The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Activision ROCKBLOCKED Rock Band!

GahazakulGahazakul regular
edited December 2007 in Games and Technology
On the PS3, as some may know, the GH3 controllers do not work with Rock Band and the fine folks behind RB had said a patch was on the way. This morning I found this.....

<quote> Hi Everyone,

As we have said in the past, Harmonix and MTV Games believe in an open standard philosophy of hardware and game compatibility. We think that there should be interoperability between music instrument controllers across all music games. This is clearly in the best interest of consumers, game developers and console manufacturers and will only help to grow the music game genre as well as inspire innovation and creativity.

Two weeks ago, Harmonix created a software patch for the Sony PLAYSTATION 3 version of Rock Band that allowed for guitar compatibility and support for third party peripherals, including enabling use of Activision's Guitar Hero III controller with Rock Band. The compatibility patch was submitted, approved and had been scheduled for release by Sony on Tuesday, December 4. Unfortunately, Activision objected to the compatibility patch's release. The patch remains with Sony, but we have been told that it will unfortunately not be released due to Activision's continued objection.

As is the case with the Microsoft Xbox360, we believe that Sony PLAYSTATION 3 users should be able to use the peripheral of their choice with Rock Band. We sincerely hope that Activision will reverse its decision and allow release of the compatibility patch and further, that Activision will allow Guitar Hero III to support Rock Band guitar controllers as well. We welcome all third party developers who wish to support our controllers and will provide any required support in order for them to do so.

We believe that when consumers have choice, everyone wins. Harmonix and MTV Games hope that Activision and others will also adopt this philosophy.

Sincerely,
The Harmonix Team <endquote>

That was a letter that popped up on the forums for Rock Band in response to people wondering why the patch was taking so long. Anyone else find this a petty move on activisions part? Over on those forums they are mobilizing and sending upset e-mails to customer support at activision's website. I just wanted to throw it out on here and make sure everyone possible is informed about Activision's Duechebaggery.

Gahazakul on
«13456713

Posts

  • 0blique0blique Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    So how come Activision allowed them to use the GH3 controller on the 360?

    0blique on
  • randombattlerandombattle Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Maybe they couldn't object for the 360?


    Seems like an easy way for them to block Rock Band from taking any customers away from the GH franchise.

    randombattle on
    itsstupidbutidontcare2.gif
    I never asked for this!
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    0blique wrote: »
    So how come Activision allowed them to use the GH3 controller on the 360?

    Apparently it has to do with MS's ridged standards for accessories that they have to work universally or something whereas Sony has a hands-off approach.

    From what the internets tells me at least.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • Lord YodLord Yod Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    0blique wrote: »
    So how come Activision allowed them to use the GH3 controller on the 360?

    360 peripherals are required to use a standard set of protocols put forward by MS.

    And this is some fucking bullshit right here. Do they actually expect to generate a bigger customer base with this? Had this patch been released, I would have picked up GH3, but now... almost certainly not going to.

    Lord Yod on
    steam_sig.png
  • GahazakulGahazakul regular
    edited December 2007
    Maybe they couldn't object for the 360?


    Seems like an easy way for them to block Rock Band from taking any customers away from the GH franchise.

    The 360 version was just lucky, the PS3 contoller used a small variance because of its diff wireless pick up. And theeere has been a small rumor that they are working on a patch they will try and legally force RB to use that would retard the games pick up, stopping its use on the 360.

    Gahazakul on
  • ruforufo Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I don't get it. What business is it of Activision's whether or not Rock Band works with any controller?

    rufo on
  • One Thousand CablesOne Thousand Cables An absence of thought Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    rufo wrote: »
    I don't get it. What business is it of Activision's whether or not Rock Band works with any controller?

    If I could put my tin-foil hat on for a moment, it's possible that this whole this is a way for Activision to stymie Rock Band's success. However, the idea that they're doing this out of spite or economic reasons seems a bit pessimistic, even for me.

    One Thousand Cables on
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    There was a dirty dirty, potentially fallacious, rumour I heard that apparently Activision may be working on a patch to lock the GH3 controller out Rock Band on the 360 too. I really, really hope this isn't true, otherwise that would be the biggest dick move of all time.

    darleysam on
    forumsig.png
  • HearthjawHearthjaw Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Wow, I was thinking of picking up GH3 while I wait for Rockband (...march >.<) but now that can go bugger right off, hell I may just send an angry letter for my own piece of mind.

    Hearthjaw on
    steamid: sewersider
  • JyardanaJyardana Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    This is a good way to remove a loyal fan base. Good show Activision.

    Jyardana on
  • Mr PeepersMr Peepers Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    This sucks..


    I was actually thinking about buying a GHIII controller when I get Rock Band. Guess they showed me....

    Mr Peepers on
  • GahazakulGahazakul regular
    edited December 2007
    rufo wrote: »
    I don't get it. What business is it of Activision's whether or not Rock Band works with any controller?

    If you look at the EULA from GH, it says that the Gutair controller can be used for nothing other than Gutair Hero games. So they are saying that to make it usable on other titles would be breaking the EULA they put with the merchandise. See, the RB fellows aren't making a game patch, they are making a game patch to make the GH controller work with their game, so Activision does have a little ground to stand on legally, but to do this is incredibley rude to the consumer, not against their music game competitor.

    Gahazakul on
  • Death of RatsDeath of Rats Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Well, looks like I'm not buying any Activision games until they get their heads out of their asses.

    And this includes Starcraft 2. If I can't use the Rock Band controller in Starcraft 2.... wait... what was I saying again?

    Death of Rats on
    No I don't.
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Previous news: Activision bought by Vivendi. Coolbeans.

    Next news: Activision says "fuck you" to controller compatibility. Man what?

    darleysam, your mentioning of that is the first I've heard of it. Thankfully it is a rumor. If it ever did come true, it would be a pretty dick move.

    Edit - Uh, aren't you getting a little too absurd with the "I'm not buying Activision games!" kind of shit? :?

    Henroid on
  • GahazakulGahazakul regular
    edited December 2007
    BTW! if you do feel the need to tell them how they make you feel, were most are going is

    http://www.activision.com/index.html

    at the bottom right of the screen there is a little "contact us" button, leave it on Corporate Communication and write your response. We are trying to keep them non "flaming" and more respectable, but every response they recieve is important.

    Gahazakul on
  • KageraKagera Imitating the worst people. Since 2004Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I'm canceling my WoW subscription, burning my copy of CoD4 in protest, and taking on Slash in a steel cage match.

    Kagera on
    My neck, my back, my FUPA and my crack.
  • Death of RatsDeath of Rats Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Henroid wrote: »
    Previous news: Activision bought by Vivendi. Coolbeans.

    Next news: Activision says "fuck you" to controller compatibility. Man what?

    darleysam, your mentioning of that is the first I've heard of it. Thankfully it is a rumor. If it ever did come true, it would be a pretty dick move.

    Edit - Uh, aren't you getting a little too absurd with the "I'm not buying Activision games!" kind of shit? :?


    Nope. I'm not buying.... wait, what games do activision make again? I can't remember the last one I bought.

    Death of Rats on
    No I don't.
  • darleysamdarleysam On my way to UKRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Henroid wrote: »
    darleysam, your mentioning of that is the first I've heard of it. Thankfully it is a rumor. If it ever did come true, it would be a pretty dick move.

    It was something they mentioned in 1UP Yours while discussing the whole situation (I think it was that), so it's likely not very credible. That said, it's kinda saddening that with the way this is all going, it's getting more believable.

    darleysam on
    forumsig.png
  • ChewyWafflesChewyWaffles Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    darleysam wrote: »
    There was a dirty dirty, potentially fallacious, rumour I heard that apparently Activision may be working on a patch to lock the GH3 controller out Rock Band on the 360 too. I really, really hope this isn't true, otherwise that would be the biggest dick move of all time.

    Well they can't force you to download the patch ;)

    Wait, does GH3 have an online mode? I don't own it ;P

    ChewyWaffles on
    mwf2sig.jpg
  • chesspiecefacechesspieceface Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Gahazakul wrote: »
    Maybe they couldn't object for the 360?


    Seems like an easy way for them to block Rock Band from taking any customers away from the GH franchise.

    The 360 version was just lucky, the PS3 contoller used a small variance because of its diff wireless pick up. And theeere has been a small rumor that they are working on a patch they will try and legally force RB to use that would retard the games pick up, stopping its use on the 360.

    The real irony here is that if such a patch were introduced it would probably just create more business for Harmonix. I purchased GH3 with the intention of using that guitar for Rock Band and only buying the stand alone game for Rock Band. If they patched the 360 so that the GH3 controller didn't work with Rock Band I would then have to both never purchase another Activision game as well as go out and actually purchase the Harmonix hardware. I've already shelved GH3 for being a pile of shit, don't make me shelve the guitar as well Activision...

    chesspieceface on
    WillieTannerBuilds - Youtube (Let's Play series including Minecraft, Terraria, Age of Empires and more.)
    Willie Tanner Livestream
  • ZekZek Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    If I owned a PS3 this would guarantee that I never buy the GH3 guitar. Really really stupid move by Activision.

    Zek on
  • edited December 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • PuddingSenatorPuddingSenator Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    darleysam wrote: »
    There was a dirty dirty, potentially fallacious, rumour I heard that apparently Activision may be working on a patch to lock the GH3 controller out Rock Band on the 360 too. I really, really hope this isn't true, otherwise that would be the biggest dick move of all time.

    What? I don't think Activision can just patch someone else's game...

    Anyway, I'm certainly not going to be buying any Activision products after this fiasco. They don't deserve a cent of my money when they show so much contempt for their consumers. I'm not trying to start an e-boycott or anything (those tend to not work), but me personally, I'm not giving them another dime. Why would I need to anyway? GH is the only franchise of theirs I would be interested in anyway and with Rock Band releasing 3 tracks a week GH is totally worthless now. By the time GH4 comes out it's full tracklist will probably be available as RB DLC anyway.

    PuddingSenator on
  • chesspiecefacechesspieceface Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I'm also really suprised that Sony hasn't stepped in and said "Cut the bullshit". Apart from the consumers they are also the ones getting screwed by Activisions petty shit. As it stands there is no comparison between PS3 and 360 when it comes to Rock Band, because of the hardware differences the 360 version is far and above the superior. Now playing armchair corporate exec, If I worked at Microsoft and there were any truth to the rumor that Activision wants to patch the guitar to not work with Rock Band I would deny the patch. It only benefits Microsoft to have the open controllers while their competitor has the gimped version.

    I hate to play the "lolsony" card, but c'mon... step up and tell activision to fuck off. It's only hurting your platform to allow this hardware divergence to exist.

    chesspieceface on
    WillieTannerBuilds - Youtube (Let's Play series including Minecraft, Terraria, Age of Empires and more.)
    Willie Tanner Livestream
  • ASimPersonASimPerson Cold... ... and hard.Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Activision is more important now than Sony is, and they have the ultimate trump card:

    "Okay, we'll just delay our releases for the PS3. Or we may just not have them at all."

    Unless the PS3 market has suddenly grown a lot and I haven't noticed, Sony would definitely hurt from this more.

    ASimPerson on
  • ScalfinScalfin __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    I think Activision's doing it to prevent another company from profiting off their R&D, which is quite reasonable.

    Scalfin on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The rest of you, I fucking hate you for the fact that I now have a blue dot on this god awful thread.
  • EndomaticEndomatic Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    rufo wrote: »
    I don't get it. What business is it of Activision's whether or not Rock Band works with any controller?

    If I could put my tin-foil hat on for a moment, it's possible that this whole this is a way for Activision to stymie Rock Band's success. However, the idea that they're doing this out of spite or economic reasons seems a bit pessimistic, even for me.

    Not me!

    It's precisely because of those reasons.

    Endomatic on
  • AbsoluteZeroAbsoluteZero The new film by Quentin Koopantino Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Scalfin wrote: »
    I think Activision's doing it to prevent another company from profiting off their R&D, which is quite reasonable.

    Precisely. But I think there's the possibility this could cause Activision to lose profits themselves.

    AbsoluteZero on
    cs6f034fsffl.jpg
  • Inglorious CoyoteInglorious Coyote Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Activision really is trying to be EA.

    "When you encounter honest competition, don't bother trying to make a better game, just use corporate muscle to get your way." is like the first rule in the EA handbook, and it seems Activision is learning it well.

    Inglorious Coyote on
  • FreddyDFreddyD Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Scalfin wrote: »
    I think Activision's doing it to prevent another company from profiting off their R&D, which is quite reasonable.
    What R&D? Harmonix created the series.

    FreddyD on
  • LBD_NytetraynLBD_Nytetrayn TorontoRegistered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Kagera wrote: »
    I'm canceling my WoW subscription, burning my copy of CoD4 in protest, and taking on Slash in a steel cage match.

    I'll back you up on the outside. If he tries to get through the door, I'll slam it on his face.

    FreddyD wrote: »
    Scalfin wrote: »
    I think Activision's doing it to prevent another company from profiting off their R&D, which is quite reasonable.
    What R&D? Harmonix created the series.

    Was that under Activision, though? If so, then they probably foot the bill for a good chunk of that R&D.

    If not, well, then screw them.

    Screw them anyway.

    LBD_Nytetrayn on
    qjWUWdm.gif1edr1cF.gifINPoYqL.png
    Like Mega Man Legends? Then check out my story, Legends of the Halcyon Era - An Adventure in the World of Mega Man Legends on TMMN and AO3!
  • edited December 2007
    This content has been removed.

  • Radikal_DreamerRadikal_Dreamer Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    This makes me pretty damned angry, as it's the reason I don't own Rock Band right now. I feel really bad now that Activision has my money from Guitar Hero 3, and I'm so close to trading it in and using that money to pay for Rock Band's full package. Only thing really keeping me from doing it is the fact that trading it in means giving money to another greedy asshole company, ebgames... bah.

    Radikal_Dreamer on
    theincidentsig.jpg
  • MisterGrokMisterGrok Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    I'm also really suprised that Sony hasn't stepped in and said "Cut the bullshit". Apart from the consumers they are also the ones getting screwed by Activisions petty shit. As it stands there is no comparison between PS3 and 360 when it comes to Rock Band, because of the hardware differences the 360 version is far and above the superior. Now playing armchair corporate exec, If I worked at Microsoft and there were any truth to the rumor that Activision wants to patch the guitar to not work with Rock Band I would deny the patch. It only benefits Microsoft to have the open controllers while their competitor has the gimped version.

    I hate to play the "lolsony" card, but c'mon... step up and tell activision to fuck off. It's only hurting your platform to allow this hardware divergence to exist.

    Well, in that case, Sony screwed themselves for not having a clearly defined controller standard. The 360 version of Rock Band will always be able to work with the GH guitar because of MS's standards. Even if the EULA states you can't use the controller for anything other than playing Guitar Hero, the ability to do so will always be there and Activision can't legally force the modification of code on Harmonix's part to keep that from happening, especially since Harmonix will be relasing their own wireless guitar (sabotaging one will sabotage the other).

    I own both systems and hope to have great games on both (okay, I hope to have great games on the PS3, you know more than just R & C, I already have great games on my 360). Sony has screwed themselves over big time by not having set-standards. Sure, UT3 will have user-made content but the online interface for so many other games just hasn't been there and ranking on Eye of Judgement is BULLSHIT.

    Sure the 360 isn't completely free of bugs (Crackdown's multi-player saved data glitch?), but there are a whole lot less problems with the 360 software-wise than with the PS3.

    MisterGrok on
    GamerTag: aintnodancer
  • MoogPaulMoogPaul Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    The Rock Band full package came with a guitar, drums, drum sticks, and a mic.
    Guitar Hero package comes with a guitar.

    The whole idea is like this.
    Harmonix is being cool about the whole thing by saying, "Hey you want two guitars? Go ahead and save yourself some money by picking yourself up GH3 Bundle and then you'll have two music games."
    Activision is being the dick saying, "You want to play Guitar Hero with two guitars? Go buy another Activision guitar."

    Edit: and to all praising microsoft for having controller standards, remember, microsoft has these standards so they can take a wee bit of profit from every kind of xbox360 controller sold. It may have worked out in this case, but this isn't really the way this should be working. It results in 3rd party controllers having to raise the price on their stuff.

    MoogPaul on
    moogpaul.png
  • arod_77arod_77 __BANNED USERS regular
    edited December 2007
    Its not like you could play GH3 with an RB strat, you would be proper fucked

    arod_77 on
    glitteratsigcopy.jpg
  • noir_bloodnoir_blood Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    MoogPaul wrote: »
    The Rock Band full package came with a guitar, drums, drum sticks, and a mic.
    Guitar Hero package comes with a guitar.

    The whole idea is like this.
    Harmonix is being cool about the whole thing by saying, "Hey you want two guitars? Go ahead and save yourself some money by picking yourself up GH3 Bundle and then you'll have two music games."
    Activision is being the dick saying, "You want to play Guitar Hero with two guitars? Go buy another Activision guitar."


    Not quite, considering the fact you can't buy the Rock Band guitar separately as of yet. So what HX is really saying is "Hey, you want two guitars? Sorry, can't sell you my version. Go buy one from Red Octane"

    And while Activision might not have much in hand with R D, Redoctane sure did, and they are in hands with Activision.

    I'm not saying this isn't a stupid move by Activision, it's just annoying how we immediately have to jump to good guys/bad guys

    noir_blood on
  • EvanderEvander Disappointed Father Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    Is it strange that I'm pissed at Harmonix here?

    I mean, they are trying to make a public scene in order to get their way, rather than looking to come to some kind of a business arangement.



    Rock Band shipped with only one guitar, presumable because folks could just use a guitar hero guitar for the second one. That is all well and good on Harmonix/EA's part, but if you were Activision, wouldn't you rather people played YOUR games, rather than buying them solely so that they could use the peripheral for some one else's games? Sure, there is a sale involved there, but there is NO purchasing of DLC, or value to advertisers, etc.



    I don't like the fact that Activision has made this decision, but it IS their perogative, and Harmonix is acting very poorly by trying to turn it into a public spectacle.

    Evander on
  • meteredsectionmeteredsection Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    noir_blood wrote: »
    Not quite, considering the fact you can't buy the Rock Band guitar separately as of yet. So what HX is really saying is "Hey, you want two guitars? Sorry, can't sell you my version. Go buy one from Red Octane"

    And while Activision might not have much in hand with R D, Redoctane sure did, and they are in hands with Activision.

    I'm not saying this isn't a stupid move by Activision, it's just annoying how we immediately have to jump to good guys/bad guys

    Yeah, but, um, this is good for Activision. They're blocking a scenario that would drive sales of their product. I'm legitimately puzzled by this. I understand why they block RB guitars in GH3 (even though I think it's short-sighted and will backfire on them in the long run), but I cannot see why it's in their best interest to prevent people from buying their hardware for any reason. If they sell their hardware, they make money. This isn't a console-style business model, and I seriously doubt their guitars are loss leaders.

    Beyond whether it makes good short-term business sense, I think we can all agree it's customer-hostile, and I treat companies that are customer-hostile as bad guys.

    meteredsection on
    Jack+Durden.png
  • EvanderEvander Disappointed Father Registered User regular
    edited December 2007
    mcdermott wrote: »
    FreddyD wrote: »
    Scalfin wrote: »
    I think Activision's doing it to prevent another company from profiting off their R&D, which is quite reasonable.
    What R&D? Harmonix created the series.
    Hey, it takes time and money to make minor ergonomic improvements to a fake plastic guitar.

    And, from everything I've heard, fuck up the technicals while they were at it.

    And no, the first (and I believe second) installments were not published by Activision. They had jack shit to do with the original development of the GH controller.

    Red Octane made the controlelr, NOT Harmonix.

    Red Octane is still with the GH series, I believe, and have come out AGAINST allowing use of the Rock Band controllers on Guitar Hero (stated something along the lines of "we could impliment it if we wanted to, but with all of theproblems that RB controllers have been having why would we want to cause that kind of headache for ourselves?")

    Evander on
Sign In or Register to comment.