Club PA 2.0 has arrived! If you'd like to access some extra PA content and help support the forums, check it out at patreon.com/ClubPA
The image size limit has been raised to 1mb! Anything larger than that should be linked to. This is a HARD limit, please do not abuse it.
Our new Indie Games subforum is now open for business in G&T. Go and check it out, you might land a code for a free game. If you're developing an indie game and want to post about it, follow these directions. If you don't, he'll break your legs! Hahaha! Seriously though.
Our rules have been updated and given their own forum. Go and look at them! They are nice, and there may be new ones that you didn't know about! Hooray for rules! Hooray for The System! Hooray for Conforming!

British Politics: Quietly Insecure

WMain00WMain00 Registered User
edited October 2010 in Debate and/or Discourse
Hello and welcome to the United Kingdom, land of the Queen, crumpets and tea! Where over there you're suffering from mad raving tea party members, useless Democrats and balmy Republicans, over here we're suffering from a Coalition, ho ho ho, what have you!

British Politics is made up of a parliament and a house of lords. Nobody cares about the house of lords, because it's made up of rich guys who aren't voted in by the public who will probably die of old age in the next...ooooh...10 minutes.

The house of parliament meanwhile is made up of three main parties, and some little parties inbetween.

Those three are:

The Conservatives
conservatives_green_tree.jpg
Leader:
David-Cameron.jpg

The Conservatives for time immemorial have always represented the rich guys and the centre right wing side of politics. They are primarily frugal in spending money, and prefer privatising services over nationalising them in order to save money. Their policies and ideals have sprung the "laissaz faire" side of politics, in which the public has to look after itself rather than look to the Government for help.

The last time they were in power they almost destroyed Britain with ruthless cuts, shut downs and demolishings of entire industrial areas such as the North of England and Scotland. Thatcher is their thorn in the backside, as she splits Britain down the middle with people who absolutely hated her and those who thought she did a good job.

The past is the past though, they argue, and their newest leader David Cameron has attempted to reconcile and revolutionise the Conservatives to be more in line with politics today. He is currently in charge of the Coaltion Government (see below).

The Labour Party
Labour-Party1.png
Leader:miliband2460x276.jpg

Labour were the last party in power before the general election of 2010. Originally they represented the centre left side of politics, however many political analysts would argue that for the past decade they've been sitting centre right alongside the Conservatives. Where the Conversatives prefer to not interfere, Labour prefers a more hands on approach with public life, sometimes so much so that the words Nanny State have been thrown about once to often.

Labour was led by Tony Blair, then Gordon Brown, of whom both their political might has shaken the foundation of Labour and has split the party into Blairites and Brownites. The legacy of both of them though - particularly the illegal invasion of the Iraq war and the reprecussions of over spending and not monitoring the banks - has led to them being ousted by the british public.

Labour is currently and very recently now led by Ed Miliband, son of a Marxist and brother of the more known David Miliband. Ed has managed to pip his brother to the top by an inch of a vote caused by unionist support alone. This suggests either a ruthlessness we've not seen, or that he's extremely innocent of what goes on in politics. Either way he's there, and his appointment seems to spell the end of the Blair/Brown era of Labour politics completely. Whether he lurches Labour to the left again remains to be seen.

The Liberal Democrats
Liberal%2BDemocrats%2B_350_18346714_0_0_7005342_300.jpg
Leader: nick-clegg1.jpg

Where Labour is seen as left (or should be) and the Conservatives are seen as right, The Liberal Democrats sit somewhere in the middle. Many see them as wishy washy and incapable of any sort of opinion or manifesto. Despite this, they've managed to grab some power in the form of a Coalition with the Conservatives!

The Lib Dems have a long history of being third place runners, and despite a resurgence recently in the general election, they still remain third and undervoted. Many people just don't know what they represent, since the media doesn't bother about them and their policies jump all over the place. Nick Clegg is their current leader, a relative unknown who has managed to push the Liberal Democrats into a source of power. The question is; at what cost?

The Coalition

At the general election, the people voted and decided for a hung parliament, with no side gaining enough power to form a Government. In an unlikely scenario, the Liberal Democrats got together with the Conservatives, forming a coalition Government designed to tackle the broken economy left by the Labour party.

Many voted for the Liberal Democrats not out of spite of Labour, but believing that if the Conservatives are to be in power then the Lib Dems will hold them back from being too draconian in spending cuts. Nothing could be further from the truth it seems, as the Conservatives are rampaging through public services in an effort to close down the crippling deficit of the economy. Analysts argue they're going too fast, the Tories say "meh" and the Liberals? Well, they seem to have gone quiet.

Now the clock seems to be counting down to how long this Coalition will last before either side starts to strangle each others necks. They hate each other, but are working towards a "common goal". Nick Clegg has been vilified by his party and the Conservatives, and analysts are questioning whether or not the Liberal Democrats could survive this, knowing that at the end of a 5 year term it would be highly likely the public would make sure they no longer exist.

Either way, THAT'S POLITICS FOR YOU.

Welcome to British Politics.

WMain00 on

Posts

  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    edited September 2010
    The way things are now, I reckon Labour has about a 60/40 chance of returning to power in five (or less) years. By then the cuts will have bitten deep, and the people who made the cuts will be very unpopular. Also, fairly or not, Nick Clegg has gotten a lot of flak for backing the Tories. I dunno how right it is to blame him for this, because hypothetically he could have been blamed for allowing a hung parliament to happen, and a fresh election was undesirable at the time.

    From a Parliamentary viewpoint, Labour are not in a terrible position, only 50 or so seats behind the Conservatives. Contrast this to the Conservatives in 1997, who were more than 250 seats behind Labour at the time. If they can get their act together, and siphon off disaffected Lib Dem voters, it wouldn't be inconcievable to retake the Government. The one big question about whether they can is the recent election of Ed Milliband over his brother David. This was a very tight race - about 1.3% difference in votes - and different categories of voters backed different brothers. It's too soon to determine if such a close fought race will have a backlash, but if Ed can consolidate his position, Labour are in a good place.

    RMS Oceanic on
  • WMain00WMain00 Registered User
    edited September 2010
    I find both Ed and David deeply annoying. They're the equivalent of smiling political yes men to me. The only consolation I can take is that Ed's space yesterday at least made him out as unique, and his attack on Iraq, much to the annoyance of his brother, at least seems to push him out as an alternative to the Blair/Brown era, and not a continuation.

    WMain00 on
  • Saint MadnessSaint Madness Registered User
    edited September 2010
    Warsi says the Tories lost seats because of voter fraud. Yet she offers no elaboration on that point except that it stems from the Asian community (?)

    Saint Madness on
  • KalkinoKalkino Buttons Londres Registered User regular
    edited September 2010
    Interesting - the BNP seems to be going through one of its periodic internal collapses. It seems the London Assembly BNP rep has been booted from the Party after a failed coup against Nick. !


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/sep/29/bnp-barnbrook-expelled-griffin-feud

    Kalkino on
    Freedom for the Northern Isles!
  • Space CoyoteSpace Coyote Registered User regular
    edited October 2010
    Warsi says the Tories lost seats because of voter fraud. Yet she offers no elaboration on that point except that it stems from the Asian community (?)

    I think there were some very close elections in the West Midlands, where there is a history of voter fraud, mainly centering around swathes of postal votes being controlled by a local patriarch. Obviously, if Lady Warsi has any evidence of fraud there are appropriate channels for conducting inquiries.

    In voting related news the AV referendum question has had to be reworded.
    Jenny Watson, Electoral Commission chairwoman, said: "People told us that the wording of the question - with some changes - was easy to understand. However, they have a limited knowledge of what the 'first past the post' system is and almost no understanding of the 'alternative vote' system.

    "Our research took place without the campaigns and extensive media coverage that will be in place in the run-up to the referendum. We found that when participants had more information on how both systems worked, their understanding improved and they could cast their vote in the way they intended.

    Space Coyote on
Sign In or Register to comment.