The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

[Evil Koch] Looks To Kill Sandy Relief

Yeah, that's not hyperbole. The Nation reports that David Koch's pet PAC, Americans For Prosperity, has drawn a line in the sand over the Sandy relief bill in Congress:
Earlier this week, AFP, which is chaired by Koch and believed to be financed by several other plutocrats from the New York City region, released a letter warning members of Congress not to vote for the proposed federal aid package for victims of the storm that swept New Jersey, New York City and much of the surrounding area in October. An announcement on the group’s website says that the vote next week for the Sandy aid package will be a “key vote”—meaning senators who support sending money for reconstruction could face an avalanche of attack ads in their next election. Already, opposition to the bill is growing, although it passed one procedural hurdle last night.

There is some legitimate criticism with aspects of the legislation, including the fact that some of the money will go to non-Sandy related reconstruction efforts in disaster areas. For AFP, however, the whole bill must die and victims of the storm deserve no help from the government.

Koch’s top deputy in New Jersey, a surly gentleman named Steve Lonegan, who heads the local AFP state chapter, called the aid package a “disgrace.” “This is not a federal government responsibility,” Lonegan told reporters. “We need to suck it up and be responsible for taking care of ourselves.”

This is just fucked up. This is a petulant child looking to hurt people just because he lost. This is what evil looks like.

XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
«13

Posts

  • ShadowfireShadowfire Vermont, in the middle of nowhereRegistered User regular
    Didn't these same assholes stand against Irene relief? And help for Joplin?

    Fuck these guys.

  • CindersCinders Whose sails were black when it was windy Registered User regular
    Shadowfire wrote: »
    Didn't these same assholes stand against Irene relief? And help for Joplin?

    Fuck these guys.

    But they are rich.

  • This content has been removed.

  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    what possible benefit do these guys get from the relief being denied

  • ForarForar #432 Toronto, Ontario, CanadaRegistered User regular
    what possible benefit do these guys get from the relief being denied

    Gotta prevent Obama's third term.

    First they came for the Muslims, and we said NOT TODAY, MOTHERFUCKER!
  • see317see317 Registered User regular
    what possible benefit do these guys get from the relief being denied

    In 4 years when it's time to elect a new president they'll be able to point to this failure to provide disaster relief as a failing of the democratic party. They'll conveniently ignore the fact that the bill was killed by a republican PAC backed by big money and count on the fact that the majority of their voters won't bother to look any further then the commercials they'll plaster all over fox.

  • DevoutlyApatheticDevoutlyApathetic Registered User regular
    Looking at this, don't most of those states affected have majority Democratic representatives?

    So....fuck Democrats?

    I sorta wish the Democrats weren't above saying the same to the other side. See which states go into budget shortfall spirals first when federal aid disappears.

    Nod. Get treat. PSN: Quippish
  • PhantoomPhantoom Registered User regular
    edited December 2012
    what possible benefit do these guys get from the relief being denied

    They are libertarians who want government as small as possible. Ron Paul is against any sort of disaster relief as well. The argument generally is that by providing relief you are A) taxing those of us who are not affected and B) not properly placing incentives on moving away from potential disaster zones. Now, I don't necessarily disagree with all, of that, but right after one of the worst disasters in our history is not the time.

    Also, the Kochs (Koches?) are pure evil for many, many other reasons. I think they probably view themselves as victims, which is the most sadly hilarious thing I can think of.
    Looking at this, don't most of those states affected have majority Democratic representatives?

    So....fuck Democrats?

    I sorta wish the Democrats weren't above saying the same to the other side. See which states go into budget shortfall spirals first when federal aid disappears.

    The Kochs are too hard line for this to be the case. They were against relief going to Louisiana and Missouri.

    Phantoom on
  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Looking at this, don't most of those states affected have majority Democratic representatives?

    So....fuck Democrats?

    I sorta wish the Democrats weren't above saying the same to the other side. See which states go into budget shortfall spirals first when federal aid disappears.

    I've said a few times that the Democrats should pass a bill that would limit the amount of federal aid a state receives to be equal to the revenues the state provides to Federal coffers.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • Captain CarrotCaptain Carrot Alexandria, VARegistered User regular
    Phantoom wrote: »
    what possible benefit do these guys get from the relief being denied

    They are libertarians who want government as small as possible. Ron Paul is against any sort of disaster relief as well. The argument generally is that by providing relief you are A) taxing those of us who are not affected and B) not properly placing incentives on moving away from potential disaster zones. Now, I don't necessarily disagree with all, of that, but right after one of the worst disasters in our history is not the time.
    I do! Both of those arguments are complete bullshit.

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Its just because they personally can't benefit from the spending. The second a Koch building is hit in any kind of natural disaster they'll be the first one with their fucking hand out. Just like Ron Paul being against pork spending except in his own district where he brought it in by the truck load.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Goddamn it.

  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    There is some legitimate criticism with aspects of the legislation, including the fact that some of the money will go to non-Sandy related reconstruction efforts in disaster areas.

    The bill IS loaded with pork.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/14/pet-projects-tacked-on-to-sandy-relief-bill/

    I don't see a big problem with the government spending millions on graveyard restoration in Washington DC - I just don't like a non-emergency thing being quietly snuck in with relief for New England.

  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • Captain CarrotCaptain Carrot Alexandria, VARegistered User regular
  • override367override367 ALL minions Registered User regular
    Looking at this, don't most of those states affected have majority Democratic representatives?

    So....fuck Democrats?

    I sorta wish the Democrats weren't above saying the same to the other side. See which states go into budget shortfall spirals first when federal aid disappears.

    I've said a few times that the Democrats should pass a bill that would limit the amount of federal aid a state receives to be equal to the revenues the state provides to Federal coffers.

    So when Mississippi gets hit by a tornado they have to pay the federal government?

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Em, are you seriously fucking linking to Fox?

    Look if we can't trust the propoganda arm of the republican party about a bill the republican party objects to because it helps liberals on the east coast, who can we trust?

    And yes hurricane relief by definition is "pork" because its a ridiculous fucking bullshit term thats basically anything someone doesn't like in congress and never anything they do like

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • RozRoz Boss of InternetRegistered User regular
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

  • TL DRTL DR Not at all confident in his reflexive opinions of thingsRegistered User regular
    Looking at this, don't most of those states affected have majority Democratic representatives?

    So....fuck Democrats?

    I sorta wish the Democrats weren't above saying the same to the other side. See which states go into budget shortfall spirals first when federal aid disappears.

    I've said a few times that the Democrats should pass a bill that would limit the amount of federal aid a state receives to be equal to the revenues the state provides to Federal coffers.

    I say propose the bill, just to generate the 'oh, shit' discussion.

    Obviously there are times when those excess federal dollars going into shithole states save us all money in the long run, though. I don't care if Alabama generated $0 in federal revenue; I still support an increase in education spending there.

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Roz wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

    Wherever Syndalis lives, because no matter the disaster I'm sure the spending on it will be kosher. Again everyone always says "Man fuck the spending for *insert place here* when will they do spending for where I LIVE!"

    Its ridiculous short sightedness/some kind of retarded NIMBY.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    I'm going to bite the bullet and read the Fox article for the points they bring up in contention.
    $2 million dollar roof restoration to the Smithsonian
    Repairs for eight military bases (including Guantanamo Bay)
    Repairs at the Kennedy Space Center
    Customs and Border Protection has asked for $2.4 million to replace "destroyed or damaged vehicles, including mobile X-Ray machines."
    $13 billion in storm-protection infrastructure for the future
    $150 million for fisheries in the gulf of Mexico and in Alaska
    $125 for Colorado wildfire problems in the summer via the Department of Agriculture

    So, feel free to tell me how any of these fucking projects are bad.

  • emnmnmeemnmnme Registered User regular
    Em, are you seriously fucking linking to Fox?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121217/us-superstorm-aid/?utm_hp_ref=sports&ir=sports
    Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma released a list of what they called "questionable" spending in the bill, including $5.3 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers with no statement of priorities about how to spend the money, $125 million for the Department of Agriculture's emergency program for restoring watersheds damaged by wildfires and drought, and $50 million in subsidies for tree planting on private properties.

  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    Roz wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

    Impervious? Impossible - but you bet your ass there are places much, MUCH safer to live.

    Once upon a time I used to work for a company that managed corporate relocation efforts, and there are databases of natural disasters that you can affix to a map via a density grid through software like ArcGIS. Everywhere gets the odd tornado, nor'easter or earthquake... but living along the Gulf, or in a non-rooted structure in Tornado Alley, or on the outer banks of NC? Those fuckers light up like Vegas on the map.

    You are purposefully choosing to live somewhere that every year has a pretty damn good chance of getting fucked with by nature. I would rather Federal Funds go to assisting in relocating victims of storms in those areas rather than them just setting up shop again so that the whole awful process can repeat again.

    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    emnmnme wrote: »
    Em, are you seriously fucking linking to Fox?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121217/us-superstorm-aid/?utm_hp_ref=sports&ir=sports
    Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma released a list of what they called "questionable" spending in the bill, including $5.3 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers with no statement of priorities about how to spend the money, $125 million for the Department of Agriculture's emergency program for restoring watersheds damaged by wildfires and drought, and $50 million in subsidies for tree planting on private properties.

    The only thing questionable is why you're giving McCain and Coburn credibility.

  • The Big LevinskyThe Big Levinsky Registered User regular
    Even according to the Fox article, the overwhelming majority of money will go to reconstruction or safeguards against future disasters. I wouldn't even object to any of the other projects listed in the article. Repairs to military bases isn't exactly a waste of money.

  • JuliusJulius Captain of Serenity on my shipRegistered User regular
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Plus it's not like there's no benefit to the location.

  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    Roz wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

    Wherever Syndalis lives, because no matter the disaster I'm sure the spending on it will be kosher. Again everyone always says "Man fuck the spending for *insert place here* when will they do spending for where I LIVE!"

    Its ridiculous short sightedness/some kind of retarded NIMBY.

    No, it's really not.

    There are places smart companies (and people) avoid building on like the fucking plague, because they are unstable or prone to getting hammered on by nature.

    You don't build nuclear power plants on fault lines (well, you shouldn't), you don't build trailer parks in flat plains in the midwest (or you REALLY fucking shouldn't), and you shouldn't build homes on sandbars. But people do. And while I am against punishing them for being there, I think funding for relocation instead of rebuilding makes more sense.

    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Even according to the Fox article, the overwhelming majority of money will go to reconstruction or safeguards against future disasters. I wouldn't even object to any of the other projects listed in the article. Repairs to military bases isn't exactly a waste of money.

    I love Big Bird, but...

  • V1mV1m Registered User regular
    what possible benefit do these guys get from the relief being denied

    Fuck the poor, save a dollar.

  • The Big LevinskyThe Big Levinsky Registered User regular
    syndalis wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    Roz wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

    Wherever Syndalis lives, because no matter the disaster I'm sure the spending on it will be kosher. Again everyone always says "Man fuck the spending for *insert place here* when will they do spending for where I LIVE!"

    Its ridiculous short sightedness/some kind of retarded NIMBY.

    No, it's really not.

    There are places smart companies (and people) avoid building on like the fucking plague, because they are unstable or prone to getting hammered on by nature.

    You don't build nuclear power plants on fault lines (well, you shouldn't), you don't build trailer parks in flat plains in the midwest (or you REALLY fucking shouldn't), and you shouldn't build homes on sandbars. But people do. And while I am against punishing them for being there, I think funding for relocation instead of rebuilding makes more sense.

    Well let's make sure people aren't homeless right now and we can worry about tax breaks for moving inland or whatever later on.

  • V1mV1m Registered User regular
    emnmnme wrote: »
    Em, are you seriously fucking linking to Fox?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20121217/us-superstorm-aid/?utm_hp_ref=sports&ir=sports
    Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma released a list of what they called "questionable" spending in the bill, including $5.3 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers with no statement of priorities about how to spend the money, $125 million for the Department of Agriculture's emergency program for restoring watersheds damaged by wildfires and drought, and $50 million in subsidies for tree planting on private properties.

    The second two of those seem eminently sensible.

  • AngelHedgieAngelHedgie Registered User regular
    Henroid wrote: »
    I'm going to bite the bullet and read the Fox article for the points they bring up in contention.
    $2 million dollar roof restoration to the Smithsonian
    Repairs for eight military bases (including Guantanamo Bay)
    Repairs at the Kennedy Space Center
    Customs and Border Protection has asked for $2.4 million to replace "destroyed or damaged vehicles, including mobile X-Ray machines."
    $13 billion in storm-protection infrastructure for the future
    $150 million for fisheries in the gulf of Mexico and in Alaska
    $125 for Colorado wildfire problems in the summer via the Department of Agriculture

    So, feel free to tell me how any of these fucking projects are bad.

    And this comes back to when idiots were railing against earmarks - the vast majority of earmarks are needed purchases.

    XBL: Nox Aeternum / PSN: NoxAeternum / NN:NoxAeternum / Steam: noxaeternum
  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Coburn and McCain two old guys who rail on and on about pork without ever looking at what they are actually talking about. Like I swear McCain complained about replacing a worn out telescope lense once because fuck you thats why.

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    Looking at this, don't most of those states affected have majority Democratic representatives?

    So....fuck Democrats?

    I sorta wish the Democrats weren't above saying the same to the other side. See which states go into budget shortfall spirals first when federal aid disappears.

    It's not that simple.

    More "fuck poor people" because these same guys are against any sort of natural disaster relief. They stood against Joplin relief and hurricanes in the south before they stood against Sandy.

    Lh96QHG.png
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Henroid wrote: »
    I'm going to bite the bullet and read the Fox article for the points they bring up in contention.
    $2 million dollar roof restoration to the Smithsonian
    Repairs for eight military bases (including Guantanamo Bay)
    Repairs at the Kennedy Space Center
    Customs and Border Protection has asked for $2.4 million to replace "destroyed or damaged vehicles, including mobile X-Ray machines."
    $13 billion in storm-protection infrastructure for the future
    $150 million for fisheries in the gulf of Mexico and in Alaska
    $125 for Colorado wildfire problems in the summer via the Department of Agriculture

    So, feel free to tell me how any of these fucking projects are bad.

    And this comes back to when idiots were railing against earmarks - the vast majority of earmarks are needed purchases.

    The existence of tacked on things to bills does not qualify them as being inherently bad, indeed. They are only bad when they are actually counter-productive. Everything in here is about helping people or our security.

    All of these plans make sense to some degree or another. Maybe they're not all 100% storm related, and the military base funding isn't specified, but it ultimately goes to serve the men and women in uniform. I thought this was a Republican thing. Now they hate it I guess.

  • PreacherPreacher Registered User regular
    Nah its more fuck "poor people who are not benefitting me." Like I said if a Koch building could apply for federal anything for relief those motherfuckers would be the first one with their hands out.

    Just like with TARP it went to all the rich guys first but the second we start talking about helping people with underwater mortgages "FUCK NO LET THOSE JERKS BURN!"

    I would like some money because these are artisanal nuggets of wisdom philistine.

    pleasepaypreacher.net
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    Preacher wrote: »
    Coburn and McCain two old guys who rail on and on about pork without ever looking at what they are actually talking about. Like I swear McCain complained about replacing a worn out telescope lense once because fuck you thats why.

    It's the same logic on why my mother and grandmother haven't bought any new kitchenware or furniture for the last two, three decades (and in some cases four) - which is to say, it's not logical at all. It's stubborn, "ITS STILL GOOD" mentality.

  • syndalissyndalis Getting Classy On the WallRegistered User, Loves Apple Products, Transition Team regular
    edited December 2012
    syndalis wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    Roz wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

    Wherever Syndalis lives, because no matter the disaster I'm sure the spending on it will be kosher. Again everyone always says "Man fuck the spending for *insert place here* when will they do spending for where I LIVE!"

    Its ridiculous short sightedness/some kind of retarded NIMBY.

    No, it's really not.

    There are places smart companies (and people) avoid building on like the fucking plague, because they are unstable or prone to getting hammered on by nature.

    You don't build nuclear power plants on fault lines (well, you shouldn't), you don't build trailer parks in flat plains in the midwest (or you REALLY fucking shouldn't), and you shouldn't build homes on sandbars. But people do. And while I am against punishing them for being there, I think funding for relocation instead of rebuilding makes more sense.

    Well let's make sure people aren't homeless right now and we can worry about tax breaks for moving inland or whatever later on.

    I am all for the Sandy relief, mostly because I am for relief from disasters in general.

    I also think people should be encouraged to rebuild there because yeah... this is the kind of thing that only really happens once every half century or so in the Northeast. Even longer, honestly.

    That said, as much as I love the city, New Orleans Megaflood #73 is kind of a big old sign saying that its okay to have a shipping port there, but maybe a huge population living below sea level is kind of fucking dumb.

    Different disasters, different ways of responding to them... but everyone should be helped by the government when stuff like this happens.

    syndalis on
    SW-4158-3990-6116
    Let's play Mario Kart or something...
  • HenroidHenroid Mexican kicked from Immigration Thread Centrism is Racism :3Registered User regular
    I hope Chris Christie steps up and is all, "Knock it the fuck off."

  • AManFromEarthAManFromEarth Let's get to twerk! The King in the SwampRegistered User regular
    syndalis wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Preacher wrote: »
    Roz wrote: »
    syndalis wrote: »
    Living in flood basins and regions that are statistically bombarded by natural disaster is not something the taxpayers should have to shoulder in perpetuity. As I say this as a dyed in the wool librul. I don't think we leave the people who suffer from these cataclysms out to dry, but doing some proper social engineering to move communities and populations out of places that are terrible money sinks is not evil.

    That said, Sandy does not fit that narrative. NYC/NJ has never in its history had to face an unexpected storm of this magnitude, its really rare, nobody saw it coming, and the government exists to help its citizens in crisis.

    Please name me one place in America that is impervious to natural disaster. I want to know the safest place to live.

    Wherever Syndalis lives, because no matter the disaster I'm sure the spending on it will be kosher. Again everyone always says "Man fuck the spending for *insert place here* when will they do spending for where I LIVE!"

    Its ridiculous short sightedness/some kind of retarded NIMBY.

    No, it's really not.

    There are places smart companies (and people) avoid building on like the fucking plague, because they are unstable or prone to getting hammered on by nature.

    You don't build nuclear power plants on fault lines (well, you shouldn't), you don't build trailer parks in flat plains in the midwest (or you REALLY fucking shouldn't), and you shouldn't build homes on sandbars. But people do. And while I am against punishing them for being there, I think funding for relocation instead of rebuilding makes more sense.

    Well let's make sure people aren't homeless right now and we can worry about tax breaks for moving inland or whatever later on.

    I am all for the Sandy relief, mostly because I am for relief from disasters in general.

    I also think people should be encouraged to rebuild there because yeah... this is the kind of thing that only really happens once every half century or so. Even longer, honestly.

    As much as I love the city, New Orleans Megaflood #73 is kind of a big old sign saying that its okay to have a shipping port there, but maybe a huge population living below sea level is kind of fucking dumb.

    We should also stop sending cops to bad neighborhoods and firetrucks to wood houses.

    I mean, those guys should just move, amirite?

    Lh96QHG.png
Sign In or Register to comment.