As was foretold, we've added advertisements to the forums! If you have questions, or if you encounter any bugs, please visit this thread: https://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/240191/forum-advertisement-faq-and-reports-thread/
Options

Solved! Lock please!

GreasyKidsStuffGreasyKidsStuff MOMMM!ROAST BEEF WANTS TO KISS GIRLS ON THE TITTIES!Registered User regular
edited November 2009 in Help / Advice Forum
So I'm putting together a bibliography for a paper I'm writing for my sociology class, and I'm trying to figure out how to reference a website like this one:

http://www.srds.com/mediakits/rollingstone/demographics.html

There's no author or any of that. I looked at a few websites that list the different types of internet sources, but I'm not sure where this would fall under. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Oh and the citation style is APA, if that makes a difference.

GreasyKidsStuff on

Posts

  • Options
    mechaThormechaThor Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Using: http://www.liu.edu/CWIS/CWP/library/workshop/citapa.htm I would consider it a website with no author, though it does reference the source of the data (noted to be MRI TwelvePlus 2007 at the bottom). That being said, you could treat MRI etc. as the author, I would assume, as such:

    MRI TwelvePlus 2007. (Spring, 2009). Rolling Stone Spring 2009 Demographics.
    Retrieved (put whatever date here), from The Rolling Stone:
    http://www.srds.com/mediakits/rollingstone/demographics.html

    I just did a bibliography today for a Soc paper (APA style no less), so I feel your pain.

    mechaThor on
    "I sent an e-mail asking why wood elves get +2 Str when other dwarves did not. My response from customer service consisted of five words: 'Wood elves are really strong.' "
  • Options
    GreasyKidsStuffGreasyKidsStuff MOMMM! ROAST BEEF WANTS TO KISS GIRLS ON THE TITTIES!Registered User regular
    edited November 2009
    Good enough for me. I'll get this locked up. Citations SUCK.

    GreasyKidsStuff on
This discussion has been closed.