The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad : The Man Who Juggles Lit Dynamite

The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
edited October 2011 in Debate and/or Discourse
Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-pointing.jpg

Meet the craziest son of a bitch on the planet (Well, you've probably already met him, but whatever).

"Oh hey now, he's not THE craziest," I can hear you retorting, "What about Kim Jong-Il or Ayman al-Zawahiri? Heck, Gadaffi is still technically alive."

Nope. Those guys aren't even in the same league. I mean sure, they're nuts, but at least they have some sense of where their boundaries are, and for the most part they know to stay tucked away inside their luxury bunkers, safe & snug behind the borders of their horrifying little domains.

Ahmadinejad really, truly, and honestly must believe his own bullshit. He thinks he owns the whole world, in an almost literal sense. He makes regular trips to New York City, where he (so far) has been able to walk around more or less unmolested by either American police or American intelligence (even after having committed the extraordinarily bloody & almost totally censored crackdown on the Iranian 'revolutionaries' (mostly a bunch of college kids who wanted to be represented by the man who won the 2009 election). He orders missile cruisers out to 'patrol' the coast of North America, essentially calling NATO's bluff on their willingness to actually do anything about him, and, well...

he just ordered a few of his thugs to try and blow-up an embassy or two in the United States with the intent of assassinating some Saudi diplomats.

I can't emphasize enough what a mind-blowing insane idea this is. We're all used to saber-rattling nonsense out of North Korea and occasionally from China, but he sent actual guys with actual resources to plant actual explosives in Washington D.C. and try to kill the ambassador to the country that the Washington intellectual bubble sees as one of it's most beloved allies.

Had the plot succeeded, it's almost indisputable that the music would finally have stopped for him. As it is... it's hard to say. Lot's of talk in Washington about 'Act of War' and all that, but we've heard that rhetoric before.


So. What kind of zany antics do you think the future holds for Mr. Ahmadinejad? Has he (in the mind of Washington) crossed the line, finally, in your opinion?

With Love and Courage
The Ender on
«13

Posts

  • IncenjucarIncenjucar VChatter Seattle, WARegistered User regular
    He picked a rather good time to be a crazy jackass, considering our resources and political environment.

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    Our ability to hurl things that blow up at Iran isn't really impaired in any way, but it's a good thing we got who we got as president right now.

    First of all, Iran getting cruise missiled would have a fuckton of international fallout. Second of all, Obama (thankfully) is smarter than that.

    If Mccain was president, right now we would be dealing with directly Iranian backed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and attempted hit and runs on American civilian targets by the Iranians, and large sections of Iran would be on fire, with those who suffer most being those who most oppose Ahmadinejad.

    So if anyone needs another reason to vote Obama in 2012, Iran is up there.

    Edit: and gas would likely be $10 a gallon because of disruptions to supply

    override367 on
  • This content has been removed.

  • Linespider5Linespider5 ALL HAIL KING KILLMONGER Registered User regular
    Obviously he figured he could get away with it. It's a deeply unfortunate thing, and some people might say that it will reflect poorly on Obama's diplomatic abilities, and they might be right with how it will land opinion-wise, but like the OP states, we're not talking about someone with a whole lot of reasonable-mindedness when it comes to dealing with others.

    Now, I don't know about you, but regardless of whatever position of wealth or power I might ever manage to attain, I wouldn't want to ever fuck with the Saudis. I don't know how they're responding to this turn of events, but I consider it a poor move right there. (Sure, the whole plotting and explosion thing is awful, but in the statesmanship, long-term consequences of national relations and all that, pretty bad decision.)

  • The EnderThe Ender Registered User regular
    But what the holy hell is going on in that man's head to do stuff like this? Other then the fact that, I disagree with the not Kim Jong-il assessment: he regularly does stuff like this to South Korea too.

    Jong-Il's antics are not the same; he does not, say, send DPRK forces into Seoul - the targets he's hit so far (the ship he sank & islands he shelled) are ever-so-marginally disputable (at least, as far as the politics are concerned), whereas flat-out blowing-up buildings in a capital is totally indisputable.
    If Mccain was president, right now we would be dealing with directly Iranian backed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and attempted hit and runs on American civilian targets by the Iranians, and large sections of Iran would be on fire, with those who suffer most being those who most oppose Ahmadinejad.

    a) I think you give Obama too much credit

    b) I will never endorse a typical mass-aerial-bombing campaign of Tehran, but for fuck's sake, the retarded pet of the Ayatolla is just going to make a war happen. He's just off the hook.

    I never understood why he wasn't arrested a long, long time ago on one of his many visits to the U.N. building or the T.V. studios in New York City.
    Edit: and gas would likely be $10 a gallon because of disruptions to supply

    Unlikely. Iran supplies a very small portion of the crude imported by the United States.

    With Love and Courage
  • Linespider5Linespider5 ALL HAIL KING KILLMONGER Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote:
    I never understood why he wasn't arrested a long, long time ago on one of his many visits to the U.N. building or the T.V. studios in New York City.

    Dude wears a nice suit. You'd be surprised what you can get away with if you can look good on live TV in a suit.

  • Dis'Dis' Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote:
    Edit: and gas would likely be $10 a gallon because of disruptions to supply

    Unlikely. Iran supplies a very small portion of the crude imported by the United States.

    Oil is fungible - those who used to buy from Iran will have to buy from different sources and drive up the world price. Plus the vast amount of oil that goes through the Persian gulf will be disrupted by any conflict causing price shocks.

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    Dis' wrote:
    The Ender wrote:
    Edit: and gas would likely be $10 a gallon because of disruptions to supply

    Unlikely. Iran supplies a very small portion of the crude imported by the United States.

    Oil is fungible - those who used to buy from Iran will have to buy from different sources and drive up the world price. Plus the vast amount of oil that goes through the Persian gulf will be disrupted by any conflict causing price shocks.

    A few guerrillas with reasonably advanced missile launchers in the Strait of Hormuz could cause an oil panic pretty quickly.

    The global energy situation is remarkably fragile, which is the reason no US president has kicked Iran over like a sand castle to win points with the nationalistic crowd. Iran has a gun pressed against the world's economy, similar to how North Korea has guns to the heads of thousands of South Koreans (and rocket assisted guns to the heads of millions)
    Holy shit.

    Well had they succeeded in this it would've been "War 4" for the US.

    But what the holy hell is going on in that man's head to do stuff like this? Other then the fact that, I disagree with the not Kim Jong-il assessment: he regularly does stuff like this to South Korea too.

    Well if its any consolation, I would bet money that the rest of the world would actually get involved in this one if Iran had succeeded and the US decided to go in (and we could have quietly abandoned Afghanistan while doing so). Ahmadinejad is essentially playing with the strategic assets of the entire world here.

    A war with Iran would be quite different than the other however many we have at the moment, in that people would actually feel it. It would have serious economic consequences.

    override367 on
  • Panda4YouPanda4You Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    Any Saudi responses so far?

    Ed: I should've looked first

    Panda4You on
  • JAEFJAEF Unstoppably Bald Registered User regular
    The only evidence linking Iran to this "plot" at all are statements made by U.S. officials, who stand to benefit from Iran attempting such an attack. There's absolutely no evidence suggesting Mahmoud was involved.

    The whole thing is laughable on its face. Iran recruited a failed used car salesman to hire a Mexican drug cartel to kill a Saudi diplomat? For what? What's the purpose? What does Iran gain? Nothing.

    Even U.S. officials behind a veil of anonymity admit they don't have the information.

    Oh look at that.The entire time the operation was being investigated the FBI was guiding the accused. No explosives were ever placed and no one was ever in any danger. The FBI, create a terror plot just to foil it? They would never do that.

  • HonkHonk Honk is this poster. Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    For the record:

    They are speculating that Khamenei probably knew about the D.C. Plot - but that Ahmadinejad did not.

    And speculations are pretty much the best we'll ever get to know about this. The guy is still very dislikeable by his own merits.

    PSN: Honkalot
  • gtrmpgtrmp Registered User regular
    Honk wrote:
    For the record:

    They are speculating that Khamenei probably knew about the D.C. Plot - but that Ahmadinejad did not.

    And speculations are pretty much the best we'll ever get to know about this. The guy is still very dislikeable by his own merits.

    I'm not even seeing any reliable sources specifically pinning this on Khamenei himself. The New York Times article on the matter brings up the possibility that the plot was orchestrated by rogue elements in the Iranian leadership to stave off any attempt at reconciliation between the US and Iran.

  • LawndartLawndart Registered User regular
    Two unrelated thoughts:

    If we're using international reach as a criteria in the International Crazy Leader Olympics, hasn't Glorious Leader Kim Jong-Il sent agents into South Korea to kidnap film directors and actors?

    Also, the OP rather overestimates how much power the President of Iran has in the grand scheme of the Iranian government. If Iran really is behind this plot, it would make a lot of sense that Khameni would be in the loop and Ahmadinejad would not have been. Especially since there have been reports of serious tensions between Ahmadinejad and the religious leadership of Iran.

  • MyDcmbrMyDcmbr PEWPEWPEW!!! America's WangRegistered User regular
    Iran is a Theocracy. The Ayatollah is real leader of the country.

    Steam
    So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
  • LawndartLawndart Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    MyDcmbr wrote:
    Iran is a Theocracy. The Ayatollah is real leader of the country.

    Yeah, pretty much. I'm willing to give the President credit for having some power over domestic policy and being the public face of Iran's foreign policy, but at best he's a mood ring for the ruling ulema.

    Lawndart on
  • HonkHonk Honk is this poster. Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    I don't even know what a ulema is, but I agree.

    PSN: Honkalot
  • MyDcmbrMyDcmbr PEWPEWPEW!!! America's WangRegistered User regular
    Honk wrote:
    I don't even know what a ulema is, but I agree.

    If you have to ask, you can't afford it. :winky:

    Steam
    So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
  • HonkHonk Honk is this poster. Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    Oh lawd!

    PSN: Honkalot
  • DerrickDerrick Registered User regular
    You know what?

    I don't really give a fuck. I also don't believe it. I think it's nothing more than another bullshit, manufactured excuse to keep us at war in the Middle East.

    Fuck the Middle East.

    America needs JOBS. America needs to motherfucking invade AMERICA and start building infrastructure, schools, and all the other trappings of nation-building to "sway hearts and minds."

    Steam and CFN: Enexemander
  • HonkHonk Honk is this poster. Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    But if America invades America, America would have to retaliate.

    PSN: Honkalot
  • CantidoCantido Registered User regular
    America would never invade America, there's no oil there.

    3DS Friendcode 5413-1311-3767
  • MyDcmbrMyDcmbr PEWPEWPEW!!! America's WangRegistered User regular
    Cantido wrote:
    America would never invade America, there's no oil there.

    Are you kidding?

    The US is the 3rd largest producer of oil in the world.

    Steam
    So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
  • Jealous DevaJealous Deva Registered User regular
    Honk wrote:
    For the record:

    They are speculating that Khamenei probably knew about the D.C. Plot - but that Ahmadinejad did not.

    And speculations are pretty much the best we'll ever get to know about this. The guy is still very dislikeable by his own merits.

    Right, they traced this back to Quds Force, blaming Ahmadinejad for it is like blaming John Boehner for Operation Fast and Furious. Totally different branch of government.


    Not to say Ahmadinejad isn't a crazy bastard, but give the devil his due.

  • HonkHonk Honk is this poster. Registered User, __BANNED USERS regular
    America would at least not invade America right now. Americas population is too unhappy about unemployment to tolerate another war.

    PSN: Honkalot
  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    MyDcmbr wrote:
    Cantido wrote:
    America would never invade America, there's no oil there.

    Are you kidding?

    The US is the 3rd largest producer of oil in the world.

    In the same way that a bank with a bunch of toxic assets is worth billions.

    The US effectively produces -12.3 million barrels of oil per day

    override367 on
  • MyDcmbrMyDcmbr PEWPEWPEW!!! America's WangRegistered User regular
    MyDcmbr wrote:
    Cantido wrote:
    America would never invade America, there's no oil there.

    Are you kidding?

    The US is the 3rd largest producer of oil in the world.

    In the same way that a bank with a bunch of toxic assets is worth billions.

    The US effectively produces -12.3 million barrels of oil per day

    But we still produce lots of oil. We just use all of it... and then some more we buy from other countries.

    Steam
    So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
  • CarpyCarpy Registered User regular
    Eh, I don't think it was as crazy an idea for the Iranians if they were the ones planning it. If it succeeds they look good to large portion of the middle east for carrying out a successful op in the us, and if it fails what are they really out?

  • DarkCrawlerDarkCrawler Registered User regular
    Ahmadinejad is a glorified figurehead with no control over the military, intelligence or the special forces, even if Iran was behind of this, he had nothing to do with it.

  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    Carpy wrote:
    Eh, I don't think it was as crazy an idea for the Iranians if they were the ones planning it. If it succeeds they look good to large portion of the middle east for carrying out a successful op in the us, and if it fails what are they really out?
    Well, there is a problem with retaliation from the Saudis. Is Saudi Arabia going to declare war on Iran. No, that is silly. Is Saudi Arabia going to work in conjunction with other countries and perform operations of their own? Probably. Mossad has likely running the idea passed them.

  • SentrySentry Registered User regular
    ugh. This guy does not deserve his own thread. He's the 12th most powerful person in Iran, he takes his orders from 11 people higher up then him, all of whom hate him. The only reason he's even slightly relevant is because American's can't be bothered to learn how Iran works.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    wrote:
    When I was a little kid, I always pretended I was the hero,' Skip said.
    'Fuck yeah, me too. What little kid ever pretended to be part of the lynch-mob?'
  • dbrock270dbrock270 Registered User regular
    The Ender wrote:
    Jong-Il's antics are not the same; he does not, say, send DPRK forces into Seoul - the targets he's hit so far (the ship he sank & islands he shelled) are ever-so-marginally disputable (at least, as far as the politics are concerned), whereas flat-out blowing-up buildings in a capital is totally indisputable.

    He's done plenty of fucked up shit. North Korea is like the schoolyard bully we're too afraid to beat up.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_abductions_of_Japanese_citizens
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_House_Raid

  • SynthesisSynthesis Honda Today! Registered User regular
    Eh, Yeltsin juggled live grenades, hence his missing fingers. We survived him.

  • CouscousCouscous Registered User regular
    Kidnapping a foreign citizen to force him to make a shitty movie is more insane than a simple assassination.

  • wanderingwandering Russia state-affiliated media Registered User regular
    I am disappointed that the thread title is just a metaphor.

  • nightmarennynightmarenny Registered User regular
    dbrock270 wrote:
    The Ender wrote:
    Jong-Il's antics are not the same; he does not, say, send DPRK forces into Seoul - the targets he's hit so far (the ship he sank & islands he shelled) are ever-so-marginally disputable (at least, as far as the politics are concerned), whereas flat-out blowing-up buildings in a capital is totally indisputable.

    He's done plenty of fucked up shit. North Korea is like the schoolyard bully we're too afraid to beat up.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_abductions_of_Japanese_citizens
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_House_Raid
    from what I hear North Korea's self imposed separation from the rest of the world has done a number on its military might. If they tried to start shit with South Korea they would get stomped even without America interference and even if they complete their Nuclear weapons program they don't have the tech or money to make it a missile.

    Help me raise a little cash for my transition costs
    https://gofund.me/fa5990a5
  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    dbrock270 wrote:
    The Ender wrote:
    Jong-Il's antics are not the same; he does not, say, send DPRK forces into Seoul - the targets he's hit so far (the ship he sank & islands he shelled) are ever-so-marginally disputable (at least, as far as the politics are concerned), whereas flat-out blowing-up buildings in a capital is totally indisputable.

    He's done plenty of fucked up shit. North Korea is like the schoolyard bully we're too afraid to beat up.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korean_abductions_of_Japanese_citizens
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_House_Raid
    from what I hear North Korea's self imposed separation from the rest of the world has done a number on its military might. If they tried to start shit with South Korea they would get stomped even without America interference and even if they complete their Nuclear weapons program they don't have the tech or money to make it a missile.

    North Korea isn't a threat to anyone's military. Their air defenses are inadequate for modern helicopters let alone jets, their planes are decades old and god knows if they still work. They do have a lot of artillery that, while out of range of Seoul (with the exception of rocket artillery), is within range of millions of South Koreans and could cause a lot of casualties.

    It's a hostage situation, and the NK is no more an existential threat to South Korea's military than a hostage taker is to a SWAT team

    override367 on
  • [Tycho?][Tycho?] As elusive as doubt Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    JAEF wrote:
    The only evidence linking Iran to this "plot" at all are statements made by U.S. officials, who stand to benefit from Iran attempting such an attack. There's absolutely no evidence suggesting Mahmoud was involved.

    The whole thing is laughable on its face. Iran recruited a failed used car salesman to hire a Mexican drug cartel to kill a Saudi diplomat? For what? What's the purpose? What does Iran gain? Nothing.

    Even U.S. officials behind a veil of anonymity admit they don't have the information.

    Oh look at that.The entire time the operation was being investigated the FBI was guiding the accused. No explosives were ever placed and no one was ever in any danger. The FBI, create a terror plot just to foil it? They would never do that.

    Pretty much this.

    And we already have a Middle East thread folks, where yes, we have been talking about this:
    http://forums.penny-arcade.com/discussion/137497/the-middle-east-thread-now-featuring-a-primer-in-the-op/p1

    [Tycho?] on
    mvaYcgc.jpg
  • dbrock270dbrock270 Registered User regular
    It's ironic in a country so fervently against adultery and homosexuality that Iran leads the world in transgender surgeries second on to Thailand.

  • NecoNeco In My Restless Dreams Registered User regular
    edited October 2011
    dbrock270 wrote:
    It's ironic in a country so fervently against adultery and homosexuality that Iran leads the world in transgender surgeries second on to Thailand.

    I learned about this a few years ago. I think it's actually really cool, right up until I remember the "why" part of it. But even then, I think it is cool to see a country that doesn't immediately lump transgenderism and homosexuality into the same category.

    EDIT: I did not word that well. My point is that while their stance on homosexuality is deplorable, it is nice to see such a hardline country be actually quite open to transgendered people, even if it is for the wrong reasons.

    Neco on
  • [Tycho?][Tycho?] As elusive as doubt Registered User regular
    What are their reasons for being open to transgendered people?

    mvaYcgc.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.