The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Help, Is There A Good Combat Flight Sim?

The Grey GOATThe Grey GOAT Registered User regular
edited April 2010 in Games and Technology
I was wondering, does anyone know of a good combat flight sim? It's been a long while since I played a good combat flight sim, the last one I remember was Janes US Navy Fighters 97'. There were a ton of these games with the Janes lable back in late 90's.....F-15, F-18/A, AH-64D Longbow.
Jane%27s_F-15_Coverart.jpg

256px-Jane%27s-F-18_-_cover.jpg

USNF was my personal favorite though. Now all we get are mediocre Tom Clancy games.


Jane%27s_US_Navy_Fighters_Coverart.png

I still have this game and would play it today, unfotunately I don't think it's even compatible with Windows XP and I don't feel like forcing my computer to work with Windows 98. Plus the graphics and sounds could definitly use an overhaul but that's all minor compared to my enjoyment of the game. I have seen something about using what is called a DOS-Box, a free software emulator of old school DOS, to run the game. However, I assume that this is easier said than done.

Basically I'm looking for something similar to US Navy Fighters, where your allowed to take on different types of missions either escort, bombing runs, dogfights, etc. I also want it to be a sim, nothing with a cheap arcade feel like HAWX or Ace Combat. Granted, USNF didn't have 100% accurate damage effects although your plane would become crippled if you got hit, but it kept track of things like fuel, G-Force limitations on your plane, accurate missle locking systems, radar, ammo capacity, etc. It even modeled most cockpits and weapons pretty well. And as I mentioned before, although you plane could take a missle or two, it would be in bad shape after a good hit. I remeber one mission where I took about 50% damage and I had to fly back to base throttling my engine between 70 - 30% because the damage it sustained caused an oil leak which would make it over heat if I fully powed it up.

Also, a big thing for me in USNF was the fact that you could fly various types of jets and even an AC-130 with a cheat code. Also, I want jets.....not world war 2 planes or anything like that. I want modern style air combat.

The other day in the store, I saw an add on to Microsofts Flight Simulator X that includes military jets, but I'm not sure if you just fly or if you take them on combat missions. I also saw a bunch of crap add-ons to other games and some X-15 Rocket Plane Flight simulator or something like that which looked like it had been on the shelf for ages.

I've been searching for a game like USNF for years now and I haven't come across anything like it. I might be missing something or just overlooked a few games, but if I have can someone please point me in the right direction. Also, if anyone has played USNF please feel free to comment on it and what your thoughts are compared to any other similar games you might recommend. Constructive thoughts only though please. If you think the game is a piece of shit, fine.....but at least back it up with why or something to keep the topic moving.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Faster, Faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." -HST
The Grey GOAT on
«1

Posts

  • RubycatRubycat Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    The only modern'ish sim I know of is Lockon/LockonFlaming cliffs its got jets (mostly russian jets), but there is also A-10 and some other nation fighters.

    Rubycat on
    steam_sig.png
    PSN: Rubycat3 / NintentdoID: Rubycat
  • OrestusOrestus Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    For 5 bucks on Amazon you can get a flight collection including Lock On: Modern Air Combat, IL-2 Sturmovik, and Pacific Fighters.

    http://www.amazon.com/Ultimate-Flight-Collection-Pc/dp/B000BWZFDE/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1270661532&sr=8-5

    I think Lock On is what you are looking for, I don't keep up on flight sims too much but this was the gold standard a couple years ago, and knowing the sim community I'm sure there are extensive and well put together mods for it.

    Plus you are also getting Il-2 which definitely has an extensive mod community and is the best WW2 sim of the last 10 years (I think), and Pacific Fighters, which I know nothing at all about.

    Orestus on
  • The Grey GOATThe Grey GOAT Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Yeah, I saw Lockon. It looks like what I'm talking about. I'll give it a try.

    The Grey GOAT on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "Faster, Faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." -HST
  • Pete0rPete0r Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    While 1998 may not be cutting edge, although it has been revamped since, Falcon 4 is one of the best fighter sims out there.

    FreeFalcon is the same but jazzed up with all sorts of stuff, it may be entirely free or may require an original installation.

    Personally I think was and still is the pinnacle of military combat sim, the dynamic campaign adds something to the experience that a set list of missions, even if they allow for branching objectives, just cannot compete with.

    Pete0r on
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    If you do try to get into Falcon 4.0 (and I recommend that you do, it's pretty awesome) look for the Allied Force version. It's a huge improvement over the original, which was released with a ton of broken features (such as its dynamic campaign, in so many ways) that the majority of were never properly addressed. Allied Force is pretty much the vision of the Falcon 4.0 realized, with more stuff too, like a Balkans Campaign in addition to the Korean Campaign.

    The F-16 is a fun plane in simulation. It's really easy to fly (landing it is another story) and it's a good performer. There is a decent bit of micromanaging going on with the flying though. Lots of MFD modes, targeting functions and the like. The tempo involved with flying a mission can get pretty hectic.

    Damn. I really need to replace my busted joystick. I miss IL-2 bigtime. And my space sims. :(

    Drake on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Yeah, there is Falcon AF, Lock On (gold version has Starforce, but you can install the base game) and IL-2 1946

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • Caveman PawsCaveman Paws Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Growing up my favorite games were Dynamix Aces over Europe/Pacific/Red Baron+Xwing,Xwing vs Tie Fighter,Microsoft flight sim,etc.

    After the Janes games [previously mentioned] I couldn't really see any good simulation games, everything was very arcady with a few minor "sim" options [obviously just so they could add a bullet point to the back of the box to attract more buyers].

    Caveman Paws on
  • BartholamueBartholamue Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    The Ace Combat series?

    Bartholamue on
    Steam- SteveBartz Xbox Live- SteveBartz PSN Name- SteveBartz
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    The Ace Combat series?

    The OP specifically mentions that he does not want anything like Ace Combat. They're definitely NOT sims.
    I still have this game and would play it today, unfotunately I don't think it's even compatible with Windows XP and I don't feel like forcing my computer to work with Windows 98. Plus the graphics and sounds could definitly use an overhaul but that's all minor compared to my enjoyment of the game. I have seen something about using what is called a DOS-Box, a free software emulator of old school DOS, to run the game. However, I assume that this is easier said than done.

    It's not a DOS-Box, it's just DOSBox, and it's really excellent and not very hard to use. But it's meant for DOS games, and AFAIK those are Windows games.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • OrogogusOrogogus San DiegoRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    The Ace Combat series?

    The OP specifically named Ace Combat and HAWX as not what he was looking for.

    Orogogus on
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Growing up my favorite games were Dynamix Aces over Europe/Pacific/Red Baron+Xwing,Xwing vs Tie Fighter,Microsoft flight sim,etc.

    After the Janes games [previously mentioned] I couldn't really see any good simulation games, everything was very arcady with a few minor "sim" options [obviously just so they could add a bullet point to the back of the box to attract more buyers].

    Take a look at Falcon 4.0 AF and IL-2 1946. That's some pretty realistic flyin' and shootin'.

    Drake on
  • BartholamueBartholamue Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Looks like I can't read...

    Wasn't there a Microsoft Combat Flight sim game that came out awhile back?

    Bartholamue on
    Steam- SteveBartz Xbox Live- SteveBartz PSN Name- SteveBartz
  • AyulinAyulin Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    All the MS Combat Flight sims were WWII-era, IIRC.

    Ayulin on
    steam_sig.png
  • NoquarNoquar Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Lockon Flaming Cliffs 2
    Falcon 4/AF
    Black Shark - KA-50 Attack Helictoper Sim


    That's it.

    Falcon 4/AF especially has quite the active community. Mods, textures, you name it. Lockon has a community as well, just not quite so rabid.

    The thing going for Lockon and Black Shark have going for it is graphics and modern planes. The latest version of Lockon, or LO-MAC as it was known is that you can play online with and against those who have Black Shark, so you can have someone flying modern jets while someone else is flying a modern attack helicopter. The Black Shark developers are also working on new modules - aircraft - for future releases.

    Noquar on
  • ueanuean Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    I played the crap out of Falcon 3.0 Gold... I think the gold pack came with F/A-18 Hornet and MiG-29 (or was it Su-27?) sims as well, all by the same guys.

    THAT was the game that defined my love of computer gaming. It came with a 400 page manual book, no freaking PDF... so awesome. I spent nights pouring over it and memorizing specs and envelop limits, all the enemy planes. I never did get to experience Falcon 4 but if it was anything like 3 then you are in for a treat. Check youtube for validation of how intense it is... full on sim. There's like a 10minute video of a guy using the mouse to manipulate cockpit controls to get the jet started. Crazy stuff.

    uean on
    Guys? Hay guys?
    PSN - sumowot
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Well, Falcon 4.0 AF is all that too.
    I think you can go full "cold start" on the ramp, and it takes like 10 minutes just to get to taxiing.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • cmsamocmsamo Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    There was another Jane's title I played a lot of and loved - USAF

    It had all kinds of jet aircraft from different era's - Korea/Vietnam/modern day....

    cmsamo on
    steam_sig.png
  • SynthesisSynthesis Honda Today! Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    As already mentioned, DCS: Black Shark, by the makers of Lock On, is very, very realism-driven. And it looks pretty good to boot (you need to force AA though).

    Flight Simulator X is about the fine art of flying aircraft, not actual combat--so military add-ons do not feature warfare.

    Synthesis on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Yeah there are lots of hard missions with the F-18, including carrier landings, but not a single bullet or missile fired
    I bet it would be great training though.

    I love doing the A-10 quick mission in Lock On.

    USAF is really old too, and all Jane's games a HELL to run on anything after Windows 98.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Well, Falcon 4.0 AF is all that too.
    I think you can go full "cold start" on the ramp, and it takes like 10 minutes just to get to taxiing.

    I have the original release of Falcon 4.0 as well as the Allied Force version. The gigantic three ring binder that came with the original Falcon 4.0 Special Edition is a godsend. Because this game simulates the shit out of an F-16, which is, as you know, probably the most versatile fighter in the history of American military aviation. Cold starts, runway procedure, AWAC, all the communications, targeting and RADAR minutiae you care to experience. It features dynamic battlefield campaigns where if you destroy a bridge, it stays destroyed until engineers come back to rebuild. While it's destroyed units will have to use alternate routes, so what you do in the air affects the ground war. And the ground war can affect the air war with mobile and static Ground to Air attack units of various types. Falcon 4 is a very granular, intensely realistic simulation.

    And now I'm getting the shakes, because I have no fucking joystick. One day, Saitek X52. One day.

    Drake on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    I have that binder
    and the extra LOMAC binder too.
    But AF changed many things, so you need the original Falcon 4.0 binder and the huge AF new manual.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • ironsizideironsizide You must whip it Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    uean wrote: »
    I played the crap out of Falcon 3.0 Gold... I think the gold pack came with F/A-18 Hornet and MiG-29 (or was it Su-27?) sims as well, all by the same guys.

    It was the MiG-29. Some cool avionics in that plane. And such a beast to fly with manual trimming you never had to worry about with the F-16.

    ironsizide on
    |_
    Oo\ Ironsizide
    camo_sig2.png
  • SynthesisSynthesis Honda Today! Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Yeah, MiG-29 was an excellent game (I mean the recent, 3dFX-era one, not the older one, I think). The physics were a "loose", in that you could pull off some ridiculous tricks in your Fulcrum, but a lot of fun nonetheless.

    I was addicted to Jane's USNF'97 for ages.

    Synthesis on
  • The Grey GOATThe Grey GOAT Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Synthesis wrote: »
    Yeah, MiG-29 was an excellent game (I mean the recent, 3dFX-era one, not the older one, I think). The physics were a "loose", in that you could pull off some ridiculous tricks in your Fulcrum, but a lot of fun nonetheless.

    I was addicted to Jane's USNF'97 for ages.

    Yeah, it's pretty sad what happened to Janes. According to the Wiki article they basically raised the bar too high and burned themselves out after creating F/A-18. Most of the original team left.

    Then consoles started rising in sales and technology to compete with computer games. In the end it really killed the market for military flight sims. Either way, their sims were great games. It would be nice if at the very least they released a verion that could run on a modern OS.

    The Grey GOAT on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    "Faster, Faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." -HST
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Synthesis wrote: »
    Yeah, MiG-29 was an excellent game (I mean the recent, 3dFX-era one, not the older one, I think). The physics were a "loose", in that you could pull off some ridiculous tricks in your Fulcrum, but a lot of fun nonetheless.

    I was addicted to Jane's USNF'97 for ages.

    I used to really enjoy F-22 ADF because of the crazy maneuvers that plane could pull off. I'm not sure how realistic it was, but once you wrapped your head around the vectored thrusting, it was a pretty trivial affair to train your guns on targets or achieve wicked fast missile locks in dog fights. I'm not sure if that runs on modern systems or how well it holds up these days. The campaign is composed of a series of scripted missions, which were fun enough back when I played it. The avionics in F-22 ADF were awesome too, but once again, I have no idea how realistic they are. Lot's of hands free, automated emissions levels and stuff that made combat a breeze and a really intuitive MFD.

    And I played the hell out of Jane's Fighters Anthology.

    Drake on
  • ueanuean Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Synthesis wrote: »
    Yeah, MiG-29 was an excellent game (I mean the recent, 3dFX-era one, not the older one, I think). The physics were a "loose", in that you could pull off some ridiculous tricks in your Fulcrum, but a lot of fun nonetheless.

    I was addicted to Jane's USNF'97 for ages.

    I remember the Su27 game was also insane to fly. Manual trim, which let you pull off the.... I forget the name of the manoeveur, dragonfly or something? Basically you rip the plane into the vertical while still maintaining forward motion, effectively turning your plane into a giant airbrake so you can get shot easier (but looks cool!)

    Anyway, this thread is making me die a little inside for some Falcon 4 goodness.

    The move is called the Cobra, FYI (and FMI)

    uean on
    Guys? Hay guys?
    PSN - sumowot
  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    It's a WWII sim but honestly I think those work better for videya games, since you can have full sim level realism without studying how to use the goddamn airplane for a year.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_Flight_Simulator_3:_Battle_for_Europe

    I've had some great times in Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator

    Robman on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    I loved EF-2000 and F-22 ADF, those dudes made some amazing games. There was something of a "race for the best sim" those days. Sigh.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Yeah, I've thought about seeing if I can eBay/Amazon a copy of DID's follow up to F 22 ADF, Total Air War. It has a dynamic campaign systems, AWAC, etc.

    I'm just not sure if it'll run on XP/Vista/Win 7. I'd hate to grab it and either find out it doesn't work on my current OS or one that I'll likely upgrade to soon.

    Drake on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    They don't work very well on modern machines, I think.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • Phoenix-DPhoenix-D Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Drake wrote: »
    And I played the hell out of Jane's Fighters Anthology.

    Ditto. Though its definitely sim lite, which is fine by me.

    ...and leads to some weeeeird MP scenarios. Among other things for a while I was a top air-to-air player with an A-10.

    FA doesn't restrict weapon loadouts, which meant I could carry 16 Sidewinders on the thing. You can dodge one. Two, not so much. Three? Four?

    Phoenix-D on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Phoenix-D wrote: »
    Drake wrote: »
    And I played the hell out of Jane's Fighters Anthology.

    Ditto. Though its definitely sim lite, which is fine by me.

    ...and leads to some weeeeird MP scenarios. Among other things for a while I was a top air-to-air player with an A-10.

    FA doesn't restrict weapon loadouts, which meant I could carry 16 Sidewinders on the thing. You can dodge one. Two, not so much. Three? Four?

    Oh.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • ironsizideironsizide You must whip it Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    *sigh* Why does my throttle and stick have to be in storage in another state? I wonder how well the Apache would fly with a gamepad...

    ironsizide on
    |_
    Oo\ Ironsizide
    camo_sig2.png
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    At least yours works. My latest joystick, a Logitech, is tripping some kind of safety feature in my PSU every time I plug it into a USB port. I suspect a short in the cable is putting current where it isn't supposed to be. But whatever it is, I plug it in and my PSU just shuts down.

    And I've vowed that my next stick shall be nothing less than a Saitek X52. It'll be a little while, unless I find an outrageous deal, before I can afford that purchase. Fucking priorities suck sometimes. :P

    Drake on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    I never really "bought" the X-52's look. It never seemed sturdy and dependable to me. Looks so plasticky and fragile.

    The new Logitech HOTAS, on the other hand (hah, I maek pun), that looks like it's built to last.

    Or maybe CH stuff, those are hardcore too.

    Stormwatcher on
    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Well, I have two friends that both have used Saitek x52 HOTAS for years without needing to replace them.

    Still, that Logitech setup looks [strike]interesting[/strike] fucking sexy. The bit about Force Feedback definitely got my attention. I've got a few games that utilize that feature. I wonder what the price point is going to be on it?

    Drake on
  • SynthesisSynthesis Honda Today! Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    I never really "bought" the X-52's look. It never seemed sturdy and dependable to me. Looks so plasticky and fragile.

    The new Logitech HOTAS, on the other hand (hah, I maek pun), that looks like it's built to last.

    It's not new anymore. I've had mine for a few months. And it is goddamn hardcore.

    Especially since its the only HOTAS setup I can think of that has full-fledged force feedback. And it is durable as hell.

    Sadly, it doesn't work with some older games like simpler HOTAS systems use. Works beautifully with LOMAC, DCS, and Falcon 4.0, or so I've heard.

    Synthesis on
  • DrakeDrake Edgelord Trash Below the ecliptic plane.Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Oh. Three hundred dollars.

    I'll be able to afford that in like never.

    Yep.

    Drake on
  • Sir CarcassSir Carcass I have been shown the end of my world Round Rock, TXRegistered User regular
    edited April 2010
    Are there any good sticks that don't use suction cups? They don't work on my desk all that well.

    Sir Carcass on
  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    edited April 2010
    My X52 has held up wonderfully for six months of heavy use so far and is still going strong

    Robman on
Sign In or Register to comment.