it's ridiculous that they think the president can order cancer to kill someone
you'd never get that shit through congress
Cancer is just another UAV.
The President has no right to order cancer on him! THERE WAS NEVER A DECLARATION OF NEOPLASMIC AUTHORIZATION. Also, the President's MD degree is obviously photoshooped.
i'm looking at the 'student life' page for community college of philadelphia
RPG/Anime Club: The SGA
2009 Most Outstanding Club and
2008 Club of the Year, RPG/Anime
is a weekly meeting club dedicated
to video games, Japanese animation, role-playing games and other
areas of so-called ‘fandom’
GREAT
JUST FUCKING GREAT
I CAN'T ESCAPE THEM
Remember, Chu: transfer students look good with extracurriculars on the resume. Get in and see if you can be voted Anime Club President!
Bleh. I was going to link comparisons to what a right-wing message board wrote about Ted Kennedy's death versus what this board is writing about Breitbart's death but I got burnt out.
I don't think you guys are showing respect for the beliefs of other people.
After all, Obama ordering his chicago thugs to assassinate Breitbart with cancer is a theory.
Evolution is also a theory.
I'm just asking that you guys respectfully give equal consideration to every theory.
Supposedly, liberals are supposed to be open minded and not rush to judgement, but I'm just not seeing that here.
I certainly do not believe any of the obama chicago thug stuff that some "journalists" hock or disagree in any way with evolution so I would appreciate you not directing that type of hyperbole at me or my arguments as I have not done the same to you.
0
SarksusATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered Userregular
Yeaaaah, only two hours left before this 783kB file is downloaded.
Yeaaaah, only two hours left before this 783kB file is downloaded.
Interesting thought, is there anyone on the forums RIGHT NOW who could possibly download the file faster than Sarkus, put it on CD, and get it to him before his download finishes?
I don't think you guys are showing respect for the beliefs of other people.
After all, Obama ordering his chicago thugs to assassinate Breitbart with cancer is a theory.
Evolution is also a theory.
I'm just asking that you guys respectfully give equal consideration to every theory.
Supposedly, liberals are supposed to be open minded and not rush to judgement, but I'm just not seeing that here.
I certainly do not believe any of the obama chicago thug stuff that some "journalists" hock or disagree in any way with evolution so I would appreciate you not directing that type of hyperbole at me or my arguments as I have not done the same to you.
Bleh. I was going to link comparisons to what a right-wing message board wrote about Ted Kennedy's death versus what this board is writing about Breitbart's death but I got burnt out.
Bleh. I was going to link comparisons to what a right-wing message board wrote about Ted Kennedy's death versus what this board is writing about Breitbart's death but I got burnt out.
I don't think you guys are showing respect for the beliefs of other people.
After all, Obama ordering his chicago thugs to assassinate Breitbart with cancer is a theory.
Evolution is also a theory.
I'm just asking that you guys respectfully give equal consideration to every theory.
Supposedly, liberals are supposed to be open minded and not rush to judgement, but I'm just not seeing that here.
I certainly do not believe any of the obama chicago thug stuff that some "journalists" hock or disagree in any way with evolution so I would appreciate you not directing that type of hyperbole at me or my arguments as I have not done the same to you.
Stop persecuting me!
I'm not making a "persecuted conservative" argument.
Bleh. I was going to link comparisons to what a right-wing message board wrote about Ted Kennedy's death versus what this board is writing about Breitbart's death but I got burnt out.
There must be a hundred threads like this one. Even Thanatos' most outrageous posts don't compare.
Ah the Free Republic. Yes, most of their posters make suggestions that would make Than blush.
Yeah. Saying "at least we're better than the Freepers" is not a distinction I'd like to make.
I tend to assume people aren't Freepers until they say otherwise. And when they do announce they are a Freeper then I question my use of the term people.
0
SarksusATTACK AND DETHRONE GODRegistered Userregular
“It is my understanding it is more of a gray area. It is my understanding that it’s illegal to, you know, stop a television signal, a radio signal. You know, it’s my understanding according to the FCC that it’s not illegal to disrupt a cell phone signal,” Eric said.
AKA "Let's make shit up when the news calls me on my dickishness"
I don't think you guys are showing respect for the beliefs of other people.
After all, Obama ordering his chicago thugs to assassinate Breitbart with cancer is a theory.
Evolution is also a theory.
I'm just asking that you guys respectfully give equal consideration to every theory.
Supposedly, liberals are supposed to be open minded and not rush to judgement, but I'm just not seeing that here.
I certainly do not believe any of the obama chicago thug stuff that some "journalists" hock or disagree in any way with evolution so I would appreciate you not directing that type of hyperbole at me or my arguments as I have not done the same to you.
Stop persecuting me!
I'm not making a "persecuted conservative" argument.
I never said you were?
I am claiming that you are persecuting me. Which seems to work really well for the Catholic Church and Fundementalist Christians whenever anyone disagrees with them about anything.
Basically, you are getting upset with me because I am jokingly adopting the tactics of the right-wing.
And you are claiming that I am accusing you of these tactics, when I am not.
I don't really give a shit whether you personally argue in bad faith like this, because the guy whose dignity you are defending did, and that is entirely the point. Not whether you yourself are basically an alright guy, because I think you are.
I don't think you guys are showing respect for the beliefs of other people.
After all, Obama ordering his chicago thugs to assassinate Breitbart with cancer is a theory.
Evolution is also a theory.
I'm just asking that you guys respectfully give equal consideration to every theory.
Supposedly, liberals are supposed to be open minded and not rush to judgement, but I'm just not seeing that here.
I certainly do not believe any of the obama chicago thug stuff that some "journalists" hock or disagree in any way with evolution so I would appreciate you not directing that type of hyperbole at me or my arguments as I have not done the same to you.
Stop persecuting me!
I'm not making a "persecuted conservative" argument.
I never said you were?
I am claiming that you are persecuting me. Which seems to work really well for the Catholic Church and Fundementalist Christians whenever anyone disagrees with them about anything.
Basically, you are getting upset with me because I am jokingly adopting the tactics of the right-wing.
And you are claiming that I am accusing you of these tactics, when I am not.
I don't really give a shit whether you personally argue in bad faith like this, because the guy whose dignity you are defending did, and that is entirely the point. Not whether you yourself are basically an alright guy, because I think you are.
ok, so your post was not orignally pointed at me. I'm not upset, i don't know why you would read my posts as otherwise, but ok.
oddly enough though, you are not chatting with the catholic church or fundamentalist christians or andrew breitbart or his ghost. you are chatting with me.
Posts
Why? I wasn't partying but I let out a "Fucking Finally" when that embarassment Sen. Byrd died.
vaxxicution
The President has no right to order cancer on him! THERE WAS NEVER A DECLARATION OF NEOPLASMIC AUTHORIZATION. Also, the President's MD degree is obviously photoshooped.
Why so tsundere?
Yeah. He makes a point here or there, but it's so buried in shit and questionable editing it throws his whole sourcing out the window.
And going for 3 for 10 may get you a 3 year contract as a DH, but it's not a good ratio for arguments.
You know what?
This is why you're in group C
People who don't make furry-vaxxer jokes sit in A group
After all, Obama ordering his chicago thugs to assassinate Breitbart with cancer is a theory.
Evolution is also a theory.
I'm just asking that you guys respectfully give equal consideration to every theory.
Supposedly, liberals are supposed to be open minded and not rush to judgement, but I'm just not seeing that here.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2326127/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2324742/posts?page=1
There must be a hundred threads like this one. Even Thanatos' most outrageous posts don't compare.
I certainly do not believe any of the obama chicago thug stuff that some "journalists" hock or disagree in any way with evolution so I would appreciate you not directing that type of hyperbole at me or my arguments as I have not done the same to you.
Interesting thought, is there anyone on the forums RIGHT NOW who could possibly download the file faster than Sarkus, put it on CD, and get it to him before his download finishes?
Stop persecuting me!
Ah the Free Republic. Yes, most of their posters make suggestions that would make Than blush.
Yeah. Saying "at least we're better than the Freepers" is not a distinction I'd like to make.
I'm not making a "persecuted conservative" argument.
http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/Senator-Carl-Levin-Proposes-Closing-Facebook-Tax-Loophole-Mark-Zuckerberg-61901-1.html
heh
I tend to assume people aren't Freepers until they say otherwise. And when they do announce they are a Freeper then I question my use of the term people.
He's zappin' our cellphones!
AKA "Let's make shit up when the news calls me on my dickishness"
DAMN, that guy has an annoying voice. All nasally and smug.
I never said you were?
I am claiming that you are persecuting me. Which seems to work really well for the Catholic Church and Fundementalist Christians whenever anyone disagrees with them about anything.
Basically, you are getting upset with me because I am jokingly adopting the tactics of the right-wing.
And you are claiming that I am accusing you of these tactics, when I am not.
I don't really give a shit whether you personally argue in bad faith like this, because the guy whose dignity you are defending did, and that is entirely the point. Not whether you yourself are basically an alright guy, because I think you are.
Interesting. What is allowing them to file for the full price of the shares? Something about fair value?
Much better than 1/33/7. Congrats.
it's tyrannus
mmm
yessssss. Oh Nooooo!
also Chu
callin' me nasally and smug
HEH
You went a year and 6 days into the future!?
TIMELORD!
QEDMF xbl: PantsB G+
i know right
most of your fat is in the gut area, not the throat and nose
you have a perfectly normal voice for a 700 pound man
get it from dk dude he has it all set up like a baws
http://pmstax.com/sec83/irc83.html
this is why. so the only way it gets a deduction for it is if mark picks it up as ordinary income, apparently?
Well he's not here right now!
ok, so your post was not orignally pointed at me. I'm not upset, i don't know why you would read my posts as otherwise, but ok.
oddly enough though, you are not chatting with the catholic church or fundamentalist christians or andrew breitbart or his ghost. you are chatting with me.