The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Legal advice - shoplifting?

mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
edited August 2009 in Help / Advice Forum
A very close friend of mine has gotten herself into some possible legal trouble. I'm looking for advice on her behalf. For reference, she is eighteen years old, and lives in Victoria, Australia. Advice on whether or not to lawyer up, while helpful, might be hard to follow through. She has a 700 dollar credit card bill she was expecting to be able to pay off, but due to this problem she'll be unable to and practically has twenty dollars to her name with her parents in a similar situation.

Here's the story

My friend, we'll call her Jessica, worked at a local supermarket (not a large chain) from April 2007 to present. Basically she has discounted approximately $500 (AUD) worth of groceries for friends by just not scanning them. I'm assuming it'll be hard to see whether or not she isn't scanning them as she'd still move them over the laser. Her friends do this too, but worse. One of her friends works in the alcohol department and doesn't scan stuff. He's probably stolen about 20,000 dollars worth of booze over a two or three year period.

Basically the ten or so people who are involved have been fired at once. Except for her.Her shifts were all cancelled and she went into enquire as to why.She was told she wasa person of interest and they were investigating her. They basically threatened her (a security guard and the manager) to rat out all her friends. She said she had nothing to tell them and left. The cameras in the store above the register are approximately 3 metres away and positioned on the roof for reference.

Her friends, who are in a similar situation have been offered a contract of say 20,000 dollars, 15,000 dollars or 3,000 dollars that if they pay that amount within two years, they won't be charbged. It IS possible to get a copy of this contract. I'm assuming this is hella fucking illegal.

As of now, they haven't formally charged anyone, but a few of her friends have signed payment plan contracts to "make it go away"

I of course told them to lawyer the fuck up, but what can you do.

SO. Advice? What's the worst case scenario that can arise for her? Can she get arrested? Will they send police to her house like they said they were going to? I'm pretty sure they're just bluffing and taking advantage of people, but it's got my friend pretty upset. What kind've punishment would she receive if she was found guilty? As I said she's eighteen, hasn't done anything ever before, is at university and is generally a fine...upstanding citizen I guess.

ANY advice is most welcome, I've calmed her down a bit, but I don't know much in the way of criminal law only civil.

mooshoepork on
«13

Posts

  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    If they have evidence of her stealing she can be arrested, the charges would depend on the amount stolen and jail time is doubtful, she'd probably be ordered to pay restitution. She should find legal aid in her area and give them a call.

    VisionOfClarity on
  • Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham Hopeless Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    See, this is tricky. Since she wasn't actually taking anything, and just letting people walk out the store with unpaid goods.

    Did she steal anything herself? Not really, and since it was only what, 500 dollars worth of stuff over the course of 2 years? That's a pretty good track record for a young cashier. She can probably just claim user error on the machine.

    If they had anything to charge her with, they would charge her. All she really has to say if she hasn't admitted anything yet is, 'I don't know what you are talking about, I've never stolen anything. I must have just failed to ring them up because I was not paying attention, I'm sorry.'

    Bendery It Like Beckham on
  • CrashtardCrashtard Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I used to work in a similar type store, and yes, you can be arrested for stealing. Seems like an odd question.
    Some people that I worked with got caught doing the same thing. A couple got off by paying back the thousands of dollars they had stolen, one went to jail for a few months. Honestly, they watch the employees scanning stuff more than customers. You definitely shouldn't give them a reason to want to watch you on the cameras.

    Crashtard on
    I pinky swear that we will not screw you.

    Crashtard.jpg
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    They'd have surveillance of her not scanning stuff I suppose. But It's probably <500 over a period of two years. The amount of effort to go through that amount of footage and find an exact number (which would be impossible unless the cameras show the screen) would be insane.

    mooshoepork on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    That really sounds like blackmail, but I'm not even sure it's illegal in the U.S., let alone Australia. She definitely needs a lawyer.

    Thanatos on
  • CrashtardCrashtard Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    See, this is tricky. Since she wasn't actually taking anything, and just letting people walk out the store with unpaid goods.

    Did she steal anything herself? Not really, and since it was only what, 500 dollars worth of stuff over the course of 2 years? That's a pretty good track record for a young cashier. She can probably just claim user error on the machine.

    This only works until they go back to review the video and see that it was the same people every time. They definitely do that sort of stuff.

    Crashtard on
    I pinky swear that we will not screw you.

    Crashtard.jpg
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    chances are the time and money involved in taking her to court far outweigh the amount they would retrieve from her. they will push for as much as they can in the meantime, but her best option is to cut contact with them and start looking for a new job

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    They'd have to go back at least a year or more to come to the conclusion is was 500 dollars or so. I think they're bluffing.

    Is it illegal to pressure them to sign a repayment contract?

    mooshoepork on
  • bsjezzbsjezz Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    They'd have to go back at least a year or more to come to the conclusion is was 500 dollars or so. I think they're bluffing.

    Is it illegal to pressure them to sign a repayment contract?

    i doubt it. from my limited experience (listening to my girlfriend's law lectures!) an offer to make or not make a legal filing in exchange for some compensation can be a legal and binding contract

    bsjezz on
    sC4Q4nq.jpg
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    bsjezz wrote: »
    They'd have to go back at least a year or more to come to the conclusion is was 500 dollars or so. I think they're bluffing.

    Is it illegal to pressure them to sign a repayment contract?

    i doubt it. from my limited experience (listening to my girlfriend's law lectures!) an offer to make or not make a legal filing in exchange for some compensation can be a legal and binding contract

    I just figured it was essentially blackmail "pay us x or we will go to the police"

    Any actual lawyers here? The contract thing isn't a big deal, I'm more worried about my friend. She hasn't been offered a contract yet.

    mooshoepork on
  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Are there lawyers in H&A, yes. Are there Australian lawyers in H&A, that I do not know.

    VisionOfClarity on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    How would they go about getting her arrested? They'd have to go to the station and show then the tapes I'm assuming? It might be pretty hard to proove depending on the resolution of the camera. It still looked like she scanned items.

    mooshoepork on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    bsjezz wrote: »
    They'd have to go back at least a year or more to come to the conclusion is was 500 dollars or so. I think they're bluffing.

    Is it illegal to pressure them to sign a repayment contract?

    i doubt it. from my limited experience (listening to my girlfriend's law lectures!) an offer to make or not make a legal filing in exchange for some compensation can be a legal and binding contract

    I just figured it was essentially blackmail "pay us x or we will go to the police"

    Any actual lawyers here? The contract thing isn't a big deal, I'm more worried about my friend. She hasn't been offered a contract yet.

    It's not blackmail. They caught her red-handed stealing. They're doing her a favor by offering her a way out that doesn't involve getting arrested and having that follow her around the rest of her life. Trust me, she's going to have a hard time finding a new job with this as a criminal mark on her record.

    Is it probably cheaper for them to just get her to pay? Undoubtedly, but don't act like they aren't doing her one huge ass favor too. Because they are.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    They haven't offered her to pay yet, they just said they were investigating her. That is all assuming she is found guilty though. They might not even be able to proove she didn't scan anything. Or they might be able to proove she did it a few times. I doubt they'll look through two years of records. It just seems to me like they are bluffing. Granted she's in a tricky situation, but I didn't think that they would bother, especially when they find out how much it was. They won't be able to come to the conclusion of 500 without looking through years

    Which is nothing compared to others who are getting done for 20k ++

    mooshoepork on
  • I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell UpI'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Sentry wrote: »
    bsjezz wrote: »
    They'd have to go back at least a year or more to come to the conclusion is was 500 dollars or so. I think they're bluffing.

    Is it illegal to pressure them to sign a repayment contract?

    i doubt it. from my limited experience (listening to my girlfriend's law lectures!) an offer to make or not make a legal filing in exchange for some compensation can be a legal and binding contract

    I just figured it was essentially blackmail "pay us x or we will go to the police"

    Any actual lawyers here? The contract thing isn't a big deal, I'm more worried about my friend. She hasn't been offered a contract yet.

    It's not blackmail. They caught her red-handed stealing. They're doing her a favor by offering her a way out that doesn't involve getting arrested and having that follow her around the rest of her life. Trust me, she's going to have a hard time finding a new job with this as a criminal mark on her record.

    Is it probably cheaper for them to just get her to pay? Undoubtedly, but don't act like they aren't doing her one huge ass favor too. Because they are.
    ultimately at this point it sounds like someone said that she was involved but they have no proof other than whoever said she was. that would be why she isn't working there until they review the tapes and why she was told about the contracts.

    I doubt they will be able to follow through with this unless they get more than one of the involved people as witnesses to her stealing. anything else can be passed off as mis-scanned items which even the best of cashiers do sometimes. She needs to lawyer up, admit to nothing and never do it again to say that they will be watching her closely from now on is a severe understatement

    I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up on
  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Or your friend is lying to you and doesn't want to admit that she has done a lot worse. They must know something if they knew to target her.

    VisionOfClarity on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    She is assuming she is fired as all her shifts have been cut, so she's looking for another job. I doubt someone would dob her in. They'll all pretty tight friends. Maybe one of the people getting done for 20k might...

    They told her she was at the bottom of their list, but they were still investigating her.

    mooshoepork on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Or your friend is lying to you and doesn't want to admit that she has done a lot worse. They must know something if they knew to target her.

    She isn't lying to me. I know that much. They are targeting everyone on front registers as far as I know. About eleven people. They have all been fired except her.

    edit: They haven't even charged anyone yet.

    mooshoepork on
  • KakodaimonosKakodaimonos Code fondler Helping the 1% get richerRegistered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Why are you posting details about all of this on a public board? I don't know what the cutoff is in Australia, but more than $500 US is getting into the range of felony charges. She needs to find a lawyer and talk to them.

    Kakodaimonos on
  • I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell UpI'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    She is assuming she is fired as all her shifts have been cut, so she's looking for another job. I doubt someone would dob her in. They'll all pretty tight friends. Maybe one of the people getting done for 20k might...

    They told her she was at the bottom of their list, but they were still investigating her.
    yeah there's a difference between being tight friends and being willing to pay an extra 13k rather than rat them out.

    if they haven't charged anyone it's probably just to assemble evidence and so they can get a few people to sign contracts.

    Obviously if she is looking for a job I would not list them as a reference.

    I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    No real names are mentioned. Not even a city. It's less than 500US, and to find that, they'd, as I said, have to look through years of surveillance. She'll talk to a lawyer soon. I just told her to wait until she got charged as money is tight.

    mooshoepork on
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2009
    I'm pretty sure they're just bluffing and taking advantage of people

    I just needed to point out that they've been taking advantage of the store for a long time so I dont think what the employees are doing is considered taking advantage as much as getting paid for all the shit your friends have been stealing.

    That said, I don't imagine they keep footage for more than a short period unless they have some fancy camera system with DVD backup and for some reason they choose to keep footage for a yearly basis. If anything its common for it to be only 30 days, especially if its a tape system.

    And if they knew shed done anything shed have been fired, they're fishing.

    DarkWarrior on
  • SatanIsMyMotorSatanIsMyMotor Fuck Warren Ellis Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Her employers are trying to settle out of court. There's nothing illegal about that. It's neither extortion or blackmail.

    If they're investigating it likely means just that, they don't know exactly what she stole so they are looking into it. If they've already nailed others then I'm sure they will end up with something legitimate on her. She should probably wait to see exactly what they end up getting on her.

    Finally, this isn't a great thing for you to be posting about on a public forum.

    SatanIsMyMotor on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    It's the dodgiest supermarket I've been to. I highly doubt they have advanced surveillance. Especially DVD backup. Thanks for that information.

    mooshoepork on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009

    Finally, this isn't a great thing for you to be posting about on a public forum.

    Victoria is a big place man. I don't think I've given enough information for that to be a problem.

    mooshoepork on
  • I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell UpI'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Her employers are trying to settle out of court. There's nothing illegal about that. It's neither extortion or blackmail.

    If they're investigating it likely means just that, they don't know exactly what she stole so they are looking into it. If they've already nailed others then I'm sure they will end up with something legitimate on her. She should probably wait to see exactly what they end up getting on her.

    Finally, this isn't a great thing for you to be posting about on a public forum.
    this.

    everything this man said

    also even small places will usually keep things for 90 days or more. the least I've ever known about was when I worked at mcdonalds we were one of the ones on the old system and they only kept footage for 2 weeks...

    it's fun to look at a company and say they're screwing over employees because they don't' have a face, but the people screwed up and got caught. The company has every right to do this. No one can tell you what the company is thinking or what evidence they have so I will say this again...

    LAWYER UP

    I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up on
  • DarkWarriorDarkWarrior __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2009
    Her employers are trying to settle out of court. There's nothing illegal about that. It's neither extortion or blackmail.

    If they're investigating it likely means just that, they don't know exactly what she stole so they are looking into it. If they've already nailed others then I'm sure they will end up with something legitimate on her. She should probably wait to see exactly what they end up getting on her.

    Finally, this isn't a great thing for you to be posting about on a public forum.
    this.

    everything this man said

    also even small places will usually keep things for 90 days or more. the least I've ever known about was when I worked at mcdonalds we were one of the ones on the old system and they only kept footage for 2 weeks...

    it's fun to look at a company and say they're screwing over employees because they don't' have a face, but the people screwed up and got caught. The company has every right to do this. No one can tell you what the company is thinking or what evidence they have so I will say this again...

    LAWYER UP

    It'll vary on the size of the store I imagine. We are one of the biggest stores in our very big chain but we only keep our poor quality footage for 30 days before taping over it.

    DarkWarrior on
  • Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham Hopeless Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Finally, this isn't a great thing for you to be posting about on a public forum.

    not really that big of a deal, he gave no name or address that can be linked back, anything anyone can gather from this is completely circumstantial.

    Bendery It Like Beckham on
  • I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell UpI'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up Registered User regular
    edited August 2009

    Finally, this isn't a great thing for you to be posting about on a public forum.

    Victoria is a big place man. I don't think I've given enough information for that to be a problem.

    listen... If you want to ignore everything that is being said, you're more than welcome to but keep in mind the things we are saying help. "I don't think they have that good of a camera setup" will only get you screwed when they go to court with more than you think they can have. Obviously they have the money to put these cameras into place in the first place and that's the expensive part. A hard drive that saves it all is the cheap part of the deal.

    Second it doesn't matter if there are a million stores in that area. If someone is looking for a reason to look for more evidence and something about this thread rings familiar, they can't use it as evidence but they can use it as motivation. there is a difference between one of the involved mentioning her name to get out of paying extra money and an uninvolved third party mentioning the exact thing on the internet, on a website which shows up on google a lot.

    probably can't and probably won't only work after you've gotten your defense built for if they do. which judging from the looks of things is likely

    I'd Fuck Chuck Lidell Up on
  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    edited August 2009
    It's the dodgiest supermarket I've been to. I highly doubt they have advanced surveillance. Especially DVD backup. Thanks for that information.

    DVR backups aren't all that expensive. Also, the whole 3-meters up thing? You don't know what kind of security they have. They may be able to look at both the transaction data and the camera at the same time, watching as an item passes over the scanner but doesn't show up on the transaction log. If this happens multiple times in a transaction, and multiple times with the same customers, the business has the proof they need.

    It's called Sweethearting. We've caught quite a few people doing it and fired them for it. One of the only things our company fires people for anymore.

    Shadowfire on
  • Mr. PokeylopeMr. Pokeylope Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I think it's a mistake to underestimate the store. They have already identified everyone involved including your friend. Either the cameras are a lot better than you think or someone has squealed, possibly both.

    Mr. Pokeylope on
  • mooshoeporkmooshoepork Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I found a place that offers free legal advice, so I'll probably hit them up this week. Other than that we can only wait I guess.

    mooshoepork on
  • GiselleceballosGiselleceballos Registered User new member
    edited August 2009
    She must talk to a lawyer. This is not something that can be told on this forum. People can advice on assuming. Only a lawyer can advise you in this situation

    Giselleceballos on
  • kathoskathos Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Assuming she did do it and things go the supermarket's way (which, no offence, I hope they do because that way she'll never fucking learn and just do it at her next job).

    Erm; basic. This isn't even some first offence bullshit where you steal some laundry detergent and get caught. This is a situation where she knowingly let someone just walk out with product.

    There's no way around it, she's straight up STEALING. Finding a lawyer won't help too too much if they've got proof that she's been stealing for her friends (which seems like they do) also they would actually go through the cams and vids if it means squeezing twenty grand out of her. Either have the justice settle it out (since the charge for theft for a first offender couldn't be THAT bad over there, also if nothing can be proven then she's fine) or pony up.

    If your justice system's (mentioned AUD so I'm guessing Australia) anything like Canada's then she might just get off with a fine, some community service time and a notch on her record since she didn't actually take anything (just allowed her friends to mooch off her position). But really, anything that happens to her she deserves.

    Live and learn; if you're going to steal, make it worthwhile and rob a fucking bank.

    Speaking from experience, most of this shit gets settled out of court, I've had enough suburban kids just be too embarassed to have a record or whatever so they agree to settle with X amount of money with their respective ex-employers, who same, are usually smaller chains or single stores, it's coming out of their pocket after all, they don't have a shrink [theft] budget like the big corporations do. I've had a guy pay close to three grand for giving his friends free expensive coffees where he worked, sad. Then was it that I realised hip and cool places stop being hip and cool when money's involved.

    @Mr.Pokeylope:

    Yeah it totally is, the smaller stores and chains are usually the most sue happy and aggressive when it comes to shit like this.

    @mooshoepork:

    Don't bother, those free legal advice places are usually the most expensive once you actually HIRE THEM. Or they're free if you put down some money (then you don't get charged for the consultation but you pay anything for the service in case you "get advice and go to a cheaper lawyer").

    Also book legal aid NOW if you're thinking of getting free advice, don't think they're a McDonald's and you just walk up and *poof* out pops a lawyer.

    Universities and colleges are the real free advice places ~_~ of course the ambulance chasing and expertise is lowered so it 's good and bad.

    kathos on
    Brlito.png
  • GuffreyGuffrey Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Ok, I catch employees and "customers" stealing for a living, so I'll see if I can offer any advice. Granted, Im in the US, and I'm not sure how Australian laws differ. Hitting on a few points:

    The store offering a contract is not illegal, at least in the US. Like others have said, they are basically making it easy for everyone and just offering the people to pay back the lost amounts. While my store doesn't do this, I have heard about others that do. I remember one that the police were there while the manager explained it, and they had no problem with it.

    What one other person mentioned is that they might be reviewing camera footage while also looking at a transaction log. We just recently caught someone this way. Three items get scanned, five go in the bag, and you have a problem. Also has been said, but if the store notices this happens multiple times, and with the same people, thats all they need.

    Finally, to reiterate another point, don't underestimate the store's security. The cameras at my store are farther than 3m away, and we can zoom in to read credit card numbers, license plates, etc. Also, although we only keep 90 days of footage on site, we can make some phone calls and review back as far as we need. As unlikely as it may seem with this store, again, don't underestimate.

    And finally, as most have said, lawyer up. In the US, and in my experiance, a lawyer is usually not needed for a misdemeanor. As in, you can get one, but in all the cases I've seen it doesnt make a bit of difference, except costing the person money. But with anything $500 or up it is a felony, and a lawyer is definately needed. Not sure how the laws differ in Australia, but a lawyer is definately a smart choice.

    Also, if they offer her a contract, I would personally take it. Shes admitted to you that shes stolen. To go about lying more, claiming she didnt realize it, training error, etc, is in my opinion stupid. Not to mention even more dishonest. I highly doubt that would go over well with a judge, and then if she is found guilty, she is bound to get a harsher punishment for the attempted lie.

    EDIT: This is going to depend on Australian law, but at least in the US, we don't need the police to arrest. Its basically a citizen's arrest, based on some part of English Common Law on merchants catching thieves (as I understand it, a lawyer might be able to explain it better). But anyways, although the police come out to write the ticket/take them to jail, she might be able to be arrested by certain employees.

    Guffrey on
  • BelketreBelketre Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    I'm pretty sure that in Australia, what they are doing is illegal and falls under extortion. You can't offer to settle a criminal matter out of court.

    Belketre on
  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    Belketre wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure that in Australia, what they are doing is illegal and falls under extortion. You can't offer to settle a criminal matter out of court.

    I find that incredibly hard to believe. Settling out of court is pretty common for almost any organization or company.

    Sentry on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2009
    Sentry wrote: »
    Belketre wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure that in Australia, what they are doing is illegal and falls under extortion. You can't offer to settle a criminal matter out of court.

    I find that incredibly hard to believe. Settling out of court is pretty common for almost any organization or company.

    yes, in the US, some property crimes can be "civilly compromised", which is basically a financial deal between defendant and victim

    sometimes this is encouraged because the defendant avoids any criminal prosecution or possible conviction and the victim is made whole

    Medopine on
  • BelketreBelketre Registered User regular
    edited August 2009
    In civil matters, yes. In criminal matters, not so much.
    Concealing a crime in return for money is a crime in itself.

    Belketre on
  • MedopineMedopine __BANNED USERS regular
    edited August 2009
    Belketre wrote: »
    In civil matters, yes. In criminal matters, not so much.
    Concealing a crime in return for money is a crime in itself.

    my state has a specific statute that authorizes a criminal case to be dismissed if the victim and defendant have civilly compromised it

    they are not "concealing a crime" they are saying look we won't pursue criminal prosecution if you just pay us back for the property you took without permission

    Medopine on
Sign In or Register to comment.