The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Questions like this rarely have an easy answer...but if you're just getting started on researching colleges, U.S. News and World Report puts out a good magazine every year that ranks colleges according to different variables such as cost, location, major, etc. Website here: http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/rankindex_brief.php
As always, the best thing to do in any case is talk to students who attend the colleges you're interested in. They're the only ones that will be able to provide an unbiased viewpoint.
Expand that into real advice or you're getting an infraction.
I couldn't resist.
As for real advice: go to each college and ask faculty, students, etc. Then take into account living conditions, cost per college, and other non-academic factors.
It honestly depends on how you'll do personally. You need to visit the colleges and see how they feel.
It's far better for you to succeed at a lesser college then perform half-decently at an excellent college.
Not true, but it's your individual goals that make the difference in that.
For example: "C's get degrees" is very true for engineers at top universities who are still extremely successful. Getting all A's in a mediocre school majoring in liberal arts might be a different story.
VeritasVR on
Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!
0
kaliyamaLeft to find less-moderated foraRegistered Userregular
Well, I mean if the difference between the two quality wise isn't that great, just choose which one you like more. I was thinking of doing BME and Johns Hopkins and Duke are #1 and #2 in that respectively... but I went with another school that maybe isn't as tops in the subject, but still good, because I liked it more. I couldn't see myself at the other two.
Then I decided I didn't want to do BME anymore so it doesn't even matter, but whatever.
This doesn't appear to be one of his options and I'm curious as to how you think it's even remotely helpful. One-word posts are generally not a good idea either.
I wouldn't recommend MIT for EE. No offense to MIT, but the graduates I know from there have very low communication skills which are essential for success.
Take a look at that U.S. and World report on college rankings. Then totally ignore the rank. It means almost nothing. Look at the individual statistics they provide for each of your options. They should mention factual information (not subjective weightings to determine rank).
In my opinion, important categories to consider are: student/faculty ratio, selectivity to get into the major, and budget for facilities. A close student/faculty ratio means you can work one-on-one with a professor, which beats all hands at any university. Selectivity is important because you may not have the ~3.4 GPA required to get into EE at the end of your freshman year. A low selectivity is safer and can be virtually guaranteed acceptance. The department facilities also need a lot of money for experiments, upkeep, and upgrading, so a high budget here means the department can spend more on providing good equipment.
Posts
That said I wouldn't go to either for what you want.
Shogun Streams Vidya
Expand that into real advice or you're getting an infraction.
As always, the best thing to do in any case is talk to students who attend the colleges you're interested in. They're the only ones that will be able to provide an unbiased viewpoint.
It's far better for you to succeed at a lesser college then perform half-decently at an excellent college.
I couldn't resist.
As for real advice: go to each college and ask faculty, students, etc. Then take into account living conditions, cost per college, and other non-academic factors.
Not true, but it's your individual goals that make the difference in that.
For example: "C's get degrees" is very true for engineers at top universities who are still extremely successful. Getting all A's in a mediocre school majoring in liberal arts might be a different story.
Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!
Then I decided I didn't want to do BME anymore so it doesn't even matter, but whatever.
This doesn't appear to be one of his options and I'm curious as to how you think it's even remotely helpful. One-word posts are generally not a good idea either.
I wouldn't recommend MIT for EE. No offense to MIT, but the graduates I know from there have very low communication skills which are essential for success.
Take a look at that U.S. and World report on college rankings. Then totally ignore the rank. It means almost nothing. Look at the individual statistics they provide for each of your options. They should mention factual information (not subjective weightings to determine rank).
In my opinion, important categories to consider are: student/faculty ratio, selectivity to get into the major, and budget for facilities. A close student/faculty ratio means you can work one-on-one with a professor, which beats all hands at any university. Selectivity is important because you may not have the ~3.4 GPA required to get into EE at the end of your freshman year. A low selectivity is safer and can be virtually guaranteed acceptance. The department facilities also need a lot of money for experiments, upkeep, and upgrading, so a high budget here means the department can spend more on providing good equipment.
Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!