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    I don't know all of this 101/102 stuff; my undergraduate college rated classes in the thousands (1001, 1027) and they were not sequential. I have recently taken graduate-level economics classes and these remain rather bereft of serious mathematics.

    Macro economics -- the stuff most people think about when they talk about The Economy -- is very light on math but heavy on theory. Generally the math involved boils down to comparisons, such as "if inflation goes up the value of the currency will go down," "tariffs are bad because of how they affect prices and competition," etc. etc. Price theory aka microeconomics deals more with the minutae and there is more math involved, but most of it is algebra. As mentioned above, there is occasionally some calculus depending on the syllabus of the class, but at an introductory undergraduate level, the professor is not going to just give you an equation and say "take the derivative." The prof is much more likely to say "These are simple equations, so here is the trick to getting the derivative or integral. Ta da!"

    EggyToast on
    || Flickr — || PSN: EggyToast
Sign In or Register to comment.