So I'm looking to buy my first laptop and I'm more than a little lost. I used to be fairly comfortable selecting desktop hardware, but I haven't even been keeping up with that over the last few years and now I'm confronted with all sorts of specs and I don't know what is good and what isn't.
It will mostly be used for internet usage, a little bit of gaming (stuff like Pharoah and Empire, nothing with real high requirements) and watching movies. I want it to be easily portable with decent battery life. I really don't know what is normal for laptop batteries, but if it could get through 4 hours of playing movies while unplugged, I'd be pretty happy. I'm also looking for a pricetag of under $900.
I've found a few in my price range, but I don't know which is better. The main difference between them seems to just be the processor and video cards, so with the prices listed here, which of these laptops would best fit my needs (or feel free to suggest something different):
HP Pavillion DV6226US $749
Pentium Dual Core Processor T2060
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950
1GB ram, 120GB HD
Toshiba Satellite A135-S4467 $899
Pentium Core 2 Duo 5200
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950
1GB ram, 120GB HD
Dell E1505 $749+
Pentium Core Duo or Pentium Core 2 Duo
Customizeable Specs
HP Pavillion DV 6253C $899
AMD Turion 64 X2 Dual Core
nVidia GeForce Go 6150
2GB RAM, 120GB HD
Gateway MT6704 $849
Intel Dual Core T2060
1GB RAM, 160GB HD
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950
They all come standard with a 6-cell battery and the Dell has the optional 9-cell for an extra $50. How much time would I get out of a 6-cell battery?
Posts
Nothing is going to give you four hours of watching movies (which requires that the DVD-ROM is spinning) on a single battery. Two hours is more reasonable, if you get a 9-cell battery. If you're not watching movies and you're just checking your email or doing other minor tasks (which don't require powering an optical drive) then 3 hours is reasonable out of a 6-cell battery.
the "no true scotch man" fallacy.
this is not true, I have a GMA 950 and Dawn of War: DC runs great. I even can sort of run Company of Heroes (it's just a bit below what I would consider the playable threshold). some games complain about not having hardware T & L, but I've never run into one that just straight up doesn't work.
needless to say, the 950 won't be winning any performance awards, but for ultra-light gaming it works fine, they're cheaper and I've been told they are significantly more energy efficient.
Also they're easy to fix if anything goes wrong.
in what way are they easy to fix?
But the cases are easy to crack open and the chipsets/mobos are Intel, so parts are plentiful.