The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Known factory defect in car costs almost as much as car itself.

joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class TraitorSmoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
edited November 2010 in Help / Advice Forum
Okay, so I own a 2002 Saturn VUE with a VTi transmission. Recently, the transmission has started making chainsaw sounds when started up in the morning or during low-gear acceleration. I figured this was going to be an expensive fix and I was right. A mechanic told us the part itself is around $3500 which is out of the question for us right now.

Then I started poking around and found this:
In yet another big red mark on GM's ledger, the General has settled a class-action lawsuit brought by the owners of more than 90,000 Saturn Vue and Ion models that came with GM's VTi continuously variable transmission. The transmissions have, apparently, had an unusually high failure rate and cost $4,000 to $5,000 to replace. The transmissions were found in the 2002 to 2005 Vue and 2003 to 2004 Ion. It was discontinued after 2005.

The settlement has received preliminary approval from a federal judge, but the official settlement hearing will not occur until February 17. In an interview with Automotive News, Rob Schmeider, who represents the Saturn owners, estimated that the lawsuit could cost GM over $100 million, though GM attorney Joe Lines found that figure to be "wildly exaggerated" and estimated the true cost would be closer to $10 million to $20 million. Lines declined to give a failure rate for the transmissions.

The settlement applies to all owners of '02 to '05 Vues and '03 to '04 Ions with the VTi transmission. The percentage of the settlement each person receives will depend on the number of miles on the vehicle when the transmission failed and whether the current owner bought it new or used. Assuming the settlement is approved, all owners of those vehicles will receive a claims form for expenses related to the transmission failure, but only if the vehicle had less than 125,000 miles on it before the failure and the transmission fails within eight years of the date the vehicle was manufactured.

How do I go about finding out how to enter a claim for this? The trannie started going out about a thousand miles ago but we've had no choice but to continue driving it, since it's our only vehicle. We have people, including mechanics, who can testify that it was going bad before the 125,000 mile mark. We have a GM dealership in town who can fix it but hadn't mentioned this class-act suit, even when we gave them the model and year, which to me means they might be trying to cheat us.

What's the best course of action for me at this point?

joshofalltrades on

Posts

  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Well, fuck.

    It looks like since GM bought out Saturn, they are refusing to honor the terms of the settlement. FUCK.

    This is a multi-thousand dollar fix here and I'm getting fucked in the ass. Shit.

    Still, any advice is appreciated.

    joshofalltrades on
  • ShogunShogun Hair long; money long; me and broke wizards we don't get along Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Saturn was owned by GM. Do you mean they sold Saturn off and are refusing to honor?

    Shogun on
  • SpudgeSpudge Witty comments go next to this blue dot thingyRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Saturn has been liquidated - the brand is no longer around

    However GM should have to honor the terms regardless as long as you meet the requirements. When the brand was liquidated GM agreed to provide parts/service/etc for Saturn branded vehicles for X years after the liquidation completed

    Spudge on
    Play With Me
    Xbox - IT Jerk
    PSN - MicroChrist

    I'm too fuckin' poor to play
    WordsWFriends - zeewoot
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Here's where I'm reading this.
    GM has responded to our new lawsuit and, like the transmissions in the affected vehicles, GM again has quit working for Saturn owners. When the proposed sale of Saturn to Penske fell through, GM's Chief Executive Officer, Fritz Henderson stated that, "We will be working closely with our dealers to ensure Saturn customers are cared for as we transition them to other G.M. dealers in the months ahead." GM also has said that it will honor the warranties of all Saturn vehicles through other GM dealerships. Despite the public rhetoric, GM has stated in response to our new lawsuit that it will not honor the terms of the VTi settlement, and it even seeks to sanction the attorneys fighting for the Saturn owners.

    joshofalltrades on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Yeah they can't refuse to cover the claims. Worst case a lot of dealerships and auto repair shops are doing payment installments.

    Better case than that worst case is calling the law firm in charge of the class-action suit. Looks like if you bought it new and it's under 100,000 miles, then it's covered 100%. lakinchapman.com is firm in charge of the class action lawsuit it looks like.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • ViscountalphaViscountalpha The pen is mightier than the sword http://youtu.be/G_sBOsh-vyIRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    More of a reason to ignore their brand. GM can seriously go fuck themselves. The sooner GM dies, the better. I wish you luck in getting GM/saturn to own up to their huge, costly mistake.

    Viscountalpha on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Gotta be honest, I'm feeling kind of sick to my stomach right now. This is something that, in the settlement, they agreed to knowing about and to make it right for the tens of thousands of people who own these vehicles. Then they go bankrupt and change from "Old GM" to "New GM" (gimme a break) and are acting like that absolves them of the responsibility to fix this for people who can't afford it or a new car.

    Really nauseous.

    joshofalltrades on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    This is where it pays to be a squeaky wheel.

    Find the GM corporate number, tell them you're trying to get your vTI replaced under the class action lawsuit and you would like to discuss why you're being denied repairs for a faulty unit? While bankruptcy does absolve people from debt, stuff like this has to be footed by people who buy the brand. You buy the trademark, you also buy the debt that goes along with that. So if old GM sells it to new GM, well, tough luck scumbags.

    You'll also have luck telling them you have absolutely no problem going to the press, all of them that you aren't getting anywhere.

    IANAL.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • SpudgeSpudge Witty comments go next to this blue dot thingyRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Yes. Be the squeaky wheel. Make a blog, talking about your relationship w your Vue, the issues you have and how GM is handling it. Call/send letters to the law firm for status updates (the case is still going) and to GM for their stance on the situation. Be sure to post GM/law firm's responses to the settlement claim

    If you get nowhere or are spinning your wheels, "Tip" off large auto enthusiast blogs to your blog. One that starts with a "J" comes to mind as a place that loves to get hold of these types of things and use their immense visibility and rabid readerbase to get results

    Spudge on
    Play With Me
    Xbox - IT Jerk
    PSN - MicroChrist

    I'm too fuckin' poor to play
    WordsWFriends - zeewoot
  • LaPuzzaLaPuzza Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Have you called a GM dealer? I don't know why people go to the Internet/Oprah/the Vatican/Corporate first when there's a local solution.

    Additionally, did you own the vehicle at the time the case was started/settled? That link looks to be a couple of years old.

    LaPuzza on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    I've owned the VUE since April 2008.

    But it's irrelevant to the class-action, since it covers anybody who own a covered vehicle at anytime and anywhere.

    joshofalltrades on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Yeah 2 years old is still relatively new, the issue may not have cropped up in a used car sitting on a lot. It should still be covered at something like 80%. But the dealership will probably tell you to go fuck off if you try to say "yeah this is covered by the class action lawsuit, so, give it to me free of charge."

    Chances are you have to send some information to the business in question and they give you a voucher, unless you're on the up and up with the dealership.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • khainkhain Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    So I may be mistaken, but according to the law firm FAQ a 2002 VUE would have had to fail by January 1, 2010 for the expenses to be paid for. Anyway, as you can read on the law firms website, since GM declared bankruptcy all litigation is on hold and thus the law firm went to court and the final decision hasn't been made yet. The site seems to indicate that are you covered by the class action and if you pay out of pocket now and they win, you'll be reimbursed but you might want to check on that more.

    Edit: Also this doesn't apply to you, but class actions do not cover everyone. In this specific case it only applies to people who owned one of the models before January 9, 2009.

    khain on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    khain wrote: »
    Edit: Also this doesn't apply to you, but class actions do not cover everyone. In this specific case it only applies to people who owned one of the models before January 9, 2009.

    I bought the car in April 2008.

    joshofalltrades on
  • MegaMan001MegaMan001 CRNA Rochester, MNRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    You said you contacted the local dealership about the repair, but you didn't inform them of the lawsuit directly. If I read your original post directly, you are assuming they are trying to cheat you because they didn't mention the claim.

    I'm not sure of the time line from when you contacted the dealership to discovering about the recall, but you may want to call the local dealership and give them the information regarding the recall as you have found it. Then ask for the contact information of their overseer or who they report to for customer service difficulties and simply move up the chain.

    I own a 2009 Toyota Matrix which has gone through four recalls in the last year and I found that local dealerships often had no idea what was going on because they had received no information from corporate. I felt better informed from reading the daily official Toyota press releases which stated what they planned to do, rather than the 'official' information trickling into the local dealerships.

    Either way, I'd start with the local dealership and present them with the info as you have it and then move up the corporate chain from there.

    MegaMan001 on
    I am in the business of saving lives.
  • MushroomStickMushroomStick Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Are you sure that any of this applies to you? I mean because a lot of the time warranties and such do not transfer past the first owner of a vehicle.

    MushroomStick on
  • PlanarblightPlanarblight Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    You can also try finding a different dealer to work with. I've had some dealers that wouldn't cover items that were clearly under warranty, and others that bent over backwards to cover things that were questionable, or pretty clearly shouldn't have been covered.

    Planarblight on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Thanks guys, I'll try some of this stuff out. I'm still kind of bummed.

    joshofalltrades on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Okay, so we brought it in to get looked at somewhere else and they confirmed it's the VTi, but the whole transmission was going to need replacing. The $3500 we were quoted was just a guess prior to test driving the vehicle. Now we're looking at $6000 transmission, which is just $1000 shy of what we paid for the car in 2008. The repair guy says that eventually (he can't predict exactly when) the transmission is going to slip/break down and we'll be stranded on the side of the road.

    Now I'm getting a bit panicky. We don't have the money every month to make a car payment until I get out of school. The wife and I both work 2 jobs and we have to be in different places at the same time fairly often, so we really need to be a 2-car family. My wife knows the service manager at the only local GM dealership but the only thing he'll do is give us the number for the people who deal with issues like this. Is there something I should do before calling that number?

    joshofalltrades on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Do you have life insurance policy, mortgage, or anything like that? The only thing I can think of is to take out a small loan on some collateral like insurance or mortgage to pay it off.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    At this point I'm pretty sure we want to trade the car in and get something else. Even if they fix the transmission there's no guarantee the next one won't fail. Basically what I'm asking is if there's a good way to get leverage or to be convincing to the people who have the power to give those things out.

    joshofalltrades on
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    http://www.carlemon.com/

    Check that out and see if you can make the dealership that sold it to you replace it. You did buy it around the time this was going down so I'm sure this was a known problem so you may be able to get the dealership that sold you the car to exchange it for a different make and/or model.

    You're almost certainly fucked, I think, though.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Do you have receipts from diagnostic work done prior to Jan 2010?

    Honestly even if the claim goes through, don't expect to get a full payment.

    You:

    1. Were near the 125,000 mile limit when the problems started.
    2. Bought a high mileage used car which was 6 years old.
    3. Were near the 8 year time limit when the problems started.

    All of this puts you at the back of the line for settlement money compared to, say, someone who bought an '05 and started having trouble in '07 and was the original owner. You may get few hundred dollars, but at 8 years old and 125,000+ miles its reasonable to assume from a legal stand point that the car has had a service life not incomparable to the usual service life of similar cars, making it very difficult to prove a monetary loss equivalent to the full purchase value of the car. This is probably why the 8 year and 125,000 mile limits were chosen in the first place, they were what the law firm considered to be a reasonable lifespan for the car.

    Jealous Deva on
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    $6K for a transmission is goddamn ridiculous. I'd google and call around for other quotes.

    My Subaru had a hitch in the transmission I needed to fix before I sold it. I could source new trannies direct from Subaru for around $4500, remanufactured ones from 3rd parties for $2k-2500 shipped, and I ended up getting it rebuilt locally for about $750. That was a pretty good deal though, and to get it I had to leave it for a week or 2 since it was basically being worked on during off hours.

    Djeet on
  • MushroomStickMushroomStick Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Djeet wrote: »
    $6K for a transmission is goddamn ridiculous. I'd google and call around for other quotes.

    My Subaru had a hitch in the transmission I needed to fix before I sold it. I could source new trannies direct from Subaru for around $4500, remanufactured ones from 3rd parties for $2k-2500 shipped, and I ended up getting it rebuilt locally for about $750. That was a pretty good deal though, and to get it I had to leave it for a week or 2 since it was basically being worked on during off hours.

    On a car I used to have, a dealership quoted me somewhere close to $1k to patch a hole in the exhaust. When I went to some little muffler shop, they quoted me $30. I'm sure you wont get quite that nice of a ratio on a transmission, but you'll almost definitely get a much more reasonable quote from a transmission shop.

    MushroomStick on
  • MidshipmanMidshipman Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Djeet wrote: »
    $6K for a transmission is goddamn ridiculous. I'd google and call around for other quotes.

    My Subaru had a hitch in the transmission I needed to fix before I sold it. I could source new trannies direct from Subaru for around $4500, remanufactured ones from 3rd parties for $2k-2500 shipped, and I ended up getting it rebuilt locally for about $750. That was a pretty good deal though, and to get it I had to leave it for a week or 2 since it was basically being worked on during off hours.

    He's got a no longer produced (and never produced in large quantity) CVT, not a regular manual or hydraulic automatic. Your experience is not comparable.

    Midshipman on
    midshipman.jpg
  • SixSix Caches Tweets in the mainframe cyberhex Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Djeet wrote: »
    $6K for a transmission is goddamn ridiculous. I'd google and call around for other quotes.

    My Subaru had a hitch in the transmission I needed to fix before I sold it. I could source new trannies direct from Subaru for around $4500, remanufactured ones from 3rd parties for $2k-2500 shipped, and I ended up getting it rebuilt locally for about $750. That was a pretty good deal though, and to get it I had to leave it for a week or 2 since it was basically being worked on during off hours.

    For what he's talking about, $6k is pretty reasonable. He can shop around, and maybe find a used transmission from a salvaged vehicle, but off the top there's nothing ridiculous about that quote.

    Six on
    can you feel the struggle within?
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    It being a low production cvt does inform, however Ebay's got one for around $3k shipped. He might could do better looking for a local salvage yard though, and dedicated transmission shops tend to have better lines on used/remanned parts.

    Djeet on
  • Diomedes240zDiomedes240z Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Don't bother repairing it. It's a belt driven CVT in a 1.5 tonne car. Making something like this last 125,000 miles is a huge engineering feat-- it's not that the CVT has a defect so much as having a CVT in a passenger car weighing more than 1 tonne is a defect.

    Chalk this up as a learning experience and buy a more reliable (conventional) car.

    Diomedes240z on
    fdod80.jpg
  • PelPel Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Don't bother repairing it. It's a belt driven CVT in a 1.5 tonne car. Making something like this last 125,000 miles is a huge engineering feat-- it's not that the CVT has a defect so much as having a CVT in a passenger car weighing more than 1 tonne is a defect.

    Chalk this up as a learning experience and buy a more reliable (conventional) car.
    Pretty much this. Your SUV has a lawn mower transmission, and is pretty much worthless and unreliable even if the transmission is replaced. Sell your non-running car to whoever will buy it, you can get a better and more reliable car for cheaper than the cost of repairs.

    Your only possible option is to get a price tag for swapping your 4-cyl/Vti for either a normal transmission or a v6/normal transmission. I would consider such a swap to be insane and insanely expensive under normal circumstances, but when you are talking 6k for parts alone on a transmission, it might be an option.

    Sucks that you got screwed, though.

    Pel on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Pel wrote: »
    Don't bother repairing it. It's a belt driven CVT in a 1.5 tonne car. Making something like this last 125,000 miles is a huge engineering feat-- it's not that the CVT has a defect so much as having a CVT in a passenger car weighing more than 1 tonne is a defect.

    Chalk this up as a learning experience and buy a more reliable (conventional) car.
    Pretty much this. Your SUV has a lawn mower transmission, and is pretty much worthless and unreliable even if the transmission is replaced. Sell your non-running car to whoever will buy it, you can get a better and more reliable car for cheaper than the cost of repairs.

    Your only possible option is to get a price tag for swapping your 4-cyl/Vti for either a normal transmission or a v6/normal transmission. I would consider such a swap to be insane and insanely expensive under normal circumstances, but when you are talking 6k for parts alone on a transmission, it might be an option.

    Sucks that you got screwed, though.

    The car still runs, it just makes weird sounds for the first minute or two it starts up in the morning. I guess now is the time to trade it, while it's still running.

    joshofalltrades on
  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Oh it still runs? Drop it like it's hot. I had a 96 Explorer with similar transmission problems (that the dealer was aware of), they still gave $2500 on a trade. As long as it cranks it's worth something, if the transmission goes out it's a boat anchor.

    Jealous Deva on
  • reddeathreddeath Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Totally get rid of the car. The CVT in those vehicles was nowhere near robust enough to keep them going for long periods of time, just can't handle the torque over time.

    You might be able to get a grand or two out of it, as long as you don't owe any on it, I'd just roll the cash from it into a new car loan or straight up trade + cash for a used car.

    reddeath on
  • badpoetbadpoet Registered User regular
    edited November 2010

    The car still runs, it just makes weird sounds for the first minute or two it starts up in the morning. I guess now is the time to trade it, while it's still running.

    Do some car shopping, find one you want at a dealership/car dealer you have not spoken to about this issue. Drive your vehicle there in the evening. Make sure you have driven it around until it's not making noise. Take the vehicle you want out an a test drive to let them estimate how much you can get for your car. Do not mention the transmission. If asked, say "It's just time for a newer car, I want something safer for my family." If they specifically ask you about the transmission (like when they notice a noise that is probably there all the time but you don't hear because you don't know what you're listening for), simply say "It's always run fine for me."

    Trade it in and get a new vehicle.

    badpoet on
  • SplitTheSkySplitTheSky Registered User new member
    edited November 2010
    Hi there, first post here. :D Anyway, I run a salvage yard and 6k is total BS on that transmission (even with labor). I sell those for 2200 a pop on the reg. I would suggest getting rid of the car though. Saturns/GMs aren't known for the reliability or re-sell value.

    SplitTheSky on
  • CasualCasual Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle Flap Flap Flap Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    It's already been said, drop it like it's hot. Even with a transmission that's about to go the value is far more than with broken transmisson. This actually happened to me and my partner last month, there was a bang and that was that. We got $200 for it from a scrap yard.

    On the plus side we went to a car auction and picked up a 92 Mitsi Galant for $1450 including action fees. It was an incredible bargain it even has four new tires on it. Only money I've had to spend on it so far was $30 to fix a squeaky shock at the back.

    So if you're looking for a cheap and functional ride go to a car auction.

    Casual on
  • joshofalltradesjoshofalltrades Class Traitor Smoke-filled roomRegistered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Hi there, first post here. :D Anyway, I run a salvage yard and 6k is total BS on that transmission (even with labor). I sell those for 2200 a pop on the reg. I would suggest getting rid of the car though. Saturns/GMs aren't known for the reliability or re-sell value.

    Thanks and welcome to the forums.

    joshofalltrades on
Sign In or Register to comment.