I'm not sure how the last two seasons were, but in season 2 5v5s, in my battlegroup, 1950 was still within the top 3%. Most people aren't going to get anywhere near 2000 (I've hit 2k, but only once before I stopped arenaing seriously, and that wasn't our ending rating).
Of course, team composition makes an absurd difference.
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
poisnedcoke on
I'm trilltastic, trilldacious even!
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
I'm not sure how the last two seasons were, but in season 2 5v5s, in my battlegroup, 1950 was still within the top 3%. Most people aren't going to get anywhere near 2000 (I've hit 2k, but only once before I stopped arenaing seriously, and that wasn't our ending rating).
Of course, team composition makes an absurd difference.
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
It's about middle. I don't know if it's changed though since s2 though, and this was 5s, not 2s. Lot less teams.
End on
I wish that someway, somehow, that I could save every one of us
I'm not sure how the last two seasons were, but in season 2 5v5s, in my battlegroup, 1950 was still within the top 3%. Most people aren't going to get anywhere near 2000 (I've hit 2k, but only once before I stopped arenaing seriously, and that wasn't our ending rating).
Of course, team composition makes an absurd difference.
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
It's about middle. I don't know if it's changed though since s2 though, and this was 5s, not 2s. Lot less teams.
Top 3% being sub 2k is pretty bad regardless of the bracket. I've seen a fuckton of bad players with s3 shoulders, you have to either not try, have no gear, or be god awful to not at least get close to them.
I'm not sure how the last two seasons were, but in season 2 5v5s, in my battlegroup, 1950 was still within the top 3%. Most people aren't going to get anywhere near 2000 (I've hit 2k, but only once before I stopped arenaing seriously, and that wasn't our ending rating).
Of course, team composition makes an absurd difference.
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
It's about middle. I don't know if it's changed though since s2 though, and this was 5s, not 2s. Lot less teams.
Top 3% being sub 2k is pretty bad regardless of the bracket. I've seen a fuckton of bad players with s3 shoulders, you have to either not try, have no gear, or be god awful to not at least get close to them.
This doesn't really make sense to me. Let's say battlegroup G is full of amazing teams and players. The overall ratings are going to be lower. Battlegroup X has a bunch of great teams, and a lot of awful teams. Ratings of the good teams will be higher than those on Battlegroup G. How can you judge the overall quality of a battlegroup by ratings alone? You can't, because there are way too many factors.
I'm not sure how the last two seasons were, but in season 2 5v5s, in my battlegroup, 1950 was still within the top 3%. Most people aren't going to get anywhere near 2000 (I've hit 2k, but only once before I stopped arenaing seriously, and that wasn't our ending rating).
Of course, team composition makes an absurd difference.
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
It's about middle. I don't know if it's changed though since s2 though, and this was 5s, not 2s. Lot less teams.
Top 3% being sub 2k is pretty bad regardless of the bracket. I've seen a fuckton of bad players with s3 shoulders, you have to either not try, have no gear, or be god awful to not at least get close to them.
This doesn't really make sense to me. Let's say battlegroup G is full of amazing teams and players. The overall ratings are going to be lower. Battlegroup X has a bunch of great teams, and a lot of awful teams. Ratings of the good teams will be higher than those on Battlegroup G. How can you judge the overall quality of a battlegroup by ratings alone? You can't, because there are way too many factors.
BG 9 has pretty much shot that theory to shit in the past (Now it's nothing special, but s2 and 3 it was the peak of competition). Every BG has around the same population, meaning they should have around the same arena teams. The more teams with a high rating raise amount you need to have X%. Combine that with active teams and a lot of teams rerolling and reforming the bgs with the better players generally have higher numbers to be top %. For instance on my bg glad in 2s last season was only 2180 or something like that. In my friend's bg it was 2100. Come S4 my bg had (And has still) more players with shoulders/weapon. Is this absolute proof that the bg is better? No it could mean the disparity between top players and the average player is larger on my bg than his. But on average the battlegroups that have a higher overall rating have generally had the better players overall and the better top-end players.
I'm not sure how the last two seasons were, but in season 2 5v5s, in my battlegroup, 1950 was still within the top 3%. Most people aren't going to get anywhere near 2000 (I've hit 2k, but only once before I stopped arenaing seriously, and that wasn't our ending rating).
Of course, team composition makes an absurd difference.
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
It's about middle. I don't know if it's changed though since s2 though, and this was 5s, not 2s. Lot less teams.
Top 3% being sub 2k is pretty bad regardless of the bracket. I've seen a fuckton of bad players with s3 shoulders, you have to either not try, have no gear, or be god awful to not at least get close to them.
This doesn't really make sense to me. Let's say battlegroup G is full of amazing teams and players. The overall ratings are going to be lower. Battlegroup X has a bunch of great teams, and a lot of awful teams. Ratings of the good teams will be higher than those on Battlegroup G. How can you judge the overall quality of a battlegroup by ratings alone? You can't, because there are way too many factors.
BG 9 has pretty much shot that theory to shit in the past (Now it's nothing special, but s2 and 3 it was the peak of competition). Every BG has around the same population, meaning they should have around the same arena teams. The more teams with a high rating raise amount you need to have X%. Combine that with active teams and a lot of teams rerolling and reforming the bgs with the better players generally have higher numbers to be top %. For instance on my bg glad in 2s last season was only 2180 or something like that. In my friend's bg it was 2100. Come S4 my bg had (And has still) more players with shoulders/weapon. Is this absolute proof that the bg is better? No it could mean the disparity between top players and the average player is larger on my bg than his. But on average the battlegroups that have a higher overall rating have generally had the better players overall and the better top-end players.
I've sat on these for ages, but I played WoW a while back, and refused to wear armor if it didn't look good. I didn't do so well.
(Spoilered for H-Scroll raaaaaaape.)
I also once played an ex-pornstar ex-wrestler Superhero called 'Hot Chocolate'.
For a while, he hung out with this japanese ex-wrestler guy that spoke pretty bad english, and liked to dance, hip-thrust style, in the middle of arresting evildooers. FWOOOOOOH!
No joke, the pics with Hard Gay are the funniest shit I've seen on the MMO forums here.
weenus on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Hooraydiation wrote: And I don't care how distraught you are. It's just impolite to shoot yourself when someone has their dick inside you.
No joke, the pics with Hard Gay are the funniest shit I've seen on the MMO forums here.
Man, you should have tried teaming with him. He'd be martial-arts-fuing people in the face, then he'd suddenly start dancing and going 'FWOOOOOOO!' in localchat. The guy had it macroed.
And then, when the option for shorts came out? Down with the leather pants. ON WITH THE LEATHER SHORTS AND MOTORCYCLE BOOTS.
I don't know if America is ready for Hard Gay, but that guy is awesome.
An adult man who rubs his crotch in little girl's faces? That will go over well, I am sure.
Actually, in all the clips I've seen, it's the little girls that are doing the rubbing. It's insane, and quite highly japanese. I don't think anything is meant by it, but that's hard to swallow. (OH SNAP)
Tonight, more screenshots of hilarious hi-jinks, I think. I don't have any of my chica that can summon CLOUDS OF RAIN AND THUNDER, after all. (Raincoat, duster-hat, and the 'Drowned Rat' badge. Just don't ask her name.)
No joke, the pics with Hard Gay are the funniest shit I've seen on the MMO forums here.
Man, you should have tried teaming with him. He'd be martial-arts-fuing people in the face, then he'd suddenly start dancing and going 'FWOOOOOOO!' in localchat. The guy had it macroed.
And then, when the option for shorts came out? Down with the leather pants. ON WITH THE LEATHER SHORTS AND MOTORCYCLE BOOTS.
(It just got better and better.)
Aww, that's it?
No, "Say say say say saaaayyy!?"
And pants was why I didn't recognize him as Hahdo Gei.
Oh, he had "Say say say sayyyy?!?" as well as "FWOOOOOO!" and a few others. I just don't remember all the catchphrases.
...The shorts outfit was the worst. I think he switched the muscletop vest for the biker jacket without any arms to make a half-decent leather vest, too.
Kay2 on
0
HenroidMexican kicked from Immigration ThreadCentrism is Racism :3Registered Userregular
Posts
Your battlegroup is pretty fail then.
It's about middle. I don't know if it's changed though since s2 though, and this was 5s, not 2s. Lot less teams.
Top 3% being sub 2k is pretty bad regardless of the bracket. I've seen a fuckton of bad players with s3 shoulders, you have to either not try, have no gear, or be god awful to not at least get close to them.
janetrabbit22og5.jpg
Bock, bock, bock.
I am a corporate whore.
hahaha
This doesn't really make sense to me. Let's say battlegroup G is full of amazing teams and players. The overall ratings are going to be lower. Battlegroup X has a bunch of great teams, and a lot of awful teams. Ratings of the good teams will be higher than those on Battlegroup G. How can you judge the overall quality of a battlegroup by ratings alone? You can't, because there are way too many factors.
BG 9 has pretty much shot that theory to shit in the past (Now it's nothing special, but s2 and 3 it was the peak of competition). Every BG has around the same population, meaning they should have around the same arena teams. The more teams with a high rating raise amount you need to have X%. Combine that with active teams and a lot of teams rerolling and reforming the bgs with the better players generally have higher numbers to be top %. For instance on my bg glad in 2s last season was only 2180 or something like that. In my friend's bg it was 2100. Come S4 my bg had (And has still) more players with shoulders/weapon. Is this absolute proof that the bg is better? No it could mean the disparity between top players and the average player is larger on my bg than his. But on average the battlegroups that have a higher overall rating have generally had the better players overall and the better top-end players.
I guess I just fail at math then, because... wut?
They should just ditch all this. One player, one rating, that's it. If you suck for a while, man up and work your way back up.
No joke, the pics with Hard Gay are the funniest shit I've seen on the MMO forums here.
Hooraydiation wrote: And I don't care how distraught you are. It's just impolite to shoot yourself when someone has their dick inside you.
Man, you should have tried teaming with him. He'd be martial-arts-fuing people in the face, then he'd suddenly start dancing and going 'FWOOOOOOO!' in localchat. The guy had it macroed.
And then, when the option for shorts came out? Down with the leather pants. ON WITH THE LEATHER SHORTS AND MOTORCYCLE BOOTS.
(It just got better and better.)
Actually, in all the clips I've seen, it's the little girls that are doing the rubbing. It's insane, and quite highly japanese. I don't think anything is meant by it, but that's hard to swallow. (OH SNAP)
Tonight, more screenshots of hilarious hi-jinks, I think. I don't have any of my chica that can summon CLOUDS OF RAIN AND THUNDER, after all. (Raincoat, duster-hat, and the 'Drowned Rat' badge. Just don't ask her name.)
It's just a Gimmick...
He married a female swimsuit model years ago...
Aww, that's it?
No, "Say say say say saaaayyy!?"
And pants was why I didn't recognize him as Hahdo Gei.
...The shorts outfit was the worst. I think he switched the muscletop vest for the biker jacket without any arms to make a half-decent leather vest, too.
Boobs.
I took this juuuuuuuuust for you.
XOXO
SIGH
Now some of Huntsman Stollen
You can't really tell, but that is the whole horizon whiting out from Hamidon's death explosion (the biggest monster in the game)
Rikti Dropships performing bombing runs to soften up resistance in Grandville before ground infantry is beamed in.
Me fighting alongside both Heroes and Villians against a small army of Rikti as part of Lady Grey's task force.
The fallen form of one of the Rikti's greatest warriors in the tragic finale of Lady Grey's task force. (SPOILERS)
"My God... Hero One... What did they do to you?"D:
Thighs can be sexy.
GM: Rusty Chains (DH Ongoing)
>_>
<_<
Super tiny boobs and giant fat lady thighs and legs
Also her waist is about 4 inches around.
GM: Rusty Chains (DH Ongoing)
There's nothing wrong with just admitting you are attracted to men, you know.
wow character models look awful
all of them
if you find them sexy there's something wrong with you
No need to get defensive, we all love wangs here.