The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Teleportation and Sci-Fi Physics

DiggxDiggx Registered User regular
edited August 2007 in Debate and/or Discourse
Alright
The other day I was telling someone that matter does not actually make contact (it is only the result of protons repelling each other). They asked how sound is made. The example used was a car accident. How do these repelling protons make noise??? I am very naive when it comes to these things... Can someone please explain in layman terms.

Diggx on
«13

Posts

  • AdrienAdrien Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Even though technically atoms don't make physical contact with each other (or rather, the idea of physical contact is meaningless at that scale), it doesn't really make a difference. You can basically treat air molecules as ping pong balls.

    Adrien on
    tmkm.jpg
  • SavantSavant Simply Barbaric Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Well, sound is caused by pressure waves.

    But if you want to get into the general "what causes air to behave that way", then your best bet is going to be the electromagnetic force. The nuclear forces only have much effect on the really small subatomic or nuclear scales, while gravity only has much effect on the large scale. Most of the stuff in between is mostly dependent upon the interaction between charges, such between the electrons and protons in atoms.

    Savant on
  • agoajagoaj Top Tier One FearRegistered User regular
    edited August 2007
    So would I be correct to say that what's stopping me from putting my hand through the desk is the electro-magnetic force of the desks atoms against mine?

    agoaj on
    ujav5b9gwj1s.png
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    agoaj wrote: »
    So would I be correct to say that what's stopping me from putting my hand through the desk is the electro-magnetic force of the desks atoms against mine?


    Theoretically, if you spent infinity trying to put your hand through your desk, there's a chance the atoms could line up and allow your hand through

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • edited August 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • MikeManMikeMan Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Well that's tunneling and actually since we don't have all the parameters of QM dialed in yet it's not quite certain whether the chances are very small or it would in fact be forbidden.

    shut up, i've been trying for years to run through a wall and now you're telling me there might not be a chance?

    asshole

    MikeMan on
  • edited August 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited August 2007
    Diggx wrote: »
    Alright
    The other day I was telling someone that matter does not actually make contact (it is only the result of protons repelling each other). They asked how sound is made. The example used was a car accident. How do these repelling protons make noise??? I am very naive when it comes to these things... Can someone please explain in layman terms.

    Sound isn't really atoms banging against each other, because things at that scale don't really work the same way as billiard balls. Think about it this way: sound is really just certain frequencies of pressure waves of air that interact with your eardrum and your brain then detects. Stuff banging together (or strumming or vibrating, or whatever) creates these pressure waves in the air.

    Irond Will on
    Wqdwp8l.png
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    but the pressure has to have physical molcules to vibrate to carry it. hence why sound doesn't carry in a vacuum.

    nexuscrawler on
  • GorakGorak Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    MikeMan wrote: »
    Well that's tunneling and actually since we don't have all the parameters of QM dialed in yet it's not quite certain whether the chances are very small or it would in fact be forbidden.

    shut up, i've been trying for years to run through a wall and now you're telling me there might not be a chance?

    asshole

    Hey now, everyone knows physics frowns on quitters :P

    And it's a general rule that, unless somethings specifically forbidden, it'll probably happen.

    Positrons were basically discoverd because Dirac realised that in the E=mc^2... formula that everyone knows is actually E=sqrt(m^2c^4...) so the energy of an electron could be -mc^2.

    In short, current theory says, "just keep trying". Maybe if you run extra hard...

    Gorak on
  • GorakGorak Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    but the pressure has to have physical molcules to vibrate to carry it. hence why sound doesn't carry in a vacuum.

    The pressure is actually the EM force. It's just that when we deal with it in the bulk scale, it's easier to treat it as billiard balls because the maths is easier.

    Gorak on
  • YarYar Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    As was stated in the OP, the subatoms repel each other.

    As such, they can propogate a wave of force just as if they were touching.

    Proton A shifts to the left and the force that repels it from Proton B (or whatever) causes B to shift as well.

    In actuality I don't think it would mechanically move one after the other like that, but that's the general idea.

    Imagine two repelling magnets - motive force you apply to one transfers across the field to the other, and so pushing one causes the other to move, regardless of whether or not they are touching. Force is the key (be it electromagnetic, mechanical, subatomic, whatever), not whether or not things are touching.

    Yar on
  • jothkijothki Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Yar wrote: »
    As was stated in the OP, the subatoms repel each other.

    As such, they can propogate a wave of force just as if they were touching.

    Proton A shifts to the left and the force that repels it from Proton B (or whatever) causes B to shift as well.

    In actuality I don't think it would mechanically move one after the other like that, but that's the general idea.

    Imagine two repelling magnets - motive force you apply to one transfers across the field to the other, and so pushing one causes the other to move, regardless of whether or not they are touching. Force is the key (be it electromagnetic, mechanical, subatomic, whatever), not whether or not things are touching.

    Does having two particles 'touch' even have a real meaning?

    jothki on
  • Che GuevaraChe Guevara __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Che Guevara on
  • edited August 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • Irond WillIrond Will WARNING: NO HURTFUL COMMENTS, PLEASE!!!!! Cambridge. MAModerator Mod Emeritus
    edited August 2007
    jothki wrote: »
    Does having two particles 'touch' even have a real meaning?
    Technically no - matter is essentially infinitely compressible. However there are various energy barriers - electrostatic repulsion, degeneracy pressure, nuclear strong force etc. which act as pretty good hard limits within certain regimes of compressive force.

    Well, there's always fusion and quantum overlap. I guess that these are as good an analogy as any in terms of having atoms "touch".

    Irond Will on
    Wqdwp8l.png
  • Fuzzy Cumulonimbus CloudFuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Physics is the only subject that makes my brain feel like it's actually expanding.
    I get this " holy crap " feeling and then smart smart comes!
    Plus, heisenberg compensators lolol.

    Fuzzy Cumulonimbus Cloud on
  • WindbitWindbit Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Wow, that's really cool. I've always heard that information traveled through the nervous system as electricity, but the idea that information is carried through our bodies by sound particles sounds much more science-y.

    Windbit on
  • MorninglordMorninglord I'm tired of being Batman, so today I'll be Owl.Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Technically it doesn't travel along nerves as electricity, it travels as a moving ionic charge difference. Effectively, it triggers a charge at repeating points along the nerve. This is why we react to things so slowly. If we actually had real efficient electrical conductors as nerves, we could probably dodge bullets.

    Morninglord on
    (PSN: Morninglord) (Steam: Morninglord) (WiiU: Morninglord22) I like to record and toss up a lot of random gaming videos here.
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Electricity really is nothing but an ionic charge difference correcting itself.

    nexuscrawler on
  • MorninglordMorninglord I'm tired of being Batman, so today I'll be Owl.Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Electricity really is nothing but an ionic charge difference correcting itself.

    For a nerve, the ionic charge difference is so small and the current produced so tiny it doesn't really go very far at all, so there's a series of bands around the nerve that produce builds ups of the charge that get triggered like circuit boosters when the head of the nerve fires. Nerves without these myelin sheaths don't communicate very fast at all and are the source of the throbbing sensation you get when you burn yourself and the reason it doesn't start throbbing until several seconds afterwards.
    You get the initial sharp pain (nerves with myelin sheathes firing and the pain shooting quickly to the brain) and then the throb (the slow ass non myelin sheathed nerves catching up several seconds later).

    What I meant really is that if we had nerves that could carry a full potential along its entire length without much resistance, like a copper wire, we could dodge bullets.

    Morninglord on
    (PSN: Morninglord) (Steam: Morninglord) (WiiU: Morninglord22) I like to record and toss up a lot of random gaming videos here.
  • nexuscrawlernexuscrawler Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    We'd also probably be so overwhelmed by our senses we'd barely be able to function.

    nexuscrawler on
  • MorninglordMorninglord I'm tired of being Batman, so today I'll be Owl.Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    We'd also probably be so overwhelmed by our senses we'd barely be able to function.

    Nerves are just the really long tail ends of specialised Neurons and we use identical if shorter versions to do the thunking. So if you want to take it all the way the things we'd be using to feel overwhelmed by would be running at the same speed as the sensory input. Presumably the synapses would be more efficient as well. So no, not really.

    This is besides the point though?

    Morninglord on
    (PSN: Morninglord) (Steam: Morninglord) (WiiU: Morninglord22) I like to record and toss up a lot of random gaming videos here.
  • JohannenJohannen Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    Not to distract the thread but it's something i've always wondered about. Another one is how does the body transform those molecules pulsing onto your eardrum into such a complex variation of sounds and levels?

    Johannen on
  • Che GuevaraChe Guevara __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Windbit wrote: »
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Wow, that's really cool. I've always heard that information traveled through the nervous system as electricity, but the idea that information is carried through our bodies by sound particles sounds much more science-y.

    It's not really a 'sound particle' as much as a discrete packet of energy. The energy creates a vibration in what you'd think of as particles, but it's not a particle itself.

    Che Guevara on
  • VeegeezeeVeegeezee Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Windbit wrote: »
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Wow, that's really cool. I've always heard that information traveled through the nervous system as electricity, but the idea that information is carried through our bodies by sound particles sounds much more science-y.

    It's not really a 'sound particle' as much as a discrete packet of energy. The energy creates a vibration in what you'd think of as particles, but it's not a particle itself.

    i feel like we've been over this before

    as in, disregarded it as a gross misunderstanding of the original research

    Veegeezee on
  • Che GuevaraChe Guevara __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Veegeezee wrote: »
    Windbit wrote: »
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Wow, that's really cool. I've always heard that information traveled through the nervous system as electricity, but the idea that information is carried through our bodies by sound particles sounds much more science-y.

    It's not really a 'sound particle' as much as a discrete packet of energy. The energy creates a vibration in what you'd think of as particles, but it's not a particle itself.

    i feel like we've been over this before

    as in, disregarded it as a gross misunderstanding of the original research

    Point to the specific reference?

    I'm confused as to what you're arguing against.

    Che Guevara on
  • VeegeezeeVeegeezee Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Veegeezee wrote: »
    Windbit wrote: »
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Wow, that's really cool. I've always heard that information traveled through the nervous system as electricity, but the idea that information is carried through our bodies by sound particles sounds much more science-y.

    It's not really a 'sound particle' as much as a discrete packet of energy. The energy creates a vibration in what you'd think of as particles, but it's not a particle itself.

    i feel like we've been over this before

    as in, disregarded it as a gross misunderstanding of the original research

    Point to the specific reference?

    I'm confused as to what you're arguing against.

    Oh, sorry - i was referring just to the stuff about nerves transmitting information via phonons or solitons and so on. The rest is cool.

    Veegeezee on
  • Che GuevaraChe Guevara __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Veegeezee wrote: »
    Veegeezee wrote: »
    Windbit wrote: »
    If you vibrate a portion of a crystaline lattice, the energy of this vibration will travel as a 'phonon' throughout the lattice structure. Interestingly enough, heat travels in the same manner. And it's recently been theorized that the brain uses phonons to transmit information along nerves.

    Wow, that's really cool. I've always heard that information traveled through the nervous system as electricity, but the idea that information is carried through our bodies by sound particles sounds much more science-y.

    It's not really a 'sound particle' as much as a discrete packet of energy. The energy creates a vibration in what you'd think of as particles, but it's not a particle itself.

    i feel like we've been over this before

    as in, disregarded it as a gross misunderstanding of the original research

    Point to the specific reference?

    I'm confused as to what you're arguing against.

    Oh, sorry - i was referring just to the stuff about nerves transmitting information via phonons or solitons and so on. The rest is cool.

    I can't really comment on how the brain might for soliton waves at the cellular level between nerves, but I believe phonons are still the correct term for the energy transfer.

    A phonon isn't necessarily sound, it can be heat as well.

    It's energy on the lowest end of the spectrum.

    Che Guevara on
  • grendel824_grendel824_ Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Well that's tunneling and actually since we don't have all the parameters of QM dialed in yet it's not quite certain whether the chances are very small or it would in fact be forbidden.


    Actually, no - tunnelling is a different concept. On a macroscopic level like a hand going through a desk, it's just a matter of the probability of the arrangements of atoms (or even just molecules) being such that they don't affect each other enough.

    grendel824_ on
  • grendel824_grendel824_ Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    It's certainly possible (well, not necessarily "perfectly," as is claimed in Star Trek, I believe, by compensating for the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle, but close enough that nobody could tell the difference). But whether it's you depends on what you consider "counts" as "you." Lots of definition of terms needed there.

    Use the analogy of ship - if a ship leaves port and on its long journey replaces every piece of wood it's made of, is it still the same ship when it docks back in the original port again? It also depends on whether "you" as an "observer" is really something moving through spacetime through the arrangement of molecules that constitute your body will count as the same observer if that specific arrangement of molecules is or isn't contiguous in three dimensions. My unproveable and somewhat based in pseudo-science and metaphysics and somewhat based in "real science" is yes. It gets even blurrier if you wonder what would happen if you WEREN'T broken down and the other body was still there - would "you" be in two places at once, or would you have a perfect clone who just has all "your" memories and you your seperate ways? There's a lot about the nature of the "oberver" that, as far as I know, has not been established with any real certainty, and involves too much metaphysics and not enough real physics (so far).

    It's one of those "really good questions" that still stumps pretty much everybody, and probably will until it's no longer a hypothetical situation and can be conducted experimentally. Heck, we might even live to see it, at the rate technology is improving and lifespan is increasing - some people living today might "never" die (well, at least never die of anything short of being atomized).

    grendel824_ on
  • edited August 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • Strange AttractorStrange Attractor Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    All the particles in your body are replaced every seven years or so it's already happened to you a bunch or times.

    Strange Attractor on
    Hi.
  • WindbitWindbit Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    All the particles in your body are replaced every seven years or so it's already happened to you a bunch or times.

    Really? Even the brain and heart?

    Windbit on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Windbit wrote: »
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    All the particles in your body are replaced every seven years or so it's already happened to you a bunch or times.

    Really? Even the brain and heart?

    According to New Scientist the average age of your body is 15 and a half years, and regenerating brain cells have been observed.

    Your heart cells are replaced just like any other muscle in your body, though I have no article for you on that one.

    On the subject of transportation/teleportation/whatever I would say it is entirely possible so long as the body could be reconstructed EXACTLY as it was and that would mean maintaining charges, pressures and motions.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • QuidQuid Definitely not a banana Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    The answer is magic.

    Quid on
  • Strange AttractorStrange Attractor Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Windbit wrote: »
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    All the particles in your body are replaced every seven years or so it's already happened to you a bunch or times.

    Really? Even the brain and heart?

    According to New Scientist the average age of your body is 15 and a half years, and regenerating brain cells have been observed.

    Your heart cells are replaced just like any other muscle in your body, though I have no article for you on that one.

    On the subject of transportation/teleportation/whatever I would say it is entirely possible so long as the body could be reconstructed EXACTLY as it was and that would mean maintaining charges, pressures and motions.

    In other words it's impossible according to the uncertainty principle.

    One thing it's important to remember is that there's no such thing as a particle or a wave. Nobodys ever SEEN one. They are only models that have been developed that fit observation and enable predictions to be made. The map is not the territory. The simple fact that current science states that "sometimes light acts as particle and other times as waves and it's more useful to use one or the other in various settings" makes it pretty obvious to me that quantum theory, particles/waves, ect are just abstract conceptualizations to predict the behavior of something more fundamental that we haven't wrapped our brains around yet.

    Strange Attractor on
    Hi.
  • Che GuevaraChe Guevara __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Windbit wrote: »
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    All the particles in your body are replaced every seven years or so it's already happened to you a bunch or times.

    Really? Even the brain and heart?

    According to New Scientist the average age of your body is 15 and a half years, and regenerating brain cells have been observed.

    Your heart cells are replaced just like any other muscle in your body, though I have no article for you on that one.

    On the subject of transportation/teleportation/whatever I would say it is entirely possible so long as the body could be reconstructed EXACTLY as it was and that would mean maintaining charges, pressures and motions.

    In other words it's impossible according to the uncertainty principle.

    One thing it's important to remember is that there's no such thing as a particle or a wave. Nobodys ever SEEN one. They are only models that have been developed that fit observation and enable predictions to be made. The map is not the territory. The simple fact that current science states that "sometimes light acts as particle and other times as waves and it's more useful to use one or the other in various settings" makes it pretty obvious to me that quantum theory, particles/waves, ect are just abstract conceptualizations to predict the behavior of something more fundamental that we haven't wrapped our brains around yet.

    It's why the mainstream is warming up to string theory, at least as a conceptual model. It incorporates aspects of both systems, and falls more in line with the mathematics used to describe them both, even if it hasn't seen rigorous testing. A string would be the shortest distance between adjacent points (0.9R = 1), hence an indivisible infinitesimal.

    As for quantum teleportation... if they told you that the teleportation required the creation of a perfect clone of you on the far side of the teleportation gate, and that after the 'magic' had occurred the original was vaporized... would you still go through with it?

    What if you'd already been teleported and hadn't known this was the standard operating procedure? And you were thousands of lightyears away by the fastest conventional spaceship. Would you be able to step back in through the gate to see your friends and family, knowing that it would only be a perfect clone of you on the other side?

    Che Guevara on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited August 2007
    Windbit wrote: »
    Johannen wrote: »
    Actually, i've always wondered...

    If transportation was possible in the sense that all the molecules in your body were dissassembled and then reassembled perfectly in another place, would you still be you?

    All the particles in your body are replaced every seven years or so it's already happened to you a bunch or times.

    Really? Even the brain and heart?

    According to New Scientist the average age of your body is 15 and a half years, and regenerating brain cells have been observed.

    Your heart cells are replaced just like any other muscle in your body, though I have no article for you on that one.

    On the subject of transportation/teleportation/whatever I would say it is entirely possible so long as the body could be reconstructed EXACTLY as it was and that would mean maintaining charges, pressures and motions.

    In other words it's impossible according to the uncertainty principle.

    One thing it's important to remember is that there's no such thing as a particle or a wave. Nobodys ever SEEN one. They are only models that have been developed that fit observation and enable predictions to be made. The map is not the territory. The simple fact that current science states that "sometimes light acts as particle and other times as waves and it's more useful to use one or the other in various settings" makes it pretty obvious to me that quantum theory, particles/waves, ect are just abstract conceptualizations to predict the behavior of something more fundamental that we haven't wrapped our brains around yet.

    It's why the mainstream is warming up to string theory, at least as a conceptual model. It incorporates aspects of both systems, and falls more in line with the mathematics used to describe them both, even if it hasn't seen rigorous testing. A string would be the shortest distance between adjacent points (0.9R = 1), hence an indivisible infinitesimal.

    As for quantum teleportation... if they told you that the teleportation required the creation of a perfect clone of you on the far side of the teleportation gate, and that after the 'magic' had occurred the original was vaporized... would you still go through with it?

    What if you'd already been teleported and hadn't known this was the standard operating procedure? And you were thousands of lightyears away by the fastest conventional spaceship. Would you be able to step back in through the gate to see your friends and family, knowing that it would only be a perfect clone of you on the other side?

    Did someone just watch The Prestige?

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • Che GuevaraChe Guevara __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2007
    Did someone just watch The Prestige?

    Ages ago.

    Although the question itself is much older than that movie.

    Che Guevara on
This discussion has been closed.