The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
The Voyage [chat]
JacobkoshGamble a stamp.I can show you how to be a real man!Moderatormod
so the singapore anti-corruption bureau tried to nail down a senior civil servant for receiving oral sex in exchange for business favours
in singapore law, it's not necessary to prove, in corruption cases, that any favours were actually given. if it is proven that there was some unexplained 'gift', the onus is on the defendant to prove that it was a legit gift and not a bribe: there is a presumption of guilt, not innocence. this is a longstanding legal standard created to fight guanxi networks in the old days
but
their main witness changed her story on the stand to that the senior civil servant forced her to give him oral sex
whoops, now it's assault instead of corruption, and a much higher standard of evidence is required! And, you know, what with changing her story and all, the witness is unreliable. Out the case goes!
they couldn't get him for assault either, even though it has to be one or the other, either he forced himself on her or he didn't :rotate:
so the singapore anti-corruption bureau tried to nail down a senior civil servant for receiving oral sex in exchange for business favours
in singapore law, it's not necessary to prove, in corruption cases, that any favours were actually given. if it is proven that there was some unexplained 'gift', the onus is on the defendant to prove that it was a legit gift and not a bribe: there is a presumption of guilt, not innocence. this is a longstanding legal standard created to fight guangxi networks in the old days
but
their main witness changed her story on the stand to that the senior civil servant forced her to give him oral sex
whoops, now it's assault instead of corruption, and a much higher standard of evidence is required! And, you know, what with changing her story and all, the witness is unreliable. Out the case goes!
they couldn't get him for assault either, even though it has to be one or the other, either he forced himself or her or he didn't :rotate:
Isnt that the thing though? The witness has proven to be unreliable, so what proof is there that she isn't lying again?
0
Podlyyou unzipped me! it's all coming back! i don't like it!Registered Userregular
my teacher read us "voyage of the dawn treader" in the 4th grade
i shouted "gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay" and went to go hit on 5th grade girls
so the singapore anti-corruption bureau tried to nail down a senior civil servant for receiving oral sex in exchange for business favours
in singapore law, it's not necessary to prove, in corruption cases, that any favours were actually given. if it is proven that there was some unexplained 'gift', the onus is on the defendant to prove that it was a legit gift and not a bribe: there is a presumption of guilt, not innocence. this is a longstanding legal standard created to fight guangxi networks in the old days
but
their main witness changed her story on the stand to that the senior civil servant forced her to give him oral sex
whoops, now it's assault instead of corruption, and a much higher standard of evidence is required! And, you know, what with changing her story and all, the witness is unreliable. Out the case goes!
they couldn't get him for assault either, even though it has to be one or the other, either he forced himself or her or he didn't :rotate:
Isnt that the thing though? The witness has proven to be unreliable, so what proof is there that she isn't lying again?
she worked for a company that could potentially have received favours that the civil servant was in a position to grant
so if the sex was voluntary, then it was corruption under singapore law; if it wasn't voluntary, then it was assault. well, it has to be one of them. but the prosecution can't prove which one it is, and the usual elevated standard in corruption doesn't even help
That ship looks unseaworthy. Luckily the Maritime Authority inspectors seem to have grown some real teeth
Obama
A trap is for fish: when you've got the fish, you can forget the trap. A snare is for rabbits: when you've got the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words.
Only if you rock up in a white jacket with a scorpion on the back and a toothpick in your mouth
What? i don't know what you're talking about.
/hides fingerless gloves and sunglasses.
+1
simonwolfi can feel a differencetoday, a differenceRegistered Userregular
I've never asked for a celebrity hairstyle, since my hair is essentially very tight curls that are extremely difficult to do anything with once they get beyond a certain length
hence why my hairstyle ever since my experimental early uni days has been "just cut it short, slightly shorter on the sides, and I'll manage"
0
BobCescaIs a girlBirmingham, UKRegistered Userregular
Marking student work is perhaps the most bring thing ever.
Celebrity hair styles are super tricky, because they normally complement the do with a buff body and a pleasant face.
this
not to mention the fact that most celebrities won't go within ten feet of a camera without spending an hour or two in the hands of a team of professionals who are dedicated to making them look not shit
hence it's dumb that their appearences are treated as an attainable standard for regular people
Celebrity hair styles are super tricky, because they normally complement the do with a buff body and a pleasant face.
this
not to mention the fact that most celebrities won't go within ten feet of a camera without spending an hour or two in the hands of a team of professionals who are dedicated to making them look not shit
hence it's dumb that their appearences are treated as an attainable standard for regular people
Which is why I like this haircut. It's nice. Simple. not too crazy.
The only good use of the -gate suffix I've seen outside Watergate itself was a scandal about the process of women being impregnanted with other couple's embryos: Surro-gate.
+3
MortiousThe Nightmare BeginsMove to New ZealandRegistered Userregular
I've never asked for a celebrity hairstyle, since my hair is essentially very tight curls that are extremely difficult to do anything with once they get beyond a certain length
hence why my hairstyle ever since my experimental early uni days has been "just cut it short, slightly shorter on the sides, and I'll manage"
I've never asked for a celebrity hairstyle, since my hair is essentially very tight curls that are extremely difficult to do anything with once they get beyond a certain length
hence why my hairstyle ever since my experimental early uni days has been "just cut it short, slightly shorter on the sides, and I'll manage"
Posts
they couldn't get him for assault either, even though it has to be one or the other, either he forced himself on her or he didn't :rotate:
Good times.
Let's play Mario Kart or something...
Isnt that the thing though? The witness has proven to be unreliable, so what proof is there that she isn't lying again?
i shouted "gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay" and went to go hit on 5th grade girls
That ship looks unseaworthy. Luckily the Maritime Authority inspectors seem to have grown some real teeth
she worked for a company that could potentially have received favours that the civil servant was in a position to grant
so if the sex was voluntary, then it was corruption under singapore law; if it wasn't voluntary, then it was assault. well, it has to be one of them. but the prosecution can't prove which one it is, and the usual elevated standard in corruption doesn't even help
Obama
I'm picturing the Evil Wizard from the Kate Beaton Pony comics.
Looks like my kids' comics are going to be put up on Nedroid's website/tumblr, which is kind of neat!
this month i have 10
i wonder what the future holds for my badger collection?
Mushroom. Mushroom.
snaaaaake!!! snaaaaaake!!!
?
I'm getting a haircut this morning. Am terrified.
You must not fear. Fear is the mindkiller.
am i a douchebag if i ask for a Ryan gosling do?
Y. Save valuable combing time!
But it's cold outside.
Should have included the word "food"
Only if you rock up in a white jacket with a scorpion on the back and a toothpick in your mouth
Celebrity hair styles are super tricky, because they normally complement the do with a buff body and a pleasant face.
Oh, Horse-not-gate.
What? i don't know what you're talking about.
/hides fingerless gloves and sunglasses.
hence why my hairstyle ever since my experimental early uni days has been "just cut it short, slightly shorter on the sides, and I'll manage"
this
not to mention the fact that most celebrities won't go within ten feet of a camera without spending an hour or two in the hands of a team of professionals who are dedicated to making them look not shit
hence it's dumb that their appearences are treated as an attainable standard for regular people
Which is why I like this haircut. It's nice. Simple. not too crazy.
It’s not a very important country most of the time
http://steamcommunity.com/id/mortious
Man, I wish I looked as good as that guy