The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I live in the US, and am currently taking a international relations class. The begining of class we usually start off by discussing current events abroad, and that means anywhere but where i live, the US. Note that this is not for a grade, it's just something he likes to do because he doesn't appear to be able to it much outside of our classes.
My problem comes from the fact that I only really get foreign news from here, and only when it gets big enough to warrant a large deal of attention. As it stands, I get a large amount of my domestic news from blogs, sites similar to boingboing.net, and here. If you guys could suggests some good blogs, or hell, even large reliable websites (like bbc is usually better than most US new outlets), that would be rocking.
I suggest the Economist. You should be able to get it at your school library or read it online at www.economist.com it is one of the more respected international news magazines (they refer to themselves as a newspaper though). I find their coverage to be valuable enough to subscribe, and their subscriptions are relatively expensive.
Yeah, the economist is good stuff. They seem to be pretty unbiased and factual and don't indulge in sensationalism. I guess their target market are the sort of people who actually need solid news to make decisions rather than reading the paper to be entertained or have their political biases validated.
Canada is currently in the middle of a federal election. The result could significantly affect the way Canada does business with the U.S. (think possible renegotiation of NAFTA).
There's the International Herald Tribute. http://www.iht.com. It's an American newspaper based in France and I think run by the New York Times, and it is a very good source of news.
Then there's always the journal Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.org. I highly recommend that, but they're long, in-depth articles and policy papers, not just news tidbits. However, reading an article from there would leave you far more informed than your average peer.
The Economist is also excellent. However, Szech is incorrect in that they are widely known to have a free market/pro-globalization bias in their journalism (see the Wiki page for more). I'd say this is more an editorial point of view (many newspapers have a similar slant) than a Fox News type of political pandering, though, but just keep it in mind.
I read Economist, that Times' (LA Times, London Time, NY Times) and then look for the English language version published in the capitol of any important countries that get mentioned (Islamabad Post, for example), mainly because it's useful to know what the people on the other side of the world are being told about the same issue. FA is decent. FP is horseshit.
SammyF on
0
ceresWhen the last moon is cast over the last star of morningAnd the future has past without even a last desperate warningRegistered User, ModeratorMod Emeritus
edited September 2008
That BBC news site in the first reply. Seriously.
ceres on
And it seems like all is dying, and would leave the world to mourn
The Economist is also excellent. However, Szech is incorrect in that they are widely known to have a free market/pro-globalization bias in their journalism (see the Wiki page for more). I'd say this is more an editorial point of view (many newspapers have a similar slant) than a Fox News type of political pandering, though, but just keep it in mind.
True, but I can guarantee that you'll never see it outside of the editorials.
Al Jazeera is definitely on level-pegging with the BBC News. They hired a lot of respected BBC journos for their English reporting, so I would strongly recommend it for a less anglo-american-centric view.
I know I'm probably biased but I have seen too much misreporting by Al Jazeera to recommend it. I guess they might be okay for general news around Europe and the Far East, but for ME stuff I wouldn't recommend them.
I know I'm probably biased but I have seen too much misreporting by Al Jazeera to recommend it. I guess they might be okay for general news around Europe and the Far East, but for ME stuff I wouldn't recommend them.
Actually? If you have evidence of misreporting I'm interested.
Wikipedia has them criticized by some Arabic countries for being "pro-israel" and the U.S. had commended them before 9/11... at which point they were accused of being propaganda when they aired the video of Osama Bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks.
I know I'm probably biased but I have seen too much misreporting by Al Jazeera to recommend it. I guess they might be okay for general news around Europe and the Far East, but for ME stuff I wouldn't recommend them.
Actually? If you have evidence of misreporting I'm interested.
Wikipedia has them criticized by some Arabic countries for being "pro-israel" and the U.S. had commended them before 9/11... at which point they were accused of being propaganda when they aired the video of Osama Bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks.
I wasn't saying they were bent against Israel- just that I've found some of their reporting off neutral. I don't have aby big name examples of lies or anything (no Jenin, sorry :winky:), it's just a tone of slant that I take a little personally considering my background. I see it in a multitude of directions (from major news sources) and it's always struck me as particularly apparent with AlJ. I may be sensitive.
As I mentioned before, in the information age, it's important to know what's being reported--even if it's biased or inaccurate--as much as it's important to know the facts on the ground because when it comes to government relations, oftentimes perception = reality. Watching a little Al Jazeera can be useful and important even if you disbelieve everything they report because if they're going off on an anti-American rant for ten minutes regarding relations between Syria and Lebanon, that should tell you about how their traditional audience is thinking about current affairs.
I still prefer foreign language or English language local dailies because they have editorial sections, and you can get right to the editorializing and not have to wade through their presentation of the facts. Generally, though, you should be skeptical of any news service of any nationality--don't look at it like raw information, look at it as a presentation of a point of view.
Posts
Also I guess http://english.aljazeera.net/ might give an alternative slant on issues, especially middle eastern ones.
Oh, and most places syndicate http://www.reuters.com/ reports anyway, so might as well go straight to the source.
www.cbc.ca is your best source for news.
Then there's always the journal Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.org. I highly recommend that, but they're long, in-depth articles and policy papers, not just news tidbits. However, reading an article from there would leave you far more informed than your average peer.
The Economist is also excellent. However, Szech is incorrect in that they are widely known to have a free market/pro-globalization bias in their journalism (see the Wiki page for more). I'd say this is more an editorial point of view (many newspapers have a similar slant) than a Fox News type of political pandering, though, but just keep it in mind.
True, but I can guarantee that you'll never see it outside of the editorials.
Actually? If you have evidence of misreporting I'm interested.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera#Criticism_and_controversy
Wikipedia has them criticized by some Arabic countries for being "pro-israel" and the U.S. had commended them before 9/11... at which point they were accused of being propaganda when they aired the video of Osama Bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks.
I wasn't saying they were bent against Israel- just that I've found some of their reporting off neutral. I don't have aby big name examples of lies or anything (no Jenin, sorry :winky:), it's just a tone of slant that I take a little personally considering my background. I see it in a multitude of directions (from major news sources) and it's always struck me as particularly apparent with AlJ. I may be sensitive.
I still prefer foreign language or English language local dailies because they have editorial sections, and you can get right to the editorializing and not have to wade through their presentation of the facts. Generally, though, you should be skeptical of any news service of any nationality--don't look at it like raw information, look at it as a presentation of a point of view.