Also, it's interesting that in most of these artist drawings they are attacking civilians and cities.
Till after WW2, bombing the fuck of civilians was perfectly kosher. Not like there were a lot of Wermacht just chilling in Dresden.
That's what I figured, I just thought it was interesting how the advertisement of FUTURE WEAPONS has changed. I'd like to see how well a modern equivalent would go over in popular science today
I can see someone not liking that. I think it's pretty much entirely horseshit. I read a pretty good article about bacteriaphage treatments, but it was sandwhiched between giant stories on time travel experiments that involve people on trampolines and such.
I can see someone not liking that. I think it's pretty much entirely horseshit. I read a pretty good article about bacteriaphage treatments, but it was sandwhiched between giant stories on time travel experiments that involve people on trampolines and such.
There aren't a lot of popular magazines about that don't contain some articles composed mainly of conjecture?
Also, it's interesting that in most of these artist drawings they are attacking civilians and cities.
Till after WW2, bombing the fuck of civilians was perfectly kosher. Not like there were a lot of Wermacht just chilling in Dresden.
That's what I figured, I just thought it was interesting how the advertisement of FUTURE WEAPONS has changed. I'd like to see how well a modern equivalent would go over in popular science today
They do stories on new weapons all the time. It's just nowadays when you vaporize two hundred people at a wedding, you totally didn't mean it and really, they were all standing around looking suspiciously brown at the time.
Hobnail on
0
Donovan PuppyfuckerA dagger in the dark isworth a thousand swords in the morningRegistered Userregular
well, I'd wouldn't be as upset if it were named gadget porn weekly or popular wild-eyed futurists with boners for engineering jerking off all over each other or something
well, I'd wouldn't be as upset if it were named gadget porn weekly or popular wild-eyed futurists with boners for engineering jerking off all over each other or something
It's called Popular Science? Not exactly the MIT Physics Review Quarterly?
Well you need a power source than can last a real long time, don't have that. I guess the idea is to make an infantryman that is totally small-arms proof, so you need some sort powered exoskeleton that can lift the amount of armour it would take to achieve that, plus all his gear, plus retaining mobility, don't have that. Gotta make it all pretty small or the multi-million dollar infantryman is going to get blowed up by a communist surplus RPG, can't do that.
I mean after they got through all the testing and figured out how to mass produce them.
And yeah, assuming that this yet to be invented power source isn't too expensive.
well, I'd wouldn't be as upset if it were named gadget porn weekly or popular wild-eyed futurists with boners for engineering jerking off all over each other or something
It's called Popular Science? Not exactly the MIT Physics Review Quarterly?
I dunno, I guess I just sort of resent the notion that real science is this super dense, boring thing that only intellectuals care about and that the layman is resigned to rubbing his dick on the latest missile system or whatever
Posts
Till after WW2, bombing the fuck of civilians was perfectly kosher. Not like there were a lot of Wermacht just chilling in Dresden.
What spring does with the cherry trees.
I don't understand how he has somehow managed to avoid choking to death on his own tongue?
That's what I figured, I just thought it was interesting how the advertisement of FUTURE WEAPONS has changed. I'd like to see how well a modern equivalent would go over in popular science today
Twitter Steam
Well there are also the home handyman articles which tend to be pretty good!
What spring does with the cherry trees.
Oh I'm sure it has happened at some point, but these asshole doctors keep saving his ass. Modern medicine will be the downfall of our society.
I can see someone not liking that. I think it's pretty much entirely horseshit. I read a pretty good article about bacteriaphage treatments, but it was sandwhiched between giant stories on time travel experiments that involve people on trampolines and such.
In the future we'll have nanites that skeletonize all brown people and non-christians
I want a raygun
why dont we have proper rayguns yet
like what kind of science would be the most popular?
that's right
the kind with dudes jerking off all over each other
There aren't a lot of popular magazines about that don't contain some articles composed mainly of conjecture?
They do stories on new weapons all the time. It's just nowadays when you vaporize two hundred people at a wedding, you totally didn't mean it and really, they were all standing around looking suspiciously brown at the time.
Because rayguns are for the gays, and if we let them arm themselves, they will just force their pinko liberal agenda on us all.
Where do I send my subscription money?
Twitter Steam
It's called Popular Science? Not exactly the MIT Physics Review Quarterly?
why isn't it here yet
zzzzzap!
PSN: Robo_Wizard1
Because they haven't made any power armor that doesn't look totally retarded yet.
Oh hells yes. Read that shit erryday.
why are we not walking around in hilarious and awesome powered armor yet
heinlein was showing us the way 60 years ago
Ahem:
because the old white guys that run america's military industrial complex can't get rich enough off of it
What spring does with the cherry trees.
have a sloppy exoskeleton
I mean after they got through all the testing and figured out how to mass produce them.
And yeah, assuming that this yet to be invented power source isn't too expensive.
this is why I'm gay for tyson and kaku