The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Hmm, diagonalization wasn't even mentioned in our lectures, and I don't see how that would help. I think it just wants it rewritten some other way in terms of the eigenvectors, not explicitly calculated. Trying to follow the method on wikipedia gets me with rows 1 and 2 both being (1,0), so unless I'm doing something wrong (very possible) I don't think it's even diagonalizable.
Oh, there's some basic answers to the exams up:
Q9 (a) Characteristic equation is L(L − 1) = 0, e’values are L = 0 with corresponding e’vector (2, 3),
and L = 1 with corresponding e’vector (1, 1).
(b) A^4(v1 + v2) = v1.
uh... huh. It works out and makes sense, but seems like an almost trivial question.
And for the similar questions for the other two sets of answers given, one of them is 256v1+v2, the other is v1+243v2, so there must be some other method than just multiplying it out and doing it by inspection.
Isn't the characteristic equation det(A-lambda*I)=0?
If it is, then for this matrix the equation is x^2-6x+5=0, which has roots 1 and 5. Plugging those back into the matrix and then finding the null space should give you the eigenvectors.
I obviously don't want to contradict your exam solutions, so I guess i'm wrong. At any rate I kind of want to know what else it could be...
edit: yeah i missed the minus on the bottom right 2. thanks!
Posts
Since this doesn't sound familiar to you, here is a handy wikipedia link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagonalizable_matrix
Oh, there's some basic answers to the exams up:
uh... huh. It works out and makes sense, but seems like an almost trivial question.
And for the similar questions for the other two sets of answers given, one of them is 256v1+v2, the other is v1+243v2, so there must be some other method than just multiplying it out and doing it by inspection.
kpop appreciation station i also like to tweet some
If it is, then for this matrix the equation is x^2-6x+5=0, which has roots 1 and 5. Plugging those back into the matrix and then finding the null space should give you the eigenvectors.
I obviously don't want to contradict your exam solutions, so I guess i'm wrong. At any rate I kind of want to know what else it could be...
edit: yeah i missed the minus on the bottom right 2. thanks!
A^4 * (v1 + v2) = A^4 * v1 + A^4 * v2, of course. Let e1 and e2 be the corresponding eigenvalues, then we have:
A^4 * v1 = A^3 * A * v1 = A^3 * e1 * v1.
Continuing to reduce the exponent on A in that fashion gives the final result
A^4 * v1 = e1^4 * v1, and likewise with A^4 * v2. So
A^4 * (v1 + v2) = e1^4 * v1 + e2^4 * v2.
The eigenvalues of this matrix are 0 and 1, so declaring that e1 = 1 and e2 = 0 gives
A^4 * (v1 + v2) = v1.
(bolded line is the important one, should explain the question with the more complicated answer as well.)
Fuzzywhale: Det(A - x*I) = x^2 - x. I think you lost a minus sign or something to get that result.
kpop appreciation station i also like to tweet some