The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Land Use issues

B:LB:L I've done worse.Registered User regular
Hi folks!

In the open plot of land across from my place, a crew just planted down a Notice of Intent for construction. They're intending to develop a 9 luxury home gated community there.

The problem is that this street is a pretty historic area, so it has a barely sufficient sewage/rain runoff system, and they're going to open up an extra street facing a already dangerous three-way fork right in front of my home.

What can we as a community do to stop this? Apparently back in 2007 there was a city council meeting to discuss construction there, and the neighborhood overwhelmingly showed up to defeat it, with over a hundred people participating. But flash forward to today where we just realized that the council approved an ammended proposal right after that one in 2007, possibly without us knowing. The approval seemed to have been passed from developer to developer until it landed in the hands of one which proposed an amended plan. A few of us got notices in the mail about that plan proposed by an advisory committee but due to confusion of the addressee on the letter we had no idea if we were supposed to appeal it or whether it was addressed to the developer. We had less than 10 days to figure it out and the period passed.

Is there any advice on what we can do now to stop/delay the construction? Thanks.

10mvrci.png click for Anime chat

Posts

  • MrMonroeMrMonroe passed out on the floor nowRegistered User regular
    Notice of Intent doesn't sound like "we're about to break ground", so you might have some time. Call your city council member and ask about it. If there's another city council meeting, consider showing up with your neighbors.

    Don't rule out the possibility of a settled agreement, though. Flooding and traffic safety are serious concerns and you could conceivably use a meeting like that to strike a bargain that would upgrade your water management and maybe get a traffic light in the intersection in exchange for allowing the construction.

    In the mean time, however, you could really use a land-use attorney. I'm afraid I don't have any tips on how to pay for something like that, outside of asking your neighbors if they would be willing to pool their funds.

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Contact a lawyer?

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • Liquid HellzLiquid Hellz Registered User regular
    Request a meeting with the mayor of the town, this is the type of crap they are elected to deal with. Sit down with him/her and explain everything maybe even bring some other people familiar with the issue or a petition or something.

    What I do for a living:
    Home Inspection and Wind Mitigation
    http://www.FairWindInspections.com/
  • B:LB:L I've done worse. Registered User regular
    MrMonroe wrote: »
    Notice of Intent doesn't sound like "we're about to break ground", so you might have some time. Call your city council member and ask about it. If there's another city council meeting, consider showing up with your neighbors.

    Don't rule out the possibility of a settled agreement, though. Flooding and traffic safety are serious concerns and you could conceivably use a meeting like that to strike a bargain that would upgrade your water management and maybe get a traffic light in the intersection in exchange for allowing the construction.

    In the mean time, however, you could really use a land-use attorney. I'm afraid I don't have any tips on how to pay for something like that, outside of asking your neighbors if they would be willing to pool their funds.

    Yeah, they just started construction right now, bulldozering the grassland.

    I figured a land use attorney would be the key but I was hoping for a less costly alternative. We tried the local council route and talked with a representative but they weren't helpful.

    I'll try sending an email out to the mayor, but given that this is Los Angeles and the Mayor is Villiagrosa, I don't expect a speedy reply.

    10mvrci.png click for Anime chat
  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    If they've got permits and have broken ground, your probably SOL for stopping them. You can try to stall them, but you may end up having your case end up as frivilous and owe your legal fees and theirs (which will be considerable). You might have better luck with whoever handles the permiting, however you can really only enforce what is considered code according to the IBC or california codes, and since we are in a recession, if the company is big enough and employs enough people. They may have gotten a waver on certain codes, but it's unlikely.

  • B:LB:L I've done worse. Registered User regular
    edited January 2013
    zepherin wrote: »
    If they've got permits and have broken ground, your probably SOL for stopping them. You can try to stall them, but you may end up having your case end up as frivilous and owe your legal fees and theirs (which will be considerable). You might have better luck with whoever handles the permiting, however you can really only enforce what is considered code according to the IBC or california codes, and since we are in a recession, if the company is big enough and employs enough people. They may have gotten a waver on certain codes, but it's unlikely.

    Yeah, the only hope I see is if that rushed approval causes it to violate the Brown Act (but this may just be internet lawyering). Last we checked they only had a permit for land grading, not for construction.

    Do you think a signed peition for the neighborhood would help? I'll probably have to walk into the Land Use offices and see what I can dig up.

    B:L on
    10mvrci.png click for Anime chat
  • HevachHevach Registered User regular
    edited January 2013
    Sounds like petition time is past. Edit: I don't mean don't bother, knock yourself out, it doesn't really cost anything but time. Brown act is real lawyer territory, but sounds like you did get some notice and that could work against you. Michigan's equivalent is pretty weak, and cursory review of the Brown Act itself suggests it's been eroded by the courts and wasn't really put into action to begin with.

    I think MrMonroe's got the best idea: Try to get a traffic light and a sewer upgrade (if the flooding is bad, the rich new residents of that gated community will also probably lobby for this) to offset the impact, but actually stopping these things is usually money vs. money, and the other side consists of a developer who probably has money all over the city and nine hypothetical future rich residents who'll pay more property taxes than you.

    Hevach on
  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    edited January 2013
    A lawyer won't help you here as much as contacting your local municipal planning office. You will need to find out when they are in session and have a big show of support against it with your local municipality. Essentially, the only way for taxpayers to overwhelm planned new construction is to make your City Council fear for the security of their seats if they allow the construction, which requires a good amount of support.

    Most legal moves are anticipated in the local zoning master plan. Unless the construction is in violation of it, which never happens because companies aren't dumb, you have little wiggle room. Especially as they are luxury developments, and thus likely going to bring more tax revenues for the municipality, you really need a some hundreds against it in order to make any impact on the council.

    Enc on
  • EncEnc A Fool with Compassion Pronouns: He, Him, HisRegistered User regular
    Also: you can file some sort of claim against the company, but unless you can really show that the development is going to harm local development, and if it is on fallow land that is likely not going to fly unless it is protected wetlands (which it probably isn't) you really have little you can do here. Urban Planning laws are designed to help development, not stop it. The only way to go against them is to go to those who make the decisions in the first place (the city council or county commission and whoever chairs it) and lobby how it will be detrimental to the city. Typically the only places these sorts of things find traction are when industrial uses are being developed, almost every measure of worth (in land use) is increased by having a neighboring luxury development.

  • The Crowing OneThe Crowing One Registered User regular
    Honestly, good luck. I suspect you're SOL on this one.

    3rddocbottom.jpg
  • DaenrisDaenris Registered User regular
    B:L wrote: »
    Yeah, they just started construction right now, bulldozering the grassland.
    B:L wrote: »
    Yeah, the only hope I see is if that rushed approval causes it to violate the Brown Act (but this may just be internet lawyering). Last we checked they only had a permit for land grading, not for construction.

    If all they're doing so far is bulldozing the grass, that likely IS just land grading.

  • B:LB:L I've done worse. Registered User regular
    Enc wrote: »
    A lawyer won't help you here as much as contacting your local municipal planning office. You will need to find out when they are in session and have a big show of support against it with your local municipality. Essentially, the only way for taxpayers to overwhelm planned new construction is to make your City Council fear for the security of their seats if they allow the construction, which requires a good amount of support.

    Most legal moves are anticipated in the local zoning master plan. Unless the construction is in violation of it, which never happens because companies aren't dumb, you have little wiggle room. Especially as they are luxury developments, and thus likely going to bring more tax revenues for the municipality, you really need a some hundreds against it in order to make any impact on the council.

    Thanks for the detailed info. Right now the plan is to get a giant petition signed just to make sure the neighborhood is aware of the effort to stop this, then go with the shotgun approach of making copies of that petition and sending it out to the mayor, city council members, city planning minicipalities, and land use offices. After that we can organize a plan to show up at a session in mass numbers and show that we've got the numbers to back us up.

    Thanks again for the ideas.

    10mvrci.png click for Anime chat
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    Call up your local paper and lay out why this is a human interest story for them. Get a few folks who agree with you to go on record as opposing it and why you think you guys got screwed by the council. Could get some media attention out of it and put the developer/council in an uncomfortable light.

    What is this I don't even.
  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    There is also the problem that since they have a permit, even if the city changes their mind they may not be able to win a legal fight if the company sues the city for damages.

    However there are things that are still productive. If you make a big enough stink. It is possible to get some concessions out of the developer. Water rights, redoing major sewage lines (which is something they should do and they'll have to tie in anyways), making a private rd as a bypass, are some things that are posible inclusions if pressure is put on them. 9 luxery homes in a gated community is worth milions. They are not going away. They may do it piece wise but the will put those buildings up, so with enough support you can get some stuff out of them when they are still looking at all the money at the begining.

  • B:LB:L I've done worse. Registered User regular
    zepherin wrote: »
    There is also the problem that since they have a permit, even if the city changes their mind they may not be able to win a legal fight if the company sues the city for damages.

    I don't think they have a full permit yet. Based on research they only seem to have a land grading permit, so Daenris could be right on that count.

    Still, there were other developers that were defeated before which eventually dumped the project after a big enough fight, so we'll keep going as far as we can.

    10mvrci.png click for Anime chat
  • zepherinzepherin Russian warship, go fuck yourself Registered User regular
    B:L wrote: »
    zepherin wrote: »
    There is also the problem that since they have a permit, even if the city changes their mind they may not be able to win a legal fight if the company sues the city for damages.

    I don't think they have a full permit yet. Based on research they only seem to have a land grading permit, so Daenris could be right on that count.

    Still, there were other developers that were defeated before which eventually dumped the project after a big enough fight, so we'll keep going as far as we can.
    Seams like an oversight on their part, but if you are correct, it could be important. I'm not trying to be a negative nancy honestly. I'm just not sure this can be stopped. If the area is zoned correctly, and they have followed proper permiting proceedure, it's a tough fight. However it might be prudent for you to pull information on their bond and insurance information as well as permit, and look at the license of the engineer/architect who put the plans together. Some times the dates of those lapse, and while most states with allow them to post date their lisence when they renew, you may be able to protest on a technicality.

  • PelPel Registered User regular
    You might have better luck if you elucidated exactly WHY you are opposed to this project. Is it because you live in a historic district? Because traffic patterns will be interfered with? It's always easy to rile people up with an anti-development platform, but coming up with good reasons why that development should not actually occur are more difficult.

    For example, If you are concerned about sewage/runoff issues, you shouldn't be petitioning to cancel the whole shebang, you should find or generate reports from an engineer that supports your concerns and petition the city to force the developers to upgrade the infrastructure before they begin. If you are worried about traffic patterns, then you should present evidence that traffic patterns will be negatively affected and demand a solution before work begins.

    You may have already considered these things, or you may not have, but your OP comes off a bit as being against development for the sake of being against development with the other stuff thrown in there as an afterthought. Which is not necessarily a bad thing, but it's also more or less legally inactionable. Clearly defining the reasons you oppose this (and I don't feel you were very clear about this in the OP, although you may have been in other venues) will help you win your battle, will help you address the most glaring problems with your new neighbors, and will help you decide for your own benefit how much it will harm you personally if worse comes to worse and the thing gets finished (It probably will).

Sign In or Register to comment.