The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Three-Month trip to the US of A

Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
edited January 2007 in Help / Advice Forum
Let me begin by saying that America was never high on my list of holiday destinations. As much as I love American TV (over here people take some unfathomable pride in putting ugly people on our screens), I was never really sold on the idea, and as such, have never really devoted much thought to such an endeavour. I think all those crime shows may be to blame.

Nevertheless, an old uni buddy of mine (lived with him and four other guys for three manic years) has a place in San Francisco now. Or rather, his father does (don't know what he does for a living, but he's super rich apparantly). Therefore, the plan is for me and a third guy (one of the four from uni) will be making our presence felt for an extended period of around three months (isn't that the max time foreigners are allowed there?).

Here's where I need the advice:

1) What would be the cheapest way to get ourselves onto the continent? The current plan is that we'll fly to Chicago (via Vienna I think), which I think works out pretty cheap (haven't done the research myself). If anyone knows of a cheaper or better way to get from anywhere in the UK to anywhere in the USA (or Canada. Would that work?) I'd love to hear it.

2) The current plan (if Chicago is the initial destination), is to rent a car (expensive, I know, but should be worth it. Third guy at first suggested a bus straight across country but that sounds like a complete waste to me) and drive all the way to San Francisco. So... What should we look out for on the way? I have a few ideas of where I'd like to visit, but haven't looked at a map yet to see if it'd be possible. What shouldn't we miss?

fake edit: Ooh, probably should mention that once we're in San Francisco, guy's father is lending us his car (gonna drive his motorbike to work for a few weeks. It's the same model as Ewan McGregor rides in Long Way Round). Anything on that coast can be taken care of then, rather than on the way there (or back).

3) Flight restrictions. Yeah... There's all these laws about what you can and cannot take on planes these days. Anything major I should work into plans? What's likely to change with threat levels and such. Contingencies?


As you can probably tell, I've done very little leg-work so far, so any info or ideas you guys can throw at me will be much appreciated. Though the excuse for the trip is to visit a lonely old friend, my intention is to make the most of it while I'm there.

...Probably should have done this piece by piece. So many questions I need sorted before we meet up to book things at the end of this month.

Sunday_Assassin on

Posts

  • SzechuanosaurusSzechuanosaurus Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited January 2007
    My brother did basically this with some of his uni friends, but instead of renting a car, they just bought a cheap, second hand car with the intention of just selling it when they got to the other side of the country (although in reality, I think they abused it so hard getting across the country that they just ended up scraping it when they got to san fran!). If you're going to be there for three months, it's likely to be cheaper than hiring a car that whole time.

    A 'fun' alternative might be to hire a camper. I did this with my family when I was a tot, staying at camp sites across the US. Means no motel fees and you can cook for yourself, but I don't know how it balances out between the extra cost of hiring a camper and camp-site fees etc.

    As for flight restrictions, the UK basically has tighter restrictions than anywhere else at the moment so basically whatever it says on BAs website will be what you should plan around.

    Szechuanosaurus on
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    There is Yellowstone, a few nice mountains, and a couple decent other natural places to see, as well as Mt. Rushmore between Chicago and San Fran. That's about it. Most of that is flyover country. If you were willing to veer off-course a bit, you could visit Vegas.

    I would be surprised if it were cheaper to fly into Chicago than NYC. I'd be even more surprised if it were cheaper to fly into Chicago or NYC and rent a car than it'd be to fly into SFO.

    By the time you get around to flying out here, flight rules will almost certainly have changed. Check about a week or two before you leave.

    Thanatos on
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Thanatos wrote:
    There is Yellowstone, a few nice mountains, and a couple decent other natural places to see, as well as Mt. Rushmore between Chicago and San Fran. That's about it. Most of that is flyover country. If you were willing to veer off-course a bit, you could visit Vegas.

    I would be surprised if it were cheaper to fly into Chicago than NYC. I'd be even more surprised if it were cheaper to fly into Chicago or NYC and rent a car than it'd be to fly into SFO.

    By the time you get around to flying out here, flight rules will almost certainly have changed. Check about a week or two before you leave.

    I'm not really bothered about it being more expensive to fly to one place and drive. Personally I'm not too keen on spending all three months in the same place, imposing on the guy's dad. It's a very long time for a holiday, and I'm up for a bit of an adventure.

    That said, from what I've heard it may well be cheaper to do it this way. Flights can run pretty damn expensive direct to San Fransisco (or so I've heard). And we won't be renting a car for all three months, just the time it takes us to get from where we land to San Fransisco, howver long that may be.

    Mt. Rushmore is one of the places I kinda wanna see, but only cos I've heard it's a lot smaller than people think.

    A camper van could well be awesome. I'll have to look into it, I think.

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    You may want to take a look at Amtrak, it might be cheaper than renting/driving a car. Of course, the negative is that you're stuck on their route and can't take side trips.

    Unfortunately, it's true that there's a while lotta nothing between Chicago and SF. Hit the Grand Canyon, or so I've heard (haven't been out there myself), Yellowstone and Rushmore if you can, though the last two will be well out of your way. I don't want to sound like an arrogant American talking down to an ignorant foreigner, so please don't take this the wrong way, but you have to remember how freaking big this country is. Something that looks like it's just a little out of your way will mean an extra day or two. Not a bad thing, but important to keep in mind.

    Once you get to the West Coast, you'll have all kinds of stuff to do. It's just the travelling that will be annoying. If anyone involved in this operation (I would assume the friend you're visiting) is part of AAA, you would be well advised to talk to them; free maps and guidebooks and lots of discounts along the way on lodging and such. They are tremendously helpful.

    GoodOmens on
    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • NPNP Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    To be completely honest, there is really barely anything between Chicago and San Francisco. If you're up for driving (and driving..and driving..and just driving..) then it'll be a fun time, with the occasional lame tourist trap on the way (and of course the occasional awesome place, but basically Yellowstone and Mt. Rushmore (and possibly Vegas) are it.

    Here is a sample of what your trip would look like: google

    So, 3 stops, and over 40 hours of driving. I would honestly recommend just flying into NYC and spending a few days there, then flying over to Chicago and spending a few days in that area, and then flying over to San Francisco. It would in all honestly be cheaper as well, as the out of state miles plus the 2000+ mile difference in the car rental drop-off point (between Chicago and San Francisco) would no doubt be ridiculously expensive. Not to be insulting, but the US is huge, and it's sometimes conceptually hard to understand just how big it is. I live on the East Coast, with much smaller states, and even I never really understood the vast size of the western states until I went there myself in my 20s.

    Also, another thing to remember is that you have to be 25 years old to rent a car in the United States. Some companies will let you get away with being younger, but expect extremely high surcharges to be added to your bill if you are under renting age.

    NP on
  • GoodOmensGoodOmens Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    NP wrote:
    Not to be insulting, but the US is huge, and it's sometimes conceptually hard to understand just how big it is. I live on the East Coast, with much smaller states, and even I never really understood the vast size of the western states until I went there myself in my 20s.

    My wife and I drove from Chicago to Seattle, and a few years later from Seattle to Boston. I swear going through Montana took 8 years.

    Oh, a bit of other advice for the OP...especially when driving through the desert areas (probably Utah and Nevada depending on what route you take), drink lots of water and WEAR SUNSCREEN! As my wife and I found out to our displeasure, you can get sunburned in a car. The glass will block alot of the UV, but not all of it (especially if you're going to be here in the spring/summer).

    GoodOmens on
    steam_sig.png
    IOS Game Center ID: Isotope-X
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    NP wrote:
    Also, another thing to remember is that you have to be 25 years old to rent a car in the United States. Some companies will let you get away with being younger, but expect extremely high surcharges to be added to your bill if you are under renting age.

    25? Seriously? If that's the case then that options out.


    ...Seriously? 25?

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    So there's nothing really between Chicago and San Francisco, then? That's a shame. I would have thought with how big your states are (and believe me, I have contemplated their vastness relative to my little corner of the world) they'd have plenty to keep us occupied.

    The distance doesn't really bother me, though. I have no problem spending more than a week on the journeys there and back. Wouldn't be an adventure without that much driving (and I'm kinda looking forward to endless stretches of road at some points. Give me a chance to drive in a way I really can't in this country).

    If there's not enough to fill the gaps, though, another route may be better. Have to have a word with my travelling buddy (he just got laid off the other day, so its not like he has much to do with his time). I'm keen on any journey that doesn't involve flying straight there or getting a bus or something. The best trips I've ever been on have been where I've just thrown my stuff in the car and gone wherever I pleased. Similarly, the worst have been those where I've just been stuck in one place or on one plan. While I will be journeying about once on the West Coast, I really want to do it on the way in too.

    If only because, once there, I'll be restricted by the plans of the guy who we're visiting: his job, when we can take the car etc. Only if it's significantly cheaper (and I mean by a lot. Like, half or something) will I consider a direct route.

    ...Unless the other guy insists.

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • drhazarddrhazard Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    It's not that there's nothing there. It's just, there's nothing structured. If your the outdoors-y type, someone who likes that kind of scenery, you can find a way there that will bring you through some breathtaking views.

    It's just going to take some effort to plan it, though, which is why an AAA membership might help.

    drhazard on
    SCB.jpg
  • NPNP Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    At the risk of sounding pretentious, most of the civilization in the United states is east of Chicago, towards NYC and New England, etc. If you drive east instead of west there will be a ton of things to do, and you won't be driving for hours without seeing any towns (in fact, you'll be seeing a LOT of towns and a lot of people). The only real exception to this is when you go far enough west and hit the West Coast. Besides that, it's a whole lotta scenery and not much else.

    About the car rental thing, if you don't mind paying an extra $10-15 per day, and are over 21, then it's still doable. If you're under 21 then there's very little hope for renting a car, sorry... Also, a little side note and YMMV, but I have rented a car under 25 with no surcharge by giving my company's corporate code (you can find a list of these online). They didn't ask for any corporate ID or anything like that (though, I did actually have the ID if necessary). Not sure what the rules are on this, but you can try giving a bogus corporate ID and try to avoid the surcharges, but it might not be a sure bet..

    NP on
  • blincolnblincoln Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I rented a car in SF when I was 23 or 24, it shouldn't be a problem for you. If you don't have insurance, they will charge you more for theirs.

    There are plenty of things to do in-between Chicago and SF. This is a drive I went on back at the end of October, which covers a lot of that potential territory. The text is really boring, but check out the pictures for things you might like to see.

    I really liked everything I saw on my trip, but I would specifically recommend Yellowstone, the Badlands, Mount Rushmore (which is actually really big, IMO), driving through Shell Canyon in Wyoming if the roads are clear, and whichever of the major cities (Chicago, Portland, Seattle, etc) you end up close to.

    Save as much time as possible for SF, though. It's an unbelievably big city compared to anywhere else I've been, and there is a ton of stuff to do.

    blincoln on
    Legacy of Kain: The Lost Worlds
    http://www.thelostworlds.net/
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Yeah, I realise the trip doesn't really target many big cities along the way, but there's not really much I can do about that (unless I change the start point, which I probably should do). Also, I'm not really a city knd of guy anyway. Scenery's higher on my list than cities, especially since we'll be in San Francisco for over two months (just looked on GoogleEarth. Sucker is huge).

    We're all over 21. Have been for a while. Is the extra charge extra insurance or something? Would kinda make sense if it was to be honest.

    Thanks for the link, blincoln. Am avidly reading as I type.

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • TSU0999TSU0999 Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Well I can't really offer you much advice on driving to SanFran other than don't do it. There's a stretch of states where you can't really tell when one ends and the other begins. You'll be greeted by corn fields, and some open plains.
    3) Flight restrictions. Yeah... There's all these laws about what you can and cannot take on planes these days. Anything major I should work into plans? What's likely to change with threat levels and such. Contingencies?

    I haven't flown international lately, but I have flown domestic. Depending on the gate security you may or may not be able to bring on drinks bought within the terminals. I've found that if the bottle is still sealed they'll let you bring it on the flight. They also tend to not check carry-ons are heavily as they used. You should pack all toiletries in the checked baggage. Saves you lots of time at the gate, and are less likely to be pulled aside for security check. If you do pack any toiletries into your carry on they have to be in a clear plastic bag, and no larger than 8 ounces. No idea if this still stands, but it did last year at November.

    Umm...I think that's all I have to offer, if you have any more questions I'll try to answer as best I can.

    TSU0999 on
    ironmansig.png
  • SilverWindSilverWind Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Flying from Canada to the US in early Jan., carry on liquids had to be in a sealed (clear?) plastic bag (just use ziploc). Nothing could be over 100 mL except for prescribed medication or anything relating to that (my contact lens fluid, for example). Check in everything else.

    SilverWind on
    signature.png
    Switch: SW-7603-3284-4227
    My ACNH Wishlists | My ACNH Catalog
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited January 2007
    NP wrote:
    Also, another thing to remember is that you have to be 25 years old to rent a car in the United States. Some companies will let you get away with being younger, but expect extremely high surcharges to be added to your bill if you are under renting age.

    25? Seriously? If that's the case then that options out.


    ...Seriously? 25?

    Some rental firms (Avis) won't rent to you if you're under 25. Others (Enterprise) will just charge you extra - usually an extra $10 per day.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • DemerdarDemerdar Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Las Vegas is definately a stop you should make on your way to San Fran. It's a little out of the way, but I'm sure you'll enjoy it.

    Demerdar on
    y6GGs3o.gif
  • Pants ManPants Man Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    i personally wouldn't recommend trying to drive cross country if you don't have any experience on a long ass road trip. one thing that i've noticed when talking with europeans about travelling here in the US is that a large amount of 'em don't really comprehend just how big the US actually is. i know it's been said before but i think it needs repeating: you don't want to be in the middle of south dakota in the middle of the summer, 100 miles away from anywhere and with no gas. travelling across the US alone and with few connections can be extremely difficult.

    going by train might be okay, although the train service here is sub par at best, and there isn't much in the way of available services, so you'd probably want to book well in advance if you decided to go that route. that said, trains here got through some very senic places, and it's fairly cheap.

    probably the best route to see anything interesting going from chicago is to basically go south and cross texas and the southwest. austin is a nice city, and there are other cool things to see going west from texas into california, but here's two huge negatives to this:

    1. it will add an enormous amount of time to your trip

    2. you may not be so keen on going straight through what is maybe the hottest and most isolated part of the lower 48.

    but i would say that if you're trying to be the most hardcore michael palinesque (although he hated America) dude ever, go for that.


    again, PLEASE don't underestimate how big this place is. if you fuck up and get lost in the wrong place, you're going to be completely miserable. i know way too many people who have had this happen to them (not just foriegners; everybody, Americans included). make sure you're set on maps and that you understand them. also, take rest stop and gas station signs seriously. when they say that there's no gas stations for 50 or 75 miles, they aren't screwing around.


    i know i sound like a worrywart here, and like i don't want you to have fun or anything, but if you take this road trip, it's not going to be like a nice jaunt through western europe. there are few (if any) hostels, if your car breaks down in the middle of nowhere, you're basically fucked, and the weather can be completely unpredictable. travelling like this across country can be fun as hell, but only if you're well-prepared.

    Pants Man on
    "okay byron, my grandma has a right to be happy, so i give you my blessing. just... don't get her pregnant. i don't need another mom."
  • CasperCasper __BANNED USERS regular
    edited January 2007
    Unless you want to take a trip that would be only a couple days drive and make it much much longer do not take a bus. Also alot of the bus stations are very disgusting and are not in the nicest areas.

    Casper on
  • blincolnblincoln Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I thought my cross-country drive was a lot easier than most people make them out to be. 6500+ miles in 11 days, and that included a lot of stopping to look around at things on the way.

    That was by myself, too. If I'd been splitting the driving with someone else, it would have been completely easy.

    But yes, it is worth reminding Europeans that the US is pretty big, and that they should be prepared. Driving a rental is a good start, since it should be in decent shape mechanically. Make sure to fill up with gas every chance you get in sparsely-populated areas, and you're set.

    blincoln on
    Legacy of Kain: The Lost Worlds
    http://www.thelostworlds.net/
  • DynagripDynagrip Break me a million hearts HoustonRegistered User, ClubPA regular
    edited January 2007
    One gas can in the trunk/boot wouldn't be an awful idea either...

    Dynagrip on
  • FeralFeral MEMETICHARIZARD interior crocodile alligator ⇔ ǝɹʇɐǝɥʇ ǝᴉʌoɯ ʇǝloɹʌǝɥɔ ɐ ǝʌᴉɹp ᴉRegistered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I did New York to Denver once in three days, then one more day to Las Vegas, then another day to San Francisco.

    This involved not stopping at any landmarks or in Los Angeles, which would be folly - folly - for you.

    Here's what I would do. Skip Chicago unless you have some specific reason to go. Instead, fly into someplace closer to the Grand Canyon, like Phoenix or Denver. Denver will be cheaper, but Phoenix has easier access to the canyon. Go from there to the Grand Canyon, then down to highway 40 and take that to Las Vegas. Spend a couple nights in Vegas, then move on to Los Angeles. Plan a few days in LA - do Disneyland, night life, hit the beach, whatever your thing is.

    Once you're in LA, you have a couple of options for getting up to San Francisco. You can take the I5 for a straight, but boring, 6-hour-ish drive, or you can take 101 and stay the night in either Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, or Monterey for a longer scenic drive with some incredibly beautiful coastline.

    Feral on
    every person who doesn't like an acquired taste always seems to think everyone who likes it is faking it. it should be an official fallacy.

    the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
  • ThanatosThanatos Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Feral wrote:
    I did New York to Denver once in three days, then one more day to Las Vegas, then another day to San Francisco.

    This involved not stopping at any landmarks or in Los Angeles, which would be folly - folly - for you.

    Here's what I would do. Skip Chicago unless you have some specific reason to go. Instead, fly into someplace closer to the Grand Canyon, like Phoenix or Denver. Denver will be cheaper, but Phoenix has easier access to the canyon. Go from there to the Grand Canyon, then down to highway 40 and take that to Las Vegas. Spend a couple nights in Vegas, then move on to Los Angeles. Plan a few days in LA - do Disneyland, night life, hit the beach, whatever your thing is.

    Once you're in LA, you have a couple of options for getting up to San Francisco. You can take the I5 for a straight, but boring, 6-hour-ish drive, or you can take 101 and stay the night in either Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, or Monterey for a longer scenic drive with some incredibly beautiful coastline.
    This is a good idea. There's a lot to do in the Monterey/Santa Cruz area, too.

    Thanatos on
  • Sunday_AssassinSunday_Assassin Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    I'm thinking all of California and Vegas will be left out of the initial trip, since we can hit them up easily enough once settled in San Francisco. Don't want to get to Vegas and lose all my money before I have a good idea of how much everything is costing me out there. I'm thinking a big southern drive might be Journey no. 2 of the trip, eating up a couple of weeks in exciting places.

    Cheers for all the advice. Chicago may well recieve a veto next time its mentioned if there's really so little going on in the middle country. I do want to get as much variety as possible, and a long week-long drive does sound tempting (there might be three of us, I've just learned, to share the driving), but its gonna be a question of cost vs. reward.

    Sunday_Assassin on
  • MichaelLCMichaelLC In what furnace was thy brain? ChicagoRegistered User regular
    edited January 2007
    Feral wrote:

    Here's what I would do. Skip Chicago unless you have some specific reason to go.

    I take exceptuion, good sir/madam, that there's no reason to go to Chicago!

    GINO-01.jpg

    Besides 10lbs. pizza, there's good museums, the Lake, and some good shopping.

    But yeah, everything between Chicago and SF is pretty much a Hell-hole.

    MichaelLC on
  • Seattle ThreadSeattle Thread Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    It is cheapest to fly into NYC. Second is Chicago, and most expensive is SFO. This was a quick search on Expedia--nothing in-depth, so if you scour around you can find different pricing models. In any case, it was at least $1500 for the tickets, round-trip.

    If I were you, I would take a tour of the east coast. You can visit the New England and see how it compares, then head south to the, erm, south, which is gorgeous.

    It seems that you're intent on exploring the lonesome crowded west, so after a few weeks or so out east you can easily start making your way over here. I warn you, like many have before, that it's barren. Once you cross the Mississippi there's no going back. But on the bright side, Frisco is great, and if you're so inclined you can come up and visit our little jewel in the northwest.

    As for renting a car, just google "rental cars" and you'll get listings for all the nationals. Train or bus are also viable options, but last time I checked Amtrak pricing, it was not that much cheaper than airfare. At any rate, renting a car is going to be costly, so you may want to look into buying a car here and then selling it before you leave. It's risky, but if you can find a good deal on a reliable car then you'll end up saving a lot and making most of it back at the end of the line. Used, of course--unless you have $20K to throw around.

    Try not to be too tied-down by a schedule, either. You'll want some sort of itinerary and and idea of where you'd like to go, but being anal about it won't make for an enjoyable trip. Leave plenty of room for getting lost, taking detours, shortcuts, sightseeing, and the like.

    Seattle Thread on
    kofz2amsvqm3.png
  • SithDrummerSithDrummer Registered User regular
    edited January 2007
    GoodOmens wrote:
    Oh, a bit of other advice for the OP...especially when driving through the desert areas (probably Utah and Nevada depending on what route you take), drink lots of water and WEAR SUNSCREEN! As my wife and I found out to our displeasure, you can get sunburned in a car. The glass will block alot of the UV, but not all of it (especially if you're going to be here in the spring/summer).
    Good advice. Drink lots of water, more than you think you need, and before you start getting very thirsty. A buddy of mine had the initial signs of heatstroke by the time we reached Austin from Dallas, and that was only about a 4 hour drive (blasted stop-and-go traffic).

    Definitely heed the advice about an extra can of gas and a spare tire, because being stuck out in the middle of nowhere is really, really crummy.

    SithDrummer on
Sign In or Register to comment.