The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[WOW] [CHAT] thread. 4.2 on the PTR, time to chuck woodland animals.

145791063

Posts

  • AphostileAphostile San Francisco, CARegistered User regular
    edited April 2011
    I wonder what my paladin's health would be in a LFD 15% group.

    Don't have any items to get from regular raiding anymore, at 11D/13P/51B.

    Aphostile on
    Nothing. Matters.
  • cncaudatacncaudata Registered User regular
    edited April 2011

    I lasted until the second paragraph: "For the record, I do not play with my face." - reads complete troll.

    cncaudata on
    PSN: Broodax- battle.net: broodax#1163
  • naengwennaengwen Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Think the url alone was a good tipoff. That thar place ain't decent, like here.

    *spit*

    *ding*

    naengwen on
  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    I thought this part
    Did you seriously complain that it's unfair that you don't get a "Satchel of Exotic Mysteries" because you only play a hunter? It's unfair that you don't get a GOODY BAG for playing a VIDEO GAME with your UNDAMAGED HANDS? Do you want me to tell you about unfair? I'm not even going to rise to that bait

    fairly clearly identified it as a troll post.

    It still makes a good point, though.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • -SPI--SPI- Osaka, JapanRegistered User regular
    edited April 2011
    I wish blizzard would filter their questions for dev Q and A a bit more, have less repeats of repeats of repeats of questions that didn't need to be asked the first time. Although I tend to suspect they do filter them and intentionally use repeat questions as easy filler.

    But come on, we don't need to have whether we can buy things with achievement points answered AGAIN.

    -SPI- on
  • belligerentbelligerent Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    That's literally the dumbest achievement question ever. It's not a currency and it would never work like one, because there's a limit on how much you can earn. Rewards for specific achievements (and metas) are how it HAS to work. Why anyone thinks, "OH NUMBER R PRETTY BUY THINGS" is beyond me.

    belligerent on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    I just noticed some wording on my rogue.

    If I have Blade Flurry turned on and am fighting two enemies at once, will Bandit's Guile continually refresh to the 30% damage bonus? I'm not leveled enough yet to have the talent.

    Henroid on
  • JavenJaven Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Henroid wrote: »
    I just noticed some wording on my rogue.

    If I have Blade Flurry turned on and am fighting two enemies at once, will Bandit's Guile continually refresh to the 30% damage bonus? I'm not leveled enough yet to have the talent.

    I don't think so, since Blade Flurry damage dealt to the second target isn't considered Sinister Strike or Revealing Strike damage, but rather just 'Blade Flurry' damage.

    Javen on
  • IndieGirlIndieGirl Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Heroth wrote: »
    I don't know about that, i'm finding it troublesome to beat some tanks out there on aoe pulls as a rogue...

    JTLcx.jpg

    Just as an FYI, this was an undead Strat run done this evening at level 48, the rogue was 49 I believe. Sure he had BOAs but so does the tank. We kicked the warrior for being AFK/retarded and got the hunter. Go figure.

    I realize this is level 49 and not level 85 but everyone acting like it's impossible to outdamage tanks at X level is just making dps like the mage, warrior, and hunter in this group think it's okay to be really bad, and that bothers me.

    People that are playing properly, wearing gear that isn't bad for their class, have decent glyphs, and actually trying should at least be within 5% of the tank, if not downright outdpsing him. Instead, what I see more often than not is people like 3/4/5 on that meter who either don't know or don't care how to play.

    To segue, that is why *I* am sick to death of tanking. I can't slack off and not care and still get carried through some shit with people saying HAY JUST LITEN UP JUS A GAEM BRO NBD U VIRGIN NEKBEARD I HAEV A LIEF BESIDES WOW!!1

    Add to that the fact that CtA is making you queue solo? That's just mean. I have more fun DPSing than tanking right now but that's because I bring my own tank I think. I could probably be enticed to queue for the satchel when CtA comes out, but queue solo.... probably not.

    IndieGirl on
    zle3Y.jpg
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Javen wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    I just noticed some wording on my rogue.

    If I have Blade Flurry turned on and am fighting two enemies at once, will Bandit's Guile continually refresh to the 30% damage bonus? I'm not leveled enough yet to have the talent.

    I don't think so, since Blade Flurry damage dealt to the second target isn't considered Sinister Strike or Revealing Strike damage, but rather just 'Blade Flurry' damage.

    It reads, "and Striking a different opponent will begin the cycle anew." Striking is indeed capitalized in the middle of the sentence so maybe it is talking about Sinister Strike specifically targeting something else.

    Henroid on
  • Eat it You Nasty Pig.Eat it You Nasty Pig. tell homeland security 'we are the bomb'Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Eh, tanks topping dps in lowend five mans has more to do with mechanics than it does with dps being bad. Tanks are effectively tanking in dps gear, and are rolling through five mans spamming their aoe stuff all the time because they have near-infinite resources. DPS have a hard time keeping up because they don't have infinite resources.

    And you can totally slack off and take it easy while tanking. Just don't bust your ass to bail out the dps who pull aggro. It's a simple, self-correcting problem.

    Eat it You Nasty Pig. on
    hold your head high soldier, it ain't over yet
    that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
  • JavenJaven Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Henroid wrote: »
    Javen wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    I just noticed some wording on my rogue.

    If I have Blade Flurry turned on and am fighting two enemies at once, will Bandit's Guile continually refresh to the 30% damage bonus? I'm not leveled enough yet to have the talent.

    I don't think so, since Blade Flurry damage dealt to the second target isn't considered Sinister Strike or Revealing Strike damage, but rather just 'Blade Flurry' damage.

    It reads, "and Striking a different opponent will begin the cycle anew." Striking is indeed capitalized in the middle of the sentence so maybe it is talking about Sinister Strike specifically targeting something else.

    As far as I know it does indeed refer to "striking" as either Sinister or Revealing Strike, though even with Blade Flurry up, you're still not changing from the target in which you've got Bandit's Guile.

    If you're attacking two mobs with blade flurry up, and spamming sinister strike one while cleaving another, you're going to build up the buff from Bandit's Guile, on that target, whose increased damage will, as far as I know, spill over into the cleave damage dealt to enemy number 2. If you switch targets and start Sinister Striking the other target, while now cleaving the first, your Bandit's Guile resets.

    Javen on
  • Smaug6Smaug6 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    cncaudata wrote: »

    I lasted until the second paragraph: "For the record, I do not play with my face." - reads complete troll.

    Its pretty dark for a Troll.

    I mean christ I felt bad for the person about people not looking at them in the face during an job interview.

    Smaug6 on
    steam_sig.png
  • Jubal77Jubal77 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    forty wrote: »
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Ahhh. Even if they go full Sta/Mastery they should have much higher Dodge + Parry and Armor Rating than Pali and Warriors though.
    Eh? DKs don't get any more dodge/parry than the other tanks, unless they use the swordshattering rune, which is just 4%.

    You stated yourself they get to 50% avoidance with procs etc... where is that coming from if they dont have block? My Dodge and Parry on my 359 tank is ~23% in my avoidance set..... that isnt close to 50%.

    Jubal77 on
  • BuddiesBuddies Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Ahhh. Even if they go full Sta/Mastery they should have much higher Dodge + Parry and Armor Rating than Pali and Warriors though.
    Eh? DKs don't get any more dodge/parry than the other tanks, unless they use the swordshattering rune, which is just 4%.

    You stated yourself they get to 50% avoidance with procs etc... where is that coming from if they dont have block? My Dodge and Parry on my 359 tank is ~23% in my avoidance set..... that isnt close to 50%.

    Aye, my Dodge+Parry+2.4%(Chance to be missed) is 30%. I hate when Chimaeron goes to Phase 2 and one shots me. all of my Rage.


    But. Heroic Chimaeron down Monday night. Heroic Halfus down last night. Went from Rank 20th on server to 13th in 2 nights. Working on Magmaw now, and I think we can get him down this week also. Which will bring us to Rank 10. Yes!

    Buddies on
  • AstaleAstale Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Smaug6 wrote: »
    cncaudata wrote: »

    I lasted until the second paragraph: "For the record, I do not play with my face." - reads complete troll.

    Its pretty dark for a Troll.

    I mean christ I felt bad for the person about people not looking at them in the face during an job interview.

    It would have been so much better if the explanation WAS they played with their face.

    "God I can stay out of the damn fire by smashing my bulbous nose on the WASD a few times, why the fuck can't you WITH YOUR TWO BEAUTIFUL FUNCTIONING HANDS?!?"

    Astale on
  • -SPI--SPI- Osaka, JapanRegistered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Yay, camel figurine!

    Nooo, crumbled to dust.

    -SPI- on
  • Jubal77Jubal77 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Gratz on H Chimmy we have got him to 5% or so a few time on our 2nd night on him we just have to get P1 down better cause currently we are using BL to get to P2 which I am guessing to down him you dont really want to do.

    The next progression is HMagmaw? The officers are talking about Maloriak next but I guess it doesnt really matter as the fights are most likely tuned for 359 which most of our raiders are currently at.

    Also your server sounds like it has a bunch of good raiders on it. We are siting 1/13 and are in the top 11 i believe for 10 mans.

    Jubal77 on
  • Basren DragonsnackBasren Dragonsnack Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    I found Heroic Magmaw extremely easy after all the nerfs, much easier than Maloriak.

    Maloriak itself isn't too difficult either, but it definitely takes more time to learn the fight correctly than Magmaw does.

    Basren Dragonsnack on
    PSN: Scotty85
  • RakeethRakeeth Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Finally killed heroic Omnotron in my 10m. Also learned that when slimes are snared (entrapment from frost trap) they apparently will target and explode on melee. This very thing happened at around 11% and we managed to limp to our first kill. There would've been so much rage at me if we wiped.

    The way they've been nerfing encounters and how long they've been taking with patches, my guild might actually clear this tier before Firelands is out.
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    The next progression is HMagmaw? The officers are talking about Maloriak next but I guess it doesnt really matter as the fights are most likely tuned for 359 which most of our raiders are currently at.

    For what its worth my 10m's heroic progression so far is Halfus -> Chimaeron -> Atramedes -> Maloriak -> Magmaw -> Conclave of wind -> Valiona -> Omnotron.

    Rakeeth on
  • Warlock82Warlock82 Never pet a burning dog Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Rakeeth wrote: »
    Finally killed heroic Omnotron in my 10m. Also learned that when slimes are snared (entrapment from frost trap) they apparently will target and explode on melee. This very thing happened at around 11% and we managed to limp to our first kill. There would've been so much rage at me if we wiped.

    The way they've been nerfing encounters and how long they've been taking with patches, my guild might actually clear this tier before Firelands is out.
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    The next progression is HMagmaw? The officers are talking about Maloriak next but I guess it doesnt really matter as the fights are most likely tuned for 359 which most of our raiders are currently at.

    For what its worth my 10m's heroic progression so far is Halfus -> Chimaeron -> Atramedes -> Maloriak -> Magmaw -> Conclave of wind -> Valiona -> Omnotron.

    As melee I just refuse to directly attack the slimes (FoK spam FTW!). It just leads to me dying because the dumbass the slime was chasing got too close. Meanwhile he survives because he was *just* out of reach of that explosion. Funny how that works.

    Warlock82 on
    Switch: 2143-7130-1359 | 3DS: 4983-4927-6699 | Steam: warlock82 | PSN: Warlock2282
  • ToddJewellToddJewell Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    wound up server transferring so I could find a guild that raids when I am able to... I can see I am going to have to be patient as I am pretty far behind on gear so they are hesitant to use me [healer] on their progression. I got sat for heroic halfus, put in on regular mode Twins / Council, sat on Cho'gall and sat on Nefarian. They didn't do the rest of bwd because they extended their lockout I guess? They one shot all of BoT tuesday then went to nefarian and got him down to 20% a couple times. Yesterday they did Nefarian all night and couldn't quite get him down. I selfishly hope they don't extend their lockout again -- I honestly think they would be better served resetting it and doing heroic chim/atramedes/maloriak. I don't know what their issues are with Nefarian but it seems like they need a break from him.

    I guess if they extend it I might just try to find a pug to do bwd with so I can try to get better gear to join their progression stuff [I am at 348 on my holy paladin]. They are great to run with, just want to do more than listen in!

    ToddJewell on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    -SPI- wrote: »
    I wish blizzard would filter their questions for dev Q and A a bit more, have less repeats of repeats of repeats of questions that didn't need to be asked the first time. Although I tend to suspect they do filter them and intentionally use repeat questions as easy filler.

    But come on, we don't need to have whether we can buy things with achievement points answered AGAIN.
    This achievements Q&A is the worst Q&A they've done yet, but that shouldn't really come as a surprise since they're fucking achievements. What else is Blizzard supposed to do with them other than just keep making new ones with new content?

    forty on
  • RakeethRakeeth Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    ToddJewell wrote: »
    wound up server transferring so I could find a guild that raids when I am able to... I can see I am going to have to be patient as I am pretty far behind on gear so they are hesitant to use me [healer] on their progression. I got sat for heroic halfus, put in on regular mode Twins / Council, sat on Cho'gall and sat on Nefarian. They didn't do the rest of bwd because they extended their lockout I guess? They one shot all of BoT tuesday then went to nefarian and got him down to 20% a couple times. Yesterday they did Nefarian all night and couldn't quite get him down. I selfishly hope they don't extend their lockout again -- I honestly think they would be better served resetting it and doing heroic chim/atramedes/maloriak. I don't know what their issues are with Nefarian but it seems like they need a break from him.

    I guess if they extend it I might just try to find a pug to do bwd with so I can try to get better gear to join their progression stuff [I am at 348 on my holy paladin]. They are great to run with, just want to do more than listen in!

    The only reason to extend their lockout on BWD to try to kill Nef is if they've never killed him before. If none of them have killed Nef yet that means they haven't unlocked BWD heroic yet.

    Rakeeth on
  • ToddJewellToddJewell Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    did not know that -- they indeed haven't killed him [not sure if someone has but I know as a guild they have not]. thanks for mentioning it! I believe Al'akir and nef are the two remaining unkilled.

    If they kill in 10m does it count? I know they have a 10m crew that sometimes runs on the weekend.

    ToddJewell on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Ahhh. Even if they go full Sta/Mastery they should have much higher Dodge + Parry and Armor Rating than Pali and Warriors though.
    Eh? DKs don't get any more dodge/parry than the other tanks, unless they use the swordshattering rune, which is just 4%.

    You stated yourself they get to 50% avoidance with procs etc... where is that coming from if they dont have block? My Dodge and Parry on my 359 tank is ~23% in my avoidance set..... that isnt close to 50%.
    Eh?
    forty wrote:
    Even if a DK tries to gear fully for avoidance, he's still going to be well under 50% avoidance when trinket procs, DRW, etc. aren't up
    I said a DK will be well under 50% when limited duration effects aren't up. DRW gives 20% parry, so yeah, it's pretty easy to be over 50% avoidance for 12 seconds out of every 90 or so, but I wouldn't really count that. And you're not gearing for dodge/parry, I would assume, since mastery is far better in most situations.

    Investigate the three plate tanks sometime. The only "bonus avoidance" DKs can pick up over the other tanks is from the parry runeforge. Buddies mentioned being around 30% full avoidance, which is right around what my 359ish DK has without buffs (I'm still using stoneskin gargoyle runeforge, for now).

    Being fully raid buffed is going to nab you another 3-4% avoidance vs. unbuffed, by the way.

    forty on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    ToddJewell wrote: »
    did not know that -- they indeed haven't killed him [not sure if someone has but I know as a guild they have not]. thanks for mentioning it! I believe Al'akir and nef are the two remaining unkilled.

    If they kill in 10m does it count? I know they have a 10m crew that sometimes runs on the weekend.
    If the raid leader has killed Nef in either raid size, then he can set any size BWD raid to heroic.

    forty on
  • Doctor DetroitDoctor Detroit Not a doctor Tree townRegistered User regular
    edited April 2011
    forty wrote: »
    -SPI- wrote: »
    I wish blizzard would filter their questions for dev Q and A a bit more, have less repeats of repeats of repeats of questions that didn't need to be asked the first time. Although I tend to suspect they do filter them and intentionally use repeat questions as easy filler.

    But come on, we don't need to have whether we can buy things with achievement points answered AGAIN.
    This achievements Q&A is the worst Q&A they've done yet, but that shouldn't really come as a surprise since they're fucking achievements. What else is Blizzard supposed to do with them other than just keep making new ones with new content?

    Well, it was nice for them to admit that making an achievement for getting keys was kind of dumb when they were removing them from the game, but I find it kind of hard to believe that they can't (even at this point) go back and convert it to a Feat.

    Also, it's kind of telling that they admit to not thinking the holiday meta through all the way, that there should have been something to bring people back to holidays they've already done. Eh, having gotten 2 characters through the Long, Strange Trip, I'm not gonna complain about that.

    Doctor Detroit on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    forty wrote: »
    -SPI- wrote: »
    I wish blizzard would filter their questions for dev Q and A a bit more, have less repeats of repeats of repeats of questions that didn't need to be asked the first time. Although I tend to suspect they do filter them and intentionally use repeat questions as easy filler.

    But come on, we don't need to have whether we can buy things with achievement points answered AGAIN.
    This achievements Q&A is the worst Q&A they've done yet, but that shouldn't really come as a surprise since they're fucking achievements. What else is Blizzard supposed to do with them other than just keep making new ones with new content?

    Two things.

    1. We all know that achievements aren't an important aspect of gameplay. But the industry, as a whole, has to cater to achievements because there is a healthy enough portion of the audience that gives a shit about them and plays because of them. So Blizzard has to toss even those people a bone. The ironic thing is, that group of people I don't think looks up information on games enough to see that a company has done a Q&A.

    2. On the repeat questions thing, some of those get pushed through repeatedly because, the WoW playerbase being what it is, people don't fucking listen the first time answers are given. That or things need to be reworded. And in some cases it's a matter of reassuring players that yes, a given issue or concern is being looked into.

    Henroid on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Oh yeah, chalk up another "fuck you, where's my tri-spec already?"

    Effectively kiting heroic Magmaw parasites as blood or unholy spec is not consistently, reasonably possible. I'm sure when (if) Blizzard was testing and tuning this fight, they weren't using a tank speced DK for it.

    forty on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Henroid wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    -SPI- wrote: »
    I wish blizzard would filter their questions for dev Q and A a bit more, have less repeats of repeats of repeats of questions that didn't need to be asked the first time. Although I tend to suspect they do filter them and intentionally use repeat questions as easy filler.

    But come on, we don't need to have whether we can buy things with achievement points answered AGAIN.
    This achievements Q&A is the worst Q&A they've done yet, but that shouldn't really come as a surprise since they're fucking achievements. What else is Blizzard supposed to do with them other than just keep making new ones with new content?

    Two things.

    1. We all know that achievements aren't an important aspect of gameplay. But the industry, as a whole, has to cater to achievements because there is a healthy enough portion of the audience that gives a shit about them and plays because of them. So Blizzard has to toss even those people a bone. The ironic thing is, that group of people I don't think looks up information on games enough to see that a company has done a Q&A.

    2. On the repeat questions thing, some of those get pushed through repeatedly because, the WoW playerbase being what it is, people don't fucking listen the first time answers are given. That or things need to be reworded. And in some cases it's a matter of reassuring players that yes, a given issue or concern is being looked into.
    I don't even know what bone was tossed with this Q&A. It was more stomping on achievement whore dreams than anything else. Most of it could have been summed up as:

    "Nothing's changed since the first time you asked this shit two years ago."
    or
    "No, that's not going to happen."

    I think there was maybe one question with a response that wouldn't be a complete disappointment to the people who care about it and wasn't already known. I can't look the Q&A up again right now, though.

    forty on
  • Jubal77Jubal77 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    forty wrote: »
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Ahhh. Even if they go full Sta/Mastery they should have much higher Dodge + Parry and Armor Rating than Pali and Warriors though.
    Eh? DKs don't get any more dodge/parry than the other tanks, unless they use the swordshattering rune, which is just 4%.

    You stated yourself they get to 50% avoidance with procs etc... where is that coming from if they dont have block? My Dodge and Parry on my 359 tank is ~23% in my avoidance set..... that isnt close to 50%.
    Eh?
    forty wrote:
    Even if a DK tries to gear fully for avoidance, he's still going to be well under 50% avoidance when trinket procs, DRW, etc. aren't up
    I said a DK will be well under 50% when limited duration effects aren't up. DRW gives 20% parry, so yeah, it's pretty easy to be over 50% avoidance for 12 seconds out of every 90 or so, but I wouldn't really count that. And you're not gearing for dodge/parry, I would assume, since mastery is far better in most situations.

    Investigate the three plate tanks sometime. The only "bonus avoidance" DKs can pick up over the other tanks is from the parry runeforge. Buddies mentioned being around 30% full avoidance, which is right around what my 359ish DK has without buffs (I'm still using stoneskin gargoyle runeforge, for now).

    Being fully raid buffed is going to nab you another 3-4% avoidance vs. unbuffed, by the way.

    I dont have a DK tank so I was asking you. It just seemed logical to me that since they dont have block that thier pure avoidance stats would be increased. Granted at 30% you still have 7% more than I do in my avoidance set as a warrior (I gem/reforge for mastery with a tiny bit of parry of course at the expense of dodge/exp). BTW DK tanks might suck for parasites but man does DK tanks sound sexy for HHalfus.

    Jubal77 on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    forty wrote: »
    Henroid wrote: »
    forty wrote: »
    -SPI- wrote: »
    I wish blizzard would filter their questions for dev Q and A a bit more, have less repeats of repeats of repeats of questions that didn't need to be asked the first time. Although I tend to suspect they do filter them and intentionally use repeat questions as easy filler.

    But come on, we don't need to have whether we can buy things with achievement points answered AGAIN.
    This achievements Q&A is the worst Q&A they've done yet, but that shouldn't really come as a surprise since they're fucking achievements. What else is Blizzard supposed to do with them other than just keep making new ones with new content?

    Two things.

    1. We all know that achievements aren't an important aspect of gameplay. But the industry, as a whole, has to cater to achievements because there is a healthy enough portion of the audience that gives a shit about them and plays because of them. So Blizzard has to toss even those people a bone. The ironic thing is, that group of people I don't think looks up information on games enough to see that a company has done a Q&A.

    2. On the repeat questions thing, some of those get pushed through repeatedly because, the WoW playerbase being what it is, people don't fucking listen the first time answers are given. That or things need to be reworded. And in some cases it's a matter of reassuring players that yes, a given issue or concern is being looked into.
    I don't even know what bone was tossed with this Q&A. It was more stomping on achievement whore dreams than anything else. Most of it could have been summed up as:

    "Nothing's changed since the first time you asked this shit two years ago."
    or
    "No, that's not going to happen."

    I think there was maybe one question with a response that wouldn't be a complete disappointment to the people who care about it and wasn't already known. I can't look the Q&A up again right now, though.

    The bone being tossed was that it was getting an official word from the company. But your summary pretty much hit the nail on the head. :^:

    Also, there was ONE question in there that was important; it was about achievements applying to an account. The answer kinda has me a little weirded out. The reason it hasn't happened is because of the way the game was originally coded, where everything is hard-pressed individualized per character? Weird. I'm no coding person at all but man, if it's true, that's gotta take a lot of work. But at the same time is sounds like a bogus reason why it's been delayed.

    Henroid on
  • Jubal77Jubal77 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Eh they stated they couldnt do flying in the old world with the way it was "coded"

    Jubal77 on
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Eh they stated they couldnt do flying in the old world with the way it was "coded"

    But because flying in the old world is something that actually matters they put the effort into reworking that coding.

    Henroid on
  • Salvation122Salvation122 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Eh they stated they couldnt do flying in the old world with the way it was "coded"

    That wasn't due to code, that was due to mapmaking tricks they used like having the peaks of "distant mountains" actually being small hills floating in midair.

    Salvation122 on
  • Jubal77Jubal77 Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Eh they stated they couldnt do flying in the old world with the way it was "coded"

    That wasn't due to code, that was due to mapmaking tricks they used like having the peaks of "distant mountains" actually being small hills floating in midair.

    Nah I wouldnt expect it to be but if i remember correctly that was the terminology used. It was just a time issue which I am pretty sure has been brought up. There have been MMOs that have had major overhauling of thier systems and it worked fine.

    Jubal77 on
  • HalfmexHalfmex I mock your value system You also appear foolish in the eyes of othersRegistered User regular
    edited April 2011
    The most interesting thing in that Q and A was their admission to being "open minded" about re-implementing the removed achievement drakes. For me at least.

    Halfmex on
  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    I dont have a DK tank so I was asking you. It just seemed logical to me that since they dont have block that thier pure avoidance stats would be increased. Granted at 30% you still have 7% more than I do in my avoidance set as a warrior (I gem/reforge for mastery with a tiny bit of parry of course at the expense of dodge/exp). BTW DK tanks might suck for parasites but man does DK tanks sound sexy for HHalfus.
    Sounds like your gear is just uncharacteristically low on dodge/parry overall. Above, Buddies noted that his is around 30%. Do you seriously have only like 10% dodge and 11% parry?

    My guild prefers paladin tanks for Halfus to abuse taunt->divine shield->cancelaura for clearing MS stacks.

    My point about the parasites was more that all tank specs suck for them since you need to be able to generate consistent, considerable ranged AoE threat on them. A frost spec DK would be great for them, but unfotunately that means I'm going to have to go through the rigmarole of the double respec shuffle since having a third talent-spec slot would break the game. Every Heroic Magmaw strategy I've seen talks about having a hunter (presumably survival, at least until 4.1 gives the other specs reasonable AoE) or frost DK handle the parasites.

    forty on
  • BuddiesBuddies Registered User regular
    edited April 2011
    Jubal77 wrote: »
    Gratz on H Chimmy we have got him to 5% or so a few time on our 2nd night on him we just have to get P1 down better cause currently we are using BL to get to P2 which I am guessing to down him you dont really want to do.

    The next progression is HMagmaw? The officers are talking about Maloriak next but I guess it doesnt really matter as the fights are most likely tuned for 359 which most of our raiders are currently at.

    Also your server sounds like it has a bunch of good raiders on it. We are siting 1/13 and are in the top 11 i believe for 10 mans.


    How are you guys tanking him? 2 Tank? 2+1DPS Tank?

    We did 2 Tank, and push him to phase 2 after Feud 3 or 4. There was only one death that was a result of 2 tanking it and chimaeron hitting to hard from break in Feud. I had 1731xx max health (was at full health) and he hit me for like 173456 (not exact but it was only 300 more health than I have in my chimaeron gear).

    Doing HMagmaw because we tried him for 30-40 minutes last night after clearing BoT, and it feels like we can beat it with just a couple more hours practice so we are gonna stick with him instead of switching to Maloriak. I'm really hoping to kill HMagmaw in the first hour or so Sunday night, and convince everyone to do Heroic Maloriak also.

    And when I said 13th, I meant overall. For Ten Mans I think we are rank 9 on the server, 2 Horde.

    Buddies on
Sign In or Register to comment.