The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I am lucky to be employed and to have saved up a moderately large sum of money. I've put a little bit in an IRA. I've hesitated to put more in for the following reason: I'm probably going to move to another city to be with my fiancée. This may mean I'd lose my job and, judging by the economic climate, I imagine it's going to be tough finding another one.
I don't spend much, so I could probably live comfortably for 2 or even 3 years just on the savings. However, I imagine now is probably a good time to invest.
Fiancée is in business school, so finances probably will not be a problem for her post-graduation (i.e. not as much pressure to use my savings).
Should I put more of my savings in an IRA? Or should I keep it close in case I need it in the near future, and wait until my life is more stable to put more in?
I am lucky to be employed and to have saved up a moderately large sum of money. I've put a little bit in an IRA. I've hesitated to put more in for the following reason: I'm probably going to move to another city to be with my fiancée. This may mean I'd lose my job and, judging by the economic climate, I imagine it's going to be tough finding another one.
I don't spend much, so I could probably live comfortably for 2 or even 3 years just on the savings. However, I imagine now is probably a good time to invest.
Fiancée is in business school, so finances probably will not be a problem for her post-graduation (i.e. not as much pressure to use my savings).
Should I put more of my savings in an IRA? Or should I keep it close in case I need it in the near future, and wait until my life is more stable to put more in?
Either you have a very low cash footprint, or you've got some very decent money saved up. I don't know how much - but I wouldn't lock it away in such a way that you couldn't get at a few months' worth in an emergency (without penalty - keep at least some of it liquid).
This coming from a guy who has absolutely nothing in the bank and buys groceries with a credit card, though.
A high yield online savings account is good. I use HSBCDirect, and have heard good things about ING. Ally seems to be the new hotness, but certain things about it spook me away from it.
Still, a "high yield" account only yields about 1.3-1.8% these days. So you could keep enough money to live off in there, and put the rest into CDs. These days the best CDs are 1yr, with most banks I've looked at having this weird and unprecedented (or so I'm told) inverted yield curve. So keep enough money to live off of for a year in the savings account, and put the rest in a CD. Or if you are worried, put half in a 1 year CD, the other half in a 6 month CD, and then when either one matures, reinvest it into a 1 year so you are never more than 6 months away from some money.
Also, many banks will let you take money out of the CDs whenever you want, but you suffer an interest penalty. Often severe. Severe enough to render the use of a CD pointless.
A high yield online savings account is good. I use HSBCDirect, and have heard good things about ING. Ally seems to be the new hotness, but certain things about it spook me away from it.
Still, a "high yield" account only yields about 1.3-1.8% these days. So you could keep enough money to live off in there, and put the rest into CDs. These days the best CDs are 1yr, with most banks I've looked at having this weird and unprecedented (or so I'm told) inverted yield curve. So keep enough money to live off of for a year in the savings account, and put the rest in a CD. Or if you are worried, put half in a 1 year CD, the other half in a 6 month CD, and then when either one matures, reinvest it into a 1 year so you are never more than 6 months away from some money.
Also, many banks will let you take money out of the CDs whenever you want, but you suffer an interest penalty. Often severe. Severe enough to render the use of a CD pointless.
A friend of mine, who works for a bank, was telling me at a party on Saturday that he could get me a savings account with 5% interest. I was dumbfounded. I don't even know how that's possible.
2 or 3 years is definitely an excessive amount of time to keep cash on hand for. The general guidelines I've always seen for that kind of emergency lost-job-slush-fund usually range from 3-6 months (more towards the high end of that recently since jobs have been scarce). It would help knowing what kind of job you hold so as to gauge how long it might take you to find a new one, but lets suppose you opt for a 6 month cash-on-hand plan. That gives you 18-30 months worth of cash that you could probably earn more than savings-account-interest rate of return.
As far as investing it goes, there's a couple different ways you can go. Unfortunately, your best bet would have been to invest since March of this year so as to ride this stock market rally. My personal opinion that I will not debate further in here is that this runup to 10,000 points has been built on false hope and earnings reports that, while being "better-than-expected", were still bad compared to years prior. I don't think the market's settled down and I think that 10,000 is going to drop significantly again, so I'm not sure I'd recommend going heavily into stocks right this moment. Or if you do, head for traditionally conservative/defensive positions (gold did VERY well this year in the face of a weak dollar and inevitable inflation).
A friend of mine, who works for a bank, was telling me at a party on Saturday that he could get me a savings account with 5% interest. I was dumbfounded. I don't even know how that's possible.
A friend of mine, who works for a bank, was telling me at a party on Saturday that he could get me a savings account with 5% interest. I was dumbfounded. I don't even know how that's possible.
That was possible 18 months ago, dunno about now.
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. But he was saying this two days ago, and I asked for clarification, and he said he was serious. My other friends were pretty baffled too. This guy is kind of a space case sometimes, but he does seem to usually know his stuff when it comes to banking and accounting.
A high yield online savings account is good. I use HSBCDirect, and have heard good things about ING. Ally seems to be the new hotness, but certain things about it spook me away from it.
Still, a "high yield" account only yields about 1.3-1.8% these days. So you could keep enough money to live off in there, and put the rest into CDs. These days the best CDs are 1yr, with most banks I've looked at having this weird and unprecedented (or so I'm told) inverted yield curve. So keep enough money to live off of for a year in the savings account, and put the rest in a CD. Or if you are worried, put half in a 1 year CD, the other half in a 6 month CD, and then when either one matures, reinvest it into a 1 year so you are never more than 6 months away from some money.
Also, many banks will let you take money out of the CDs whenever you want, but you suffer an interest penalty. Often severe. Severe enough to render the use of a CD pointless.
ING has all my money right now (with the exception of a slight amount in an IRA) and I'm pretty happy with it as far as savings accounts go.
Can you explain the mechanics of why a CD is a good idea? I am pretty financially ignorant.
And yeah, were I to invest, I'm definitely going to wait until (what looks like) the little financial bubble the stock market's got going right now pops. Though I'm planning to invest in SRI's with PAX, so I'm not sure how much those companies will be affected anyway. (Actually, does anyone have thoughts on the merits of socially-responsible investment funds, while we're at it?)
A high yield online savings account is good. I use HSBCDirect, and have heard good things about ING. Ally seems to be the new hotness, but certain things about it spook me away from it.
Still, a "high yield" account only yields about 1.3-1.8% these days. So you could keep enough money to live off in there, and put the rest into CDs. These days the best CDs are 1yr, with most banks I've looked at having this weird and unprecedented (or so I'm told) inverted yield curve. So keep enough money to live off of for a year in the savings account, and put the rest in a CD. Or if you are worried, put half in a 1 year CD, the other half in a 6 month CD, and then when either one matures, reinvest it into a 1 year so you are never more than 6 months away from some money.
Also, many banks will let you take money out of the CDs whenever you want, but you suffer an interest penalty. Often severe. Severe enough to render the use of a CD pointless.
A friend of mine, who works for a bank, was telling me at a party on Saturday that he could get me a savings account with 5% interest. I was dumbfounded. I don't even know how that's possible.
The credit union I work for does something like this (though it's only 4% right now), but you only get the high rate on the first $500 in your account, and the rest is at the regular rate. They do it on both savings and checking, so the max amount they have to pay the 4% interest on is $1000, so it's actually pretty feasable. I bet it's the same deal with your friends bank.
Aioua on
life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
A high yield online savings account is good. I use HSBCDirect, and have heard good things about ING. Ally seems to be the new hotness, but certain things about it spook me away from it.
Still, a "high yield" account only yields about 1.3-1.8% these days. So you could keep enough money to live off in there, and put the rest into CDs. These days the best CDs are 1yr, with most banks I've looked at having this weird and unprecedented (or so I'm told) inverted yield curve. So keep enough money to live off of for a year in the savings account, and put the rest in a CD. Or if you are worried, put half in a 1 year CD, the other half in a 6 month CD, and then when either one matures, reinvest it into a 1 year so you are never more than 6 months away from some money.
Also, many banks will let you take money out of the CDs whenever you want, but you suffer an interest penalty. Often severe. Severe enough to render the use of a CD pointless.
A friend of mine, who works for a bank, was telling me at a party on Saturday that he could get me a savings account with 5% interest. I was dumbfounded. I don't even know how that's possible.
The credit union I work for does something like this (though it's only 4% right now), but you only get the high rate on the first $500 in your account, and the rest is at the regular rate. They do it on both savings and checking, so the max amount they have to pay the 4% interest on is $1000, so it's actually pretty feasable. I bet it's the same deal with your friends bank.
That's got to be what he was talking about. Because otherwise...well, I think my current savings gets .05% or something ridiculous like that.
Can you explain the mechanics of why a CD is a good idea? I am pretty financially ignorant.
CDs will give you a pretty much guaranteed return in a set amount of time, and are FDIC-backed. You won't get much higher than 4%, but I guarantee you people were treasuring their 4% CDs a year ago around this time.
Put 6 months of expenses into savings; that's your emergency fund, if you tuck into it for whatever reason top it up before directing additional funds into investments. If you're sure you're going to move in the near future also roll into savings your relocation expenses (movers, costs of securing housing at new location).
Do you have any debts? Do you have any plans for the money (down payment on home, bitching home entertainment system, getting a pet)? Is this "extra" money the result of saving (good discipline) or some windfall (inheritance, bonus, etc.)?
If it's a result of disciplined savings, and you don't have any debts, and you're not planning any major purchases soon, you're likely going to increase your longterm returns by fully funding your IRA and then investing the money in that IRA in some way.
CD's are FDIC-insured (or they should be, check the fine print), and they guarantee the rate of return advertised. You will get the 2.0% or whatever when the CD matures. The tradeoff is you cannot get to the money until the CD matures without monetary penalty (unless you buy a lower rate CD that permits early withdrawal, which may garner no better return then a high-yield savings account). CD income is also interest income which is taxed at a lower rate then short-term capital gains (I'm pretty sure at least). CD's are for the risk-averse and for those whose highest concern is preservation of capital, but can tolerate the illiquidity of the CD during its marurity period. If your time horizon is longer then a few years, then you can likely get a higher rate of return from investing in different securities (though it's not guaranteed).
Put 6 months of expenses into savings; that's your emergency fund, if you tuck into it for whatever reason top it up before directing additional funds into investments. If you're sure you're going to move in the near future also roll into savings your relocation expenses (movers, costs of securing housing at new location).
Where did this CW about 6 months come from, exactly? Before the recession? Ordinarily I'd take this advice, but about half of my friends have been underemployed/unemployed for a year or more. And lots of economists are saying this will be a jobless recovery. Scary!
Another potential complication is that my fiancée won't be able to find a job, so my savings will have to support us both. Though I think she'll have an easier time finding one than I will.
Do you have any debts? Do you have any plans for the money (down payment on home, bitching home entertainment system, getting a pet)? Is this "extra" money the result of saving (good discipline) or some windfall (inheritance, bonus, etc.)?
No debts, just saving over time. The only major plan I have would be moving, and possibly supporting myself and/or my fiancée. Eventually I'd like to pay for a wedding but that can wait until we're both financially secure.
So about these CD's ... 2% is only a bit higher than my money market's giving me. But it doesn't sound like the maturity time will be an issue if I keep enough in savings to get through it if need be. Any tips on where/what kind of CD's to purchase?
Put 6 months of expenses into savings; that's your emergency fund, if you tuck into it for whatever reason top it up before directing additional funds into investments. If you're sure you're going to move in the near future also roll into savings your relocation expenses (movers, costs of securing housing at new location).
Where did this CW about 6 months come from, exactly? Before the recession? Ordinarily I'd take this advice, but about half of my friends have been underemployed/unemployed for a year or more. And lots of economists are saying this will be a jobless recovery. Scary!
Another potential complication is that my fiancée won't be able to find a job, so my savings will have to support us both. Though I think she'll have an easier time finding one than I will.
Do you have any debts? Do you have any plans for the money (down payment on home, bitching home entertainment system, getting a pet)? Is this "extra" money the result of saving (good discipline) or some windfall (inheritance, bonus, etc.)?
No debts, just saving over time. The only major plan I have would be moving, and possibly supporting myself and/or my fiancée. Eventually I'd like to pay for a wedding but that can wait until we're both financially secure.
So about these CD's ... 2% is only a bit higher than my money market's giving me. But it doesn't sound like the maturity time will be an issue if I keep enough in savings to get through it if need be. Any tips on where/what kind of CD's to purchase?
6 Months worth of actual expenses should still work even now, as if you become involuntarily unemployed (and didn't get fired for cause), you'll also be able to collect unemployment, which would supplement the savings you have tucked away, enabling it to last much longer than 6 months.
adding my question in here about high yield savings accounts. Do these have a monthly fee or something? Why wouldn't everyone want to put their savings into such an account? I suppose I should just go ask at my bank...
You should at least max your Roth IRA contribution for the year and have $5000 ready to contribute January 2nd, 2010. Per year it is $5000 or $6000 if you're over 50 years old.
adding my question in here about high yield savings accounts. Do these have a monthly fee or something? Why wouldn't everyone want to put their savings into such an account? I suppose I should just go ask at my bank...
They're usually on-line only. People like to have a physical location they can go to deal with issues that may arise.
adding my question in here about high yield savings accounts. Do these have a monthly fee or something? Why wouldn't everyone want to put their savings into such an account? I suppose I should just go ask at my bank...
"high yield savings" could mean a lot of things. It could be a savings that gets more than the regular savings, but if its under a certian balance there's a fee. It could be where if its under a certian balance it doesn't earn anything at all. For some (like the first $500 gets a better rate ones we were talking about before) they want you to have direct deposit and online statements or somethin like that. Or, like Septus said it could be with an online-only kind of place. I think that's what ING is.
Aioua on
life's a game that you're bound to lose / like using a hammer to pound in screws
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
I guess to clarify, when I said "high yield" savings account, thats what the banks themselves call it. Typically they are online only, and the reason they are high yield is because there is less overhead tied up in paperwork, physical bank branches, and employees. For example, with my HSBCDirect account, I can't just walk into an HSBC Branch and have them deal with it. It's website only, which is why it has such a better APY than other savings accounts.
The reason you'd want CDs over a savings account is because it offers a better rate of return. My savings account gets 1.35% and my CD gets 0.5% more. 0.5% might not seem like much. But if you have a good chunk of money, every little bit counts. If you have 100,000 saved that comes out to an extra $500 a year. Ok, sure, it's penny pinching, but it's basically free money for being smarter with your money. Savings accounts and CDs are both equally secure. It's not like the stock market. The only thing you lose out on with CDs is immediate access to your cash. Which is why I'd only do it with the money you know you won't need, and keep the rest in the savings account. It's also why I suggested staggering a pair of cds by 6 months, to give you quicker access to it in the event of job loss and the emergency fund being eaten.
adding my question in here about high yield savings accounts. Do these have a monthly fee or something? Why wouldn't everyone want to put their savings into such an account? I suppose I should just go ask at my bank...
I've been with ING for several years and I'd highly recommend it. I used to get an 4-5% interest rate, before the recent unpleasantness.
I guess to clarify, when I said "high yield" savings account, thats what the banks themselves call it. Typically they are online only, and the reason they are high yield is because there is less overhead tied up in paperwork, physical bank branches, and employees. For example, with my HSBCDirect account, I can't just walk into an HSBC Branch and have them deal with it. It's website only, which is why it has such a better APY than other savings accounts.
The reason you'd want CDs over a savings account is because it offers a better rate of return. My savings account gets 1.35% and my CD gets 0.5% more. 0.5% might not seem like much. But if you have a good chunk of money, every little bit counts. If you have 100,000 saved that comes out to an extra $500 a year. Ok, sure, it's penny pinching, but it's basically free money for being smarter with your money. Savings accounts and CDs are both equally secure. It's not like the stock market. The only thing you lose out on with CDs is immediate access to your cash. Which is why I'd only do it with the money you know you won't need, and keep the rest in the savings account. It's also why I suggested staggering a pair of cds by 6 months, to give you quicker access to it in the event of job loss and the emergency fund being eaten.
I have the HSBC online account and it seems to vary by who the teller is. They all answered my questions, but of the three that I had dealt with, only one would deposit my checks. The others just said use the ATM.
I guess to clarify, when I said "high yield" savings account, thats what the banks themselves call it. Typically they are online only, and the reason they are high yield is because there is less overhead tied up in paperwork, physical bank branches, and employees. For example, with my HSBCDirect account, I can't just walk into an HSBC Branch and have them deal with it. It's website only, which is why it has such a better APY than other savings accounts.
The reason you'd want CDs over a savings account is because it offers a better rate of return. My savings account gets 1.35% and my CD gets 0.5% more. 0.5% might not seem like much. But if you have a good chunk of money, every little bit counts. If you have 100,000 saved that comes out to an extra $500 a year. Ok, sure, it's penny pinching, but it's basically free money for being smarter with your money. Savings accounts and CDs are both equally secure. It's not like the stock market. The only thing you lose out on with CDs is immediate access to your cash. Which is why I'd only do it with the money you know you won't need, and keep the rest in the savings account. It's also why I suggested staggering a pair of cds by 6 months, to give you quicker access to it in the event of job loss and the emergency fund being eaten.
I have the HSBC online account and it seems to vary by who the teller is. They all answered my questions, but of the three that I had dealt with, only one would deposit my checks. The others just said use the ATM.
Yeah, I never tried. There aren't any branches near me.
Where did this CW about 6 months come from, exactly? Before the recession? Ordinarily I'd take this advice, but about half of my friends have been underemployed/unemployed for a year or more. And lots of economists are saying this will be a jobless recovery. Scary!
Actually that number comes from an article I had read citing BLS estimating average time unemployed being about 6 months. Cannot find it now; it's a moving target anyways. There are other considerations to factor in (e.g. local labor market, having to support your fiance and her student loan payments [if any]). It couldn't hurt to have more in emergency savings, though you could offset reduction of return by splitting a years worth of expenses between savings and a 6-month CD.
So about these CD's ... 2% is only a bit higher than my money market's giving me. But it doesn't sound like the maturity time will be an issue if I keep enough in savings to get through it if need be. Any tips on where/what kind of CD's to purchase?
If you can get an equivalent rate in savings/checking then you can find for a CD then I'd stick to savings/checking, cause I'd value the instant liquidity to another 25 basis points*. The shortterm CD's I've been looking at don't really offer a much better rate then a high-balance ($25K) savings account.
And I was wrong about interest money being taxed at a lower rate, I thought it would be taxed like a qualified dividend, but I believe it's actually taxed at your marginal income tax rate.
For CD's I'd check bankrate, and look into whether or not you can become a USAA customer. FYI, I've seen advertised very attractive 6-15 month CD rates (4.75% APR) in the newspaper. My understanding is that the investment groups offering these are basically paying banks to underwrite these CD's to get you in the door, then they try to hardsell you their own investment vehicles (most likely shitty annuities). I haven't opted into these CD's, but so long as they're FDIC-insured and you can put up with their BS it may be worth looking into.
*Edit: Specifically because I'm tracking several things that I'd likely purchase on a major dip.
You should at least max your Roth IRA contribution for the year and have $5000 ready to contribute January 2nd, 2010. Per year it is $5000 or $6000 if you're over 50 years old.
Tax free money for retirement is a good thing.
I thought you could contribute money toward the 2009 yearly limit until April 15th, 2010. Am I incorrect?
Talk to a financial advisor and let them take care of your money. They know way more stuff about money. Preferably one that a friend or family member recommends.
mastman on
B.net: Kusanku
0
ArminasStudent of LifeSF, CARegistered Userregular
You should at least max your Roth IRA contribution for the year and have $5000 ready to contribute January 2nd, 2010. Per year it is $5000 or $6000 if you're over 50 years old.
Tax free money for retirement is a good thing.
I thought you could contribute money toward the 2009 yearly limit until April 15th, 2010. Am I incorrect?
Contributions must be made by due date. Contributions can be made to your traditional IRA for a year at any time during the year or by the due date for filing your return for that year, not including extensions. For most people, this means that contributions for 2008 must be made by April 15, 2009, and contributions for 2009 must be made by April 15, 2010.
You can make contributions to a Roth IRA for a year at any time during the year or by the due date of your return for that year (not including extensions).
You can make contributions for 2008 by the due date (not including extensions) for filing your 2008 tax return. This means that most people can make contributions for 2008 by April 15, 2009.
If you don't mind my asking, can you give me a ballpark number as to how much you have saved, and what your monthly footprint is?
While his choice to reveal his personal finances to peers/friends and while online is his own... you could probably guess a ballpark on his personal finance.
2-3 years of living expenses.
No property payments assuming they are relocating without much hassle.
Engaged significant other going to school so probably living in an acceptable suburb/city and not the boonies.
I'm generally aiming at larger sums, and I'm guessing per month:
$1000 for rent. ~$400 for food. Maybe $350 more for random expenses or entertainment.
I'd guess at $35k - $55k. But I have no idea how cheaply the op might actually live. Living in a tiny 1br, with few luxuries, mostly eating beans/rice/noodles for meals, no car, no pets, few outings, etc. would make monthly costs easily 1/2 or less of what I guessed at.
Note to the op: If you'd rather I didn't post this guesstimate, pm me, i'll remove it. Some people are understandably sensitive about their financial information.
If you don't mind my asking, can you give me a ballpark number as to how much you have saved, and what your monthly footprint is?
Yeah, I don't know what the etiquette is about giving that out on the internet. So, um, spoiler.
About $30,000 (about equal to my pre-tax income). I'd say I live on $1300-1400 a month, maybe a little more, definitely a bit more in winter months. However, this includes bimonthly plane tickets to visit my fiancé, so if we were living together it would be more like $1100-1200. I spend a lot of money on food and the iPhone but not much else.
That is why I asked for a ballpark number. While legally I can't give any financial advice, knowing that a person has 25k in savings would make me point them in a different direction than someone who has 1-5k.
Alright so for the sake of the internet, let's go with 25k in savings and 1200 a month, which puts you (jobless) at roughly two years of money before you add in unemployment and whatever your fiance ends up making.
So first things first; does your current employer have a 401k? Are you putting in whatever % up to what they will match every paycheck? If you aren't, start doing that now. I'm also going to second starting up a Roth IRA and putting in your maximum contribution, which should be 5,000$. You should be able to still contribute to both your 2009 limit and your 2010 limit.
After that, it really depends on how much money you have left, and how much you feel comfortable keeping in savings. If you are sure you can get another job in 6 months if you get laid off/quit/move, keep the 6 months available. If you think it might be longer, keep that much. Anything over that can go directly into an investment vehicle of your choice (which is where you would need to research or talk to a financial advisor), you have more than enough money to meet the minimums of all the major mutual funds out there, so finding one that suits what you need shouldn't be an issue.
You should at least max your Roth IRA contribution for the year and have $5000 ready to contribute January 2nd, 2010. Per year it is $5000 or $6000 if you're over 50 years old.
Tax free money for retirement is a good thing.
I thought you could contribute money toward the 2009 yearly limit until April 15th, 2010. Am I incorrect?
I meant that since he has so much saved up, he might as well do this year's and have the money ready for next year's contributions since the end of the year is coming up.
Mr Blonde on
0
ArminasStudent of LifeSF, CARegistered Userregular
edited October 2009
I might also start looking for jobs in your destination area as well. It'd be pretty great if you could just start a new job when you land, granted the market sucks.
Something to think about for longer term investing is the dumbbell theory- 80-85% in boring safe shit like T-bills, 15-20% in stocks. T-bills are boring but you won't have to worry about losing money unless the current world order melts down, and the stocks part is small enough that it's not the end of the world if it all goes poof. You may want to stick a portion of that in blue chip stuff like Google and get more adventurous with the last 5-10%, but that's your call. This strategy gives you a reliable income stream and the potential for a big payoff if you get lucky with your stock picks while sheltering you from all but the most catastrophic of meltdowns. If T-bills go under too quickly for you to see the writing on the wall and switch to something safer you'll probably be worrying about bigger things than your investments at that point, like running from zombies or slow mutants.
If you're a young investor there is really no reason to have 85% of your portfolio in "safe" options, nor should you be worried about picking specific stocks (and I wouldn't pick Google anyways because it's too expensive at this point). Just look at how target date retirement funds are set up; they are extremely aggressive early on, but as you close in on and pass the target date they shift over to being safe and conservative.
Diversification > playing it safe. Plus international growth and sector funds.
I like the idea mentioned earlier about splitting some money up between multiple staggered CDs instead of one big one, as if you run into any trouble and need a bit of the money quicker you are more likely to have one of them maturing soon. If you need all the money at once though that won't work as well, but as a padding for needing to dip into them for regular living expenses as a rainy day fund it'll work better.
Also, if you start looking into bonds (which are often a tier below of stocks in terms of riskiness), you should educate yourself about them a bit before jumping in, or at very least research a mutual fund for them. The Federal Government finances its debt through issuing bonds, with names like Treasury notes or bills. The risk of the Federal Government not being able to make a payment and go outright bankrupt is more or less nonexistent right now, as they can monetize the debt, or in other words, "run the printing press". The big problem right now with T-bills is that interest rates on them are extremely low, particularly for short term ones, as they are the safe haven with everything else falling apart left and right.
For long term bonds the risk of rising interest rates means you can actually lose money if you don't intend to hold them to maturity. For bonds the market interest rate and the price on the bond are inversely related. In particular, a zero coupon bond like T-Bills the bond is sold at a discount value and pays the face value at maturity, where the interest rate is determined by how much interest would be required for the current discount price to reach the par value at the maturity date. So with less time until maturity, the price will tend to be much closer to the par value and have a lot less room to fluctuate based on interest rate volatility, and can simply be held to maturity without much risk. This means that in normal times the yield on short term bonds are lower than those on long term bonds due to the reduced risk and volatility.
Also, be careful about bonds from other sources, like companies or state and local governments, as they can go bankrupt and refuse to pay. For example, buying up debt from the California state government right now should not be undertaken by the faint of heart.
Investing is definitely an advisable option. Find yourself a good broker and they can make your money work for you on stock picks that are easy and strong enough for you to not lose any sleep over.
I started learning about investing about 2 months ago and it's one of the smartest things I've ever done, while I've only been trading for about a month myself it's something I would suggest if you want to learn something new and make money while you're doing it.
That said, if you don't want to do it yourself you can set some guidelines for what you want from a broker and they will do most of the work for you. It's not something you can learn in a day, a month, or even a year.
If you're a young investor there is really no reason to have 85% of your portfolio in "safe" options, nor should you be worried about picking specific stocks (and I wouldn't pick Google anyways because it's too expensive at this point). Just look at how target date retirement funds are set up; they are extremely aggressive early on, but as you close in on and pass the target date they shift over to being safe and conservative.
Diversification > playing it safe. Plus international growth and sector funds.
How do you think those funds are doing these days? Most people are taking it square in the ass but they avoided it somehow, right? In our current economic climate you are much better served by finding a safe harbor until the storm passes. If you're a savvy investor with experience and balls, sure, be aggressive and look for good deals while everything is in the toilet. That type of person probably wouldn't be posting here looking for advice though.
At the beginning of this year I moved most of one of my accounts to international funds, an index fund and an ETF. All of them are outperforming the "safe" options, so I would say with certainty that those funds are doing just fine.
In our economic climate you are much better served by finding a safe harbor if you are getting ready to retire. Young investors, aka accumulators, shouldn't be worried about preservation and maintenance of wealth, they should be looking for growth.
Hell, take a look at the front page of Investopedia (which I also have linked in my sig, if you're going to be serious about starting to invest for retirement you should probably just read the entire site.). Today's front page article has what I have been saying as one of it's major talking points, diversification and international exposure.
Posts
Either you have a very low cash footprint, or you've got some very decent money saved up. I don't know how much - but I wouldn't lock it away in such a way that you couldn't get at a few months' worth in an emergency (without penalty - keep at least some of it liquid).
Still, a "high yield" account only yields about 1.3-1.8% these days. So you could keep enough money to live off in there, and put the rest into CDs. These days the best CDs are 1yr, with most banks I've looked at having this weird and unprecedented (or so I'm told) inverted yield curve. So keep enough money to live off of for a year in the savings account, and put the rest in a CD. Or if you are worried, put half in a 1 year CD, the other half in a 6 month CD, and then when either one matures, reinvest it into a 1 year so you are never more than 6 months away from some money.
Also, many banks will let you take money out of the CDs whenever you want, but you suffer an interest penalty. Often severe. Severe enough to render the use of a CD pointless.
A friend of mine, who works for a bank, was telling me at a party on Saturday that he could get me a savings account with 5% interest. I was dumbfounded. I don't even know how that's possible.
As far as investing it goes, there's a couple different ways you can go. Unfortunately, your best bet would have been to invest since March of this year so as to ride this stock market rally. My personal opinion that I will not debate further in here is that this runup to 10,000 points has been built on false hope and earnings reports that, while being "better-than-expected", were still bad compared to years prior. I don't think the market's settled down and I think that 10,000 is going to drop significantly again, so I'm not sure I'd recommend going heavily into stocks right this moment. Or if you do, head for traditionally conservative/defensive positions (gold did VERY well this year in the face of a weak dollar and inevitable inflation).
PSN: TheScrublet
That was possible 18 months ago, dunno about now.
Yeah, my thoughts exactly. But he was saying this two days ago, and I asked for clarification, and he said he was serious. My other friends were pretty baffled too. This guy is kind of a space case sometimes, but he does seem to usually know his stuff when it comes to banking and accounting.
Can you explain the mechanics of why a CD is a good idea? I am pretty financially ignorant.
And yeah, were I to invest, I'm definitely going to wait until (what looks like) the little financial bubble the stock market's got going right now pops. Though I'm planning to invest in SRI's with PAX, so I'm not sure how much those companies will be affected anyway. (Actually, does anyone have thoughts on the merits of socially-responsible investment funds, while we're at it?)
The credit union I work for does something like this (though it's only 4% right now), but you only get the high rate on the first $500 in your account, and the rest is at the regular rate. They do it on both savings and checking, so the max amount they have to pay the 4% interest on is $1000, so it's actually pretty feasable. I bet it's the same deal with your friends bank.
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
That's got to be what he was talking about. Because otherwise...well, I think my current savings gets .05% or something ridiculous like that.
CDs will give you a pretty much guaranteed return in a set amount of time, and are FDIC-backed. You won't get much higher than 4%, but I guarantee you people were treasuring their 4% CDs a year ago around this time.
PSN: TheScrublet
Do you have any debts? Do you have any plans for the money (down payment on home, bitching home entertainment system, getting a pet)? Is this "extra" money the result of saving (good discipline) or some windfall (inheritance, bonus, etc.)?
If it's a result of disciplined savings, and you don't have any debts, and you're not planning any major purchases soon, you're likely going to increase your longterm returns by fully funding your IRA and then investing the money in that IRA in some way.
CD's are FDIC-insured (or they should be, check the fine print), and they guarantee the rate of return advertised. You will get the 2.0% or whatever when the CD matures. The tradeoff is you cannot get to the money until the CD matures without monetary penalty (unless you buy a lower rate CD that permits early withdrawal, which may garner no better return then a high-yield savings account). CD income is also interest income which is taxed at a lower rate then short-term capital gains (I'm pretty sure at least). CD's are for the risk-averse and for those whose highest concern is preservation of capital, but can tolerate the illiquidity of the CD during its marurity period. If your time horizon is longer then a few years, then you can likely get a higher rate of return from investing in different securities (though it's not guaranteed).
Another potential complication is that my fiancée won't be able to find a job, so my savings will have to support us both. Though I think she'll have an easier time finding one than I will.
No debts, just saving over time. The only major plan I have would be moving, and possibly supporting myself and/or my fiancée. Eventually I'd like to pay for a wedding but that can wait until we're both financially secure.
So about these CD's ... 2% is only a bit higher than my money market's giving me. But it doesn't sound like the maturity time will be an issue if I keep enough in savings to get through it if need be. Any tips on where/what kind of CD's to purchase?
6 Months worth of actual expenses should still work even now, as if you become involuntarily unemployed (and didn't get fired for cause), you'll also be able to collect unemployment, which would supplement the savings you have tucked away, enabling it to last much longer than 6 months.
Backlog Wars - Sonic Generations | Steam!
Viewing the forums through rose colored glasses... or Suriko's Ye Old Style and The PostCount/TimeStamp Restoral Device
Tax free money for retirement is a good thing.
They're usually on-line only. People like to have a physical location they can go to deal with issues that may arise.
"high yield savings" could mean a lot of things. It could be a savings that gets more than the regular savings, but if its under a certian balance there's a fee. It could be where if its under a certian balance it doesn't earn anything at all. For some (like the first $500 gets a better rate ones we were talking about before) they want you to have direct deposit and online statements or somethin like that. Or, like Septus said it could be with an online-only kind of place. I think that's what ING is.
fuck up once and you break your thumb / if you're happy at all then you're god damn dumb
that's right we're on a fucked up cruise / God is dead but at least we have booze
bad things happen, no one knows why / the sun burns out and everyone dies
The reason you'd want CDs over a savings account is because it offers a better rate of return. My savings account gets 1.35% and my CD gets 0.5% more. 0.5% might not seem like much. But if you have a good chunk of money, every little bit counts. If you have 100,000 saved that comes out to an extra $500 a year. Ok, sure, it's penny pinching, but it's basically free money for being smarter with your money. Savings accounts and CDs are both equally secure. It's not like the stock market. The only thing you lose out on with CDs is immediate access to your cash. Which is why I'd only do it with the money you know you won't need, and keep the rest in the savings account. It's also why I suggested staggering a pair of cds by 6 months, to give you quicker access to it in the event of job loss and the emergency fund being eaten.
I have the HSBC online account and it seems to vary by who the teller is. They all answered my questions, but of the three that I had dealt with, only one would deposit my checks. The others just said use the ATM.
Yeah, I never tried. There aren't any branches near me.
Actually that number comes from an article I had read citing BLS estimating average time unemployed being about 6 months. Cannot find it now; it's a moving target anyways. There are other considerations to factor in (e.g. local labor market, having to support your fiance and her student loan payments [if any]). It couldn't hurt to have more in emergency savings, though you could offset reduction of return by splitting a years worth of expenses between savings and a 6-month CD.
If you can get an equivalent rate in savings/checking then you can find for a CD then I'd stick to savings/checking, cause I'd value the instant liquidity to another 25 basis points*. The shortterm CD's I've been looking at don't really offer a much better rate then a high-balance ($25K) savings account.
And I was wrong about interest money being taxed at a lower rate, I thought it would be taxed like a qualified dividend, but I believe it's actually taxed at your marginal income tax rate.
For CD's I'd check bankrate, and look into whether or not you can become a USAA customer. FYI, I've seen advertised very attractive 6-15 month CD rates (4.75% APR) in the newspaper. My understanding is that the investment groups offering these are basically paying banks to underwrite these CD's to get you in the door, then they try to hardsell you their own investment vehicles (most likely shitty annuities). I haven't opted into these CD's, but so long as they're FDIC-insured and you can put up with their BS it may be worth looking into.
*Edit: Specifically because I'm tracking several things that I'd likely purchase on a major dip.
I thought you could contribute money toward the 2009 yearly limit until April 15th, 2010. Am I incorrect?
Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!
B.net: Kusanku
According to this page, you are correct.
http://www.fivecentnickel.com/2008/11/07/2009-traditional-and-roth-ira-contribution-limits/
And confirmed by http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch01.html#en_US_publink10006076 for Traditional IRAs.
The rules for Roth IRAs http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch02.html#en_US_publink10006488 are the same, although worded differently.
While his choice to reveal his personal finances to peers/friends and while online is his own... you could probably guess a ballpark on his personal finance.
2-3 years of living expenses.
No property payments assuming they are relocating without much hassle.
Engaged significant other going to school so probably living in an acceptable suburb/city and not the boonies.
I'm generally aiming at larger sums, and I'm guessing per month:
$1000 for rent. ~$400 for food. Maybe $350 more for random expenses or entertainment.
I'd guess at $35k - $55k. But I have no idea how cheaply the op might actually live. Living in a tiny 1br, with few luxuries, mostly eating beans/rice/noodles for meals, no car, no pets, few outings, etc. would make monthly costs easily 1/2 or less of what I guessed at.
Note to the op: If you'd rather I didn't post this guesstimate, pm me, i'll remove it. Some people are understandably sensitive about their financial information.
So first things first; does your current employer have a 401k? Are you putting in whatever % up to what they will match every paycheck? If you aren't, start doing that now. I'm also going to second starting up a Roth IRA and putting in your maximum contribution, which should be 5,000$. You should be able to still contribute to both your 2009 limit and your 2010 limit.
After that, it really depends on how much money you have left, and how much you feel comfortable keeping in savings. If you are sure you can get another job in 6 months if you get laid off/quit/move, keep the 6 months available. If you think it might be longer, keep that much. Anything over that can go directly into an investment vehicle of your choice (which is where you would need to research or talk to a financial advisor), you have more than enough money to meet the minimums of all the major mutual funds out there, so finding one that suits what you need shouldn't be an issue.
I meant that since he has so much saved up, he might as well do this year's and have the money ready for next year's contributions since the end of the year is coming up.
I 'spose ya'll can close this thread.
Diversification > playing it safe. Plus international growth and sector funds.
Also, if you start looking into bonds (which are often a tier below of stocks in terms of riskiness), you should educate yourself about them a bit before jumping in, or at very least research a mutual fund for them. The Federal Government finances its debt through issuing bonds, with names like Treasury notes or bills. The risk of the Federal Government not being able to make a payment and go outright bankrupt is more or less nonexistent right now, as they can monetize the debt, or in other words, "run the printing press". The big problem right now with T-bills is that interest rates on them are extremely low, particularly for short term ones, as they are the safe haven with everything else falling apart left and right.
For long term bonds the risk of rising interest rates means you can actually lose money if you don't intend to hold them to maturity. For bonds the market interest rate and the price on the bond are inversely related. In particular, a zero coupon bond like T-Bills the bond is sold at a discount value and pays the face value at maturity, where the interest rate is determined by how much interest would be required for the current discount price to reach the par value at the maturity date. So with less time until maturity, the price will tend to be much closer to the par value and have a lot less room to fluctuate based on interest rate volatility, and can simply be held to maturity without much risk. This means that in normal times the yield on short term bonds are lower than those on long term bonds due to the reduced risk and volatility.
Also, be careful about bonds from other sources, like companies or state and local governments, as they can go bankrupt and refuse to pay. For example, buying up debt from the California state government right now should not be undertaken by the faint of heart.
I started learning about investing about 2 months ago and it's one of the smartest things I've ever done, while I've only been trading for about a month myself it's something I would suggest if you want to learn something new and make money while you're doing it.
That said, if you don't want to do it yourself you can set some guidelines for what you want from a broker and they will do most of the work for you. It's not something you can learn in a day, a month, or even a year.
How do you think those funds are doing these days? Most people are taking it square in the ass but they avoided it somehow, right? In our current economic climate you are much better served by finding a safe harbor until the storm passes. If you're a savvy investor with experience and balls, sure, be aggressive and look for good deals while everything is in the toilet. That type of person probably wouldn't be posting here looking for advice though.
In our economic climate you are much better served by finding a safe harbor if you are getting ready to retire. Young investors, aka accumulators, shouldn't be worried about preservation and maintenance of wealth, they should be looking for growth.
Hell, take a look at the front page of Investopedia (which I also have linked in my sig, if you're going to be serious about starting to invest for retirement you should probably just read the entire site.). Today's front page article has what I have been saying as one of it's major talking points, diversification and international exposure.