The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
Please vote in the Forum Structure Poll. Polling will close at 2PM EST on January 21, 2025.
I remember Hal Jordan saying after Blackest Night that whatever force was out there that allowed heroes to die and come back to life was over, that death would be permanent from here on out. But then again Bruce Wayne never really died, he was lost in time (I wonder if everyone Darkseid killed with his Omega Beams is just lost in time?).
Witch_Hunter_84 on
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten in your presence.
0
Bloods EndBlade of TyshallePunch dimensionRegistered Userregular
edited October 2010
No one ever dies
Bloods End on
0
Garlic Breadi'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm a bitch i'm aRegistered User, Disagreeableregular
I hope not. The death of characters in comic books is pretty always pointless and lame. Why would I want Bruce Wayne to die when I enjoy stories about him, and even if I didn't there would be others out there who did, and I woildn't want their fun to be spoiled.
Solar on
0
FencingsaxIt is difficult to get a man to understand, when his salary depends upon his not understandingGNU Terry PratchettRegistered Userregular
edited October 2010
I've had to wait for a year to read Batman stories. That is too long without Batman.
But comic companies have to break the dependency a lot of readers have to the status quo, they've been taught that death and returns are such a trivial aspect that it's expected.
Sadly when you cater to a small narrow fanbase there isn't much real or true change you can do without them revolting most of the time.
I hope not. The death of characters in comic books is pretty always pointless and lame. Why would I want Bruce Wayne to die when I enjoy stories about him, and even if I didn't there would be others out there who did, and I woildn't want their fun to be spoiled.
Because a story about their death and its aftermath is still a story about that character. I'm not in favor of mass character snuffing, it's just in the case of icons like Bruce Wayne, I'm totally okay if they go away for much longer than a year because there's a lot of story potential there. Plus, when it's big characters and not c-listers, they can do a lot of out of continuity stories so you can still get your Bruce Wayne fix but have a main storyline that takes place after them.
bring back ryan choi
Lux on
0
Bloods EndBlade of TyshallePunch dimensionRegistered Userregular
edited October 2010
Also, the whole thing of Bruce being time lost and coming back is awesome and Grant Morrison should write everything ever.
You only stay dead if you get cancer. Or some other terminal illness.
Didn't they say Cancer was special? Like, it was the universal manifestation of the evil of unchecked or something, and that's why there was no way to save Captain Marve, because if you get Cancer there is a point where nothing can stop it.
I kind of liked that idea, especially in that DnA really explored it in the Thanos Imperative, where Captain Marvel survived the cancer by accepting the power of unchecked life, destroying death and turning his universe into Cthulhu-land.
Really, it will be great if Cthulhu appears in that series, he's public use anyway. Somewhere like the command centre of the Inhumans, right in front of Medusa, and we get a splash page of her looking up at something mostly off panel and visibly going utterly insane. Silly bitch.
I mean... That might not be a huge deal for some, but when you're a superhero that relies on agile fighting and the ability to glide around skyscrapers like you're flying, being wheelchair bound might be just like death for someone like Bruce Wayne.
Superheroes dying in many comic universes are basically just a way to boost sales and have nerds drooling and foaming at the mouth. Which is essentially why they come back to life.
Because rape and death are serious issues that can't be undermined by showing the affected characters having spectral adventures.
After all TLB, how would you feel if your wife was raped on a satellite by a supervillain with light powers, while you were out fighting crime with your stretching powers, and then you read a comic that undermined the integrity of those serious and realistic developments?
Ted Kord will come back. Hell, he already has in a sense, Booster is still hanging about with him in his series, just in the past. Honestly speaking Blue Beetle and Booster Gold together are just so great that at some point a writer will go "fuck it, random ressurection guff, now let's have some adventures," and I say good for whoever does it.
Because rape and death are serious issues that can't be undermined by showing the affected characters having spectral adventures.
After all TLB, how would you feel if your wife was raped on a satellite by a supervillain with light powers, while you were out fighting crime with your stretching powers, and then you read a comic that undermined the integrity of those serious and realistic developments?
Man, I really hate all of this "comics should keep people dead" or "comics should innovate, except when it's something I like". The only thing comics should be is good.
Anyhow, to chime in on the broader topic at hand: I'm always puzzled by superhero fans that rail against how nothing ever changes in the Big 2 books. For me, that's kind of why I like them. I like seeing development over the course of a series, but I always want things to basically stay true to the iconic interpretation.
A Blue Beetle book starring Jaime Reyes can do a lot of things. He can get a new job, he can establish new relationships, he can break up with Traci 13 and start dating someone new, he can vacation in Minnesota and meet new villains, he can temporarily lose the power of the scarab and fight crime with gadgets from Ted's old ship, he can get a new teacher at his high school, and so on. But in the longterm, I always want that book to be about a teenager that fights crime in El Paso, using an alien scarab that talks to him.
For me, the insistence to always push characters forward in huge ways is just kind of silly, and ultimately makes a mess of things. I much prefer tales of the heroes having sort of iconic adventures. And if I want a comic where stuff does change in huge, memorable ways, I'll read something like Dynamo 5 or Invincible, where a singular creative vision is driving those characters towards a known end-point.
Man, I really hate all of this "comics should keep people dead" or "comics should innovate, except when it's something I like". The only thing comics should be is good.
This is true. However doing something, anything, too much makes it less good. Including death. Including resurrection.
Just_Bri_Thanks on
...and when you are done with that; take a folding
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
This is true. However doing something, anything, too much makes it less good. Including death. Including resurrection.
I can appreciate that maybe in context, you might be tired of something in particular, a well-written version with something to say is still going to be good. I mean, that's pretty much what Morrison's New X-men is - all the tired X-men cliches done so well that you didn't even notice until Xorneto.
I have to say, House of M kind of ruined the X-Men for me. Whenever there's no longer a school, and no longer a large body of young mutants, the entire thing sort of falls apart for me.
Plus, I miss that time when the characters just got to hang out, have picnics, play baseball, and such. It seems that, with a lot of the push for big serious development in comics, a lot of the quiet, subtler stuff went out the window.
Man, I really hate all of this "comics should keep people dead" or "comics should innovate, except when it's something I like". The only thing comics should be is good.
Indeed you are correct, though people often say what they want to happen in a desire to make things good. For all their many flaws, it is very hard to find a fan who, at heart, doesnn't simply want to read comics that he loves. The problem is that comic fans are very often unaware of what makea a comic good, and suggest something rather stupid (not that some writers aren't much better).
I found it entertaining how many non comic fans were rushing to buy the death of Captain America issue thinking it was going to fund their retirement or put their kids through college or something. I bet a lot of those people still think the character is dead.
The same thing happened with the death of Superman. I wonder how much that's going for these days. A lot of stores still have stacks of that issue.
Posts
It's the same thing in Marvel, dude
Also non-heroes that stay dead don't count
also
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2008/09/340x_neverdie.jpg
But comic companies have to break the dependency a lot of readers have to the status quo, they've been taught that death and returns are such a trivial aspect that it's expected.
Sadly when you cater to a small narrow fanbase there isn't much real or true change you can do without them revolting most of the time.
Besides, with parallel universes, Earth-One style reboots and out of continuity all-ages books, any character can be in any story.
Because a story about their death and its aftermath is still a story about that character. I'm not in favor of mass character snuffing, it's just in the case of icons like Bruce Wayne, I'm totally okay if they go away for much longer than a year because there's a lot of story potential there. Plus, when it's big characters and not c-listers, they can do a lot of out of continuity stories so you can still get your Bruce Wayne fix but have a main storyline that takes place after them.
bring back ryan choi
No one Ever Really Dies
https://medium.com/@alascii
Yup.
But Bruce Wayne didn't really die. You can do "after they died" stories and just have it as a fake like it is in Batman, no problem with that.
Alright I just want rid of all the Flashes.
Tumblr Twitter
In that case, Thunderbird's the one who has stayed dead the longest (until recently?)?
Or maybe the original Vision.
Nope. Thread over.
White FC: 0819 3350 1787
Characters die all the time, they just don't stay dead.
Didn't they say Cancer was special? Like, it was the universal manifestation of the evil of unchecked or something, and that's why there was no way to save Captain Marve, because if you get Cancer there is a point where nothing can stop it.
I kind of liked that idea, especially in that DnA really explored it in the Thanos Imperative, where Captain Marvel survived the cancer by accepting the power of unchecked life, destroying death and turning his universe into Cthulhu-land.
Really, it will be great if Cthulhu appears in that series, he's public use anyway. Somewhere like the command centre of the Inhumans, right in front of Medusa, and we get a splash page of her looking up at something mostly off panel and visibly going utterly insane. Silly bitch.
I mean... That might not be a huge deal for some, but when you're a superhero that relies on agile fighting and the ability to glide around skyscrapers like you're flying, being wheelchair bound might be just like death for someone like Bruce Wayne.
Superheroes dying in many comic universes are basically just a way to boost sales and have nerds drooling and foaming at the mouth. Which is essentially why they come back to life.
Hooraydiation wrote: And I don't care how distraught you are. It's just impolite to shoot yourself when someone has their dick inside you.
why are they not around
After all TLB, how would you feel if your wife was raped on a satellite by a supervillain with light powers, while you were out fighting crime with your stretching powers, and then you read a comic that undermined the integrity of those serious and realistic developments?
Tumblr Twitter
Ted Kord will come back. Hell, he already has in a sense, Booster is still hanging about with him in his series, just in the past. Honestly speaking Blue Beetle and Booster Gold together are just so great that at some point a writer will go "fuck it, random ressurection guff, now let's have some adventures," and I say good for whoever does it.
munch you are making me sad
stop making me sad
Anyhow, to chime in on the broader topic at hand: I'm always puzzled by superhero fans that rail against how nothing ever changes in the Big 2 books. For me, that's kind of why I like them. I like seeing development over the course of a series, but I always want things to basically stay true to the iconic interpretation.
A Blue Beetle book starring Jaime Reyes can do a lot of things. He can get a new job, he can establish new relationships, he can break up with Traci 13 and start dating someone new, he can vacation in Minnesota and meet new villains, he can temporarily lose the power of the scarab and fight crime with gadgets from Ted's old ship, he can get a new teacher at his high school, and so on. But in the longterm, I always want that book to be about a teenager that fights crime in El Paso, using an alien scarab that talks to him.
For me, the insistence to always push characters forward in huge ways is just kind of silly, and ultimately makes a mess of things. I much prefer tales of the heroes having sort of iconic adventures. And if I want a comic where stuff does change in huge, memorable ways, I'll read something like Dynamo 5 or Invincible, where a singular creative vision is driving those characters towards a known end-point.
Tumblr Twitter
This is true. However doing something, anything, too much makes it less good. Including death. Including resurrection.
chair to Creation and then suplex the Void.
I can appreciate that maybe in context, you might be tired of something in particular, a well-written version with something to say is still going to be good. I mean, that's pretty much what Morrison's New X-men is - all the tired X-men cliches done so well that you didn't even notice until Xorneto.
Plus, I miss that time when the characters just got to hang out, have picnics, play baseball, and such. It seems that, with a lot of the push for big serious development in comics, a lot of the quiet, subtler stuff went out the window.
Tumblr Twitter
Indeed you are correct, though people often say what they want to happen in a desire to make things good. For all their many flaws, it is very hard to find a fan who, at heart, doesnn't simply want to read comics that he loves. The problem is that comic fans are very often unaware of what makea a comic good, and suggest something rather stupid (not that some writers aren't much better).
The same thing happened with the death of Superman. I wonder how much that's going for these days. A lot of stores still have stacks of that issue.