The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Skyline] Independence Day meets Prey (sadly without the Cherokee magic)

HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
edited November 2010 in Debate and/or Discourse
I just got around to seeing this movies.

I liked it a lot. It did a lot of things right:

1) Military actually shows up and does shit, placing what would be a very limited story into a wider context.
2) Effects were great.
3) Aliens were suitably scary and alien. Good designs, though derivative I think of a lot of previous attempts.

It does have some weaknesses though:

1) Really wish it was 10, maybe 20 minutes longer. But I can see why it isn't.
2) Acting is functional, but it's not really compelling. No one really stood out that much.

While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
HamHamJ on

Posts

  • VerrVerr Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    I wish it had been 10 minutes shorter.
    In my mind, it would have had the couple just looking up into the light, accepting their fate, together.

    As it is, we got the trite OMG YOUR AN ALIEN and a shitty ending.

    Was very, very, very angry at this movie when I left the theater. Not the good kind of angry either.

    I give it a thumbs down.

    Verr on
  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Verr wrote: »
    I wish it had been 10 minutes shorter.
    In my mind, it would have had the couple just looking up into the light, accepting their fate, together.

    As it is, we got the trite OMG YOUR AN ALIEN and a shitty ending.

    Was very, very, very angry at this movie when I left the theater. Not the good kind of angry either.

    I give it a thumbs down.

    Man what.
    That would not have been better in anyway.

    That would have been a truly mediocre ending.

    What we got was serious badass. I wish there had been more of it, but I think I get why there wasn't:

    As is, it makes a solid ending with some obvious, but cool, sequel bait. Continuing it would have either required wrapping the whole thing up in under half an hour, which would have meant some kind of "now destroy all the aliens!" plot at the end, which would have been dumb, or something like another hour to get to any point that would serve as an ending.

    HamHamJ on
    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
  • YranYran Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    What? This movie was just terrible.

    It couldn't really decide if it was a horrible Independence Day, or a really bad Cloverfield-like take on an invasion movie. Except all the actors are terrible. And their characters are all unlikeable.

    I'm not exaggerating when I say it was the worst movie I've ever seen in theaters (though I only see something like half a dozen movies a year in theater).

    Yran on
    630847-1.png?1294970711
  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Yran wrote: »
    What? This movie was just terrible.

    It couldn't really decide if it was a horrible Independence Day, or a really bad Cloverfield-like take on an invasion movie. Except all the actors are terrible. And their characters are all unlikeable.

    I'm not exaggerating when I say it was the worst movie I've ever seen in theaters (though I only see something like half a dozen movies a year in theater).

    I didn't think the characters were unlikeable. Pretty meh really.

    HamHamJ on
    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
  • Mr.SunshineMr.Sunshine Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    This movie is bad and you should feel bad for liking it.

    Edit: Independence Day was/is bad too.

    Mr.Sunshine on
  • Atlas in ChainsAtlas in Chains Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    This is the worst movie I've seen in theatres in the last 10 years. The acting was so painful, but even if it had a decent cast, the characters would have been hateworthy. The only guy that didn't act like a douche was the first guy to get sucked into the light, but he just looked like a douche, so even he wasn't likeable.

    Atlas in Chains on
  • MoridinMoridin Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Jumping on the 'this movie was horrible' train.
    Right off the bat it uses an unnecessary timeskip to try and build tension/develop characters. This might have been effective if the characters were at all likeable, but they weren't, and they either acted everything poorly or the script was horrible. I haven't decided yet.

    The whole "character looks at the bright like and is transfixed" schtick completely lost any dramatic tension it might have had after the third time it happened to the same character. And then the same character inexplicably gets super strength or something.

    Also the whole movie is shot around the same goddamn hotel complex. And I couldn't take the hotel manager seriously at all.

    And the end doesn't make any sense.

    This movie would have been considerably better if it had been told from the perspective of the military. But that's what The Battle of Los Angeles is going to be. And I think I heard somewhere that the studio that made Skyline was involved with the special effects studio for The Battle of Los Angeles, and basically just stole the whole visual effects pipeline and shat out Skyline before The Battle of Los Angeles could come out. Not sure if that's correct though.

    Moridin on
    sig10008eq.png
  • HamHamJHamHamJ Registered User regular
    edited November 2010
    Moridin wrote: »
    Jumping on the 'this movie was horrible' train.
    Right off the bat it uses an unnecessary timeskip to try and build tension/develop characters. This might have been effective if the characters were at all likeable, but they weren't, and they either acted everything poorly or the script was horrible. I haven't decided yet.

    The whole "character looks at the bright like and is transfixed" schtick completely lost any dramatic tension it might have had after the third time it happened to the same character. And then the same character inexplicably gets super strength or something.

    Also the whole movie is shot around the same goddamn hotel complex. And I couldn't take the hotel manager seriously at all.

    And the end doesn't make any sense.

    This movie would have been considerably better if it had been told from the perspective of the military. But that's what The Battle of Los Angeles is going to be. And I think I heard somewhere that the studio that made Skyline was involved with the special effects studio for The Battle of Los Angeles, and basically just stole the whole visual effects pipeline and shat out Skyline before The Battle of Los Angeles could come out. Not sure if that's correct though.
    It's not inexplicable, and that's why the ending makes sense.

    It was very clearly foreshadowed. His reaction to the light was different in several respects from anyone else's:

    1) He continues to have left over vein-marks after it wears off.
    2) He's not mind controlled during subsequent exposures.
    3) No one else seems to have that whole power feeling.

    It's obviously some kind of metabolic/genetic difference that causes him to have an unintended reaction to the light. He's able to retain some of the effects of the light, even after exposure and while not being controlled. Most obviously crazy vein crap and super strength. And it's this same resistance which causes, at the end, his ability to subvert whatever symbiote/suite/thing they put his brain into.

    HamHamJ on
    While racing light mechs, your Urbanmech comes in second place, but only because it ran out of ammo.
Sign In or Register to comment.