The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
So I'm getting married in March,and I have to help my fiance decide on the guest list and then try and choose my Best Man.I'm already having a fairly small wedding,so I only have 3 groomsmen from whom to choose.I have my 2 best friends and my cousin who is like my figurative 3rd brother.I originally chose him to avoid conflict between my two friends,but as it turns out,my cousin may not be able to make it down here for the wedding.
What do I do,choose the friend I've known the longest,or choose the friend to whom I've remained closest,if only by proximity?
Also,who knew that my future wife and I knew so many people,or even cared to invite so many.As of last count,I think we are around 110. >_<
I've given it a bit more thought, and maybe you should bring it up with both of them. The Best Man has a lot of responsibilities on the big day, one might be more inclined to go along with that than the other. Me? I'll be a groomsman and that's it.
I'm probably going to have two brides maids (granted one of them is a dude) if I get married. If you're going to follow the advice of not having a best man at all, why not just have both of them be your best men? Doesn't really make a difference, and both people feel good.
So I'm getting married in March,and I have to help my fiance decide on the guest list and then try and choose my Best Man.I'm already having a fairly small wedding,so I only have 3 groomsmen from whom to choose.I have my 2 best friends and my cousin who is like my figurative 3rd brother.I originally chose him to avoid conflict between my two friends,but as it turns out,my cousin may not be able to make it down here for the wedding.
What do I do,choose the friend I've known the longest,or choose the friend to whom I've remained closest,if only by proximity?
Also,who knew that my future wife and I knew so many people,or even cared to invite so many.As of last count,I think we are around 110. >_<
Stick with your cousin and if he can't make it then leave it without one. I hate when people choose someone just for the sake of having someone. This is how I hear it, "Hey, my real best man couldn't make it so I need a plan B and I guess you'll do."
Also, Holy Batman, March?!? Get those STD's out ASAP, invites will need to be out soon! Also, think about now if you're doing children, children over X years or no children and +1 for all singles or +1 for serious relationships. Do you know what your venue can max hold or what your budget is per head/total?
Yeah, I'll go with not having a best man, unless you're depending on the best man to help you with things.
If there are no responsibilities, then choosing a best man is only an expression of preference, and you don't want to do that.
If there are responsibilities, then just make it clear to them that your choice is based on who wants to/can handle the position. And if they both want to do it, then just let them share the job and the title.
The best man has a lot of responsibilities. Choose the one who is can carry them out. Or... no best man, I didnt have one either!
This, my husband went with one that was able to come that he had known the longest instead of a friend he'd known for a lot shorter of a time that was a lot more dependable, and he regretted it. The best man's supposed to be helping you, not making you tear your hair out because you can't find him, he doesn't respond to things, and he's doing the absolute minimum and treating it like a vacation for himself and his girlfriend.
Secondly,I think that sticking with my cousin and if he can't make it,just not having one could be the best idea.I can't imagine there being too many responsibilities for him to fulfill,our wedding is pretty low key.
As to having BOTH of them be Best Men,my fiance is already having 1 Matron of Honor and 2 Maids of Honor and no Bridesmaids.Maybe I'll make them both Best Men to match her.Something to consider.
And Save The Dates are a pain in the ass because we have to figure out who to leave out.There aren't many children invited so I think leaving them out would be more inconvenient than helpful.
Oh man, I never understood the point of everyone being BM or MOH. At that point it's like why bother?
When it comes to the guestlist I suggest setting some baseline rules to keep things sane, especially if your folks are the kind who think it's their wedding too and have bigass lists they want invited. Also, don't be afraid to cut people you're not close too. There is nothing wrong with saying "I'm sorry, our venue is small so we're keeping the wedding small" to people presumptuous enough to ask for an invite. Some people do A and B lists but I find that kind of tacky.
Oh man, I never understood the point of everyone being BM or MOH. At that point it's like why bother?
When it comes to the guestlist I suggest setting some baseline rules to keep things sane, especially if your folks are the kind who think it's their wedding too and have bigass lists they want invited. Also, don't be afraid to cut people you're not close too. There is nothing wrong with saying "I'm sorry, our venue is small so we're keeping the wedding small" to people presumptuous enough to ask for an invite. Some people do A and B lists but I find that kind of tacky.
She just has me add another person her mom invited whom I've NEVER EVEN HEARD OF.
At this point,she and I are gonna tell them to shove it and just go elope.We can have a party later after the sexcapades end.
Havok417 on
0
MichaelLCIn what furnace was thy brain?ChicagoRegistered Userregular
edited December 2010
Get those Save The Dates out!
Also assume many people will either send regrets and/or not show up. However also assume about an equal amount of uninvited guests will come so pass on getting "extra" dinners.
Oh man, I never understood the point of everyone being BM or MOH. At that point it's like why bother?
When it comes to the guestlist I suggest setting some baseline rules to keep things sane, especially if your folks are the kind who think it's their wedding too and have bigass lists they want invited. Also, don't be afraid to cut people you're not close too. There is nothing wrong with saying "I'm sorry, our venue is small so we're keeping the wedding small" to people presumptuous enough to ask for an invite. Some people do A and B lists but I find that kind of tacky.
She just has me add another person her mom invited whom I've NEVER EVEN HEARD OF.
At this point,she and I are gonna tell them to shove it and just go elope.We can have a party later after the sexcapades end.
Yea, this is a line you need to draw early. And don't be afraid to tell her mom or yours that you're very sorry but you won't be inviting Susie & John and that you're sorry she already told them they're invited but that you're just not able to include them.
And I wouldn't assume that people are going to not show up when planning. If you rely on No's to not go over on you max number you may run into a big problem.
If I were ever to get married, and someone talked me into having a big wedding, I'd select my BM from among my closest friends based solely on their ability to organize and get things done, because that's what Best Man is for. If you don't need anyone in such a role, don't appoint a Best Man at all.
Having a Best Man at my wedding was a mistake. It unfairly conferred some sort of "this person has done everything", when in fact most of the work was split between the BM and another groomsman. My BM was also obstinate for a lot of the time, and tried to steer things his way rather than my way.
For my wedding, I just had two "Better Men". They were what I referred to as "brotherfriends", and I had a pool of like 12 "cousinfriends" that it would have sucked to choose from for a third. So I just didn't. It helped that their responsibilities that day consisted of one doing a reading and the other holding on to the ring.
For a friend's wedding, he had 3 groomsmen, and then a hole in a lineup where the best man was, even though he was actually in Japan at the time.
Moral of the story, do whatever works out for you and yours. Don't feel tied in to doing something because it's expected.
Moral of the story, do whatever works out for you and yours. Don't feel tied in to doing something because it's expected.
I like this.
I appointed my dad as my best man to avoid hurting any of my friends' feelings. It's really hard to get pissed at the groom for choosing his dad as his go-to guy.
All of my groomsmen planned all the stuff, but my dad got the title to avoid conflict. It worked out well.
Depending on your two friends and how well they would work together, splitting duties/privileges is a distinct possibility while calling them both your 'Best Men'. Draw up a list of assignments (ie, 'Stand next to groom during service', 'Give first speech at the after party', 'Host the Bachelor Party', 'Pick up Aunt from Airport', etc), bring them both together, flip a coin, whoever wins goes down the list first picking jobs for himself. You could also pre-assign jobs if one person would be obviously better than the other at it (ie, 'Ted doesn't drink, so he can be DD for the weekend' or 'Joe knows ever stripper in town, of course he can plan the Bachelor party'). No hurt feelings, asks are delineated according to abilities, everyone theoretically goes home happy. This depends on a number of things, of course, and you know the guys best. If one or both wouldn't handle this well, having no Best Man seems a decent compromise.
susan on
2010 PAX DM Challenge Grand Champion 2011 PAX Warmachine/Hordes Champion
I had my two brothers both fill out Best Man duties, it was win-win. Like Susan says, share the responsibilities and it will make life easier for both of them as well.
I had a similar dilemma a few months ago. My fiancee only has her maid of honor and no bridesmaids (with a short guest list and strict budget it didn't make sense to go much farther anyway) so it wouldn't work well having them both up there.
Anyway, in my case, when it came down to it, I went with neither. My uncle (who's been like a father since I lost my parents) is the best man, the two prime candidates are ushers. Neither of them can really say they were shorted by the pick, and it also gives me a good reason to give them some of the best man responsibilities anyway - my aunt made very clear her husband will have nothing to do with a bachelor party on her watch.
I have 2 close friends one I have know since 7th grade and one I have known for about 5 years. Both live out of state. Also I have a brother and a cousin who I consider a brother that live close by. But both have families and their spouses are very controlling, so they don't get much free time. They are all deserving but I just would like an outside opinion to see what other people think. I wouldn't be opposed to having 2 but would like to just have one without hurting feelings. I think my friends are better choices since they have more freedom in their relationships and no kids. The one I have known the longest is a good friend but has let me down a few times. Also he passed me over in his wedding for a guy he grew up with as a kid when he lived in ireland. He moved here when he was 12 and now we are 30. And I was always there for him. Not mad about it just didn't think they were that close. Then the other guy was there for me 100% since we became close and looked out big time during some very shady situations for me. And we lived together for about 3 yrs and never had any problems. He's getting married in a few months and has asked me to be his best man. So theres the situation. Please give me some input and your welcome to ask questions as needed. Thanks guys
I was the best man for one of my fraternity brothers, who had a relatively informal wedding at the beach. My "duties" amounted to giving the toast at the reception and helping like, move some chairs around once (aside from the ceremony, that is.)
If your wedding isn't going to be a complex thing with a lot of explicit Best Manly duties that will need to be accomplished, I would just not have one. If you do need to pick one, I'd go with whoever you are closest to / whoever is the most dependable. If something about the wedding does wind up being stressful, you want the person you're most comfortable with to be your designated troubleshooter and interference runner.
hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
Wedding is going to be very simple about 150 people. I have 4 guys, which I'm pretty sure the two family members won't even be able to go to the bachleor party because of their wives. And I'm my gut I really think my buddy that I lived with is the best choice but I just can't decide
If one is helping you get the ring he seems a logical choice. The best man's role at the front is very short, he'll be sat with the others on the front pew very soon.
Yea but there's still my brother and the friend who was there threw everything and never let me down. Also the guy helping with the ring let me down a little not using me as his best man when I was always there and much closer to him
0
ceresWhen the last moon is cast over the last star of morningAnd the future has past without even a last desperate warningRegistered User, ModeratorMod Emeritus
Please make your own thread for questions. Thanks.
And it seems like all is dying, and would leave the world to mourn
Posts
Or just tell them together that they need to play rock paper scissors for it.
Street Fighter Turbo contest
best of three
Ditto.
As far as I was concerned, it was better that everyone involved was mildly disappointed than any particular person felt slighted.
Check out my art! Buy some prints!
Stick with your cousin and if he can't make it then leave it without one. I hate when people choose someone just for the sake of having someone. This is how I hear it, "Hey, my real best man couldn't make it so I need a plan B and I guess you'll do."
Also, Holy Batman, March?!? Get those STD's out ASAP, invites will need to be out soon! Also, think about now if you're doing children, children over X years or no children and +1 for all singles or +1 for serious relationships. Do you know what your venue can max hold or what your budget is per head/total?
If there are no responsibilities, then choosing a best man is only an expression of preference, and you don't want to do that.
If there are responsibilities, then just make it clear to them that your choice is based on who wants to/can handle the position. And if they both want to do it, then just let them share the job and the title.
https://twitter.com/Hooraydiation
This, my husband went with one that was able to come that he had known the longest instead of a friend he'd known for a lot shorter of a time that was a lot more dependable, and he regretted it. The best man's supposed to be helping you, not making you tear your hair out because you can't find him, he doesn't respond to things, and he's doing the absolute minimum and treating it like a vacation for himself and his girlfriend.
Secondly,I think that sticking with my cousin and if he can't make it,just not having one could be the best idea.I can't imagine there being too many responsibilities for him to fulfill,our wedding is pretty low key.
As to having BOTH of them be Best Men,my fiance is already having 1 Matron of Honor and 2 Maids of Honor and no Bridesmaids.Maybe I'll make them both Best Men to match her.Something to consider.
And Save The Dates are a pain in the ass because we have to figure out who to leave out.There aren't many children invited so I think leaving them out would be more inconvenient than helpful.
When it comes to the guestlist I suggest setting some baseline rules to keep things sane, especially if your folks are the kind who think it's their wedding too and have bigass lists they want invited. Also, don't be afraid to cut people you're not close too. There is nothing wrong with saying "I'm sorry, our venue is small so we're keeping the wedding small" to people presumptuous enough to ask for an invite. Some people do A and B lists but I find that kind of tacky.
She just has me add another person her mom invited whom I've NEVER EVEN HEARD OF.
At this point,she and I are gonna tell them to shove it and just go elope.We can have a party later after the sexcapades end.
Also assume many people will either send regrets and/or not show up. However also assume about an equal amount of uninvited guests will come so pass on getting "extra" dinners.
We didn't have much to do, but he still had to chose which one of us stood right next to him :P
Yea, this is a line you need to draw early. And don't be afraid to tell her mom or yours that you're very sorry but you won't be inviting Susie & John and that you're sorry she already told them they're invited but that you're just not able to include them.
And I wouldn't assume that people are going to not show up when planning. If you rely on No's to not go over on you max number you may run into a big problem.
I think not having one is best.
For a friend's wedding, he had 3 groomsmen, and then a hole in a lineup where the best man was, even though he was actually in Japan at the time.
Moral of the story, do whatever works out for you and yours. Don't feel tied in to doing something because it's expected.
I like this.
I appointed my dad as my best man to avoid hurting any of my friends' feelings. It's really hard to get pissed at the groom for choosing his dad as his go-to guy.
All of my groomsmen planned all the stuff, but my dad got the title to avoid conflict. It worked out well.
There's got to be a better abbreviation for that.
Although, it has inspired me to send out my own with the envelope labeled, "STDs from Taximes & Fiancee inside!"
2011 PAX Warmachine/Hordes Champion
Anyway, in my case, when it came down to it, I went with neither. My uncle (who's been like a father since I lost my parents) is the best man, the two prime candidates are ushers. Neither of them can really say they were shorted by the pick, and it also gives me a good reason to give them some of the best man responsibilities anyway - my aunt made very clear her husband will have nothing to do with a bachelor party on her watch.
I was the best man for one of my fraternity brothers, who had a relatively informal wedding at the beach. My "duties" amounted to giving the toast at the reception and helping like, move some chairs around once (aside from the ceremony, that is.)
If your wedding isn't going to be a complex thing with a lot of explicit Best Manly duties that will need to be accomplished, I would just not have one. If you do need to pick one, I'd go with whoever you are closest to / whoever is the most dependable. If something about the wedding does wind up being stressful, you want the person you're most comfortable with to be your designated troubleshooter and interference runner.
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat