The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Need an affordable point & shoot camera

KyzenKyzen Registered User regular
edited July 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
I know absolutely nothing when it comes to buying cameras, and luckily have never had to buy one for myself in my life, as every camera I've owned has been a gift.

I'm going to Vegas in 2 weeks, and looking to pick up a camera for the trip. My last digital camera was some old 3.1mp HP thing with some fun shooting modes and mediocre focus control that used SD cards - that's all I could tell you about it. It made its way into a pitcher of beer the last time I was in Vegas, so I'm not looking to spend much on this one in case it should have a similar fate.

Can any of you camera-gurus suggest something in the <100, 100-150, and 150-200 price ranges? Or suggest models/brands to avoid when I'm out shopping?

I'd love to do pick something up in the next 2 days or so, so I can spend some time learning how to use it before the trip.

Kyzen on

Posts

  • saltinesssaltiness Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Anything Canon makes should suit you just fine.

    saltiness on
    XBL: heavenkils
  • KyzenKyzen Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Good to know, thanks. I recall hearing at some point that more megapixels does not necessarily make for better photos. Is this true, or should I go for the most megapixels I can get for my budget?

    Kyzen on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    It's absolutely true under certain circumstances. The more pixels you pack into a small space, the worse the noise characteristics are going to be and the more the camera's software is going to have to compensate. It normally isn't a big deal in good lighting, but no one only takes pictures outside in broad daylight. Under poor / indoor lighting, the camera is going to apply a noise reduction algorithm which is going to reduce details and cause smearing, and there will still be sections of grain left in the images.


    That being said, it isn't necessarily a bad thing. If you are only shrinking them for viewing on the web, or printing at 4x6, you can get away with quite a bit of noise before things look bad. Most small point and shoot cameras all have similar problems - corner softness, overall softness, poor contrast, weak flash, red eye, noisy images, lack of manual control, etc... The one exception being a camera range from Fuji, the finepix F series (from the F10 to the F31fd, the f40fd is much noisier), whose low light images are nearly comparable to dSLRs in noise characteristics. You just have to decide which weaknesses you want to live with, and which features you need the most.

    stigweard on
  • QuarterMasterQuarterMaster Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    saltiness wrote: »
    Anything Canon makes should suit you just fine.

    Alternatively, I would also recommend this Sony. I have the older version (DSC-W50) and it's been a great little camera.

    QuarterMaster on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Anything over 6 MP is complete overkill for a point and shoot. Don't consider MP over 6.0 a selling point, and if it's on a suspiciously cheap camera, consider it a negative.

    My advice is to get the most expensive Canon Powershot A line camera that you can easily afford. They're fantastic cameras with a wide range of manual settings for you to learn on, as well as a wide range of automatic settings to cover most situations.

    The best part is though, that they're the only point and shoot cameras in the reasonable price range with a really usable ISO 800 setting. That's very, very nice to have if you're shooting at night, or in low light.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • KyzenKyzen Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I'm presently looking at a Canon Powershot a550 and a560 - I'd go with the 560 if Circuit City will match their websites price ($21 cheaper than in-store) and let me layer a $40 off $200 coupon on top of it (and thus be able to pick up the accessories that I need for essentially free).

    Complete camera noob question, but what are ISO speeds for? 800 vs 100? Is faster better?

    Kyzen on
  • yourspaceholidayyourspaceholiday Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    The higher the ISO, the more sensitive it is to light, which makes it better to take pictures in low light. You begin to see a lot of grain in the higher ISO speeds, though. So, if you're shooting outside in the daylight, you'd want to use a really low speed, but if you're shooting in low light, you'd want to bump it up a bit.

    yourspaceholiday on
  • ege02ege02 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited July 2007
    Kyzen wrote: »
    Complete camera noob question, but what are ISO speeds for? 800 vs 100? Is faster better?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_5800:1987

    ege02 on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Also in digital cameras you don't get grain, you get noise. Grain is what you see on high ISO film, and sometimes it can even be used in an artistic manner and end up looking pretty good. Digital noise just looks bad.

    Usually you don't really want to shoot above ISO 400, and if you can swing it, using ISO 200 on most point and shoot cameras is advisable. Very rarely will you see noise at ISO 200 due to the sensor being too sensitive though, so you don't really need to use ISO 100 unless you're shooting outdoors and you want to use a slower shutter speed than you otherwise might.

    The rule of thumb is typically to use one setting lower than the max your camera supports as your max "safe" setting. However, with point and shoot cameras you'll frequently find that ISO 400 is the highest setting available, and that it also usually looks fine, at least on more recent cameras. Some manufacturers offer an ISO 800 setting, however, the problem is that many cameras simply cannot do ISO 800 properly. The ones that do are frequently made by manufacturers of digital SLR cameras that go up to ISO 1600 or higher, and have the capability to produce a good sensor capable of low noise photos. Canon is definitely one of the best on the market for high ISO point and shoot cameras, and trust me, you're going to want a camera capable of stepping up a notch when it's dark out because the built in flash will always look like shit, and you're never going to pull a clean hit at a low enough shutter speed to properly compensate for the conditions inside a bar or outside at night. Not with a point and shoot camera anyhow.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • altmannaltmann Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    as far as point-and-shoot cameras here are things to consider:

    1. Card Interface: SD cards are cheap and great, many laptops have SD slots. CF cards are great as well but less computers/laptops seem to have built-in CF slots. I advise to stay away from Sony as they have proprietary "memory sticks" which i hate. ALWAYS ALWAYS buy an extra card (the one coming with your camera doesn't count). The reason i say this is if your card suddenly dies you can resume picture-taking immediately. Instead of a 2gb card, buy 2 1gb cards. Also, you don't NEED to shoot at maximum res. I find anything over 4 Megapixels to be overkill. I use my Rebel XT SLR for anything special.

    2. Batteries: Depending on your uses you may or may not want to go with a camera with a special rechargable battery or that takes AAs. Canons A series takes AA batteries which is a plus being that if you're in a pinch or in a foreign country you can always get AA batteries. Though, having the cameras that have custom batteries that re-charge can be nice and way cheaper. I have a Canon SD150 (old but still great) and i have used the re-chargable battery over 100 times easily.

    Other than that really most point-and-shoots are great. Go with brand name though, Canon, Nikon, Sony, Kodak.

    That's my .02

    P.S. I love canon cameras and my SD150 has never had a problem and i've had it for 5+ years. Canon rules!

    altmann on
    Imperator of the Gigahorse Jockeys.

    "Oh what a day, what a LOVELY DAY!"

    signature.png
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I disagree on one point about using at less than maximum resolution. Besides the fact that many small p&s don't have the option (or have an ebay or blog only option), many of the compact and ultra compact have soft to downright blurry corners. If you keep that in mind when you frame your photos, you can crop the softness out completely.

    stigweard on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    No one suggested using lower than maximum resolution. Doing so is retarded and does nothing to prevent any noise that might come from an overcrowded sensor. Using less than maximum ISO is completely unrelated to resolution.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Re-read the post directly above mine.

    stigweard on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    oh, right.

    Yeah just shoot at maximum res because really a 2 GB SD card is dirt cheap anyhow and you're never going to fill it before you get to a computer.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • PorkChopSandwichesPorkChopSandwiches Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I just picked up a Fuji S700 and have been really happy with it if you don't mind having an almost-SLR size body. It has great shooting modes, including letting you control most of the options you would find on a SLR camera. You can get one on Amazon for less than $200. It runs on AA, so I picked up the Energizer 15 minute charger, which does a great job. Most of the other chargers take several hours to charge.

    PorkChopSandwiches on
  • SixSix Caches Tweets in the mainframe cyberhex Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I've had a Canon SD1000 for a few months now and couldn't be happier.

    Six on
    can you feel the struggle within?
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    If you can, try and find out the response time between depressing the shutter and the picture being taken. I have a canon powershot 175 and it's fantastic. Takes shots quickly, has brilliant image quality and powerful manual settings to boot. I forgot to take it with me on the weekend, so we bought an ass-cheap camera from the duty free shop at the airport. It was fine as an emergency substitute for taking a few holiday snaps but my god was the response time slow. It took about three seconds between pressing the button and the picture actually being taken which meant that more often than not the subject had moved off frame or we'd lowered the camera thinking the photo had already been taken resulting in blurry pictures of the ground and our feet.

    Pretty damn abysmal.

    (Note: I believe that response time is - or at least used to be - partially related to the size of the SD card. The bigger the storage, the longer the camera takes to access it. But really, any modern camera should be able to write to a 1GB SD card quicker than this POS did).

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    DrDizaster wrote: »
    The best part is though, that they're the only point and shoot cameras in the reasonable price range with a really usable ISO 800 setting. That's very, very nice to have if you're shooting at night, or in low light.

    Sunset in Cuba, taken on my 175, no tripod:
    003.jpg

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • altmannaltmann Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Really I see your points guys on not shooting below maximum rez. My main argument on this was really only a situational thing: Space. When you're out on a long trip shooting 3mb files space can become a factor. My last 9 day trip to italy I took over 3000 photos. I was able to upload them to my computer so it wasn't an issue. This is situational.

    I'm not saying you should shoot below maximum as a NORM., I'm just suggesting it. I never shoot below max on my SLR but on long trips i with my point-and-shoot (before I had my SLR) i used to use the resolution 1 step below max.

    That's all.

    Thanks DrDizaster for calling me a retard. My resolution suggestion had nothing to do with noise. Also, the only thing I even said in the matter was that you don't NEED to shoot maximum rez. Lets get bent out of shape over it. Again we're talking point-and-shoots here not SLR so it's really a non-issue since if someone was really going to whine about noise on a canon SD camera I would tell them to go get a real camera :)

    altmann on
    Imperator of the Gigahorse Jockeys.

    "Oh what a day, what a LOVELY DAY!"

    signature.png
  • KyzenKyzen Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Well to stay within my budget *and* get it in time for the trip I'm going to have to choose between the A550 + $40 worth of accessories, or the A630. Either one will come out to $160 when all is said and done.

    Any suggestions/input?

    Kyzen on
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Specification wise, they are very similar cameras. ~1mp difference doesn't amount to much in print, and the lenses have the same range. The a630 has a slightly slower lens in the wide end and a slightly faster lens in the telephoto end. They both can only take up to 1gb sd cards. If you google around a bit, you'd be sure to find comprehensive reviews on both that will help you out better.

    stigweard on
  • saint2esaint2e Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    This thread is so full of good advice, I only have one thing to add:

    One of the things I consider alot with what camera I purchase is the Optical Zoom. This is especially good if you're doing a lot of sightseeing, or shots from distances. Optical Zoom means the lenses are actually doing the zooming. Digital Zoom means that the software is doing the zooming based on extrapolation.

    Optical Zoom > Digital Zoom

    In fact, I have Digital Zoom turned off all the time on my Canon Powershot S1 IS, because it's got 10X optical zoom, which I find sufficient. Plus, you can get photo software to do the same thing, so unless you have a really specific reason for wanting more digital zoom, it's not worth having a higher digital zoom.

    The two you've selected are both excellent P&S cameras, and I'm sure you'll be happy with either one. If it were me, I'd go for the A550 with accessories, as the extra cost for the A630 is negligable for what you want to use it for.

    Hope this helps.

    *edit* OH! Also, invest in some rechargeable AA batteries, if you're going with one of these two Canons. I personally prefer Energizer mAH 2500's.

    saint2e on
    banner_160x60_01.gif
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Yes, digital zoom is dumb. It's not better than scaling up the photograph in photoshop (I guess theres an argument for having some digital zoom so you can better compose a photograph for direct print, but still - dumb).

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • saint2esaint2e Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Yes, digital zoom is dumb. It's not better than scaling up the photograph in photoshop (I guess theres an argument for having some digital zoom so you can better compose a photograph for direct print, but still - dumb).

    I was thinking after I posted my diatribe up there that some people just use the camera and a docking station which prints the photos off without the use of a computer. Digital Zoom comes in handy there, I suppose.

    But otherwise, use Photoshop or whatever software comes with the camera to crop and zoom. Same, and probably better, quality.

    saint2e on
    banner_160x60_01.gif
  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Yeah, even free programs like iPhoto allow you to zoom, rotate and crop. There's just no excuse for cameras having digital zoom except to deceive punters.

    Well, there probably is but I can't think what. Maybe for shooting upskirt mpegs from across a busy street for youtube.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • Nova_CNova_C I have the need The need for speedRegistered User regular
    edited July 2007
    I have a Canon Powershot A550 and love it. Great little camera. At max res and max quality, a 2GB card holds about 625 photos or so. You can also get 45 min+ 640x480 video AND unlike older Canons, you can keep filming for as long as the card can store (My friend has a Canon A330 or 300 or something and it films for 3min and stops :P)

    It takes great photos and has quite a few options, more than you'll really need for point-and-shoot purposes. Also, it only takes a pair of AAs and they last for friggin' ever (I never use the flash, even in low light the camera takes great photos).

    EDIT - Here's my flickr page if you're interested in seeing photos taken with this camera (I'm an amateur, so don't expect art or anything): http://www.flickr.com/photos/nova_collision/

    Also, part of this video was filmed with my camera: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiS_bT6PE-E
    All close ups of the targets were shot with my camera. Incidentally, I'm also the 'cameraman' in the video. :P

    Nova_C on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Kyzen wrote: »
    Well to stay within my budget *and* get it in time for the trip I'm going to have to choose between the A550 + $40 worth of accessories, or the A630. Either one will come out to $160 when all is said and done.

    Any suggestions/input?

    The A550 is certainly good enough. I had an A520 back when they still made them and I thought it was an amazing camera, so you'll have no problems with the newer A550.

    Plus, there are certain accessories that are literal must-buys:
    1) An SD card. You want 1 GB or more. SD Cards are dirt cheap anyhow. Get 4 GB if you can afford it.
    2) NiMH batteries + charger. They're the current gen rechargeable batteries, they take like an hour to charge and one pair will give you enough shots to fill your card unless you snag a 4 GB card and even then maybe. Look for a sale though, because these can be pricey. You'll save money in the long term though, and if you're travelling, there's nothing like being able to just charge your batteries while you sleep and know they'll be ready the next day, instead of being forced to find a gas station or convenience store to pay ludicrous prices for one pair of AAs.
    3) A camera bag. Something small, ideally with a clip, ideally something with some padding. Lowepro is one of the best brands you could buy, but really, a small camera bag for a point and shoot doesn't need to cost more than $15 anyhow. Cheap is fine in this case.

    After you've satisfied those three, more or less in that order, you're set. That may or may not be more than $40 worth of stuff to grab, depending on if you can swing a deal or not.

    Pro tip: If you see a sale at Futureshop or Best Buy, take the flyer to an independent camera shop and convince them to make you a deal. You'll probably be able to swing a good one if you say you're looking to buy the camera, a bag, the batteries and a memory card all at once, as the latter three are really high margin items.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • KyzenKyzen Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Thanks for all the advice. I have a bad case of "oh-i'll-just-get-the-next-step-up" and ended up with the Powershot a710, which cost me about $240 after taxes.

    I''ll be buying SD cards and such on newegg next week.

    Now I get to figure out what all this stuff means, and most importantly, how to take good low-light night shots

    Kyzen on
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited July 2007
    Use ISO 400, a tripod, and shutter priority, or full manual mode. In full manual set the aperture to the widest you can, and start at about 1/30 shutter speed and slow it down until you get a good shot. At 1/30 you'll need quite still subjects though, and it only gets worse the slower you set it If you can't pull a clean hit, increase to ISO 800 and start over at 1/30.

    Luckily if you're shooting landscapes, you can get away with multiple second exposures, assuming there's little to no wind.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • saint2esaint2e Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    If you're like me when I started off, just use the "Motion" setting (if the a710 has it, Canon usually indicates it by a Running dude). I found that a lot better than the "automatic" setting. This'll help you if you don't have a tripod or steady hand yet.

    The only exception to this is night shots. You need to have a longer exposure (ie- not the Motion setting, as it's got a very short exposure time) and a steady head for those to work.

    Let us know how you get on!

    saint2e on
    banner_160x60_01.gif
  • stigweardstigweard Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    Be sure whatever camera you get can actually take a 4gb sd card. Many can't, or need to have the firmware flashed first.

    edit: If you don't happen to have a tripod around, you can always fill a grocery or sandwich bag with sand and use it as a beanbag, placing it on a table, chair bench, etc... Also, if you are getting a large tripod to use with a light camera, be sure to get one with a hook so you can mount some extra wieght between the legs. It helps to stabilize the tripod and prevent shaking from light wind.

    stigweard on
  • MuridenMuriden Registered User regular
    edited July 2007
    http://shopping.yahoo.com/p:Panasonic%20Lumix%20DMC-FX8K%20Digital%20Camera:1992423774:page=compare

    simg_t_o1992423774.1143242660.jpg

    Currently what I have. Have used and loved it for over a year now. Very simple auto focus and great pictures, plus SD cards are very cheap.

    Muriden on
    MrGulio.332 - Lover of fine Cheeses. Replays
    301787-1.png
Sign In or Register to comment.