every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
+6
HonkHonk is this poster.Registered User, __BANNED USERSregular
Chanus
The area is extremely kid friendly, there are 8 daycare places and 8 schools. Even though the population is just like 3000 people or whatever.
Children and a higher-than-median amount of guys with facial tattoos. Because there’s a medium security prison there as well. Figured we hit a time where a lot of people were heading back after one-day paroles.
Their character models never seem quite human, it’s some uncanny valley shit. They never quite act human, they look a little too polished and plastic (especially for whatever task they’re beset by), and their clothing is always just a little … wrong.
They’re like the spaghetti western version of games, filtered and translated just a few too many times through a few too many layers.
0
AtomikaLive fast and get fucked or whateverRegistered Userregular
Like, the villain of RE4 is a little person in a clown suit, but we’re supposed to be scared of him and take it all seriously.
Their character models never seem quite human, it’s some uncanny valley shit. They never quite act human, they look a little too polished and plastic (especially for whatever task they’re beset by), and their clothing is always just a little … wrong.
They’re like the spaghetti western version of games, filtered and translated just a few too many times through a few too many layers.
Like, the villain of RE4 is a little person in a clown suit, but we’re supposed to be scared of him and take it all seriously.
you absolutely are not
+11
SummaryJudgmentGrab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front doorRegistered Userregular
it's dehumanizing to call me a gamer; it centers my identity around this transitory circumstance. please- i'm a person experiencing games.
Chu ilu
Reminds me of the dialog from Cryptonomicon about how in Germany they do not use a word for addict, instead they are drug-seeking
I was compromised by enemy action.
0
SummaryJudgmentGrab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front doorRegistered Userregular
edited March 2023
Also, re: cargo cult religion:
My wife's work completed a merger with another company like a year ago and they've been combining systems and branding and untangling a bunch of stuff. One of the things is a particular suite of branding the purchased company used previously, and my wife was putting together a press release saying that "access to [old brand name software] is going to be terminated on X date, and users will be migrated into [new brand name software]."
Legal was like, you can't make reference to [x], it's against policy to not use the most current branding!
To which my wife, in relaying the story to me, hit on the same problem as I did: uh, we can't say X is going away with referring to X; this isn't using outdated branding for like, marketing material, this is literally informing them of the termination of X. Stop doing cargo cult policy and fucking read what is in front of you!
SummaryJudgment on
I was compromised by enemy action.
+6
SummaryJudgmentGrab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front doorRegistered Userregular
edited March 2023
FromSoft games: deliberate, intentional
FromSoft games perfected: naked man yeets through with 2H club
SummaryJudgment on
I was compromised by enemy action.
0
AtomikaLive fast and get fucked or whateverRegistered Userregular
My wife's work completed a merger with another company like a year ago and they've been combining systems and branding and untangling a bunch of stuff. One of the things is a particular suite of branding the purchased company used previously, and my wife was putting together a press release saying that "access to [old brand name software] is going to be terminated on X date, and users will be migrated into [new brand name software]."
Legal was like, you can't make reference to [x], it's against policy to not use the most current branding!
To which my wife, in relaying the story to me, hit on the same problem as I did: uh, we can't say X is going away with referring to X; this isn't using outdated branding for like, marketing material, this is literally informing them of the termination of X. Stop doing cargo cult policy and fucking read what is in front of you!
That's not what legal gets paid for
Legal gets paid to point out anything that might potentially maybe be a problem, never concretely answer whether or not it actually is a problem, and then say their prayers to Corpus Juris Secundum and American Jurisprudence, 2d that they will never actually have to be in a courtroom.
+1
SummaryJudgmentGrab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front doorRegistered Userregular
Neat. It's probably a good thing that we try to use more-precise language, or at least language that doesn't annihilate the underlying person and turn them into [blank].
My wife's work completed a merger with another company like a year ago and they've been combining systems and branding and untangling a bunch of stuff. One of the things is a particular suite of branding the purchased company used previously, and my wife was putting together a press release saying that "access to [old brand name software] is going to be terminated on X date, and users will be migrated into [new brand name software]."
Legal was like, you can't make reference to [x], it's against policy to not use the most current branding!
To which my wife, in relaying the story to me, hit on the same problem as I did: uh, we can't say X is going away with referring to X; this isn't using outdated branding for like, marketing material, this is literally informing them of the termination of X. Stop doing cargo cult policy and fucking read what is in front of you!
That's not what legal gets paid for
Legal gets paid to point out anything that might potentially maybe be a problem, never concretely answer whether or not it actually is a problem, and then say their prayers to Corpus Juris Secundum and American Jurisprudence, 2d that they will never actually have to be in a courtroom.
I get that, but dumb in-house counsel annoy me, professionally.
My wife's work completed a merger with another company like a year ago and they've been combining systems and branding and untangling a bunch of stuff. One of the things is a particular suite of branding the purchased company used previously, and my wife was putting together a press release saying that "access to [old brand name software] is going to be terminated on X date, and users will be migrated into [new brand name software]."
Legal was like, you can't make reference to [x], it's against policy to not use the most current branding!
To which my wife, in relaying the story to me, hit on the same problem as I did: uh, we can't say X is going away with referring to X; this isn't using outdated branding for like, marketing material, this is literally informing them of the termination of X. Stop doing cargo cult policy and fucking read what is in front of you!
Ugggggggh argle bargle
every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
+1
TraceGNU Terry Pratchett; GNU Gus; GNU Carrie Fisher; GNU Adam WeRegistered Userregular
Chanus
Also I do not know where to put this, but I am laughing my ass off about this right now.
Gov. Ron DeSantis’ handpicked board overseeing Disney World’s government services is gearing up for a potential legal battle over a 30-year development agreement they say effectively renders them powerless to manage the entertainment giant’s future growth in Central Florida.
Ahead of an expected state takeover, the Walt Disney Co. quietly pushed through the pact and restrictive covenants that would tie the hands of future board members for decades, according to a legal presentation by the district’s lawyers on Wednesday.
“This essentially makes Disney the government,” board member Ron Peri said. “This board loses, for practical purposes, the majority of its ability to do anything beyond maintain the roads and maintain basic infrastructure.”
Among other things, a “declaration of restrictive covenants” spells out that the district is barred from using the Disney name without the corporation’s approval or “fanciful characters such as Mickey Mouse.”
That declaration is valid until “21 years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, king of England,” if it is deemed to violate rules against perpetuity, according to the document.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH holy shit what an absolute masterclass in malicious compliance. I love it, I know [chat]'s basically politics free these days but this is just such a goddamn hilarious middle finger that I can't help but want to post it in here.
+8
SummaryJudgmentGrab the hottest iron you can find, stride in the Tower’s front doorRegistered Userregular
Not to be confused with the Call Me Maybe Sword, wielded by the demiurge Carly Rae Jepsen.
Gov. Ron DeSantis’ handpicked board overseeing Disney World’s government services is gearing up for a potential legal battle over a 30-year development agreement they say effectively renders them powerless to manage the entertainment giant’s future growth in Central Florida.
Ahead of an expected state takeover, the Walt Disney Co. quietly pushed through the pact and restrictive covenants that would tie the hands of future board members for decades, according to a legal presentation by the district’s lawyers on Wednesday.
“This essentially makes Disney the government,” board member Ron Peri said. “This board loses, for practical purposes, the majority of its ability to do anything beyond maintain the roads and maintain basic infrastructure.”
Among other things, a “declaration of restrictive covenants” spells out that the district is barred from using the Disney name without the corporation’s approval or “fanciful characters such as Mickey Mouse.”
That declaration is valid until “21 years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, king of England,” if it is deemed to violate rules against perpetuity, according to the document.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH holy shit what an absolute masterclass in malicious compliance. I love it, I know [chat]'s basically politics free these days but this is just such a goddamn hilarious middle finger that I can't help but want to post it in here.
Disney has really good fucking lawyers. And they aren’t going to let anyone tell them what to do. It’s hilarious when power flexes on assholes.
+3
WeaverWho are you?What do you want?Registered Userregular
Working 7a-330p tomorrow, then I've got my first apprenticeship class from like, 5-9. Gonna be a long one.
0
jungleroomxIt's never too many graves, it's always not enough shovelsRegistered Userregular
RE4 is extremely goofy, very deliberately. It swings back and forth between pulpy grimness and hilariously cartoonish nonsense. Leon is traumatized by his horrific experience in Racoon City, but he also backflips over scythes, says "I'll let myself out" before jumping out windows, and suplexes zombified spanish villagers
You are supposed to be giggling and then sweating as you flee through dark dungeon tunnels from a huge man with all his orifices sewn shut and swords for hands
I absolutely loathe that I’m seeing nothing but Bioshock Infinite news all over the place on social media, like nonstop. I hated the game. Get me off whatever listserv I’m on please.
And you to, Bioshock Infinite, for the last time: Fuck you for sucking.
Posts
I hear the DRM is horrendous
Pirating Chanus is a moral imperative.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Children and a higher-than-median amount of guys with facial tattoos. Because there’s a medium security prison there as well. Figured we hit a time where a lot of people were heading back after one-day paroles.
Reported.
@Atomika what the hell are you talking about
I’m struck about why they work so well for me
I find them deeply meditative experiences
Almost the entire design philosophy of games is rejected
They want you to slow down, to be deliberate, intentional
I suspect a large part of why people bounce off them is because people specifically aren’t looking for that experience in gaming
Think of all the money will save, and all the options you will have to configure every everything yourself.
Their character models never seem quite human, it’s some uncanny valley shit. They never quite act human, they look a little too polished and plastic (especially for whatever task they’re beset by), and their clothing is always just a little … wrong.
They’re like the spaghetti western version of games, filtered and translated just a few too many times through a few too many layers.
But it’s a little person. Wearing a clown suit.
They eat robots, that's just what happens.
People bounce off of them because
They are a mirror
A reflective surface
And what bounces off of reflective surfaces?
Lasers
Therefore, FromSoft fans are lasers
QED
I'M STORMING THE CAPITALMOD FORUM
*gets banned*
Chu ilu
Reminds me of the dialog from Cryptonomicon about how in Germany they do not use a word for addict, instead they are drug-seeking
My wife's work completed a merger with another company like a year ago and they've been combining systems and branding and untangling a bunch of stuff. One of the things is a particular suite of branding the purchased company used previously, and my wife was putting together a press release saying that "access to [old brand name software] is going to be terminated on X date, and users will be migrated into [new brand name software]."
Legal was like, you can't make reference to [x], it's against policy to not use the most current branding!
To which my wife, in relaying the story to me, hit on the same problem as I did: uh, we can't say X is going away with referring to X; this isn't using outdated branding for like, marketing material, this is literally informing them of the termination of X. Stop doing cargo cult policy and fucking read what is in front of you!
FromSoft games perfected: naked man yeets through with 2H club
A lot of jargon is going this way
Homeless —> “facing housing scarcity”
Chronically ill—> “healthcare dependent”
Unemployed —> “employment hiatus”
As opposed to high school, where the naked man yeeting through campus was with the 4H Club
That's not what legal gets paid for
Legal gets paid to point out anything that might potentially maybe be a problem, never concretely answer whether or not it actually is a problem, and then say their prayers to Corpus Juris Secundum and American Jurisprudence, 2d that they will never actually have to be in a courtroom.
Neat. It's probably a good thing that we try to use more-precise language, or at least language that doesn't annihilate the underlying person and turn them into [blank].
yeah, other way to in cases like autism and such where folks now accept or demand it to be part of their identity.
*stands in front of wall and does wall dance*
I get that, but dumb in-house counsel annoy me, professionally.
Ugggggggh argle bargle
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-ne-disney-new-reedy-creek-board-powerless-20230329-qalagcs4wjfe3iwkpzjsz2v4qm-story.html
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH holy shit what an absolute masterclass in malicious compliance. I love it, I know [chat]'s basically politics free these days but this is just such a goddamn hilarious middle finger that I can't help but want to post it in here.
It's okay I don't even speak a word of Ikea.
but they're listening to every word I say
lmao what?
Nothing in RE4 is to be taken seriously. It's Army of Darkness: The Video Game.
You are supposed to be giggling and then sweating as you flee through dark dungeon tunnels from a huge man with all his orifices sewn shut and swords for hands
And you to, Bioshock Infinite, for the last time: Fuck you for sucking.