I edited the Charles Darwin section and was quickly banned. I should have been subtler. For example, I should have said he supported abortion somewhere.
First to edit the penny arcade entry on conservapedia to add "Penny Arcade forums is a well known place where liberal communists convene to plot the downfall of America." gets a cookie.
I was going to suggest that the article mention all the comics in which Jesus appears.
"In the comic appearing on *date*, Jesus Christ descended from Heaven amidst choirs of angels, expressing enthusiasm for deep-fried Twinkies."
It should make it sound like Penny Arcade isn't making fun of Jesus at all.
Whoever sneaks the picture of Jesus throwing up the horns into the Jesus entry wins the internets.
remember, if it doesn't stay up for at least ten minutes, it doesn't count.
The Jesus article is locked from being edited, or I was totally on it.
Erandus on
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
0
Options
No-QuarterNothing To FearBut Fear ItselfRegistered Userregular
The Blackbird is the nickname for the Lockheed SR-71.
It was a Mach 3+ reconnaissance aircraft designed by Clarence L "Kelly" Johnson at Lockheed's "Skunk Works" plant in the late 1950's, the Blackbird served until 1989. In 1994, the program was reactivated under NASA, and the aircraft continued to fly until 1999.
Someone should put in there that "Blackbirds are also birds used in making delicious pies.
Couscous on
0
Options
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
The Blackbird is the nickname for the Lockheed SR-71.
It was a Mach 3+ reconnaissance aircraft designed by Clarence L "Kelly" Johnson at Lockheed's "Skunk Works" plant in the late 1950's, the Blackbird served until 1989. In 1994, the program was reactivated under NASA, and the aircraft continued to fly until 1999.
Someone should put in there that "Blackbirds are also birds used in making delicious pies.
...the best of which require no less than 24 birds to make.
I found a good one. A while back Conservapedia had a contest to design a new logo for the site.
This is the logo that won.
Designed by a guy called BillOReillyFan, it went up on the sites main page for a week or so before someone noticed something amiss. Look carefully. (Edit: actually its pretty easy to see on this forum.). A hidden alpha channel! Also open the file in notepad and written at the bottom is:
Thank you for investigating this file
enough to find this little note.
Here's a treat for you:
Place this image onto a dark
background and look real close.
If you can't see anything, use
graphical manipulation software
to up the brightness and contrast.
You'll find out what I actually
feel about this website.
You see, I find the very existence of
Conservapedia repugnant. Please do not
use this website. It really is a crock of
shit.
* believe that there are no inherent differences between men and women and that all inequality is the result of men oppressing women[4]
* view traditional marriage as unacceptably patriarchal
* prefer shirking traditional gender activities, like baking [5]
* support affirmative action for women * detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewife,[6] and especially dislike those who defend such roles
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do[7][8]
* seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines
* flat-out refuse to take the husband's last name when marrying[9]
Actually, you can probably add crazy shit to that article as long as it fits the conservative mindset and you are golden. What are some feminist stereotypes that aren't on there?
Probability that a "news commenter" mentioned in an article is a reference from FreeRepublic: 0.68
News commenters have noted that FreeRepublic is a stalwart Conservative organization with strong ties to the factual underpinings of Conservapedia's Quest for Truth.
There are quite a few counter-studies out there that directly contradict their information, and I belive every creditable psychiatric organization out there has given up on calling homosexuality a mental disorder or the idea that it's mutable.
Actually, you can probably add crazy shit to that article as long as it fits the conservative mindset and you are golden. What are some feminist stereotypes that aren't on there?
Not to suggest that it's particularly common amongst feminists, but I have heard the pejorative term "breeder" thrown around for a woman who has children at a young age and stays at home with them.
Actually, you can probably add crazy shit to that article as long as it fits the conservative mindset and you are golden. What are some feminist stereotypes that aren't on there?
* believe that there are no inherent differences between men and women and that all inequality is the result of men oppressing women[4]
* view traditional marriage as unacceptably patriarchal
* prefer shirking traditional gender activities, like baking [5]
* support affirmative action for women * detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewife,[6] and especially dislike those who defend such roles
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do[7][8]
* seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines
* flat-out refuse to take the husband's last name when marrying[9]
Actually, you can probably add crazy shit to that article as long as it fits the conservative mindset and you are golden. What are some feminist stereotypes that aren't on there?
Are disproportionately likely to be lesbians. And not the hot asian kind, neither.
moniker on
0
Options
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
* believe that there are no inherent differences between men and women and that all inequality is the result of men oppressing women[4]
* view traditional marriage as unacceptably patriarchal
* prefer shirking traditional gender activities, like baking [5]
* support affirmative action for women * detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewife,[6] and especially dislike those who defend such roles
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do[7][8]
* seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines
* flat-out refuse to take the husband's last name when marrying[9]
Actually, you can probably add crazy shit to that article as long as it fits the conservative mindset and you are golden. What are some feminist stereotypes that aren't on there?
Are disproportionately likely to be lesbians. And not the hot asian kind, neither.
"are more likely than the general population to be homosexual, a sexual orientation widely regarded as a sin"
Couscous on
0
Options
Gabriel_Pitt(effective against Russian warships)Registered Userregular
Not to suggest that it's particularly common amongst feminists, but I have heard the pejorative term "breeder" thrown around for a woman who has children at a young age and stays at home with them.
It's the perjorative of choice anytime you want to mock someone's family choice, not limited to any one group, although I always want to punch someone through the internet when I hear someone use it. Especially self-proclaimed child-free types.
So what does conservapedia say about the child free movement? I'm using my bro-in-law's laptop, and I don't want that coming up in the history,
Children without families are known as orphans. They reside in orphanages, and they generally want to be adopted by loving parents.
I can't make this shit up.
Someone should put "In a study by scientists, orphans voted 10 to 1 their preference for being adopted by hetereosexual parents. The dissenters were noted as having mental health issues."
Posts
Anti-Homosexuality Sermon Suspiciously Well-Informed
My word suggestion is "pie" or "pies".
I think any edits with the word should be subtle at first, perhaps where it is relevant.. then sneak it in more and more.
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
The Jesus article is locked from being edited, or I was totally on it.
:winky:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Pie
This links to blackbird. Someone should put in there that "Blackbirds are also birds used in making delicious pies.
...the best of which require no less than 24 birds to make.
Your wish is my command.
Damn, they were all over my shit too. IP Blocked and article reverted within 1 minute.
and Hard.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Laura_Bush
Add "Laura Bush has released a recipe for President's Pecan Pie." For fun, insert the .gov link as a source.
God damn them! God! Damn them to hell!
This should actually be done, since it's true and funny.
Laura Bush likes pecan pie? I knew there was another reason I liked her beyond librarian-ness.
I suppose you are banned so can't add it? Who here isn't banned?
Wikipedia, like reality, has a well known liberal bias.
Just until 2013. Hahaha!
Steps forward, I am not banned Mr. President!
I haven't yet created an account, i've been trying to think of something really, really good to add before I go get myself banned.
---
I've got a spare copy of Portal, if anyone wants it message me.
This is the logo that won.
Designed by a guy called BillOReillyFan, it went up on the sites main page for a week or so before someone noticed something amiss. Look carefully. (Edit: actually its pretty easy to see on this forum.). A hidden alpha channel! Also open the file in notepad and written at the bottom is:
Thank you for investigating this file
enough to find this little note.
Here's a treat for you:
Place this image onto a dark
background and look real close.
If you can't see anything, use
graphical manipulation software
to up the brightness and contrast.
You'll find out what I actually
feel about this website.
You see, I find the very existence of
Conservapedia repugnant. Please do not
use this website. It really is a crock of
shit.
-- MarkyH, concerned "liberal."
The logo was quickly removed.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Feminism Actually, you can probably add crazy shit to that article as long as it fits the conservative mindset and you are golden. What are some feminist stereotypes that aren't on there?
News commenters have noted that FreeRepublic is a stalwart Conservative organization with strong ties to the factual underpinings of Conservapedia's Quest for Truth.
I am guessing this would be unacceptable to add..
I'm going to guess that they have some filter set up to warn them about newly registered people making changes.
Also I think people need to be a little more subtle with their changes if they hope to get away with it.
secretly plot to castrate unborn fetuses
have buzz-cuts
own rosey the riveter posters
are dykes
and deserving of a Cameronesque Award. So many bogus statistics.
just needs a good deep dickin'?
Are disproportionately likely to be lesbians. And not the hot asian kind, neither.
What happens when you follow the instructions?
...can you not see the shadow lettering?
"are more likely than the general population to be homosexual, a sexual orientation widely regarded as a sin"
So what does conservapedia say about the child free movement? I'm using my bro-in-law's laptop, and I don't want that coming up in the history,
The use of the world "generally" in that quote is what really gets me.
Someone should put "In a study by scientists, orphans voted 10 to 1 their preference for being adopted by hetereosexual parents. The dissenters were noted as having mental health issues."
some orphans are gay, and secretly plot to destroy loving families