The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
Take this news with a grain of salt, but a friend of mine manages a video game store and he has stated that HQ requested all the local stores to send back 20 GB models of the PS3. I know Best Buy has already taken the models down, or is at least in the process of doing so. He suggested it was being discontinued outright, due to the skewed sales between 20 and 60 GB models and the fact that the 60 GB model was in huge demand compared to the 20 GB. By using resources to make the 20, they are taking resources away to build the 60. I believe most people would spring for the 60 model anyway, if it was available.
It will be interesting to see where this goes in the coming weeks - either only this chain was pulling the model because it's selling like crap, or it's a regional/national deal until Sony gets their act straight.
cj iwakuraThe Rhythm RegentBears The Name FreedomRegistered Userregular
edited March 2007
I've suspected something like this for a while, since I haven't seen any 20 GBs since launch. I guess it makes sense, since $100 isn't much difference once you hit that price range, but I personally don't see the need for 40 extra gigs myself. Then again, I'm not an online or HD person.
So all those comparions Sony (and some of it's most dedicated fans) make about the price of the PS3 (using the 20GB model) against the 360 will stop?
Rohan on
...and I thought of how all those people died, and what a good death that is. That nobody can blame you for it, because everyone else died along with you, and it is the fault of none, save those who did the killing.
Considering I haven't seen a 20 GB model in stores for over a month now, this isn't much of a surprise.
Gyral on
0
Vicious_GSRDudePrincipality of ZeonRegistered Userregular
edited March 2007
I always thought two different versions of a console was a stupid move for any company. Sony might not have such a huge technological gap between the 20gig and 60gig model. The two SKUs do not limit there consumers from anything really but Wi-Fi and memory card slots. I still think having one SKU (the 60gig) could help lower the overall price of the PS3 and help promote the console in a much greater light.
I haven't seen a Core 360 in my area in months. And I've been paying attention, since I've been stopping by electronics stores every so often thinking about buying a Premium sometime in the future.
I'm not suprised by either that, or this.
Also, at least the 20GB PS3 is not only funtional, but user-upgradable without paying a greediculous amount of money, unlike the 360. Zing!
But yeah, I'm really not surprised. 20GB PS3s aren't selling very well at all.
I always thought two different versions of a console was a stupid move for any company ..... I still think having one SKU (the 60gig) could help lower the overall price of the PS3 and help promote the console in a much greater light.
Having one version of the console means you only need to build one model of the console (mass production helps reduce the price after a while). It also puts all of the PS3 owners on the same playing field and makes everyone equal in what they can do with there console.
Doctor DetroitNot a doctorTree townRegistered Userregular
edited March 2007
Maybe I'm missing something here...
People can't find the 20 gig PS3, so that means it's not in demand? Doesn't the opposite make more sense? As in, Sony has been skewing production to the 60 gig version, but people are snatching up the 20 gig, to save $100?
To add to this thread, Gamestop is apparently no longer carrying 20 gig models either, just yesterday we were told to take down all our display boxes and replace them with 60 gig boxes.
Best Buy complained of not selling any of their stock. I think the retailers want to be "the place where you can find the 60 GB models," so they're basically saying, "Hey, Best Buy doesn't have to carry your 20 gig model, why do we?
I think the profit margin is the same for the retailers - probably like $10 to $20 a system. But once you have someone paying for a system, they also have to buy games (big profits for used) and accessories. All from the same store, or at least what the retailers hope. Then in the future customers think "Well, they had the 60 gb in stock, so they probably have this..."
Sony is at a crossroads, with this and the demands from many stores to drop the PSP price.
Which sucks, cause if I was to buy a PS3 right now, I would buy a 20GB model.
It just seems better in every way to me, but I guess consumers see "More space out of the box= better!"
People can't find the 20 gig PS3, so that means it's not in demand? Doesn't the opposite make more sense? As in, Sony has been skewing production to the 60 gig version, but people are snatching up the 20 gig, to save $100?
To be fair, my old store has only seen two 20gig PS3s, and that was at launch.
I always thought two different versions of a console was a stupid move for any company. Sony might not have such a huge technological gap between the 20gig and 60gig model. The two SKUs do not limit there consumers from anything really but Wi-Fi and memory card slots. I still think having one SKU (the 60gig) could help lower the overall price of the PS3 and help promote the console in a much greater light.
Honestly, the biggest appeal the lower models have is to act as psychological buffers to the pricing. The 360 Core's sole purpose was to get the number "$299" into store flyers, and the 20GB PS3 is there almost solely to reduce the price difference between 360/PS3 to $100.
...Sony is at a crossroads, with this and the demands from many stores to drop the PSP price.
You make a good point. I think retailers are starting to get a little more agressive in their demands. And unless Sony plans on selling it's hardware mail-order, they're gonna have to figure something out to satisfy them.
Also, your fucking avatar is like 163kb and unsized, you fucker.
Vicious_GSRDudePrincipality of ZeonRegistered Userregular
edited March 2007
I understand why most people would want a 20gig PS3 to a 60gig, 100 dollars is not a small amount. I just think that with the loss of one of the SKUs the price would go down faster and equalize the playing field.
I always thought two different versions of a console was a stupid move for any company. Sony might not have such a huge technological gap between the 20gig and 60gig model. The two SKUs do not limit there consumers from anything really but Wi-Fi and memory card slots. I still think having one SKU (the 60gig) could help lower the overall price of the PS3 and help promote the console in a much greater light.
Honestly, the biggest appeal the lower models have is to act as psychological buffers to the pricing. The 360 Core's sole purpose was to get the number "$299" into store flyers, and the 20GB PS3 is there almost solely to reduce the price difference between 360/PS3 to $100.
Both of these are very true, but to be fair to the PS3, as stated above, at least the 20gig model is fully functional, while the core 360 system isn't really (assuming you want to go online, mem cards could be okay for offline gaming I guess).
But still, yeah, I was definately in the 'at that price what difference does another 100 dollars make' group anyway.
You make a good point. I think retailers are starting to get a little more agressive in their demands. And unless Sony plans on selling it's hardware mail-order, they're gonna have to figure something out to satisfy them.
Also, your fucking avatar is like 163kb and unsized, you fucker.
Haha, yeah it is. So instead, here is a picture of Kurtwood Smith in a funny hat.
You make a good point. I think retailers are starting to get a little more agressive in their demands. And unless Sony plans on selling it's hardware mail-order, they're gonna have to figure something out to satisfy them.
Also, your fucking avatar is like 163kb and unsized, you fucker.
Haha, yeah it is. So instead, here is a picture of Kurtwood Smith in a funny hat.
Oh, and Einhander is a sweet game.
Thanks. A lot of people think I'm named after the game, but what I'm really named after is masturbation. You can tell because I don't use an umlaut.
You cannot go wrong with funny hats.
On a side note, I wonder what kind of flack Sony would have taken if they would have released a single model PS3 with HDMI and no hard drive, and just required the consumer to buy and install their own?
Also, even if you bought a Core, the memory card adds $49.99 to the price, and will probably stay at $49.99 until a larger card is released.
You make a good point. I think retailers are starting to get a little more agressive in their demands. And unless Sony plans on selling it's hardware mail-order, they're gonna have to figure something out to satisfy them.
Also, your fucking avatar is like 163kb and unsized, you fucker.
Haha, yeah it is. So instead, here is a picture of Kurtwood Smith in a funny hat.
Oh, and Einhander is a sweet game.
Thanks. A lot of people think I'm named after the game, but what I'm really named after is masturbation. You can tell because I don't use an umlaut.
You cannot go wrong with funny hats.
On a side note, I wonder what kind of flack Sony would have taken if they would have released a single model PS3 with HDMI and no hard drive, and just required the consumer to buy and install their own?
Also, even if you bought a Core, the memory card adds $49.99 to the price, and will probably stay at $49.99 until a larger card is released.
I really wouldn't mind a version of the PS3 with no hard drive, no HDMI, and no card reader, as none of them do much for me, and I would just install my own HD for much cheaper.
Especially at the retail price of $399
CokomonOur butts are worth fighting for!Registered Userregular
edited March 2007
I remember hearing that people were actually opting out of the 60g and buying the 20g and then just installing a bigger harddrive for much cheaper. That might be why Sony is pulling them, since they want people to buy the $600 version.
I've suspected something like this for a while, since I haven't seen any 20 GBs since launch. I guess it makes sense, since $100 isn't much difference once you hit that price range, but I personally don't see the need for 40 extra gigs myself. Then again, I'm not an online or HD person.
You would if you have a PS3. The games install on the system so that load times are alleviated. I hear tell that Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidge RACER! takes a whopping 5 gigs of hard drive space just to play it. There goes a fourth of your 20 gig hard drive.
At this stage in the game, I would hate to move backward to a machine without a hard drive.
That includes the Wii. I've been spoiled by the current gen Xbox.
Not that you'd really care that much, but it's not like you're in any danger of filling up the Wii's internal storage right now. I've got a pile of VC games, all the optional channels, and bunch of photos my friends keep sending me, and I'm nowhere near filling it up.
Maybe if/when they get Neo Geo games up on the VC, my tune will change a bit, but for right now it doesn't seem like there's any difference between the Wii's internal flash and the 360's drive except that there's no online service in place for you to download gigs of movies and demos from.
At this stage in the game, I would hate to move backward to a machine without a hard drive.
That includes the Wii. I've been spoiled by the current gen Xbox.
Not that you'd really care that much, but it's not like you're in any danger of filling up the Wii's internal storage right now. I've got a pile of VC games, all the optional channels, and bunch of photos my friends keep sending me, and I'm nowhere near filling it up.
Maybe if/when they get Neo Geo games up on the VC, my tune will change a bit, but for right now it doesn't seem like there's any difference between the Wii's internal flash and the 360's drive except that there's no online service in place for you to download gigs of movies and demos from.
The one thing that still draws me to the Wii is VC. Whenever Neo Geo games hit the service... depending on the lineup I might buy one. If the emulation is rock-solid and they work out some kind of storage system and a better classic controller, then a Wii+NG games over VC would be a hell of a lot cheaper than buying an actual Neo Geo system.
I don't want a hard drive in my video game systems AT ALL unless they provide solid state drives because... hard drives fail eventually. I figure the life cycle for these consoles should be roughly 4-6 years, so maybe by the time the next wave of machines comes around, we'll see a significant price decrease in solid state. Until then, I'm happy with Wii system memory + SD cards.
At this stage in the game, I would hate to move backward to a machine without a hard drive.
That includes the Wii. I've been spoiled by the current gen Xbox.
Not that you'd really care that much, but it's not like you're in any danger of filling up the Wii's internal storage right now. I've got a pile of VC games, all the optional channels, and bunch of photos my friends keep sending me, and I'm nowhere near filling it up.
Maybe if/when they get Neo Geo games up on the VC, my tune will change a bit, but for right now it doesn't seem like there's any difference between the Wii's internal flash and the 360's drive except that there's no online service in place for you to download gigs of movies and demos from.
The one thing that still draws me to the Wii is VC. Whenever Neo Geo games hit the service... depending on the lineup I might buy one. If the emulation is rock-solid and they work out some kind of storage system and a better classic controller, then a Wii+NG games over VC would be a hell of a lot cheaper than buying an actual Neo Geo system.
Well, the last time Ben Herman let anybody know what was up, he hinted that they may be considering a controller shell built to work like the old Neo Geo AES sticks ... but even he admitted that was just speculation. Also, that Neo Geo games would probably weigh in at $10.
Unfortunately storage is a bit of a problem when your games can clock in as high as 90MB. You could probably only get one or two on the system at a time (since 256 MB of the internal 512 MB is reserved for the OS), but you could keep a large amount on your SD card and copy them on/off when necessary. It's by no means perfect, but it's still far cheaper than an AES or MVS setup and actual Neo Geo games.
Yeah, this is more than likely because Sony loses less money on the 60GB model, and the company is tired of losing money.
I always assumed the 20 GB sold much better comparatively, explaining why it was so rarely seen. (I remember a forumer looking for one for weeks, and this was after PS3 stock became abundant.) If this is true, would this kind of move put the brakes on sales? Or would the mentality of "I'm paying $500 anyway, what's another $100?" kick in?
Yeah, this is more than likely because Sony loses less money on the 60GB model, and the company is tired of losing money.
I always assumed the 20 GB sold much better comparatively, explaining why it was so rarely seen. (I remember a forumer looking for one for weeks, and this was after PS3 stock became abundant.) If this is true, would this kind of move put the brakes on sales? Or would the mentality of "I'm paying $500 anyway, what's another $100?" kick in?
Not to generalize, but the kind of people buying PS3s now don't see it as a budget purchase. They understand that it's a luxury item and are willing to pay for the "extra" luxury of the 60GB version.
Yeah, this is more than likely because Sony loses less money on the 60GB model, and the company is tired of losing money.
I always assumed the 20 GB sold much better comparatively, explaining why it was so rarely seen. (I remember a forumer looking for one for weeks, and this was after PS3 stock became abundant.) If this is true, would this kind of move put the brakes on sales? Or would the mentality of "I'm paying $500 anyway, what's another $100?" kick in?
Not to generalize, but the kind of people buying PS3s now don't see it as a budget purchase. They understand that it's a luxury item and are willing to pay for the "extra" luxury of the 60GB version.
While I agree with this reasoning, the mass-market nature of game consoles makes it a big mistake to be seen as a luxury item, assuming you want your install base to stomp the competitors.
Yeah, this is more than likely because Sony loses less money on the 60GB model, and the company is tired of losing money.
I always assumed the 20 GB sold much better comparatively, explaining why it was so rarely seen. (I remember a forumer looking for one for weeks, and this was after PS3 stock became abundant.) If this is true, would this kind of move put the brakes on sales? Or would the mentality of "I'm paying $500 anyway, what's another $100?" kick in?
Not to generalize, but the kind of people buying PS3s now don't see it as a budget purchase. They understand that it's a luxury item and are willing to pay for the "extra" luxury of the 60GB version.
While I agree with this reasoning, the mass-market nature of game consoles makes it a big mistake to be seen as a luxury item, assuming you want your install base to stomp the competitors.
Oh, I'm not defending the practice... I'm just saying that's probably why so many people forgo the cheaper 20 GB version to get the 60 GB version.
This kinda sucks. I wasn't going to pay more than $300 for a PS3 anyways, but if this is true, I may have even longer to hold off on the purchase since I have to wait through $300 worth of price cuts instead of #200.
I don't want a hard drive in my video game systems AT ALL unless they provide solid state drives because... hard drives fail eventually. I figure the life cycle for these consoles should be roughly 4-6 years, so maybe by the time the next wave of machines comes around, we'll see a significant price decrease in solid state. Until then, I'm happy with Wii system memory + SD cards.
Solid state fails as well, especially when its read/written a lot.
Also, at least the 20GB PS3 is not only funtional, but user-upgradable without paying a greediculous amount of money, unlike the 360. Zing!
Really? How do you upgrade the HD? How do you upgrade it to WiFi enabled? Does it even have a HDMI output (no the xbox doesn't either but we are talking about upgrading here) How do you upgrade it so it can use wireless controllors (my personal biggest gripe of the system).
Unless I've missed something or the Zing was sarcastic I'm fairly surely the 20gig PS3 is completely un-upgradable.
Also, at least the 20GB PS3 is not only funtional, but user-upgradable without paying a greediculous amount of money, unlike the 360. Zing!
Really? How do you upgrade the HD? How do you upgrade it to WiFi enabled? Does it even have a HDMI output (no the xbox doesn't either but we are talking about upgrading here) How do you upgrade it so it can use wireless controllors (my personal biggest gripe of the system).
Unless I've missed something or the Zing was sarcastic I'm fairly surely the 20gig PS3 is completely un-upgradable.
You can replace the hard drive, use a wireless bridge, it already has HDMI, and it already uses wireless controllers, which are bluetooth, not 802.11.
Posts
Nothing's forgotten, nothing is ever forgotten
I'm not suprised by either that, or this.
Also, at least the 20GB PS3 is not only funtional, but user-upgradable without paying a greediculous amount of money, unlike the 360. Zing!
But yeah, I'm really not surprised. 20GB PS3s aren't selling very well at all.
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
Yes, but god I so want it to be right this time.
Why?
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
Because (read below)
Having one version of the console means you only need to build one model of the console (mass production helps reduce the price after a while). It also puts all of the PS3 owners on the same playing field and makes everyone equal in what they can do with there console.
It's really early where I am.
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
People can't find the 20 gig PS3, so that means it's not in demand? Doesn't the opposite make more sense? As in, Sony has been skewing production to the 60 gig version, but people are snatching up the 20 gig, to save $100?
I think the profit margin is the same for the retailers - probably like $10 to $20 a system. But once you have someone paying for a system, they also have to buy games (big profits for used) and accessories. All from the same store, or at least what the retailers hope. Then in the future customers think "Well, they had the 60 gb in stock, so they probably have this..."
Sony is at a crossroads, with this and the demands from many stores to drop the PSP price.
It just seems better in every way to me, but I guess consumers see "More space out of the box= better!"
To be fair, my old store has only seen two 20gig PS3s, and that was at launch.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/Cykstfc
I think it's more along the lines of "well, fuck, I'm paying at least $500 anyway..."
Also, doesn't Sony actually make money (or at least lose less money) on the 60 gig model?
You make a good point. I think retailers are starting to get a little more agressive in their demands. And unless Sony plans on selling it's hardware mail-order, they're gonna have to figure something out to satisfy them.
Also, your fucking avatar is like 163kb and unsized, you fucker.
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
Both of these are very true, but to be fair to the PS3, as stated above, at least the 20gig model is fully functional, while the core 360 system isn't really (assuming you want to go online, mem cards could be okay for offline gaming I guess).
But still, yeah, I was definately in the 'at that price what difference does another 100 dollars make' group anyway.
I am a freaking nerd.
Sony doesn't make a profit on any of the versions. At launch, Sony was losing 240 dollars for the 60 GB and 300 for the 20 GB.
Haha, yeah it is. So instead, here is a picture of Kurtwood Smith in a funny hat.
Oh, and Einhander is a sweet game.
Thanks. A lot of people think I'm named after the game, but what I'm really named after is masturbation. You can tell because I don't use an umlaut.
You cannot go wrong with funny hats.
On a side note, I wonder what kind of flack Sony would have taken if they would have released a single model PS3 with HDMI and no hard drive, and just required the consumer to buy and install their own?
Also, even if you bought a Core, the memory card adds $49.99 to the price, and will probably stay at $49.99 until a larger card is released.
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
I really wouldn't mind a version of the PS3 with no hard drive, no HDMI, and no card reader, as none of them do much for me, and I would just install my own HD for much cheaper.
Especially at the retail price of $399
http://steamcommunity.com/id/Cykstfc
That includes the Wii. I've been spoiled by the current gen Xbox.
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
You would if you have a PS3. The games install on the system so that load times are alleviated. I hear tell that Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidge RACER! takes a whopping 5 gigs of hard drive space just to play it. There goes a fourth of your 20 gig hard drive.
Twitter: Cokomon | dA: Cokomon | Tumblr: Cokomon-art | XBL / NNID / Steam: Cokomon
Not that you'd really care that much, but it's not like you're in any danger of filling up the Wii's internal storage right now. I've got a pile of VC games, all the optional channels, and bunch of photos my friends keep sending me, and I'm nowhere near filling it up.
Maybe if/when they get Neo Geo games up on the VC, my tune will change a bit, but for right now it doesn't seem like there's any difference between the Wii's internal flash and the 360's drive except that there's no online service in place for you to download gigs of movies and demos from.
The one thing that still draws me to the Wii is VC. Whenever Neo Geo games hit the service... depending on the lineup I might buy one. If the emulation is rock-solid and they work out some kind of storage system and a better classic controller, then a Wii+NG games over VC would be a hell of a lot cheaper than buying an actual Neo Geo system.
Steam / Bus Blog / Goozex Referral
Wii Code: 1040-1320-0724-3613 :!!:
Well, the last time Ben Herman let anybody know what was up, he hinted that they may be considering a controller shell built to work like the old Neo Geo AES sticks ... but even he admitted that was just speculation. Also, that Neo Geo games would probably weigh in at $10.
Unfortunately storage is a bit of a problem when your games can clock in as high as 90MB. You could probably only get one or two on the system at a time (since 256 MB of the internal 512 MB is reserved for the OS), but you could keep a large amount on your SD card and copy them on/off when necessary. It's by no means perfect, but it's still far cheaper than an AES or MVS setup and actual Neo Geo games.
You actually saw one in stores? I've never seen a 20 GB model, and I've probably seen around two dozen PS3's in the wild since launch.
I always assumed the 20 GB sold much better comparatively, explaining why it was so rarely seen. (I remember a forumer looking for one for weeks, and this was after PS3 stock became abundant.) If this is true, would this kind of move put the brakes on sales? Or would the mentality of "I'm paying $500 anyway, what's another $100?" kick in?
Not to generalize, but the kind of people buying PS3s now don't see it as a budget purchase. They understand that it's a luxury item and are willing to pay for the "extra" luxury of the 60GB version.
While I agree with this reasoning, the mass-market nature of game consoles makes it a big mistake to be seen as a luxury item, assuming you want your install base to stomp the competitors.
Oh, I'm not defending the practice... I'm just saying that's probably why so many people forgo the cheaper 20 GB version to get the 60 GB version.
Solid state fails as well, especially when its read/written a lot.
£425 60Gig or nothing.
Really? How do you upgrade the HD? How do you upgrade it to WiFi enabled? Does it even have a HDMI output (no the xbox doesn't either but we are talking about upgrading here) How do you upgrade it so it can use wireless controllors (my personal biggest gripe of the system).
Unless I've missed something or the Zing was sarcastic I'm fairly surely the 20gig PS3 is completely un-upgradable.
Satans..... hints.....
You can replace the hard drive, use a wireless bridge, it already has HDMI, and it already uses wireless controllers, which are bluetooth, not 802.11.