The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

2018 Congressional/Senate Election Results Thread

1151618202125

Posts

  • FencingsaxFencingsax It is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understanding GNU Terry PratchettRegistered User regular
    Sorry, I am listening to a podcast about a different thing. My thumbs are not connected to my brain, apparently

  • TaramoorTaramoor Storyteller Registered User regular
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Sorry, I am listening to a podcast about a different thing. My thumbs are not connected to my brain, apparently

    It’s okay. Darkest timeline. Nothing for granted until Pelosi has the gavel and is hitting people in the face with it.

  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    Enc wrote: »

    Win or lose, every vote counts. I mean, clearly we actually should have won as I'm sure at least 15k votes in the state were rejected improperly, but, it's still good to spend as long as possible counting.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • PantsBPantsB Fake Thomas Jefferson Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    .
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Fencingsax wrote: »
    Kevin McCarthy has been elected as Republican House majority leader.

    Minority leader. Same position he has now, just flipped to the minority.

    Well the minority leader is equivalent to the Speaker, just in the minority so with basically no power. If the GOP had the House it'd be a huge fight. Instead with a GOP President and highly partisan GOP Senate, he's not even second fiddle. He has been the big Tea Party/Freedom caucus leader previously and they aren't getting anything passed now so there was no reason to fight with the extreme wing. Steve Scalise has been the Majority Whip and will continue. Apparently Liz Cheney is going to be the #3 spot, Conference Chair which on the Dem side was Joe Crowley's.

    The Dems will also have a Majority Leader, which was Steny Hoyer last time with . There's the Progressive Caucus, the more moderate New Democrats, and the basically Neo-Blue Dogs. Members of the last group are anti-Pelosi and there are some on the Progressive Caucus that oppose her as too establishment so maybe one of them gets a high position. Pelosi has the backing of NARAL, the AFL/CIO, and is gradually rolling out endorsements. I think the CBC and most of the Progressive Caucus and New Dems will back her. Steney Hoyer already has the votes for Majority Leader, which basically says only a real challenge from Pelosi's right is possible (he's substantially more conservative) and I don't see it. There doesn't seem to be anyone acceptable to the Blue Dogs types that would be fine with most of the caucus, which might be why there isn't an alternative candidate yet.

    Jim Clyburn is being challenged by Diana DeGette(D-CO, Denver) for whip. I don't think you can boot the only African American (only non-white even) member of leadership, especially one with his pedigree.

    PantsB on
    11793-1.png
    day9gosu.png
    QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited November 2018
    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Feral wrote: »

    Well being the party that literally blame the state for unpreventable forest fires and threatens to not give them federal aid should kill your party there.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • ViskodViskod Registered User regular
    One of the best parts about Nelson potentially winning is Scott in Washington right now just going about life in orientation under the assumption that he’s already won.

    I’d say I would love to see the look on his face the moment he’s informed he’s not actually a senator but I don’t want to see any look on his face because his face is made of nightmares.

  • Undead ScottsmanUndead Scottsman Cybertronian Paranormal Eliminator Registered User regular
    Viskod wrote: »
    One of the best parts about Nelson potentially winning is Scott in Washington right now just going about life in orientation under the assumption that he’s already won.

    I’d say I would love to see the look on his face the moment he’s informed he’s not actually a senator but I don’t want to see any look on his face because his face is made of nightmares.

    He knows he might lose; it's why he's hemming and hawing about voting fraud and etc.

  • Marty81Marty81 Registered User regular
    Enc wrote: »

    Count or recount? Like, the first count isn't even done yet, right?

  • AtomikaAtomika Live fast and get fucked or whatever Registered User regular
    The GOP died before Nixon’s election

    The Dixiecrats just stole the name

  • Undead ScottsmanUndead Scottsman Cybertronian Paranormal Eliminator Registered User regular
    Marty81 wrote: »
    Enc wrote: »

    Count or recount? Like, the first count isn't even done yet, right?

    It's a machine recount, isn't it? They can recount already counted votes while they count uncounted votes for the first time; so long as they keep shit separate.

  • Hahnsoo1Hahnsoo1 Make Ready. We Hunt.Registered User, Moderator, Administrator admin
    Preacher wrote: »

    Well being the party that literally blame the state for unpreventable forest fires and threatens to not give them federal aid should kill your party there.
    Off-topic (probably goes in the California politics thread), but California Conservative social media has this circuitous thing where Jerry Brown is really to blame for the Camp Fire. Something about signing off on a bill that allowed PG&E to ignore faulty wiring or some conspiracy level shit like that.

    8i1dt37buh2m.png
  • Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    It can't be that pine forests just catch on fire sometimes, from lightning + drought if nothing else, and maybe humans shouldn't build houses there.

  • ArbitraryDescriptorArbitraryDescriptor Registered User regular
    Marty81 wrote: »
    Enc wrote: »

    Count or recount? Like, the first count isn't even done yet, right?

    It's a machine recount, isn't it? They can recount already counted votes while they count uncounted votes for the first time; so long as they keep shit separate.

    I am genuinely unclear on if / when they finished, but not sure if the original total matters since they've got to run them all again anyway; and the premise is that the original count is being thrown out anyway.

    It's a more thorough count, since the machine recount procedure includes copying damaged ballots and rechecking the machines; so no real loss.

  • JavenJaven Registered User regular
    Shouldn’t the Senste recount be by hand? Or is that only if the machine recount returns a difference of less than .25%?

  • ArbitraryDescriptorArbitraryDescriptor Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    Javen wrote: »
    Shouldn’t the Senste recount be by hand? Or is that only if the machine recount returns a difference of less than .25%?

    Right.

    Machine recount (copy damaged ballots, recalibrate sassy machines ) then a hand recount if the margin is still less than 0.25% and less than the total number of over/undervotes identified.

    So Gillum can still get a hand count if the machine recount lands him in that zone. (A big "if")

    Manual recount

    Machine recount (7)

    ArbitraryDescriptor on
  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    Washington Post reporter:

    This is freaking hilarious.

  • Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    You're muckin' with a G!

    Do not engage the Watermelons.
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • Undead ScottsmanUndead Scottsman Cybertronian Paranormal Eliminator Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    Warren is also on the short list of potential 2020 candidates so they're pretty happy to cheer at her misfortune.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    Porter was Warren's protege and mentor back in college, or something to that effect. She's basically seen as Warren's chief side-kick or the like and so if she failed it's a shot at Warren.

  • Bloods EndBloods End Blade of Tyshalle Punch dimensionRegistered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperate

  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    Warren is also on the short list of potential 2020 candidates so they're pretty happy to cheer at her misfortune.

    Until it becomes ashes in their mouths.

  • ElJeffeElJeffe Registered User, ClubPA regular
    It can't be that pine forests just catch on fire sometimes, from lightning + drought if nothing else, and maybe humans shouldn't build houses there.

    Yeah, in this case it was most likely a PG&E equipment failure.

    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • Commander ZoomCommander Zoom Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    This time, sure. But IMO, it's like "if you build your house in Tornado Alley, don't be surprised if a funnel cloud carries it off to Oz someday." Or on a flood plain, or a fault line, etc etc.

    Buuuuut I'm getting off topic, I know.

    Commander Zoom on
  • CauldCauld Registered User regular
    I thought I read this morning that PG&E has been found responsible for a lot of the recent fires in California... I honestly don't know much about it, so if someone does I'd be interested to learn.

  • SyphonBlueSyphonBlue The studying beaver That beaver sure loves studying!Registered User regular
    Significant evidence exists the PG&E knew about a faulty wire that possibly led to the fire, but we don't know for sure, and the reason wouldn't be "California Laws"

    LxX6eco.jpg
    PSN/Steam/NNID: SyphonBlue | BNet: SyphonBlue#1126
  • ElbasunuElbasunu Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    Cauld wrote: »
    I thought I read this morning that PG&E has been found responsible for a lot of the recent fires in California... I honestly don't know much about it, so if someone does I'd be interested to learn.

    The power companies are responsible for caring for the areas they have their equipment on and for upkeeping that equipment. At least three major fires have been started by failures in the past three years, not to mention fire spreading over improperly maintained land in general. It's not looking good for them.

    Another reason why getting more dems in the house might be helpful in that they can, if willing, apply more regulation.

    edit sorry forgot links:
    Thomspon Fire: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/31/662399218/southern-california-edison-says-it-is-partly-to-blame-for-thomas-fire

    Might be responsible for a bunch more: https://www.npr.org/2018/08/09/637230064/california-wildfires-set-off-big-political-fight-on-who-should-pay-for-damage

    Elbasunu on
    g1xfUKU.png?10zfegkyoor3b.png
    Steam ID: Obos Vent: Obos
  • Santa ClaustrophobiaSanta Claustrophobia Ho Ho Ho Disconnecting from Xbox LIVERegistered User regular
    This is the congressional election thread?

    Natural disasters are here unless there is a thread specifically about the California fires I'm not seeing. Did somebody have the wrong tab open?

    You're muckin' with a G!

    Do not engage the Watermelons.
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    the Tax Bill was basically the GOP surrendering blue state representation for a generation.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    moniker wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    Warren is also on the short list of potential 2020 candidates so they're pretty happy to cheer at her misfortune.

    Until it becomes ashes in their mouths.

    Honestly I'm sick of the whole "Trump and the gop did pretty well" narrative. They were obliterated. Devastated. Republican strategists are weeping into their gerrymandering books as an easy path to power (gerrymandering the house) has crumbled beneath their feet. This was not a partial victory or a close run thing. The republicans SHOULD have won like 5 seats in the Senate. Democrats should have been fighting to keep them from being a supermajority. Only winning 3 or 2 with this map is them LOSING. Losing Arizona Senate seats is a damn catastrophe for them.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
  • monikermoniker Registered User regular
    the Tax Bill was basically the GOP surrendering blue state representation for a generation.

    We're at the back end of the bell curve for the latest realignment. (Or the very beginning of a brand new one. Ask again in 40 years) Some demographics break faster than others, but we're basically just seeing the tail end of people coming to terms with who Democrats and Republicans are. Dems finally seeming to consistently win white college grads is going to continue, but more slowly than the loss of white non-college &c. Which will mostly be visible in the suburbs. It'll be interesting to see when more detailed breakdowns of the election come out.

    Of course first we have to actually finish the election. *glares at Florida and Georgia*

  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    Blue states have lots of Republican strongholds based on wealth and property

    the tax bill was a 50 foot tall neon FUCK YOU sign to those people.

  • shrykeshryke Member of the Beast Registered User regular
    Blue states have lots of Republican strongholds based on wealth and property

    the tax bill was a 50 foot tall neon FUCK YOU sign to those people.

    They are also generally less interested in Trump's overt open right-wing politics.

  • MazzyxMazzyx Comedy Gold Registered User regular
    tbloxham wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    Warren is also on the short list of potential 2020 candidates so they're pretty happy to cheer at her misfortune.

    Until it becomes ashes in their mouths.

    Honestly I'm sick of the whole "Trump and the gop did pretty well" narrative. They were obliterated. Devastated. Republican strategists are weeping into their gerrymandering books as an easy path to power (gerrymandering the house) has crumbled beneath their feet. This was not a partial victory or a close run thing. The republicans SHOULD have won like 5 seats in the Senate. Democrats should have been fighting to keep them from being a supermajority. Only winning 3 or 2 with this map is them LOSING. Losing Arizona Senate seats is a damn catastrophe for them.

    Pod Save America had a good rant on this Tuesday but I think it is something that is worth restating.

    The initial narrative last Tuesday was Dems did well but probably lost 3-4 Senate seats with maybe a single pick up in Nevada. They got the House but it wasn't by a giant margin so it wasn't a wave.

    Problem is a lot of states are moving to mail in only or heavily mail in. Which takes longer to count which our horse racing Tuesday night 24 hour cable voteathon doesn't really work. Because the real results don't come in for a week or two. And with those results now in, it was a very large blue wave. And a huge turnout on both sides. And that is probably why Trump and a few others have been so angry because on Tuesday they were told it was a huge Republican win but a week later the narrative has been shown to be not true at all.

    u7stthr17eud.png
  • Inkstain82Inkstain82 Registered User regular
    edited November 2018
    Narrative gaming and expectation tweaking are inevitable in politics right now. It just doesn’t bother me that much because what really matters is the actual power Democrats accumulated by winning so many actual government jobs.

    Inkstain82 on
  • RedTideRedTide Registered User regular
    Blue states have lots of Republican strongholds based on wealth and property

    the tax bill was a 50 foot tall neon FUCK YOU sign to those people.

    And it isn't the megarich that are going to be hurt, it's the Wall St Journals idea of "regular people" the Henry's and such.

    Sure they have more money then they'll ever need, but they don't have the offshore tax haven money you needed to really take advantage. A lot of their net worth is tied up in their houses and such and they are about to get soaked this tax season.

    Hell they haven't even gotten the bill yet and they rebelled, next year should be interesting.

    RedTide#1907 on Battle.net
    Come Overwatch with meeeee
  • MarathonMarathon Registered User regular
    Trump might have also really believed his own bullshit about how it was actually going to be a red wave this election.

    That belief, coming up against the reality of “actually, most of the country hates you and doesn’t like what you’re doing”, might be tough for Trump.

  • tbloxhamtbloxham Registered User regular
    Mazzyx wrote: »
    tbloxham wrote: »
    moniker wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    So they were making fun of a politician because somebody else might have lost?

    Probably someone that Warren endorsed. The GOP is desperately thirsty to cause a rift in the democrats.

    Warren is also on the short list of potential 2020 candidates so they're pretty happy to cheer at her misfortune.

    Until it becomes ashes in their mouths.

    Honestly I'm sick of the whole "Trump and the gop did pretty well" narrative. They were obliterated. Devastated. Republican strategists are weeping into their gerrymandering books as an easy path to power (gerrymandering the house) has crumbled beneath their feet. This was not a partial victory or a close run thing. The republicans SHOULD have won like 5 seats in the Senate. Democrats should have been fighting to keep them from being a supermajority. Only winning 3 or 2 with this map is them LOSING. Losing Arizona Senate seats is a damn catastrophe for them.

    Pod Save America had a good rant on this Tuesday but I think it is something that is worth restating.

    The initial narrative last Tuesday was Dems did well but probably lost 3-4 Senate seats with maybe a single pick up in Nevada. They got the House but it wasn't by a giant margin so it wasn't a wave.

    Problem is a lot of states are moving to mail in only or heavily mail in. Which takes longer to count which our horse racing Tuesday night 24 hour cable voteathon doesn't really work. Because the real results don't come in for a week or two. And with those results now in, it was a very large blue wave. And a huge turnout on both sides. And that is probably why Trump and a few others have been so angry because on Tuesday they were told it was a huge Republican win but a week later the narrative has been shown to be not true at all.

    It wasn't a huge Republican win on Tuesday either! The house was lost on election night which is, by Republican design, supposed to be impossible. Like, they cheated, they rigged the dice so it said Republican on every side. They rolled it, and it turned into a damned dog turd.

    They were down by 6 points on election night in a midterm. That means in reality they are losing in an 'everyone votes, no voter suppression, environment by like 12 points or more. They were annihilated. And it's just gotten worse for them every day since then.

    Within 3 points in TEXAS? A catastrophe. And so on.

    "That is cool" - Abraham Lincoln
This discussion has been closed.