The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
i also cannot get rid of this totally, i got a program to delete it but its still there in some form trying to re-download itself ALL THE TIME! any way to stop this?
RoshinMy backlog can be seen from spaceSwedenRegistered Userregular
edited March 2007
I don't know about McAffee, but I agree that you should stay the hell away from Norton. Get rid of it, before it sinks it's claws too deep into your system. I've seen people forced to wipe their drives and reinstall Windows, because a Norton uninstall screwed their systems up so bad.
Roshin on
0
ViscountalphaThe pen is mightier than the swordhttp://youtu.be/G_sBOsh-vyIRegistered Userregular
edited March 2007
Symantec has some serious issues with their AV/system works. I cannot in good concience recommend anyone buy ANY of their software. I've never liked macafee from the get go. But thats me.
NOD32, and kaspersky seem to get high ratings from all the circles i visit. One of these days I want to stress test NOD 32 on a test system while connected to one of the online filesharing virus carriers.
I read on Coding Horror recently that someone conducted a review of how badly each antivirus product affected your bootup time, CPU access, and disk access. Norton was horrifyingly bad (1000s of percents slower), and the very best was AVG Free. My AV at the time - Avast! Home - was mid-pack. I'm now running AVG Free, and very happy with it.
Intruigingly enough, the AV product we're suppost to pimp out at work - Panda - is second-fastest, only just behind AVG Free. I don't feel nearly so bad about recommending it now.
I've had nothing but JOYS and pleasures from NOD32. Very lite, doesn't bog anything else down and destroy everything in it's path, plus it actually catches viruses.
I read on Coding Horror recently that someone conducted a review of how badly each antivirus product affected your bootup time, CPU access, and disk access. Norton was horrifyingly bad (1000s of percents slower), and the very best was AVG Free. My AV at the time - Avast! Home - was mid-pack. I'm now running AVG Free, and very happy with it.
Intruigingly enough, the AV product we're suppost to pimp out at work - Panda - is second-fastest, only just behind AVG Free. I don't feel nearly so bad about recommending it now.
AVG is quite fast, the biggest problem with it is that it catches far less viruses than the "top dogs" do. IMO, being fast is important but not if it comes at the expense of security. After all, a single infection is often all it takes to ruin your data.
Posts
Norton will fuck with your system badly.
http://ts.mcafeehelp.com/displaydoc.asp?frames=1&docid=71525&CategoryId=62217
edit: I agree that Norton is terrible. I've had good experience with NOD32 in the past
That it will, but the problem is that so does McAffee. Stay away from both of them.
There is no color lime enough.
Seriously, Mcafee and Norton are BOTH garbage.
You're much better off sticking to Pc-cillin (not free), AVG (free), or Antivir (also free).
www.pc-cillin.com
www.grisoft.com
www.avira.com
End of story. I don't care how much you paid for Norton, it's not worth it. You seriously couldn't pay me to use Mcafee/Norton at this point.
Is there no add/remove options in the control panel?
edit: Quick google search threw up these:
http://www.wikihow.com/Uninstall-McAfee-Security-Center
http://www.lockergnome.com/nexus/blade/2006/12/08/uninstall-mcafee-security-products/
I'M A TWITTER SHITTER
NOD32, and kaspersky seem to get high ratings from all the circles i visit. One of these days I want to stress test NOD 32 on a test system while connected to one of the online filesharing virus carriers.
Intruigingly enough, the AV product we're suppost to pimp out at work - Panda - is second-fastest, only just behind AVG Free. I don't feel nearly so bad about recommending it now.
AVG is quite fast, the biggest problem with it is that it catches far less viruses than the "top dogs" do. IMO, being fast is important but not if it comes at the expense of security. After all, a single infection is often all it takes to ruin your data.