The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Horse of a Different [Chat]
ZampanovYou May Not Go HomeUntil Tonight Has Been MagicalRegistered Userregular
Though I seriously question the value of case studies next to pretty much any other form of data.
Case studies aren't really meant to demonstrate the same thing as any other form of data.
For instance, let's say that 95% of people with disease {X} who take {Y} drug improve in 12 weeks, versus 50% of people on placebo. And let's also say that 75% of people who take {Z} improve in 12 weeks.
A case study might show that one of the 5% who does not improve from {Y} drug does improve from {Z} drug, and then posit a possible causal reason based on the unique properties of that patient.
This is not useless information, and it is the kind of detailed information that you do not get from a large study. Note that it also does not contradict the larger study.
Feral on
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
0
KageraImitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered Userregular
I usually just tell them that their evidence is anecdotal, and isn't representative of the facts and statistics that I am aware of. I tell them I've just given them some facts and things that they can check out on their own to see if I'm telling the truth, or to see how relevant they are, whereas I can't check up on their anecdotes at all. Those situations could have come about by chance and are an outlier or the person could just be straight up lying to me to try to make their point. I put it on them to convince me.
I basically insinuate that they're lying in the most gentle way possible, like I'm breaking bad news to them. It will make almost anyone angry and feel like they're losing.
Thanks I shall have to try this next time.
CommunistCow on
No, I am not really communist. Yes, it is weird that I use this name.
Though I seriously question the value of case studies next to pretty much any other form of data.
Case studies aren't really meant to demonstrate the same thing as any other form of data.
For instance, let's say that 95% of people with disease {X} who take {Y} drug improve in 12 weeks, versus 50% of people on placebo. And let's also say that 75% of people who take {Z} improve in 12 weeks.
A case study might show that one of the 5% who does not improve from {Y} drug does improve from {Z} drug, and then posit a possible causal reason based on the unique properties of that patient.
This is not useless information, and it is the kind of detailed information that you do not get from a large study. Note that it also does not contradict the larger study.
Superior to a case study in that instance is an actual experiment.
I only really think case studies are valuable in situations where you can't have an experiment for practical reasons.
Winky on
0
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
Though I seriously question the value of case studies next to pretty much any other form of data.
Case studies aren't really meant to demonstrate the same thing as any other form of data.
For instance, let's say that 95% of people with disease {X} who take {Y} drug improve in 12 weeks, versus 50% of people on placebo. And let's also say that 75% of people who take {Z} improve in 12 weeks.
A case study might show that one of the 5% who does not improve from {Y} drug does improve from {Z} drug, and then posit a possible causal reason based on the unique properties of that patient.
This is not useless information, and it is the kind of detailed information that you do not get from a large study. Note that it also does not contradict the larger study.
Which is cool, but it doesn't really tell us anything other than "hey sometimes people are outliers"
Unless you use that to then go and make a bigger study of the mechanisms that patient possesses that cause him/her to react differently
i mean
anecdotes can impart useful information, but they are the very base in the pillar of knowledge
you need em, but that doesn't mean they can hold up a house on their own
Though I seriously question the value of case studies next to pretty much any other form of data.
Case studies aren't really meant to demonstrate the same thing as any other form of data.
For instance, let's say that 95% of people with disease {X} who take {Y} drug improve in 12 weeks, versus 50% of people on placebo. And let's also say that 75% of people who take {Z} improve in 12 weeks.
A case study might show that one of the 5% who does not improve from {Y} drug does improve from {Z} drug, and then posit a possible causal reason based on the unique properties of that patient.
This is not useless information, and it is the kind of detailed information that you do not get from a large study. Note that it also does not contradict the larger study.
Unfortunately, pharm companies encourage doctors to publish n=1 case studies for their new experimental drugs.
People are really bad at most everything that involves numbers.
Bill Goffe recently (2009) surveyed one of his macro principles classes and found, for example, that the median student believes that 35% of workers earn the minimum wage and a substantial fraction think that a majority of workers earn the minimum wage (Actual rate in 2007: 2.3% of hourly-paid workers and a smaller share of all workers earn the minimum wage, rates are probably somewhat higher today since the min. wage has risen and wages have not).
When asked about profits as a percentage of sales the median student guessed 30% (actual rate, closer to 4%).
When asked about the inflation rate over the last year (survey was in 2009) the median student guessed 11%. Actual rate: much closer to 0%. Note, how important such misconceptions could be to policy.
Also:
It's quite sad, really, and leads to warped understandings of how the world actually exists.
full of ascii art since i cant use image hosting services from work
o <- an ascii donut
i <- an ascii person from really far away
l <- an ascii pole
@ <- an ascii whirlpool viewed from above
~ <- an ascii worm
S <- an ascii snake
Posts
PSN/XBL: Zampanov -- Steam: Zampanov
Case studies aren't really meant to demonstrate the same thing as any other form of data.
For instance, let's say that 95% of people with disease {X} who take {Y} drug improve in 12 weeks, versus 50% of people on placebo. And let's also say that 75% of people who take {Z} improve in 12 weeks.
A case study might show that one of the 5% who does not improve from {Y} drug does improve from {Z} drug, and then posit a possible causal reason based on the unique properties of that patient.
This is not useless information, and it is the kind of detailed information that you do not get from a large study. Note that it also does not contradict the larger study.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
So I could close on that sweet ass of yours.
I need chat to play with me when it is finished.
I guess the bear riding a horse is a decent reason to hang on to this.
Thanks I shall have to try this next time.
that is until I become hoarse
that's what I was hoping
PSN/XBL: Zampanov -- Steam: Zampanov
I like his telescope...
rgr rgr
Superior to a case study in that instance is an actual experiment.
I only really think case studies are valuable in situations where you can't have an experiment for practical reasons.
/wikis
Oh, he's the guy who did the music for Monty on the Run! That's a neat tune.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK716RqoUms
careful it might aggravate your broncoitis
PSN/XBL: Zampanov -- Steam: Zampanov
Which is cool, but it doesn't really tell us anything other than "hey sometimes people are outliers"
Unless you use that to then go and make a bigger study of the mechanisms that patient possesses that cause him/her to react differently
i mean
anecdotes can impart useful information, but they are the very base in the pillar of knowledge
you need em, but that doesn't mean they can hold up a house on their own
Don't saddle us with this horseshit.
so, there are maybe two or three animals I am actually afraid of
Bears, horses, and MAYBE pelicans
that picture is a terrifying thing to me
Wait, what is this?
what is up
how are you?
i haven't talked to you in a long time
you can't rein a maverick in
UUUUUUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGgggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh[tiny]hhhhhhhhhh...[/tiny]
"Women's intuition".
trying to get into an AFM lab
very excited
also a degree would be nice too
test: successful
You've gotten mixed up. It's actually the Halford telescope. It's made of metal, it's circuits gleam.
Rob Hubbard started a cult.
chemistry is the best though
good luck my friend!
Are we going to beat this dead horse again?
thanks friend, buddy, palomino
PSN/XBL: Zampanov -- Steam: Zampanov
I wonder if it's going to have a positive impact on the popularity of musicals or a negative one in that it revives horrible musicals.
because it is not bad but, in fact, awesome.
Wait I thought that was a guy named Hubert...
Ohhhhh
So bullshit then.
Or more thread appropriate horseshit?
Sometimes I swear the pun people are like some kind of colt
full of ascii art since i cant use image hosting services from work
o <- an ascii donut
i <- an ascii person from really far away
l <- an ascii pole
@ <- an ascii whirlpool viewed from above
~ <- an ascii worm
S <- an ascii snake