The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
Gun Control Thread and the Temple of Doom
Thanatos
Registered User regular
Registered User regular
Yes, because Obama has definitely made gun control his #1 priority.I really need to stop procrastinating and buy an AR-15 for 3-gun. I don't know how Obama can lose the general election. The end of limited gun rights is nigh. At least it will be a switch in terms of how the feds are bossing us around. The neocons wear on you after a while.
The man never shuts up about it.
Thanatos on
0
Posts
Hillary has already been burned by gun control and would never touch it. Obama is probably dumb enough to try to bring Chicago gun control to the national level (federalism, anyone?)
Could you at least be internally consistent in your trolling? Obama will tell me how to eat! The President doesn't make the laws!
That was within a span of hours.
Yeah, I remember how when the AWB was in effect, it was impossible to buy a gun anywhere. Truly the end is nigh for the noble gun enthusiast.
Your right to be inane on the internet is in no immediate jeopardy, though I don't know if a sad face really excuses "he's going to tell me how to eat lawl lawl".
And I like the right to not get shot in the face. You don't have the right to arm yourself with all sorts of things. That should include assault weapons.
Besides, no would be tyrant would ever remove the 2nd amendment. That's the weakest defense amongst the populace. They'd go after habeus corpus, due process, judicial oversight...
You guys have spent decades completely and utterly failing to defend anyone else's rights - I mean, really, the record of gun types at defending rights is pathetic, it's abysmal - so please don't expect us to go crying for your lost wang-substitutes.
1) Buying guns.
2) Not paying taxes.
Wow.
I guess dumbfucks can get surprised too.
Move to gun thread, please, so we can actually get an actual reasonable discussion here.
XBL Gametag: mailarde
Screen Digest LOL3RZZ
And beer cans. And little metal duckies on a track.
This is literally the first reasonable thing I've ever seen in D&D. I don't care if you completely disagree with me on everything else.
I should screen capture this and open it up the next time I think about venturing into this forum.
Wait- are you pro-gun or anti-gun? I'm honestly confused.
It is rather hard to argue against little metal duckies on a track.
Maybe that's why they get shot at so much.
What are the major differences between this AWB and the previous one?
Please ban bayonets and require homeowners to use trigger locks.
If you ever need to talk to someone, feel free to message me. Yes, that includes you.
Somehow I doubt that. Did you even read the primary thread before dropping in? There's a lot of good crunchy info there for anyone willing to invest a few minutes.
Anyway, guns. I would like to hear your answer to my contention that you really haven't done much to defend any actual non-second amendment rights with them. In the past eight years we've seen privacy and habeus corpus go largely out the window, and you guys were not manning any barricades that I saw.
2) "Assault weapon" is basically a meaningless term at this point.
3) Consider ElJeffe's post limed. The assault weapons ban is retarded.
4) Most anti-gun pundits are retarded.
5) Most pro-gun pundits are retarded.
6) Most people who speak out on this issue at all are retarded.
7) The Second Amendment is retarded.
8) The whole situation is retarded.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Your mistake is in assuming that I'm one of the ones a-tryin to take your guns away. I think maybe individual municipalities should be able to make certain reasonable restrictions, but generally I take the NRA at their word and assume that the problem is a lack of enforcement of the existing laws.
And that's where the problem is. Just saying 'fully automatic' doesn't even really answer it appropriately and has lots of issues on definition in its own right. Doesn't necessarily mean that a proper definition or categorization exists, though.
If you ban flesh-melting holy arks of the covenant, only outlaws will have flesh-melting holy arks of the covenant.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I just posted in a gun control thread, so by my own reasoning I am also retarded.
So you're in good company.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I'm expecting them to stop using bullshit fictitious arguments about how they're standing by to defend freedom for all of us. Because so far all they're doing is standing.
Outlaws and nazis. And I hate Illinois nazis.