I kind of hoped she was just a out of control soldier so they sent her and others on a mission with little chance of success and she went deep cover into the empire to get the info they need like really deep as she ended up being Mauler at the battle of Yavin
0
Options
Dr. ChaosPost nuclear nuisanceRegistered Userregular
edited October 2016
Theres the trailer this movie needed. Really good stuff.
Still worried since Gareth Edwards hasn't had a film yet that won me over 100% (the characters in Monsters and Godzilla really fell flat) but visually, it looks fantastic.
Theres the trailer this movie needed. Really good stuff.
Still worried since Gareth Edwards hasn't had a film yet that won me over 100% but visually, it looks fantastic.
If anything, this movie looks like it will look amazing all the way through.
Oh I'm sure thats guaranteed.
Edwards seems to have a flair for big special effects heavy scenes if Godzilla is anything to go by. Its just more the human drama I'm worried about and being bored to tears by any scene without any action.
Theres the trailer this movie needed. Really good stuff.
Still worried since Gareth Edwards hasn't had a film yet that won me over 100% but visually, it looks fantastic.
If anything, this movie looks like it will look amazing all the way through.
Oh I'm sure thats guaranteed.
Edwards seems to have a flair for big special effects heavy scenes if Godzilla is anything to go by. Its just more the human drama I'm worried about and being bored to tears by any scene without any action.
Yeah, that's the fear. Is this Pacific Rim or Saving Private Ryan?
Theres the trailer this movie needed. Really good stuff.
Still worried since Gareth Edwards hasn't had a film yet that won me over 100% but visually, it looks fantastic.
If anything, this movie looks like it will look amazing all the way through.
Oh I'm sure thats guaranteed.
Edwards seems to have a flair for big special effects heavy scenes if Godzilla is anything to go by. Its just more the human drama I'm worried about and being bored to tears by any scene without any action.
Yeah, that's the fear. Is this Pacific Rim or Saving Private Ryan?
Well it's got giant robots in the AT-ATs and a squad of soldiers moving through a war so... both?
Before following any advice, opinions, or thoughts I may have expressed in the above post, be warned: I found Keven Costners "Waterworld" to be a very entertaining film.
0
Options
SixCaches Tweets in the mainframe cyberhexRegistered Userregular
Theres the trailer this movie needed. Really good stuff.
Still worried since Gareth Edwards hasn't had a film yet that won me over 100% but visually, it looks fantastic.
If anything, this movie looks like it will look amazing all the way through.
Oh I'm sure thats guaranteed.
Edwards seems to have a flair for big special effects heavy scenes if Godzilla is anything to go by. Its just more the human drama I'm worried about and being bored to tears by any scene without any action.
Yeah, that's the fear. Is this Pacific Rim or Saving Private Ryan?
Well it's got giant robots in the AT-ATs and a squad of soldiers moving through a war so... both?
I just meant will this be lots of awesome action with little else (how I view Pacific Rim) or good action surrounded by character drama.
Those two movies were the first ones that came to mind and maybe they aren't the best examples.
can you feel the struggle within?
0
Options
FakefauxCóiste BodharDriving John McCain to meet some Iraqis who'd very much like to make his acquaintanceRegistered Userregular
Do we know of any characters beside Vader, Mon Mothma, and Saw Gerrera that have shown up before?
Bail Organa is apparently in the trailer but I haven't gone through and picked him out. There was a shot from the sizzle real where he's apparently there but you can't see his face.
i bet vader only shows up for like 15 seconds, which is a good thing
There's really only two ways to approach Vader in this film: as the Sword of Damocles for the villain or as the Minotaur in the Labyrinth for the heroes. In the first, he hangs around menacingly, or is talked about more than seen, always in terms of what he'll do if the villain fails, and it ultimately pays off with him murdering the shit out of the villain at the end. In the second, the heroes have to complete their final mission while avoiding him, and when things go pear shaped (which they have to otherwise you have a dull climax) it's either because of him or it allows him to catch up with them and nearly undo all their hard work. You could work both of these approaches into the film, but that would require overexposing Vader. They'll probably do one or the other.
The first option seems like kind of a waste. You can imply the bad guy will have bad things happen to him if he fails without shoving Vader in there; it ultimately amounts to a fanservice cameo. The other is also fanservicey, but it at least includes the option of Vader being a genuine threat to the heroes, and maybe reclaiming some of his lost prestige as one of pop culture's preeminent villains.
i bet vader only shows up for like 15 seconds, which is a good thing
There's really only two ways to approach Vader in this film: as the Sword of Damocles for the villain or as the Minotaur in the Labyrinth for the heroes. In the first, he hangs around menacingly, or is talked about more than seen, always in terms of what he'll do if the villain fails, and it ultimately pays off with him murdering the shit out of the villain at the end. In the second, the heroes have to complete their final mission while avoiding him, and when things go pear shaped (which they have to otherwise you have a dull climax) it's either because of him or it allows him to catch up with them and nearly undo all their hard work. You could work both of these approaches into the film, but that would require overexposing Vader. They'll probably do one or the other.
The first option seems like kind of a waste. You can imply the bad guy will have bad things happen to him if he fails without shoving Vader in there; it ultimately amounts to a fanservice cameo. The other is also fanservicey, but it at least includes the option of Vader being a genuine threat to the heroes, and maybe reclaiming some of his lost prestige as one of pop culture's preeminent villains.
I think they'll go with the latter personally.
Keeping him close to the Rogue 1 squad sets him up to intercept the Princess in ANH after she receives the plans, because it's Vader's job to keep the plans safe.
It would seem to flow better that way than to have him menacing the Villain who loses the plans and then somehow it's Vader job to recover them.
Star Wars Rebels shows that it is possible to use Vader as an effective returning villain. There, he's a horror movie monster that the heroes and villains are lucky to survive.
i bet vader only shows up for like 15 seconds, which is a good thing
There's really only two ways to approach Vader in this film: as the Sword of Damocles for the villain or as the Minotaur in the Labyrinth for the heroes. In the first, he hangs around menacingly, or is talked about more than seen, always in terms of what he'll do if the villain fails, and it ultimately pays off with him murdering the shit out of the villain at the end. In the second, the heroes have to complete their final mission while avoiding him, and when things go pear shaped (which they have to otherwise you have a dull climax) it's either because of him or it allows him to catch up with them and nearly undo all their hard work. You could work both of these approaches into the film, but that would require overexposing Vader. They'll probably do one or the other.
The first option seems like kind of a waste. You can imply the bad guy will have bad things happen to him if he fails without shoving Vader in there; it ultimately amounts to a fanservice cameo. The other is also fanservicey, but it at least includes the option of Vader being a genuine threat to the heroes, and maybe reclaiming some of his lost prestige as one of pop culture's preeminent villains.
I think they'll go with the latter personally.
Keeping him close to the Rogue 1 squad sets him up to intercept the Princess in ANH after she receives the plans, because it's Vader's job to keep the plans safe.
It would seem to flow better that way than to have him menacing the Villain who loses the plans and then somehow it's Vader job to recover them.
I don't think that second one is a hard sell at all. It's him cleaning up the mess of his inferiors.
Posts
The final poster
strongly in favor
Steam ID - VeldrinD | SS Post | Wishlist
Either he's got a really secret role or just a really minor one that doesn't matter like Max Von Sydow in Force Awakens
I'd be pretty bummed if I were that actor
Snope Doogo, the stonedest smuggler
oh shit his partner can be martha stewart
Kinda spoilers? Based on interviews
He might also be a key engineer or designer of the Death Star
i'm jazzed
It is unavoidable.
It is your destiny.
Edit: Here you go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sC9abcLLQpI
If nothing else, this movie will look spectacular
PSN ID : DetectiveOlivaw | TWITTER | STEAM ID | NEVER FORGET
I'm officially more hype for this than I was for TFA.
That trailer was shit-hot.
I've shifted into maximum overhype.
Also I will watch any movie with Riz Amed in it so
Still worried since Gareth Edwards hasn't had a film yet that won me over 100% (the characters in Monsters and Godzilla really fell flat) but visually, it looks fantastic.
If anything, this movie looks like it will look amazing all the way through.
Edwards seems to have a flair for big special effects heavy scenes if Godzilla is anything to go by. Its just more the human drama I'm worried about and being bored to tears by any scene without any action.
http://m.imgur.com/PW1ohe9?r
Yeah, that's the fear. Is this Pacific Rim or Saving Private Ryan?
Well it's got giant robots in the AT-ATs and a squad of soldiers moving through a war so... both?
I just meant will this be lots of awesome action with little else (how I view Pacific Rim) or good action surrounded by character drama.
Those two movies were the first ones that came to mind and maybe they aren't the best examples.
I think that's a collapsed statue of enormous size.
Bail Organa is apparently in the trailer but I haven't gone through and picked him out. There was a shot from the sizzle real where he's apparently there but you can't see his face.
There's really only two ways to approach Vader in this film: as the Sword of Damocles for the villain or as the Minotaur in the Labyrinth for the heroes. In the first, he hangs around menacingly, or is talked about more than seen, always in terms of what he'll do if the villain fails, and it ultimately pays off with him murdering the shit out of the villain at the end. In the second, the heroes have to complete their final mission while avoiding him, and when things go pear shaped (which they have to otherwise you have a dull climax) it's either because of him or it allows him to catch up with them and nearly undo all their hard work. You could work both of these approaches into the film, but that would require overexposing Vader. They'll probably do one or the other.
The first option seems like kind of a waste. You can imply the bad guy will have bad things happen to him if he fails without shoving Vader in there; it ultimately amounts to a fanservice cameo. The other is also fanservicey, but it at least includes the option of Vader being a genuine threat to the heroes, and maybe reclaiming some of his lost prestige as one of pop culture's preeminent villains.
I think they'll go with the latter personally.
Keeping him close to the Rogue 1 squad sets him up to intercept the Princess in ANH after she receives the plans, because it's Vader's job to keep the plans safe.
It would seem to flow better that way than to have him menacing the Villain who loses the plans and then somehow it's Vader job to recover them.
I don't think that second one is a hard sell at all. It's him cleaning up the mess of his inferiors.