The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent
vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums
here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules
document is now in effect.
Is Television Picking on White Guys? Part 2
Posts
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Debate and Discourse
The only thing I'd add is that white men are the "default" so they get to be the patsy most of the time when nothing else about the patsy matters and that making a white male the patsy means you don't run afoul of anyone crying racism/sexism/etc.
(Although that's technically just debate 'or' discourse, since 'or' shouldn't imply exclusivity on its own. /nerd)
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
I can't say it really bugs me either since more often than not it's going to be a white guy saving the day with maybe a plucky minority helping them.
This post is going to attract a dozen links to Louis CK videos, won't it?
News flash here, white guys are portrayed as EVERYTHING on television.
Better just fire up youtube now.
I don't get the sense that he's bitching. Just observing.
Anyway, I think shryke nailed it:
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
Rigorous Scholarship
This. I've been so much happier since I stopped watching comercials.
By how will I be manipulated by increasingly sophisticated psychological techniques for other's profit if I don't?
How are you going to know how awesome Honey Nut Cheerios cereal is without a cartoon bee telling you about it? :bz
Yes, TV commercials are generally dumb flashes of light and sound to attract eyeballs. Yes, they appeal to a low, low common denominator. Compelling reasons for why they should be ignored - but Americans love their TVs and they do watch these ads. Joe American can recognize the Geico Gecko or Ronald McDonald but can he name his representative in Congress? I am very sure these ads must hold a powerful influence over us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oFpUW11RPs
Okay. Do you consider the prevalence of white actors in these influential commercials to be detrimental, beneficial, or uneventful to society?
is like this couple:
and this couple:
and this couple:
and this couple:
and this couple:
because advertisers have a very short time to tap into an image that you are familiar with.
Rigorous Scholarship
YouTube link here (it's about an hour long):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uUU7cjfcdM
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
People will have a slightly lower opinion of chubby balding white men in real life after being exposed to sitcoms and fool commercials for years. When I see the first three seconds of a commercial starring a chubby white male, I expect some kind of misfortune will befall him before the end of the commercial. I don't know if this is extreme enough to be considered conditioning.
EDIT: You've never seen this commercial before but you immediately recognize the setup. What will happen to this chubby Dad? Something good?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0geG9i1N9M
technically, you are my LARP character
You feel bad for the kids in those commercials, since dad is a moron and mom is a twat.
Rigorous Scholarship
Everyone knows women hate fun and you enjoying yourself - so getting into a relationship or getting married is a surefire recipe for no longer being able to do fun things with the guys.
I mean jeez.
Shit, I thought everything but the animation is pictures of ads.
The taco cart guy is a great example, poor guy with foot in mouth disease, or the very successful All-State commercial guy, who feels so safe and fatherly I'd let him watch my children.
I mean clearly there's plenty of subtle negative crap out there, but getting better is definitely a good thing. And I think it improves society. It helps young people grow up thinking of more a more integratedsocial and economyc society as just the way things should be.
--LeVar Burton
God this shit is getting old.
Ad companies are typical ten to twenty years behind on trends, depending on the age of the company.
Also, if you're trying to be culturally "edgy," making the dominant group in society the butt of your joke makes sense.
a white guy will also usually fill every other role
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
not really
cultural "trends" are usually 10-20 years ahead of the people with all the buying power, which is who advertisers are actually targeting
that's why we call it the struggle, you're supposed to sweat
It's nothing malicious. It's just the biz, baby.
I tried very hard to pick from a wide range of everyday products, purchased by both men and women for the under 30 crowd.
How long have you been waiting for an appropriate setup to use that in context? :P
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197970666737/
Unfortunately, the end result is that white men get a lot more variety of roles than anyone else, so they become seen as the default human being.
It turns out TV is full of white people. What do you want you to know? Whether TV's white people are portrayed as something or the other? They are. You're welcome.