The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[TRENCHES] Thursday, July 19, 2012 - Photographic

GethGeth LegionPerseus VeilRegistered User, Moderator, Penny Arcade Staff, Vanilla Staff vanilla
edited July 2012 in The Penny Arcade Hub
Photographic


Photographic
http://trenchescomic.com/comic/post/photographic

Perspective.

Anonymous

At the townhall company meetings, the developers would air their grievances about how unfair it was that their bonuses were *only* 6% that year.

Mind you, this was their annual bonus they were talking about, not their completion bonus, nor their performance bonus. They would fuss and whine for a full two hours about how unfair it was, meanwhile the testers were taking home less than $18k a year.


Geth on
«1

Posts

  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    Well I was right about the wall of "Do Not Hire". Poor Marley. :(

  • TychoCelchuuuTychoCelchuuu PIGEON Registered User regular
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

  • Rhesus PositiveRhesus Positive GNU Terry Pratchett Registered User regular
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    [Muffled sounds of gorilla violence]
  • -Tal-Tal Registered User regular
    so, Marley's going to get a haircut in the next strip

    PNk1Ml4.png
  • RMS OceanicRMS Oceanic Registered User regular
    -Tal wrote: »
    so, Marley's going to get a haircut in the next strip

    I suspect they'll be a little more thorough in vetting new hirees for a while.

    Still awaiting word on who leaked his story. I'm curious to see the reasoning.

  • Jam WarriorJam Warrior Registered User regular
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    MhCw7nZ.gif
  • ikkonoishiikkonoishi Registered User regular
    Any chance we could get separated RSS feeds for the comic and the text posts? Or just bludgeon the two together in the main feed?

    It is somewhat annoying to get two different links to the same basic page every time you update.

  • Sage_CatharsisSage_Catharsis Registered User regular
    Can some one shop actual momento stills into that? I always love how clueless but curious Guy Peirce looks like he is sort of forgetting stuff as he is being surprised by what he is looking at...

  • twestermtwesterm Lewisville, TXRegistered User regular
    I like this comic. :-)

    As for the story, the person is just incredibly naive. That's about all I really have to say about that.

  • GaslightGaslight Registered User regular
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Out of sight, out of mind.

    Poor Marley.

  • El SkidEl Skid The frozen white northRegistered User regular
    *arley could make an aweful lot of money with some white out and creativity.

    "Next time you see this man, give him a raise!" would work much better with that photo. :P

  • GaslightGaslight Registered User regular
    El Skid wrote: »
    *arley could make an aweful lot of money with some white out and creativity.

    "Next time you see this man, give him a raise!" would work much better with that photo. :P

    Less effort: white-out one line, add another, F becomes H. "If you see this man, hire him again!"

    For some reason the LBB having the old polaroid camera cracks me up.

  • Chris FOMChris FOM Registered User regular
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

    Cost of living differences make such statements great for shock value but worthless for actual discussion.

  • GaslightGaslight Registered User regular
    Chris FOM wrote: »
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

    Cost of living differences make such statements great for shock value but worthless for actual discussion.

    Yeah, cost of living is pretty low when you're in a one-room shack with no electricity or running water. :P

  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    And there's also a reason that most companies consider it a fireable offense to openly discuss salaries.

    What is this I don't even.
  • GundiGundi Serious Bismuth Registered User regular
    Isaac you misguided arse, you! I want the next comic to be Cora punching him in the face. Or Cora confesses, and then Q punches Isaac in the face. So long as Isaac gets punches in the face.

  • GyralGyral Registered User regular
    I can't view panel two without expecting Downtown Julie Brown off-panel making the sound effect.

    25t9pjnmqicf.jpg
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    Darkewolfe wrote: »
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    And there's also a reason that most companies consider it a fireable offense to openly discuss salaries.

    Yeah, I really envy all those people living on 4k a year, i mean, the malaria and cholera and famine are totally worth the lower cost of living.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • tech_huntertech_hunter More SeattleRegistered User regular
    Darkewolfe wrote: »
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    And there's also a reason that most companies consider it a fireable offense to openly discuss salaries.

    There are actually new laws in place that protect employees discussing their pay. A company in the US can no longer prohibit their employees from discussing their pay with each other. This was passed a year or two ago, its due to the fact that there can be a great disparity in pay for two employees who perform the same job, like if one happens to be female and the other male. Those kinds of policies made it difficult to know if discrimination in pay was occurring.

    Sig to mucho Grande!
  • PonyPony Registered User regular
    wubba wubba wubba is the perfect polaroid shaking sound effect

  • JayeEmmJayeEmm New HampShireRegistered User regular
    edited July 2012
    Gyral wrote: »
    I can't view panel two without expecting Downtown Julie Brown off-panel making the sound effect.


    I thought of the same thing. And you and I, sir (or madam, as the case may be), have just dated ourselves.

    ETA: but I don't mean 'dated ourselves' in that way, I just mean... oh you know what I mean.

    JayeEmm on
  • drthmikdrthmik Registered User new member
    edited July 2012
    "It wasn't me it was the snuffl--"

    From this it looks like it WAS Marley blaming his pet rabbit or maybe that elephant thing

    drthmik on
  • TychoCelchuuuTychoCelchuuu PIGEON Registered User regular
    Chris FOM wrote: »
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

    Cost of living differences make such statements great for shock value but worthless for actual discussion.
    Adjusted for purchasing power parity, if you make $18k a year you are still in the richest 6.2% of the world.

  • Jam WarriorJam Warrior Registered User regular
    Darkewolfe wrote: »
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    And there's also a reason that most companies consider it a fireable offense to openly discuss salaries.

    Seriously? SERIOUSLY?

    I mean I'm British, we're too polite and reserved to discuss salaries, but the thought of being fired for it?

    Let me add it to this ever growing list I have over here entitled, 'Fuck American Employment Culture.'

    MhCw7nZ.gif
  • NAND NORNAND NOR Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    I have to admit that this storyline absolutely confuses me. I thought Isaac was supposedly the mole ... but then it's like all the characters start talking like it's Cora ... and now Marley gets fired. Why would Cora have anything to confess? Or does 'confess' actually mean rating out someone else?

    Maybe I'm just not paying close enough attention? Maybe it's just that the strip only updates twice a week? I dunno. It just feels that they way this story is being told is kind of muddled and unclear.

    NAND NOR on
    moebius.jpg
  • cearkceark Registered User new member
    edited July 2012
    as far as I experienced, discussing salary in game and film is actually pretty common despite "taboo." People do it fairly openly because it's a good way to gauge what a salary range you SHOULD have for what you do. In a tight budget industry, management will often try to screw you over on salary if you don't stay informed.

    Also that being said, it indeed relative. A tester can get a job, often times without a whole lot of credentials. Devs and Artists are competing for a small number of positions that few are qualified for but everyone wants, and most of these people have 25-120k in student loans with 5-20 year payments (which means they pay exponentially more due to high interest). They study for years, work up from really awful art/dev positions (unless of course they are genius savants from the beginning) and go through a gauntlet to get those good jobs, they have the right to fight for higher compensation. If anyone should be complaining about "wage" differences, start looking at the executives (of any big company. not just games).

    ceark on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    NAND NOR wrote: »
    I have to admit that this storyline absolutely confuses me. I thought Isaac was supposedly the mole ... but then it's like all the characters start talking like it's Cora ... and now Marley gets fired. Why would Cora have anything to confess? Or does 'confess' actually mean rating out someone else?

    Maybe I'm just not paying close enough attention? Maybe it's just that the strip only updates twice a week? I dunno. It just feels that they way this story is being told is kind of muddled and unclear.

    The kinda consensus in this thread is that Cora was the leak, because she was pissed off with how the whole thing was just wrong for the players. Isaac caught up to that and had that weird conversation at the fries place. Then Q told a different rollback story to each person, as a way to identify the leak, because the leaked version would indicate who knew that one.

    But then Marley got fucked, I don't know why.

    I agree that the storytelling in Trenches is not very good at all. I wouldn't have understood all that without reading each comic's thread.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • GaslightGaslight Registered User regular
    NAND NOR wrote: »
    I have to admit that this storyline absolutely confuses me. I thought Isaac was supposedly the mole ... but then it's like all the characters start talking like it's Cora ... and now Marley gets fired. Why would Cora have anything to confess? Or does 'confess' actually mean rating out someone else?

    Maybe I'm just not paying close enough attention? Maybe it's just that the strip only updates twice a week? I dunno. It just feels that they way this story is being told is kind of muddled and unclear.

    Why would you ever think Isaac was the mole?

    There was a whole series of comics where Isaac thinks Cora is the mole and tries to talk her out of leaking and she appears to defend her actions.

    Yeah, I'm sorry, I just don't think you're paying attention, or you have a short memory of the comics...I guess only updating twice a week could play a part in the latter.

  • jothkijothki Registered User regular
    NAND NOR wrote: »
    I have to admit that this storyline absolutely confuses me. I thought Isaac was supposedly the mole ... but then it's like all the characters start talking like it's Cora ... and now Marley gets fired. Why would Cora have anything to confess? Or does 'confess' actually mean rating out someone else?

    Maybe I'm just not paying close enough attention? Maybe it's just that the strip only updates twice a week? I dunno. It just feels that they way this story is being told is kind of muddled and unclear.

    The kinda consensus in this thread is that Cora was the leak, because she was pissed off with how the whole thing was just wrong for the players. Isaac caught up to that and had that weird conversation at the fries place. Then Q told a different rollback story to each person, as a way to identify the leak, because the leaked version would indicate who knew that one.

    But then Marley got fucked, I don't know why.

    I agree that the storytelling in Trenches is not very good at all. I wouldn't have understood all that without reading each comic's thread.

    Marley let slip his version of the story to Isaac, and the assumption is that Isaac leaked it himself to shift the blame for the earlier leaks to Marley.

    I kind of like this style of storytelling, there's no need for it to beat you over the head with the obvious stuff.

  • GaslightGaslight Registered User regular
    jothki wrote: »
    I kind of like this style of storytelling, there's no need for it to beat you over the head with the obvious stuff.

    Unfortunately judging from the threads it apparently isn't obvious to a segment of the readership. Not trying to be insulting to anyone when I say that, I am just honestly flummoxed about how people can find this so confusing. Maybe it's a difference in the way people read or process information in their memories or something.

  • fortyforty Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    I wish I knew what my coworkers made so I would have some ammunition for arguing for a raise (assuming I'm underpaid, that is!).

    forty on
  • StormwatcherStormwatcher Blegh BlughRegistered User regular
    Gaslight wrote: »
    jothki wrote: »
    I kind of like this style of storytelling, there's no need for it to beat you over the head with the obvious stuff.

    Unfortunately judging from the threads it apparently isn't obvious to a segment of the readership. Not trying to be insulting to anyone when I say that, I am just honestly flummoxed about how people can find this so confusing. Maybe it's a difference in the way people read or process information in their memories or something.

    I understand what they're trying to do, and this kind of narrative technique is really cool when it works. But the medium and the update schedule are not very helpful, and I do believe the writers could do a better job overall. It would be a lot clearer if this was in a comic book. I read and work on way to many books and games and strips, so this kind of structure ends up falling short, I guess.

    Steam: Stormwatcher | PSN: Stormwatcher33 | Switch: 5961-4777-3491
    camo_sig2.png
  • SmrtnikSmrtnik job boli zub Registered User regular
    Gaslight wrote: »
    Chris FOM wrote: »
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

    Cost of living differences make such statements great for shock value but worthless for actual discussion.

    Yeah, cost of living is pretty low when you're in a one-room shack with no electricity or running water. :P
    My cousins in Bosnia all have electric, water, heat, internet, satellite TV, designer clothes, etc... and think I'm rich because my biweekly paycheck is almost as much as their yearly salary. Nevermind that my monthly mortgage is just over that paycheck.

    steam_sig.png
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Chris FOM wrote: »
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

    Cost of living differences make such statements great for shock value but worthless for actual discussion.
    Adjusted for purchasing power parity, if you make $18k a year you are still in the richest 6.2% of the world.

    TC you're making a disingenuous argument here. $18k in one country doesn't carry the same weight in every other country. In America, $18k isn't a whole hell of a lot. I think you're trying to take this "first world problems" type stuff to an imaginary level.

  • GaslightGaslight Registered User regular
    He did specify that's adjusted for purchasing power.

  • collinccollinc Registered User regular
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    Doesn't that seem like the fault of management? Why would that discussion be taking place in a town hall style meeting? Is that the only time the developers could air the grievance of pay?
    ceark wrote: »
    as far as I experienced, discussing salary in game and film is actually pretty common despite "taboo." People do it fairly openly because it's a good way to gauge what a salary range you SHOULD have for what you do. In a tight budget industry, management will often try to screw you over on salary if you don't stay informed.

    Also that being said, it indeed relative. A tester can get a job, often times without a whole lot of credentials. Devs and Artists are competing for a small number of positions that few are qualified for but everyone wants, and most of these people have 25-120k in student loans with 5-20 year payments (which means they pay exponentially more due to high interest). They study for years, work up from really awful art/dev positions (unless of course they are genius savants from the beginning) and go through a gauntlet to get those good jobs, they have the right to fight for higher compensation. If anyone should be complaining about "wage" differences, start looking at the executives (of any big company. not just games).

    *cries at the incredible description of my life*

    Free cake. Inquire within.
  • jothkijothki Registered User regular
    Isn't an annual bonus just a part of your standard salary that the company can take away if they're low on money or don't like you? I'd think that if you expect that your bonus should always be above a certain level, you'd just demand a raise up to that level?

    Is it just that it's really difficult to cut someone's salary, but easy to cut someone's bonus?

  • ArbitraryDescriptorArbitraryDescriptor Registered User regular
    edited July 2012
    jothki wrote: »
    Isn't an annual bonus just a part of your standard salary that the company can take away if they're low on money or don't like you? I'd think that if you expect that your bonus should always be above a certain level, you'd just demand a raise up to that level?

    Is it just that it's really difficult to cut someone's salary, but easy to cut someone's bonus?

    Perhaps, but It also costs less to keep you around for the long haul if you just get a misleadingly large bonus rather than half as much as a raise.

    Gratuitous example:
    Let's call COL 2%, and know that some people don't even get that. If you take a 2% COL raise and a 6% bonus over a straight 5% raise (COL+3% ), you'll be making a lower annual gross entering year 4, suffering a net loss on lifetime earnings at the end of that year, and missing almost your entire first year salary after 10 years.

    Even a 4% raise vs 2%+6% has you earning more per year in year 5, and breaking even on lifetime earnings after 6. 3% is far less exciting, taking 7 and 13 years to match up annual and lifetime earnings respectively.


    ArbitraryDescriptor on
  • A duck!A duck! Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited July 2012
    Darkewolfe wrote: »
    The difference is, you're not in a meeting with those people.

    Yeah, the story isn't that the people with the skilled jobs are being paid more than the job any vaguely bright spark could do? Shock!

    It's that it's not very tactful to piss and moan about wage issues in front of your lower paid co-workers. Implies you think of them as menials rather than colleagues.

    And there's also a reason that most companies consider it a fireable offense to openly discuss salaries.

    Seriously? SERIOUSLY?

    I mean I'm British, we're too polite and reserved to discuss salaries, but the thought of being fired for it?

    Let me add it to this ever growing list I have over here entitled, 'Fuck American Employment Culture.'

    Shall we add your posts the growing list of things people won't be seeing in this thread?

    A duck! on
  • fearsomepiratefearsomepirate I ate a pickle once. Registered User regular
    Henroid wrote: »
    Chris FOM wrote: »
    Memento reference = hehe.

    With respect to the story, everything's relative: more than 80% of the world lives on less than $4k a year. So next time you get made that someone's fussing and whining over their 6% bonus, remember that someone is probably pretty pissed at you for fussing and whining over your $18k.

    Cost of living differences make such statements great for shock value but worthless for actual discussion.
    Adjusted for purchasing power parity, if you make $18k a year you are still in the richest 6.2% of the world.

    TC you're making a disingenuous argument here. $18k in one country doesn't carry the same weight in every other country. In America, $18k isn't a whole hell of a lot. I think you're trying to take this "first world problems" type stuff to an imaginary level.
    Cost of living is overrated to some extent. Sure, $18K goes a lot farther in Mexico. It's actually a middle-class salary in Mexico. Of course, being a middle class family in Mexico means living at a level many Americans would consider "crushing poverty" (no climate control in your rather small dwelling place, you probably rent, you MAYBE own a car, you have one TV in the house, no cable, no Internet, no dryer, kids don't have piles of toys, places you work and shop aren't OSHA/ADA/state dept of health compliant, etc).

    Basically, you could make $18K go a lot farther if you were willing to live like a Mexican. Heck, if you were willing to live like an American in 1956, your salary would go a lot farther.

    Nobody makes me bleed my own blood...nobody.
    PSN ID: fearsomepirate
Sign In or Register to comment.