K, so we're doing nomenclature in class today, which is horrendously boring for me as I am not a total idiot. Anyways, I was asked to name the compound PbO2, and a thought struck me: was this lead(iv) oxide or lead(ii) peroxide? Curious, I later looked up both substances online and found that, apparently, lead(ii) peroxide doesn't exist.
My question, then, is this: why doesn't lead(ii) peroxide exist, naturally or in the lab?
EVE: Online - the most fun you will ever have not playing a game.
"Go up, thou bald head." -2 Kings 2:23
K, so we're doing nomenclature in class today, which is horrendously boring for me as I am not a total idiot. Anyways, I was asked to name the compound PbO2, and a thought struck me: was this lead(iv) oxide or lead(ii) peroxide? Curious, I later looked up both substances online and found that, apparently, lead(ii) peroxide doesn't exist.
My question, then, is this: why doesn't lead(ii) peroxide exist, naturally or in the lab?
Peroxide has to be X-O-O-X.
Lead in that bonding configuration is still in the +1 valence state. The molecule would probably auto-react to yield PbO2 and a Pb2+ instead. No it wouldn't - the easiest way out of that would be to go and become Pb(I)O, but off-the-top of my head that would be an unstable intermediate.
I think I found it under "Bonding" on the peroxide wiki page: "Owing to the weak bonding between the oxygen atoms, peroxide easily undergoes homolytic cleavage." So it would probably go 2 PbO2 -> 2 PbO + O2 almost immediately, even if it was created in the lab.
delroland on
EVE: Online - the most fun you will ever have not playing a game.
"Go up, thou bald head." -2 Kings 2:23
Posts
Peroxide has to be X-O-O-X.
Lead in that bonding configuration is still in the +1 valence state. The molecule would probably auto-react to yield PbO2 and a Pb2+ instead. No it wouldn't - the easiest way out of that would be to go and become Pb(I)O, but off-the-top of my head that would be an unstable intermediate.
"Go up, thou bald head." -2 Kings 2:23