pyromaniac221this just might bean interestin YTRegistered Userregular
Holy fuck the comments are so terrible
psn tooaware, friend code SW-4760-0062-3248 it me
0
Options
HacksawJ. Duggan Esq.Wrestler at LawRegistered Userregular
It's the Paultards, man. They're the reason we can't have nice things.
0
Options
AstaerethIn the belly of the beastRegistered Userregular
That was depressing. Krugman's responses boiled down to "You're not right. You're not even wrong." Krugman has no real way to argue against Ron Paul saying things like "inflation is theft" and "Why not try having a gold standard? If I'm wrong, who cares, it won't hurt anything, but if I'm right, awesome!" and "If you like big government, sure, maybe the Fed is good, but some of us believe in freedom and markets."
Krugman also seemed somewhat unprepared for Paul speaking loudly and quickly out of fear that at any moment a conspiracy was going to drag him off-camera with a vaudeville hook.
It shouldn't be a debate. It should be Ron Paul bound and ball-gagged, and made to actually listen to someone who actually knows something about economics.
Jesus Christ, Paul refers to "My First Ancient Civilization" history class talking points for a botched attempt of "BUT THE ROMAN EMPIRE" credibility, and says they didn't have "computers" back then. Well actually Mr. Paul they did have computers back then; computers were literally people whose only job was to plug away at mathematical equations.
If you're going to try to use history to legitimize your argument, do your homework first.
Well with some luck, PRI will actually succeed and eventually mine enough gold from asteroids to finally put the notion of a gold standard to rest. Sure Ron Paul might be dead by that point but he still reproduced and he has cult following that consists of too many people from various age groups.
And now it looks to me like all three of those photos I posted might be from the same event, or he appears to be wearing the same shirt, tie, and jacket in all three.
Krugman's "WTF" face throughout was well worth watching Ron Paul ramble.
Krugman kinda always looks like that though, doesn't he?
Yeah. Honestly, I think he's pretty bad at these public media debates. It's surprising, given how good a writer he is and how much experience he's had at this.
So we get stiff once in a while. So we have a little fun. What’s wrong with that? This is a free country, isn’t it? I can take my panda any place I want to. And if I wanna buy it a drink, that’s my business.
Rachel has a near-infinitely higher level of patience than I do. I was this close to punching my monitor just to wipe the condescending shmuck out of my vision.
Steam
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
BaronSamediSame dude as yesterday.The AlamoRegistered Userregular
"This isn't a math is hard Barbie, thing"
"Yes it is."
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck Yooooooooooooou Alex Castellanos!
"Have you ever noticed that their stuff is shit, and your shit is stuff?"--George Carlin
0
Options
AstaerethIn the belly of the beastRegistered Userregular
"The Obama administration, those traitor fascist Muslim Communist Socialist liberal elitists, are trying to divide America."
I am actually greatly amused by the Republicans going all apoplectic at the whole "War on Women" thing. Finally the Democrats are playing a little hardball and controlling the message, and it's driving them nuts because they have no defense.
The three Republican counter-arguments in that video are:
1) "Nuh-uh!"
2) "Look, this is nothing new, we've always been against women's rights."
3) "LOOK OVER THERE! It's the economy! Let's talk about that."
I liked when the Pub lady got all incredulous about actual state laws concerning women's rights but all incensed about the federal government taking health care decisions away from women via imaginary legislation.
Because honestly, which is more terrifying: Actual laws that fuck women over a little, or imaginary laws that fuck women over a lot?
ArbitraryDescriptor on
0
Options
KalTorakOne way or another, they all end up inthe Undercity.Registered Userregular
jesus christ, my blood is actually running pretty hot after watching just the first few minutes of that. I had to turn it off when Wilford Brimley left off his giggling fit and started drawling "I love how passionate you are..." like he was talking to his fucking teenaged daughter about her softball team.
Do you guys remember back when OWS hit its peak last year and people kept asking where are the jobs, and the republicans were like "stop talking about that! Who cares!" I would love to see someone bring that up now but of course they won't.
Posts
Krugman also seemed somewhat unprepared for Paul speaking loudly and quickly out of fear that at any moment a conspiracy was going to drag him off-camera with a vaudeville hook.
It shouldn't be a debate. It should be Ron Paul bound and ball-gagged, and made to actually listen to someone who actually knows something about economics.
Jesus fucking christ MSM, jesus fucking christ
If you're going to try to use history to legitimize your argument, do your homework first.
battletag: Millin#1360
Nice chart to figure out how honest a news source is.
http://imgur.com/a/JSXrw
Krugman kinda always looks like that though, doesn't he?
"Let's just be clear here: I do not support the economic policies of Deocletian!"
so, he's rich now, it's confirmed?
Maybe he was just high that day.
Krugman follows american politics.
Krugman has every right to wear that face at all times of the day and night.
Yeah. Honestly, I think he's pretty bad at these public media debates. It's surprising, given how good a writer he is and how much experience he's had at this.
It's cool, you are allowed to kill endangered species when you are rich. If anything, you should feel bad for not being rich.
Vote Romney 2012!
Battlenet ID: MildC#11186 - If I'm in the game, send me an invite at anytime and I'll play.
I see what you did there.
Twitch Stream
What in the flying fuck those pictures jesus christ.
Let 'em eat fucking pineapples!
I wonder how rich you have to be before you start getting the urge to hunt the most dangerous game. Because Romney's gotta be getting close.
He tried but got stuck on hunting "small varmints" with his, sorry, his son's shotgun.
Who says he's not there already? Maybe that's his real motive for wanting to be president.
Fucking. Wow.
The first, like, minute-ish of this clip is just fucking phenomenal.
I would just punch everyone in the face
Especially that completely condescending douchebag to her right
3DS FC: 4699-5714-8940 Playing Pokemon, add me! Ho, SATAN!
Where's my jetpack.
PSN: Robo_Wizard1
i think i'm glad for it.
cause i want to punch everybody but rachel.
Democrats Abroad! || Vote From Abroad
"Yes it is."
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck Yooooooooooooou Alex Castellanos!
I am actually greatly amused by the Republicans going all apoplectic at the whole "War on Women" thing. Finally the Democrats are playing a little hardball and controlling the message, and it's driving them nuts because they have no defense.
The three Republican counter-arguments in that video are:
1) "Nuh-uh!"
2) "Look, this is nothing new, we've always been against women's rights."
3) "LOOK OVER THERE! It's the economy! Let's talk about that."
Because honestly, which is more terrifying: Actual laws that fuck women over a little, or imaginary laws that fuck women over a lot?
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go punch myself in the dick.