The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.

First ever Accident (Updated w/new issue)

KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
edited February 2011 in Help / Advice Forum
b817ce9c.jpg?t=1275774348

:(

So yeah, got into my first accident. Pretty sure it was my fault too. We both switched from outside lanes to a middle lane at the same time. Since I was in front I figure I should have made sure no one was switching at the time. His front bumper ending up catching my rear bumper and pulling on it, which caused the damage.

We turned into a gas station, called the cops, who just told us to exchange info, and that was it. No ticket, no report. The other car was actually a tow truck, so apart from a couple scuffs on his metal bumper, there was no damage.

So what's next? I filed a partial claim while I was waiting for the cops to arrive, but I won't speak to an adjuster till Monday most likely. What should I say/shouldn't I say when speaking to him.

Kyougu on

Posts

  • DragonPupDragonPup Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    He hit you from behind, it's his fault. Period.

    Take a dose of Advil tonight. It'll help if there's any pain tomorrow.

    DragonPup on
    "I was there, I was there, the day Horus slew the Emperor." -Cpt Garviel Loken

    Currently painting: Slowly [flickr]
  • EshEsh Tending bar. FFXIV. Motorcycles. Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    DragonPup wrote: »
    He hit you from behind, it's his fault. Period.

    Is this actually gospel? I keep seeing this in threads but I don't really see how that could be.

    Esh on
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2010
    Esh wrote: »
    DragonPup wrote: »
    He hit you from behind, it's his fault. Period.

    Is this actually gospel? I keep seeing this in threads but I don't really see how that could be.

    No, it's not. From what Kyougu is describing, the truck didn't hit him but rather he changed lanes into the front right fender of the truck. Then the fender of the truck caught on the side of his rear left fender and partially separated it from the body. I don't see how that's the truck driver's fault unless possibly he didn't signal. Even then you'd pretty much need witnesses to verify he didn't signal and if he was already in the lane when Kyougu changed lanes that still probably wouldn't matter. Some people mistakenly assume that anyone who's generally behind you when you impact each other means they're at fault.

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Yeah, pretty sure it's my fault and I don't really dispute that. Though I also didn't admit any fault to the other driver. Should I admit it to the insurance company or will they make a judgment once they get the stories together?

    Kyougu on
  • DragonPupDragonPup Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Huh, I read it as both cars merged into the same lane at the same time and I didn't notice which side hit who.

    DragonPup on
    "I was there, I was there, the day Horus slew the Emperor." -Cpt Garviel Loken

    Currently painting: Slowly [flickr]
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2010
    Well, it depends. If you were both merging from the same lane and he was (presumably) behind you before you both merged, it sounds like he was driving pretty aggressively and sped up to keep you from getting over. Rather than simply stating you are or are not at fault, explain exactly what happened as in where each of you were (to your knowledge) before and at the time of impact. It's too late now, but when the cop was there you could have pointed out that (again I'm assuming from what you've stated) he was behind you before merging, then accelerated to apparently keep you from merging in front of him. If the lane you were merging from ended and you needed to merge, then he may have been guilty of some moving violation.

    edit: oh wait, you just said you both merged from outside lanes and I assumed you meant you were both in the same lane. So it sounds like you were merging from the right lane to center and he was merging from the left lane to center. In that case, it looks pretty clear that you're at fault. Though again you don't necessarily need to outright say so, but describe what happened to your insurance company.

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Druhim wrote: »
    Well, it depends. If you were both merging from the same lane and he was (presumably) behind you before you both merged, it sounds like he was driving pretty aggressively and sped up to keep you from getting over. Rather than simply stating you are or are not at fault, explain exactly what happened as in where each of you were (to your knowledge) before and at the time of impact. It's too late now, but when the cop was there you could have pointed out that (again I'm assuming from what you've stated) he was behind you before merging, then accelerated to apparently keep you from merging in front of him. If the lane you were merging from ended and you needed to merge, then he may have been guilty of some moving violation.

    edit: oh wait, you just said you both merged from outside lanes and I assumed you meant you were both in the same lane. So it sounds like you were merging from the right lane to center and he was merging from the left lane to center. In that case, it looks pretty clear that you're at fault. Though again you don't necessarily need to outright say so, but describe what happened to your insurance company.

    No.

    The person behind does not have a huge blind spot and could easily slow or stop if they need to when they see a car coming over at the same time.

    dispatch.o on
  • JasconiusJasconius sword criminal mad onlineRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    You shouldn't even be admitting fault in this thread.

    Here's how it works.

    You report to your insurance company, he reports to his. You tell your side of the story to both. The insurance companies fight it out. You state what happened, and you let them decide.

    DO. NOT. ADMIT. FAULT.

    Jasconius on
    this is a discord of mostly PA people interested in fighting games: https://discord.gg/DZWa97d5rz

    we also talk about other random shit and clown upon each other
  • EshEsh Tending bar. FFXIV. Motorcycles. Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    dispatch.o wrote: »
    Druhim wrote: »
    Well, it depends. If you were both merging from the same lane and he was (presumably) behind you before you both merged, it sounds like he was driving pretty aggressively and sped up to keep you from getting over. Rather than simply stating you are or are not at fault, explain exactly what happened as in where each of you were (to your knowledge) before and at the time of impact. It's too late now, but when the cop was there you could have pointed out that (again I'm assuming from what you've stated) he was behind you before merging, then accelerated to apparently keep you from merging in front of him. If the lane you were merging from ended and you needed to merge, then he may have been guilty of some moving violation.

    edit: oh wait, you just said you both merged from outside lanes and I assumed you meant you were both in the same lane. So it sounds like you were merging from the right lane to center and he was merging from the left lane to center. In that case, it looks pretty clear that you're at fault. Though again you don't necessarily need to outright say so, but describe what happened to your insurance company.

    No.

    The person behind does not have a huge blind spot and could easily slow or stop if they need to when they see a car coming over at the same time.

    There are many other factors which could make this not possible or more difficult than needed.

    Esh on
  • DruhimDruhim Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2010
    dispatch.o wrote: »
    Druhim wrote: »
    Well, it depends. If you were both merging from the same lane and he was (presumably) behind you before you both merged, it sounds like he was driving pretty aggressively and sped up to keep you from getting over. Rather than simply stating you are or are not at fault, explain exactly what happened as in where each of you were (to your knowledge) before and at the time of impact. It's too late now, but when the cop was there you could have pointed out that (again I'm assuming from what you've stated) he was behind you before merging, then accelerated to apparently keep you from merging in front of him. If the lane you were merging from ended and you needed to merge, then he may have been guilty of some moving violation.

    edit: oh wait, you just said you both merged from outside lanes and I assumed you meant you were both in the same lane. So it sounds like you were merging from the right lane to center and he was merging from the left lane to center. In that case, it looks pretty clear that you're at fault. Though again you don't necessarily need to outright say so, but describe what happened to your insurance company.

    No.

    The person behind does not have a huge blind spot and could easily slow or stop if they need to when they see a car coming over at the same time.

    No. Merging into someone that you didn't see does not make them at fault for not getting out of your way.

    Druhim on
    belruelotterav-1.jpg
  • JasconiusJasconius sword criminal mad onlineRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    This is why insurance companies staff lawyers. Especially if there is no clear fault assigned.

    They work this stuff out. Which is why you just need to talk to them. I mean.

    Why would you even go to a forum for this. You pay an insurance company big money every year for exactly this purpose, to both handle it and tell you what to do.

    Jasconius on
    this is a discord of mostly PA people interested in fighting games: https://discord.gg/DZWa97d5rz

    we also talk about other random shit and clown upon each other
  • KotenkKotenk Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Yes, this is definitely one for your insurance to figure out.

    It's also possible they will look at the prospective cost of repair versus potential dispute and just pay for it. But again, that's their decision and their numbers to run.

    Edit: You should also consider whether it's worth reporting at all.

    Kotenk on
  • EshEsh Tending bar. FFXIV. Motorcycles. Portland, ORRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Kotenk wrote: »
    Yes, this is definitely one for your insurance to figure out.

    It's also possible they will look at the prospective cost of repair versus potential dispute and just pay for it. But again, that's their decision and their numbers to run.

    Edit: You should also consider whether it's worth reporting at all.

    Did you look at the photo?

    Esh on
  • KotenkKotenk Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Esh wrote: »
    Kotenk wrote: »
    Yes, this is definitely one for your insurance to figure out.

    It's also possible they will look at the prospective cost of repair versus potential dispute and just pay for it. But again, that's their decision and their numbers to run.

    Edit: You should also consider whether it's worth reporting at all.

    Did you look at the photo?

    Yes I did. It's a bumper on a previous generation Corolla, worth less than $200. I do see now that he already reported it to insurance though.

    Kotenk on
  • JasconiusJasconius sword criminal mad onlineRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Kotenk does make a legitimate point, that being that if the damage is less than your deductible, then you can legitimately decide to just not get it repaired, since you would be paying out of pocket anyway.

    However, I think that you have a case for at least partial liability against the guy who you ran into (or visa versa), meaning that you could get some or all of that deductible back. And to do that, you have to actually file the claim and get the work done, and then cross your fingers. An insurance company will not fight for you if you don't file the claim and get the work done.

    Jasconius on
    this is a discord of mostly PA people interested in fighting games: https://discord.gg/DZWa97d5rz

    we also talk about other random shit and clown upon each other
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Druhim wrote: »
    dispatch.o wrote: »
    Druhim wrote: »
    Well, it depends. If you were both merging from the same lane and he was (presumably) behind you before you both merged, it sounds like he was driving pretty aggressively and sped up to keep you from getting over. Rather than simply stating you are or are not at fault, explain exactly what happened as in where each of you were (to your knowledge) before and at the time of impact. It's too late now, but when the cop was there you could have pointed out that (again I'm assuming from what you've stated) he was behind you before merging, then accelerated to apparently keep you from merging in front of him. If the lane you were merging from ended and you needed to merge, then he may have been guilty of some moving violation.

    edit: oh wait, you just said you both merged from outside lanes and I assumed you meant you were both in the same lane. So it sounds like you were merging from the right lane to center and he was merging from the left lane to center. In that case, it looks pretty clear that you're at fault. Though again you don't necessarily need to outright say so, but describe what happened to your insurance company.

    No.

    The person behind does not have a huge blind spot and could easily slow or stop if they need to when they see a car coming over at the same time.

    No. Merging into someone that you didn't see does not make them at fault for not getting out of your way.

    They merged into one another. He didn't dive into the lane already occupied by the description. Either way, did the police report assign fault in a report? Did you say it was your fault?

    dispatch.o on
  • JasconiusJasconius sword criminal mad onlineRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    read the threeeaaaddddd, dispatch. There was no report and no ticket.

    Jasconius on
    this is a discord of mostly PA people interested in fighting games: https://discord.gg/DZWa97d5rz

    we also talk about other random shit and clown upon each other
  • Sir CarcassSir Carcass I have been shown the end of my world Round Rock, TXRegistered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Jasconius wrote: »
    Why would you even go to a forum for this.

    Because, like he said, it's his first wreck? Not everyone instantly knows what to do.

    Anyway, it's not up to you to determine fault. That's up to the insurance companies. Like mentioned, you tell your side of the story and let them work it out.

    With that said, it probably varies by state but I know in Texas that in this situation, the car in the left lane would have right of way. I believe it's because they have less visibility of the middle lane than the person in the right lane.

    Sir Carcass on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Jasconius wrote: »
    Why would you even go to a forum for this.

    Because, like he said, it's his first wreck? Not everyone instantly knows what to do.

    Anyway, it's not up to you to determine fault. That's up to the insurance companies. Like mentioned, you tell your side of the story and let them work it out.

    With that said, it probably varies by state but I know in Texas that in this situation, the car in the left lane would have right of way. I believe it's because they have less visibility of the middle lane than the person in the right lane.

    I heard that mentioned by the truck driver, which is another reason why I assumed I was at fault.

    And yeah, this is my first wreck, so that's why I'm posting here. Never gone through this. Now my deductable is high, (Around a grand). I'm guessing that fixing the bumper will probably be around that. Could I tell the insurance that I'm going to pay for it, so my rates don't go up?

    Kyougu on
  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Esh wrote: »
    DragonPup wrote: »
    He hit you from behind, it's his fault. Period.

    Is this actually gospel? I keep seeing this in threads but I don't really see how that could be.

    No, if someone runs into you from behind at a set of lights or a junction then the evidence is very strongly against them but it doesn't mean that all accidents from behind are open and shut. Certainly not this one.

    Anyway if you're genuinly not sure whoes fault it was then DO NOT ADMIT FAULT. Report it to the insurance companies and leave it to them to fight it out.

    Casual on
  • Bionic MonkeyBionic Monkey Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited June 2010
    Kyougu wrote: »
    Yeah, pretty sure it's my fault and I don't really dispute that. Though I also didn't admit any fault to the other driver. Should I admit it to the insurance company or will they make a judgment once they get the stories together?

    Insurance companies are not your friends. You don't get extra brownie points for being honest with them, and they won't go easy on you, just because you manned up and told the truth. Do not admit fault ever. Stick to the facts, and only the facts.

    Bionic Monkey on
    sig_megas_armed.jpg
  • cabsycabsy the fattest rainbow unicorn Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Kyougu wrote: »
    Jasconius wrote: »
    Why would you even go to a forum for this.

    Because, like he said, it's his first wreck? Not everyone instantly knows what to do.

    Anyway, it's not up to you to determine fault. That's up to the insurance companies. Like mentioned, you tell your side of the story and let them work it out.

    With that said, it probably varies by state but I know in Texas that in this situation, the car in the left lane would have right of way. I believe it's because they have less visibility of the middle lane than the person in the right lane.

    I heard that mentioned by the truck driver, which is another reason why I assumed I was at fault.

    And yeah, this is my first wreck, so that's why I'm posting here. Never gone through this. Now my deductable is high, (Around a grand). I'm guessing that fixing the bumper will probably be around that. Could I tell the insurance that I'm going to pay for it, so my rates don't go up?

    I doubt fixing your bumper will be around a grand, unless you are absolutely set on it matching colors exactly, and even then it's doubtful. Unless there was significant frame damage that we can't see, it shouldn't cost much at all.

    cabsy on
  • dispatch.odispatch.o Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    cabsy wrote: »
    Kyougu wrote: »
    Jasconius wrote: »
    Why would you even go to a forum for this.

    Because, like he said, it's his first wreck? Not everyone instantly knows what to do.

    Anyway, it's not up to you to determine fault. That's up to the insurance companies. Like mentioned, you tell your side of the story and let them work it out.

    With that said, it probably varies by state but I know in Texas that in this situation, the car in the left lane would have right of way. I believe it's because they have less visibility of the middle lane than the person in the right lane.

    I heard that mentioned by the truck driver, which is another reason why I assumed I was at fault.

    And yeah, this is my first wreck, so that's why I'm posting here. Never gone through this. Now my deductable is high, (Around a grand). I'm guessing that fixing the bumper will probably be around that. Could I tell the insurance that I'm going to pay for it, so my rates don't go up?

    I doubt fixing your bumper will be around a grand, unless you are absolutely set on it matching colors exactly, and even then it's doubtful. Unless there was significant frame damage that we can't see, it shouldn't cost much at all.

    This is sort of what bumpers are for anyway, maybe if it were an old school chrome bumper or some heavy metal bumper on an old Z or something hard to find, but a recent model should be really cheap, especially if you have a pick-n-pull type salvage yard where you can go buy your own salvaged part off a junker.

    dispatch.o on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    Well that's a relief. I have no idea about cars. That combined with the fact that there was no damage to the other guy's car and no ticker means my wallet should hopefully not take a huge hit.

    Kyougu on
  • BeazleBeazle Registered User regular
    edited June 2010
    From your location it looks like you are in Plano, Texas. If that is so then you will cover your damage and the tow truck guy will cover his. Since Texas is a no-fault state when it comes to insurance you have to be over 60% at fault before your insurance will cover the other persons damage. That's why our rates are one of the highest in the country. Also the police in Dallas and the surrounding area very rarely give tickets for fender benders.

    Beazle on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    So bringing back thread to life with an update and a new question:

    So after the accident and the insurance researching it they found me at no fault. Didn't have to pay a deductible, had no rise in payments, and my car was fixed. So yay, least I thought.

    Fast forward to this week when I got a called from the attorneys representing my insurance claim agaisnt the other driver. Seems they're having trouble with the info that I provided, as they can't match it up. They asked for a police report, but as I mentioned no report was ever taken. And sadly I don't have the other driver's info anymore to verify that I gave my insurance the right info (99.9%) I did though.

    Anyone know what kind of hassle I'm looking at now? Could the insurance reverse their original decision? I should mention that no claim was ever done agaisnt me, so that's also why they're having difficulty tracking the other driver.

    Kyougu on
  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    Kyougu wrote: »
    So bringing back thread to life with an update and a new question:

    So after the accident and the insurance researching it they found me at no fault. Didn't have to pay a deductible, had no rise in payments, and my car was fixed. So yay, least I thought.

    Fast forward to this week when I got a called from the attorneys representing my insurance claim agaisnt the other driver. Seems they're having trouble with the info that I provided, as they can't match it up. They asked for a police report, but as I mentioned no report was ever taken. And sadly I don't have the other driver's info anymore to verify that I gave my insurance the right info (99.9%) I did though.

    Anyone know what kind of hassle I'm looking at now? Could the insurance reverse their original decision? I should mention that no claim was ever done agaisnt me, so that's also why they're having difficulty tracking the other driver.

    Direct them to your insurance company. Don't discuss the accident details with them over the phone, direct them to your insurance company.

    Robman on
  • The Crowing OneThe Crowing One Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    Robman wrote: »
    Direct them to your insurance company. Don't discuss the accident details with them over the phone, direct them to your insurance company.

    It sounds like things are looking good for you, OP. Let your insurance company fight the fight for you, that's what you pay them for.

    The Crowing One on
    3rddocbottom.jpg
  • schussschuss Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    Robman wrote: »
    Direct them to your insurance company. Don't discuss the accident details with them over the phone, direct them to your insurance company.

    It sounds like things are looking good for you, OP. Let your insurance company fight the fight for you, that's what you pay them for.

    Limed. So hard. Do not give them statements. Do not answer their questions. Direct them to your adjuster/ins. company contact. I work for an insurance company. Unless they have a subpoena or YOUR insurance company tells you to, do not do anything but confirm your name. What will probably go down is the 2 co's will hash it out and it won't count against you. Depending on the reputation of the firm and the solidity/value of the case, they'll most likely toss the lawyer/driver $1500 bucks and tell them to leave you alone (cheaper than drawing it out).

    schuss on
  • matt has a problemmatt has a problem Points to 'off' Points to 'on'Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    I think you guys have missed what he said there, it's the attorneys for his company representing him in the claim. And they're not able to match up the insurance information he gave his company for the driver who hit him.

    matt has a problem on
    nibXTE7.png
  • ViscountalphaViscountalpha The pen is mightier than the sword http://youtu.be/G_sBOsh-vyIRegistered User regular
    edited February 2011
    I'd say start with the tow truck and a description of the other driver. Otherwise, this might be a painful lesson on why you keep records of such incidents.

    Viscountalpha on
  • KyouguKyougu Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    Yeah, Matthasaproblem has it right. It's the attorney's representing my insurance company. Sorry I didn't make that clear.

    And Viscountalpha, that's exactly what I'm worried about.

    Kyougu on
  • ViscountalphaViscountalpha The pen is mightier than the sword http://youtu.be/G_sBOsh-vyIRegistered User regular
    edited February 2011
    Seriously, do you remember which tow truck company it was? Do some digging. Get some proof and don't hesitate.

    Viscountalpha on
  • The Crowing OneThe Crowing One Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    Kyougu wrote: »
    Yeah, Matthasaproblem has it right. It's the attorney's representing my insurance company. Sorry I didn't make that clear.

    And Viscountalpha, that's exactly what I'm worried about.

    Oops!

    I'd still go through your contact to confirm. Any information your company's attorneys need can hopefully be, at least, confirmed by your insurance rep.

    The Crowing One on
    3rddocbottom.jpg
  • Dr. FrenchensteinDr. Frenchenstein Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    even if the cop gave a report, it wont necessarily match up to whom the insurance companies deem at fault. You must have a good insurance company if you didn't have to pay a dime. I got full on rear ended, had to pay my deductible and the other guys insurance still hasn't accepted liability. At most you will be on the hook for your deductible and it shouldn't affect your rates. However, my insurance carrier (Erie) were total assholes in my claim, so you never know. but yeah, never admit fault to a 3rd party. if the other driver talked you into admitting fault, you are probably still ok b/c it's his word against yours.

    If his towing company is a smallish business, your company will probably have a hell of a time recovering your damages. My insurance company said cab companies are notoriously uncooperative, i'd imagine tow trucks to be similar.

    Dr. Frenchenstein on
  • RobmanRobman Registered User regular
    edited February 2011
    AFAIK there are two types of tow truck drivers. The ones who work for big companies like AAA and other rescue services, and criminals who have moved on to legal forms of extortion like the towing racket.

    Robman on
Sign In or Register to comment.