This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
I AM CONFUSED AND ANGRY. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE A $2 HOTDOG & SODA COMBO IN ADDITION TO A BUCKET OF RUM!!!
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
Shocking news, different states have different laws regarding the sale of liquor.
0
PiptheFairFrequently not in boats.Registered Userregular
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
Shocking news, different states have different laws regarding the sale of liquor.
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
Shocking news, different states have different laws regarding the sale of liquor.
The only election commercials I've seen are the ones for opening liquor sales outside of the state stores, so I think everyone's nothing but alcoholics.
I don't think there's any ballot initiatives here in Connecticut. There is elections for the state legislature and municipal elections. We don't only have mayors here, some of the smaller towns have things like First Selectman or Town Manager, who generally serve in the same capacity as a mayor.
I do research the candidates, but I am an unapologetic liberal and almost always vote Democratic.
Coincidentally, Issue 2 gets talked about here a bit due to Quinnipac University doing a poll in Ohio asking citizens there about Issue 2. In case you put any consideration into polls, the vote is 57 to 32 percent in favor of rejecting Issue 2. I think that essentially means if people voted this way, issue 2 would be defeated. Issue 2 was an initiative to uphold Ohio's Senate Bill 5, which removed some collective-bargaining rights for workers in state and local government.
I would vote against issue 2 if I lived in Ohio. Sorry, Ohioans.
If I have anything wrong, let me know. The reason I bring this topic up although I don't live in Ohio is because they tried to pull something similar here, but it was voted down by the legislature.
The unions' rights issue is quickly becoming a national one, please take heed.
P.S. Connecticut also has a law banning alcohol sales in stores on Sundays. Repeal dat sumbitch!
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
In Washington, hard liquor can only be sold at state-run stores.
BLM - ACAB
0
The GeekOh-Two Crew, OmeganautRegistered User, ClubPAregular
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
I AM CONFUSED AND ANGRY. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE A $2 HOTDOG & SODA COMBO IN ADDITION TO A BUCKET OF RUM!!!
I highly enjoy a plain cheese Costco pizza.
BLM - ACAB
0
TonkkaSome one in the club tonightHas stolen my ideas.Registered Userregular
Huh. I can't find anything on I-1183 in my voter's pamphlet.
When we changed our hot dogs to ones that weren't kosher to keep them $1.50 you should have heard the wailing and crying from some of the members. Of course my building is in south florida, so I might have a different demographic than most, but it was certainly hilarious to watch.
0
TonkkaSome one in the club tonightHas stolen my ideas.Registered Userregular
I am just going to sit here and bite my tongue on that one.
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
I AM CONFUSED AND ANGRY. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE A $2 HOTDOG & SODA COMBO IN ADDITION TO A BUCKET OF RUM!!!
I highly enjoy a plain cheese Costco pizza.
Oh my lord, they are some kind of wizards with their pizza .
0
BusterKNegativity is Boring Cynicism is Cowardice Registered Userregular
The only strict alcohol laws we have in California involve drinking and driving
No open containers anywhere in the car
And it is illegal for anyone under 21 to drive with any amount of alcohol in their blood
But there are no restrictions on selling it that I know of
When we changed our hot dogs to ones that weren't kosher to keep them $1.50 you should have heard the wailing and crying from some of the members. Of course my building is in south florida, so I might have a different demographic than most, but it was certainly hilarious to watch.
Well, it is a very important part to the belief systems of an entire religious group...
Oh I know. It was more that they thought we owed it to them that I found hilarious. Kind of like when corperate found out our building didn't use the two different opening times for the different kinds of memberships. So all of a sudden gold stars weren't allowed into the building at 10:00 am anymore like the executive members were. OMG the bitching and moaning. Priceless. And now we are back to everybody in at 10:00 am again. Until an auditor notices again.
0
ZoelI suppose... I'd put it onRegistered Userregular
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
I AM CONFUSED AND ANGRY. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE A $2 HOTDOG & SODA COMBO IN ADDITION TO A BUCKET OF RUM!!!
you have to go to ikea for this sorry
at least you'll get an extra hot dog out of it
A magician gives you a ring that, when worn, will let you see the world as it truly is.
However, the ring will never leave your finger, and you will be unable to ever describe to another living person what you see.
0
Shortytouching the meatIntergalactic Cool CourtRegistered Userregular
I did not know this. I guess I have some reading to do.
both yes and no campaigns will lie to you
the yes campaign claims that a yes vote will result in savings for the consumer and increased revenue for the state
the no campaign claims that they are just defending our communities, that privatized liquor will automatically result in children getting hammered all over the damn place (they notably neglect to mention that by "children" they mean "adults who aren't quite old enough to buy alcohol but can pass as such")
the reality is that the vast majority of both campaigns are funded by business- pro by costco, con by an amalgam of beer and wine distributors (they don't want to have to compete with hard liquor distributors for shelf space in grocery stores)
the stranger has been covering this really well
and say what you will about their general liberal bias, but they have historically been very vocal advocates of privatizing liquor
This coming election there is only one critical piece of legislation on my mind.
I WANT HARD BOOZE AT COSTCO!
Your costco doesn't have liquor? It has to be its own separate building, but our costco has boatloads of liquor. Really cheap place to get 1.5L of some pretty premium brands, too
In Washington, hard liquor can only be sold at state-run stores.
i'm done with seattle!
A magician gives you a ring that, when worn, will let you see the world as it truly is.
However, the ring will never leave your finger, and you will be unable to ever describe to another living person what you see.
Oh I know. It was more that they thought we owed it to them that I found hilarious. Kind of like when corperate found out our building didn't use the two different opening times for the different kinds of memberships. So all of a sudden gold stars weren't allowed into the building at 10:00 am anymore like the executive members were. OMG the bitching and moaning. Priceless. And now we are back to everybody in at 10:00 am again. Until an auditor notices again.
Or not so much that you owed them, but that paying customers were letting Costco know they weren't happy with the change. You know, valuable feedback for a business.
0
ZoelI suppose... I'd put it onRegistered Userregular
Druhim you sure do provide a lot of people with valuable feedback around these parts
A magician gives you a ring that, when worn, will let you see the world as it truly is.
However, the ring will never leave your finger, and you will be unable to ever describe to another living person what you see.
0
TonkkaSome one in the club tonightHas stolen my ideas.Registered Userregular
I did not know this. I guess I have some reading to do.
both yes and no campaigns will lie to you
the yes campaign claims that a yes vote will result in savings for the consumer and increased revenue for the state
the no campaign claims that they are just defending our communities, that privatized liquor will automatically result in children getting hammered all over the damn place (they notably neglect to mention that by "children" they mean "adults who aren't quite old enough to buy alcohol but can pass as such")
the reality is that the vast majority of both campaigns are funded by business- pro by costco, con by an amalgam of beer and wine distributors (they don't want to have to compete with hard liquor distributors for shelf space in grocery stores)
the stranger has been covering this really well
and say what you will about their general liberal bias, but they have historically been very vocal advocates of privatizing liquor
Yeah everything I've read sounds like that, except I have not read anyone claim that booze will be cheaper, just more conveniently available. Ther revenue for the state seems pretty well researched, so there's that.
I'll read that article in the meantime and hopefully come to a decision.
Posts
Look at what Shorty and As7 have clarified about the initiative in question.
I AM CONFUSED AND ANGRY. I WANT TO BE ABLE TO PURCHASE A $2 HOTDOG & SODA COMBO IN ADDITION TO A BUCKET OF RUM!!!
Shocking news, different states have different laws regarding the sale of liquor.
shocking news
all of your gay
yay florida
ever tried to buy it on sunday morning before football?
nope
but i don't drink that much so
indirectly drove?
I'm not good with synonyms
Coran Attack!
Yes, let us make a timeline/chart of the indirect factors that drove him to that decision. I am sure we as a people are capable of such a task...
Also what pip said
Pip, you should be at church on sunday morning, not boozing it up!
I'll make you drag for me!
We have hard booze at our Costcos.
All of my gay?
Please don't say no
Coran Attack!
You have my sword.
Keep on keepin` on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUVwR0rw5fk
I do research the candidates, but I am an unapologetic liberal and almost always vote Democratic.
Coincidentally, Issue 2 gets talked about here a bit due to Quinnipac University doing a poll in Ohio asking citizens there about Issue 2. In case you put any consideration into polls, the vote is 57 to 32 percent in favor of rejecting Issue 2. I think that essentially means if people voted this way, issue 2 would be defeated. Issue 2 was an initiative to uphold Ohio's Senate Bill 5, which removed some collective-bargaining rights for workers in state and local government.
I would vote against issue 2 if I lived in Ohio. Sorry, Ohioans.
If I have anything wrong, let me know. The reason I bring this topic up although I don't live in Ohio is because they tried to pull something similar here, but it was voted down by the legislature.
The unions' rights issue is quickly becoming a national one, please take heed.
P.S. Connecticut also has a law banning alcohol sales in stores on Sundays. Repeal dat sumbitch!
I thought this was about the presidential primaries or something
but hey look its november
I haven't voted since 08 so I don't know
In Washington, hard liquor can only be sold at state-run stores.
I highly enjoy a plain cheese Costco pizza.
Time to wade through the bullshit.
Oh my lord, they are some kind of wizards with their pizza .
No open containers anywhere in the car
And it is illegal for anyone under 21 to drive with any amount of alcohol in their blood
But there are no restrictions on selling it that I know of
Amazon Wishlist: http://www.amazon.com/BusterK/wishlist/3JPEKJGX9G54I/ref=cm_wl_search_bin_1
Well, it is a very important part to the belief systems of an entire religious group...
you have to go to ikea for this sorry
at least you'll get an extra hot dog out of it
However, the ring will never leave your finger, and you will be unable to ever describe to another living person what you see.
both yes and no campaigns will lie to you
the yes campaign claims that a yes vote will result in savings for the consumer and increased revenue for the state
the no campaign claims that they are just defending our communities, that privatized liquor will automatically result in children getting hammered all over the damn place (they notably neglect to mention that by "children" they mean "adults who aren't quite old enough to buy alcohol but can pass as such")
the reality is that the vast majority of both campaigns are funded by business- pro by costco, con by an amalgam of beer and wine distributors (they don't want to have to compete with hard liquor distributors for shelf space in grocery stores)
the stranger has been covering this really well
and say what you will about their general liberal bias, but they have historically been very vocal advocates of privatizing liquor
here's their most relevant bit: http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/straight-up/Content?oid=10214077
i'm done with seattle!
However, the ring will never leave your finger, and you will be unable to ever describe to another living person what you see.
Or not so much that you owed them, but that paying customers were letting Costco know they weren't happy with the change. You know, valuable feedback for a business.
However, the ring will never leave your finger, and you will be unable to ever describe to another living person what you see.
Yeah everything I've read sounds like that, except I have not read anyone claim that booze will be cheaper, just more conveniently available. Ther revenue for the state seems pretty well researched, so there's that.
I'll read that article in the meantime and hopefully come to a decision.