The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
I've gone through the HTML tutorials at HTML Dog, and I'm starting to read CSS: The Missing Manual. However, I'd like something a bit more in-depth on HTML.
HTML Dog is great for teaching the no-frills basics of HTML, but I've found that the author doesn't really explain things very deeply.
To be more precise, I'm looking for something that will give me a deeper understanding of why I should use different tags, not just when I should use them.
Actually the two resources you listed happen to be the best I am even aware of.
I don't know what else to tell you. CSS: Missing Manual is like.. THE book.
I think what you are trying to ask for is information on building truly semantic HTML pages. And the answer might be in just googling for building semantic HTML.
Short of that, I think you are sort of misunderstanding the nature of HTML 4. Most tags as entities are all the same husk that get different CSS properties assigned to them behind the scenes by the browsers themselves. The only thing that makes them special is their semantic meaning to certain types of parsers. Such as <strong> and <em>
You can make many tags behave like <strong> visually. <strong> only exists because it has meaning to certain programs that consume it.
Actually the two resources you listed happen to be the best I am even aware of.
I don't know what else to tell you. CSS: Missing Manual is like.. THE book.
I think what you are trying to ask for is information on building truly semantic HTML pages. And the answer might be in just googling for building semantic HTML.
Short of that, I think you are sort of misunderstanding the nature of HTML 4. Most tags as entities are all the same husk that get different CSS properties assigned to them behind the scenes by the browsers themselves. The only thing that makes them special is their semantic meaning to certain types of parsers. Such as <strong> and <em>
You can make many tags behave like <strong> visually. <strong> only exists because it has meaning to certain programs that consume it.
HTML Dog is great, but I often find myself not understanding why some things work the way they do.
And I didn't realize that The Missing Manual had a book on HTML. I just started learning HMTL/CSS a month or so ago. That said, I really like what I've read of the CSS book thus far. I will definitely look into their HTML book.
Thanks!
e: I will take a look at that O'Reilly book for sure
Posts
I don't know what else to tell you. CSS: Missing Manual is like.. THE book.
I think what you are trying to ask for is information on building truly semantic HTML pages. And the answer might be in just googling for building semantic HTML.
Short of that, I think you are sort of misunderstanding the nature of HTML 4. Most tags as entities are all the same husk that get different CSS properties assigned to them behind the scenes by the browsers themselves. The only thing that makes them special is their semantic meaning to certain types of parsers. Such as <strong> and <em>
You can make many tags behave like <strong> visually. <strong> only exists because it has meaning to certain programs that consume it.
we also talk about other random shit and clown upon each other
http://www.amazon.com/Head-First-HTML-CSS-XHTML/dp/059610197X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1285089366&sr=8-1
I really liked the book and in my personal opinion it covered the "Why" moreso than anything I have ever read.
One thing you want to get in the habit of is programming for XHTML compliance, I still see a lot of people who don't do that
HTML Dog is great, but I often find myself not understanding why some things work the way they do.
And I didn't realize that The Missing Manual had a book on HTML. I just started learning HMTL/CSS a month or so ago. That said, I really like what I've read of the CSS book thus far. I will definitely look into their HTML book.
Thanks!
e: I will take a look at that O'Reilly book for sure
For some of us, that's quite intentional.
http://hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml