The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

(lock me)

Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham HopelessRegistered User regular
edited May 2010 in Help / Advice Forum
Yesterday morning while I was driving my little sister to school I got pulled over and told that I did not make a complete stop at the stop sign. This is false because I did make a complete stop and I know I made a complete stop because I can't get my car in to first gear without being at a complete stop, and because I made a complete stop.

The problem is I made the stop with a considerable amount of room between myself and the line, I stopped on the letters.

The intersection I was at is not a perfect + It does more of a
||
-
-
     -           *
     -

  || thing

The asterix is where the police officer was sitting. The officer's view was obstructed by a fence and a variety of plants

in fact here is where i stopped

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=San+Miguel+rd+san+diego,+ca&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=49.043149,79.013672&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=San+Miguel+Rd,+Bonita,+San+Diego,+California+91902&ll=32.735293,-117.036653&spn=0.001602,0.002411&z=19&layer=c&cbll=32.735304,-117.036733&panoid=b_XT1jIE1ckpCJol9PyrWw&cbp=12,99.36,,0,5


and here is where the police officer was

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=San+Miguel+rd+san+diego,+ca&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=49.043149,79.013672&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=San+Miguel+Rd,+Bonita,+San+Diego,+California+91902&ll=32.735094,-117.03657&spn=0.001602,0.002411&z=19&layer=c&cbll=32.735012,-117.036574&panoid=TQKwVnh48YiNiF677tO1YQ&cbp=12,99.36,,0,5

So, I need to wait for similar conditions (over cast) to go back and take line of sight pictures, but i Also was wondering what else can help my case?

She made an error on my ticket, saying I was 25, but i doubt that helps at all. Also, she was being reviewed by a superior officer, as she was constantly asking him questions while she wrote my ticket, and he was watching her like a hawk.

I didn't say a word, only confirmed my address

Would it be sufficient to say that under the pressure of review and obstructed line of sight the officer made a judgment in error?

Anyone else fight a ticket that has some helpful hints?

Bendery It Like Beckham on
«1

Posts

  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Well, the argument against you is that you did not stop at the traffic sign, you stopped far before it. Can I stop 20 feet from a red light and then proceed to make a right turn at said red light? I still didn't stop at the red light.

    From the officer's view, you ran the stop sign.

    Fight it. Take the pictures. Dress in a suit for the court date. Be polite. Speak elequently. That's all you can do. It's the officer's word against yours.

    Whatever you do, don't play the "but she is a new officer" card because calling her incompetent will not win you any points.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • SiskaSiska Shorty Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Make sure you take pictures that show you actually had full view of the traffic to both the left and particularly the right. The points with a stop sign is that you are suppose to take your time to check both ways. So if the argument is you couldn't see from that far back you wont have a leg to stand of if you can't prove that you did.

    Siska on
  • adytumadytum The Inevitable Rise And FallRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    You should go into it assuming you'll need to pay the ticket.

    I've been to traffic court once, for a BS ticket, and in court the officer admitted to having no idea as to what actually happened and filling in the blanks himself to write me the ticket. I had pictures, diagrams, etc., showing that what the police officer said happened was physically impossible. He even said to the judge that if I had not pulled over to the shoulder myself (because a cop was tailgaiting me for a quarter of a mile with no lights..) that he would not have pulled me over.

    The result? The judge dropped it to a lesser charge that was a small ($200 with court costs) fine and didn't affect my insurance, so I'd be sure not to appeal.

    Traffic court is bullshit. Once you realize that it makes the experience easier to handle.

    adytum on
  • Red RoverRed Rover Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Like everyone said... take pictures. My father had a very similar situation happen. He was cited for not stopping but he made the claim that the officer couldn't possibly have seen him because his view was obstructed by a snowbank. He won his case based on that alone.

    Red Rover on
    This message will self-destruct in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1... !
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    If your record is clean, you probably have a good case.

    Honestly? Don't even let them say "well we'll reduce it so you still have to pay us." Fuck that shit, if I stopped at a stop sign I'm not paying $200 for a no-standing just because they need to make money and fill a quota.

    If your car can't even shift into first gear without a full stop, make sure to bring that up. Cite make, model, year, and explain it. Say, in eloquent words, that the officer's view was obstructed by a fence and other garbage and that ticket is bogus based on your car's capabilities.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • SeriouslySeriousSeriouslySerious Registered User new member
    edited May 2010
    Looking at the locations you gave us with Google Maps the officer would not have seen you stop. If you stopped at the letters and then drove through the intersection the officer would have missed the stop entirely and only witnessed you driving through the intersection.

    I would use pictures to show this fact and explain to the judge that it was most likely a misunderstanding and that the officer simply couldn't see you stop from her point of view. It might also help if you made a short video showing that your car can not shift into first if it is moving at all. You can bring in a laptop or your phone and show this to the judge. I think a 30 second video will help your case although they could argue that you were in second gear. I can start moving from second in my car but it doesn't like it at all.

    Just like everyone suggested make sure to dress nice, be polite and understanding, and show that you put a lot of effort into your defense.

    Good luck!

    SeriouslySerious on
    Jealousy is an awkward homage which inferiority renders to merit.
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Also looking at the video, your view is obstructed by the bush on the right. The judge is going to tell you that if you couldn't see the officer when you stopped (and he couldn't see you) then you did not make a complete, safe stop at the stop sign.

    After stopping at a stop sign, you look both ways to make sure the intersection is safe to cross. Since you couldn't even see the officer who was parked not 30 feet away, how would you see if there was a vehicle coming your way? What about a kid on a bicycle?

    You may have made a complete stop, but it wasn't close enough to the proper place to stop so that you could safely determine if it was safe to cross the intersection. That's what is going to get you nailed.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2010
    Yeah, you stopped too far from the intersection and you did not have clear line of sight to the right due to that bush. So it looks like you were ticketed appropriately and I'd recommend that instead of trying to contest the ticket, you simply try to get it reduced as a first offense.

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    It's a 4 way stop. If he can see the other stop positions, he's in a perfectly safe, yet dumb, position. You never know when some drunk is going to come barreling through the intersection. However, being a 4 way stop, as long as he can see the stop signs I don't see a problem. It also appears he can see people approaching the sign at a distance, just not quite as far as the cop was.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • NeylaNeyla Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    She made an error on my ticket, saying I was 25, but i doubt that helps at all. Also, she was being reviewed by a superior officer, as she was constantly asking him questions while she wrote my ticket, and he was watching her like a hawk.

    Granted I live in Canada, buuut a friend of mine got stopped for speeding and the officer wrote up the wrong speedlimit zone (he wrote 50 zone when it was 60) and the ticket got tossed because it was written up in wrong. May not help since it's your age (and may not be that important) but i would mention it atleast.

    You just never know when technicality will kick in. Oh and she was clocked doing 80.

    Neyla on
    13142111181576.png
  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Neyla wrote: »
    She made an error on my ticket, saying I was 25, but i doubt that helps at all. Also, she was being reviewed by a superior officer, as she was constantly asking him questions while she wrote my ticket, and he was watching her like a hawk.

    Granted I live in Canada, buuut a friend of mine got stopped for speeding and the officer wrote up the wrong speedlimit zone (he wrote 50 zone when it was 60) and the ticket got tossed because it was written up in wrong. May not help since it's your age (and may not be that important) but i would mention it atleast.

    You just never know when technicality will kick in. Oh and she was clocked doing 80.

    Writing the wrong speed limit on a speeding ticket is a pretty important detail to fuck up.

    Writing the wrong age on a failure to stop ticket is not, really.

    Dhalphir on
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    bowen wrote: »
    It's a 4 way stop. If he can see the other stop positions, he's in a perfectly safe, yet dumb, position. You never know when some drunk is going to come barreling through the intersection. However, being a 4 way stop, as long as he can see the stop signs I don't see a problem. It also appears he can see people approaching the sign at a distance, just not quite as far as the cop was.

    That's not true.

    I can stop 100 feet from the intersection and still see the stop signs. The line indicating where you should stop is there for a reason, and you can't just stop wherever you please. If you stop over the line or before the line, that's not a complete stop at the stop sign. Every time someone posts a traffic ticket question here, there are always responses based on common sense and logic. This is traffic law, not logic.

    You might get away with it in court, but the ticket is correct.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • Bionic MonkeyBionic Monkey Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2010
    Well, he says he stopped on the letters, which would only put him five or six feet back from the line. It's unrealistic to expect someone to stop perfectly on the line every single time, so the question is if he was within a reasonable distance of the line legally.

    Bionic Monkey on
    sig_megas_armed.jpg
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Well, he says he stopped on the letters, which would only put him five or six feet back from the line. It's unrealistic to expect someone to stop perfectly on the line every single time, so the question is if he was within a reasonable distance of the line legally.

    I wouldn't call a car's length a reasonable distance.

    Still, the cop (and her supervisor) positioned themselves in that spot for a reason--they had line of sight to cars that would be stopping (or not) at the sign. For all she knows, he could have stopped six houses before the line or six inches out of her line of sight, it doesn't matter. It wasn't at the sign.

    It's a tough case, cause no one but him knows where he stopped.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2010
    Well, he did show us exactly where he stopped in the OP. If you look at where he stopped, his view to the right was obstructed by that bush.

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Figgy wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    It's a 4 way stop. If he can see the other stop positions, he's in a perfectly safe, yet dumb, position. You never know when some drunk is going to come barreling through the intersection. However, being a 4 way stop, as long as he can see the stop signs I don't see a problem. It also appears he can see people approaching the sign at a distance, just not quite as far as the cop was.

    That's not true.

    I can stop 100 feet from the intersection and still see the stop signs. The line indicating where you should stop is there for a reason, and you can't just stop wherever you please. If you stop over the line or before the line, that's not a complete stop at the stop sign. Every time someone posts a traffic ticket question here, there are always responses based on common sense and logic. This is traffic law, not logic.

    You might get away with it in court, but the ticket is correct.

    I'm sorry, I didn't posit my statement with "REASONABLE FUCKING DISTANCE". Sorry, I apologize for not being pedantic enough.

    For all practical purposes, IANAL, or a cop, but stopping around the line is the general rule of thumb. Even the STOP word is close enough as long as the front of your car is after them and not on or before them.

    Plus, looking at those bushes, you'd pretty much have to be on or past the line in order for the cop to see you. From the cop's point of view, I can barely see the stop sign itself.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • edited May 2010
    This content has been removed.

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Which may be great evidence, especially if you can prove the cop couldn't see. Proving a cop is retaded with math is a beautiful thing.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    The cop was sitting there for a reason. It's where her supervisor told her to sit. In the OP's case, not only could he not see the cop, the cop couldn't see him. He was so far back that the nose of his car wasn't even in view.

    Go ahead and fight it, but the judge is going to tell you what I am telling you. Your defense is actually going to work against you.

    "There was a bush in the way."

    "Then you shouldn't have stopped so far back. You obviously couldn't see anything to the right of that intersection."

    Go look at the google maps image again. You cannot see anyone coming on the right from where the OP stopped. Yes, other cars would technically have to stop anyway, but that's not the point. With that logic, you could just blow through the four-way as long as you don't see anyone at the signs.

    Also, pedestrians and kids on bikes.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Nothing I can find on CA isn't giving a distance but does say that you have to stop at the limit line.
    22450. (a) The driver of any vehicle approaching a stop sign at the entrance to, or within, an intersection shall stop at a limit line, if marked, otherwise before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection.

    VisionOfClarity on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Figgy wrote: »
    The cop was sitting there for a reason. It's where her supervisor told her to sit. In the OP's case, not only could he not see the cop, the cop couldn't see him. He was so far back that the nose of his car wasn't even in view.

    Go ahead and fight it, but the judge is going to tell you what I am telling you. Your defense is actually going to work against you.

    "There was a bush in the way."

    "Then you shouldn't have stopped so far back. You obviously couldn't see anything to the right of that intersection."

    Go look at the google maps image again. You cannot see anyone coming on the right from where the OP stopped. Yes, other cars would technically have to stop anyway, but that's not the point. With that logic, you could just blow through the four-way as long as you don't see anyone at the signs.

    Also, pedestrians and kids on bikes.

    They have to stop too. And it looks like the closest you can see even at the line is about to the telephone pole.

    But use some math to determine when it's possible for the cop to see you physically, or the nose of the car, and where he'd have to be. Then determine if the cop can even reasonably determine if you stopped.

    Plus we're trying to advise him if the cop has anyway to know if he stopped, not if he could see a eight of a mile up the road. From where I'm sitting, unless the cop was pretty much right in the intersection (thus making people go around him too, which is bad to begin with, he probably couldn't tell if there was a ticker-tape parade there or not.

    Logistically, it seems like the cop is making shit up to write a ticket, and he set up there specifically to catch people he couldn't see properly. In a word, this is a bullshit ticket and he should fight this tooth and nail.

    Now if he plowed through a snowdrift into traffic at a 4-way stop, that'd be a different situation entirely.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • Captain VashCaptain Vash Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    What I'm hearing is this:

    "I stopped early yes, but I could clearly see all the spots where people would have to stop, so I could safely determine that it was my turn"
    "but that's not the law"
    "but it was ssaaafffeeeeee"

    Two problems here.

    1. read the law, someone took the time to quote you your states law, and it says "at the line" that means anything not "at the line" is failure to obey a traffic control device. eat your heart out.

    2. it is not "safe" just because you could see all the stopping positions, the idea of the 4 way stop is not only to regulate the traffic safely through a 4 way stop, but to allow each driver time to assess what other drivers are on the road, or what pedestrians or bicycles or whatever else might be approaching, but not yet at the stop.

    Captain Vash on
    twitterforweb.Stuckens.1,1,500,f4f4f4,0,c4c4c4,000000.png
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    I guess we need to know exactly where he stopped too. Well within judgement, maybe he thought he was on the line. Maybe he was 15 feet back too. This will be critical because if you didn't try to stop on that line, that's a ticket, pretty much after those words is your window.

    I think ultimately he probably has a pretty decent case just to prove all of this and him stating he made a reasonable attempt to stop at the line, stay in control of the vehicle, and be able to determine right of way situations.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2010
    bowen wrote: »
    I guess we need to know exactly where he stopped too. Well within judgement, maybe he thought he was on the line. Maybe he was 15 feet back too. This will be critical because if you didn't try to stop on that line, that's a ticket, pretty much after those words is your window.

    I think ultimately he probably has a pretty decent case just to prove all of this and him stating he made a reasonable attempt to stop at the line, stay in control of the vehicle, and be able to determine right of way situations.

    he showed us exactly where he stopped in the OP

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • VisionOfClarityVisionOfClarity Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Druhim wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    I guess we need to know exactly where he stopped too. Well within judgement, maybe he thought he was on the line. Maybe he was 15 feet back too. This will be critical because if you didn't try to stop on that line, that's a ticket, pretty much after those words is your window.

    I think ultimately he probably has a pretty decent case just to prove all of this and him stating he made a reasonable attempt to stop at the line, stay in control of the vehicle, and be able to determine right of way situations.

    he showed us exactly where he stopped in the OP

    He flat out told us he was not on the line.
    The problem is I made the stop with a considerable amount of room between myself and the line, I stopped on the letters.

    VisionOfClarity on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Yes, looking at the photo, though, that's still fairly close. But is he on the letters, can he see them, did he pass over them then stop with his front end closer to the line?

    But if he can read the letters? No way in hell.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Look at the picture where he says he stopped. Then, look at the intersection on the right where those letters are. From that view, imagine someone stopping with their nose on those letters. That's way too far back. Keep in mind that your actual view is a good 5 feet back from your nose, too.

    If he stopped even covering up the letters with his nose, his view is still too far back to safely see to the right.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    His diagram was really hard for me to make sense of with it's alignment and where was. But definitely wayyyyy too far back if that's the case.

    Though, he may still be able to get it thrown out if he can prove his car can't shift into first without being stopped.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    He would then need to prove that he was in first gear.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • khainkhain Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Estimating distance off of these Google Maps pictures is a little difficult, but if the police officer was parked on the right side of the street if you're facing the intersection then she has a pretty clear view of the line and I would think the area between the STOP letters and the line*. If you're not stopping within that area then at least in my opinion you aren't safely stopping though like someone said you could try and find out what the legal area to stop in is.

    *One thing to note is that the google map view of the officers view is on the left side of the street, and the cop was on the right according the OP which should allow a clearer view.

    khain on
  • A Dabble Of TheloniusA Dabble Of Thelonius It has been a doozy of a dayRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Look. All the useless back and forth aside, the question was about fighting the ticket.


    Sure, go for it. Never know what might happen. Don't get your hopes up though. Taking everything into account, looks like it was a righteous ticket as far as the law goes.

    Best bet would probably be to dress nice, state your case politely and in a matter of fact way and hope for your clean record to help you out.

    A Dabble Of Thelonius on
  • DaenrisDaenris Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    bowen wrote: »
    Plus, looking at those bushes, you'd pretty much have to be on or past the line in order for the cop to see you. From the cop's point of view, I can barely see the stop sign itself.

    It's unlikely the cop was sitting exactly where the Google Street View image was taken from. First off, the street view image is taken from the lane going away from the stop sign, while the cop was likely sitting on the other side facing the stop sign, so would have a better angle to actually see the sign.

    Daenris on
  • DhalphirDhalphir don't you open that trapdoor you're a fool if you dareRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    If you have a clean record to begin with, is a failure to stop at a stop sign really that big of a deal of a ticket that you're willing to take a day off work to fight it?

    It doesn't really sound like you have much of a case or chance. If you had a chance I'd be telling you to go for it but you really don't unless you get phenomenally lucky and to be honest you're better off just paying the ticket.

    Unless failure to stop tickets are ridiculously expensive there or something.

    Dhalphir on
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Dhalphir wrote: »
    If you have a clean record to begin with, is a failure to stop at a stop sign really that big of a deal of a ticket that you're willing to take a day off work to fight it?

    It doesn't really sound like you have much of a case or chance. If you had a chance I'd be telling you to go for it but you really don't unless you get phenomenally lucky and to be honest you're better off just paying the ticket.

    Unless failure to stop tickets are ridiculously expensive there or something.

    It's never the price of the ticket that is the issue, it's the demerit points that will hike up your insurance for years to come.

    With a clean record, even though I'm certain they won't just drop the ticket, they might reduce it to a charge that at least doesn't include a point deduction.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • RaneadosRaneados police apologist you shouldn't have been there, obviouslyRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    you didn't stop at the stop sign, you stopped before it and then ran it

    from where you say the officer was, all she could see was you driving right through the intersection, due to the fence, she is unable to see where/if you stopped

    from where you DID stop, you cannot see down the road to the right


    that's why they have lines. They tell you where to stop

    you failed to stop at a stop sign, sorry



    i say fight it, if your record is clean, you may well be able to get off with a warning

    can't hurt

    Raneados on
  • Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham Hopeless Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    For the record I stopped with my front tires on the letters. There was barely 3 feet between the limit line and my front end. Because I'm apparently too vague even when i offer diagrams and satellite images.

    I drive a honda civic, so my front fender is roughly 5 feet after my front wheels.

    There have been cops sitting at that intersection lately and I have a tendency to stop over lines/crosswalks if I'm not making a special attempt not to. Just a fluke and me being a socal driver. So in my attempt to be extra safe, i end up with a ticket.

    Bendery It Like Beckham on
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited May 2010
    That logic ain't gonna fly in court son, you still didn't stop at the line or close enough to be considered at the line.

    "I'm a socal driver so I usually stop past the line, so this time I was trying to be extra safe and stopped before the line, then assumed it was cool to go."

    I still think your best bet is not to contest it but just try to get it reduced as a first offense.

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • FiggyFiggy Fighter of the night man Champion of the sunRegistered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Stopping 8-10 feet before the line is not being "extra safe." This is not a case where the further back you are, the safer you are. The further back you are, the less likely you are to see cars/cyclists/pedestrians.

    Figgy on
    XBL : Figment3 · SteamID : Figment
  • AvicusAvicus Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    Figgy wrote: »
    Stopping 8-10 feet before the line is not being "extra safe." This is not a case where the further back you are, the safer you are. The further back you are, the less likely you are to see cars/cyclists/pedestrians.

    He said it was barely 3 feet from the line to the front of the car.

    Avicus on
    stephen_coop.gifkim_coop.gifscott_guitar.gif
  • Bendery It Like BeckhamBendery It Like Beckham Hopeless Registered User regular
    edited May 2010
    someone lock this, it hasn't been about tips for fighting a ticket since ... well any post.

    Bendery It Like Beckham on
This discussion has been closed.