Are we in the golden age of gaming?

RaslinRaslin Registered User regular
edited March 2007 in Games and Technology
After seeing that Sonic and Mario will be in the same game together, I realized something, something that had been lingering in my mind for a while now. We are in the golden age of gaming. I daresay better than the SNES/Genesis days. Now, before you kill me, just hear me out.

Look at the situation. More people are playing video games than ever before. Especially because of the Wii and DS, most of you probably know people playing games like Brain age and Wii Sports, people you would never expect to play games before. My family is a bit different, they've always played games. However, I can't play my Wii anymore. Why? My dad. He doesn't get off of super swing golf. I got it for him at Christmas. There is little time when he is home, that he doesn't play it.

Us hard core's aren't left out. We have arguably the best Zelda game to date out, which is saying something. Even being second is still something. We have, again arguably, the most perfected shooter developed to date, Gears of War out. World of Warcraft has stormed the gaming charts, and Blizzard is printing money not known since the Starcraft days. Stalker has finally come out; even with bugs, it is just an amazing game. Civilization 4 is giving most of us TBS fans a hard-on, and a new expansion is on the way. RTS? Command and Conquer is finally getting a true sequel, and we also have games like Company of Heroes, and Supreme commander.

Fighting games that aren't evolutions of Street Fighter. DBZ: BT2 is a game that many of my friends who aren't huge fighting game fans, are playing a lot. Racing games, from Motorstorm, to Burnout and Mario Kart DS, are arguably seeing their best days. Then we have more. A New NiGHTS game is coming for the Wii. Guitar Hero is going strong, and mini-games have exploded in potential with the Wii. Open-ended games are coming more and more often. Crackdown out, Oblivion out, Stalker out, GTA4 coming.

Retro gaming? We have backwards compatability going back two generations for some systems. Virtual Console and Live Marketplace are giving us games from even further back. Furthermore, indie games are growing exponentially. The modding community is pure sex right now. Half life 2 and BF2 are coming out with excellent mods, and games like Oblivion, Stalker, and others are giving us great opportunities for modding. Indie games actually have a chance now, with online distributing, whether through Steam and its contemporaries, or Live marketplace/PS3 home/Virtual console in the future, potentially. We have game college's now, its amazing.

Online multiplayer is increasingly becoming a standard. If you're so inclined, its unlikely you can't fulfill a multiplayer urge at any time of day, most of us really like at least one game that has online multiplayer. Wireless controllers are now the standard; We've all had situations where wired controllers have been a problem, at least once. Consoles now pretty much come standard with onboard memory, no more having to buy memory cards(Damn you, Xbox Core).

Obviously, in pure power, we're at our height. All the systems are capable of handing games with large environments, large numbers of things on screen, and quite good looking things as well. Once we get further into this generation, it will get even better.

We have an incredible line of games coming. Crysis, Bioshock, FFXIII, new FF:Tactics games, Mario Galaxy, SSBB, A new Kirby game, Halo 3, Metroid Prime 3, Ace Combat 6, MGS 4, DMC 4. All these games will be out within two years, most probably this year. These are just a few of the incredible games coming, just what I could think of on hand.

We have games proliferating more onto varying systems. Playstation games on the Xbox, Xbox games on the PC, Sega games on the Wii. Solid Snake in SSBB, A halo character in… what was it, tekken? Link in soul caliber(though that's a bit old).

It completely feels like a golden age for us gamers. I can't imagine what's coming next. I'll leave you with one last thing: If Starcraft 2 is announced in the next six months, I will eat my cock. Simply because if I don't, it will explode in anticipation, and I may as well get the nourishment.

TL;DR: Lots of cool shit coming out, more people playing than ever, no genre feels underloved.

Your thoughts?

I cant url good so add me on steam anyways steamcommunity.com/id/Raslin

3ds friend code: 2981-6032-4118
Raslin on
«1

Posts

  • jclastjclast Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    And 2D is still alive and well. The GBA/DS combo is jam packed with great 2D games. New Super Mario Bros.. Metroid: Zero Mission. All 5 recent portable Castlevanias. Drill Dozer.

    It's a good time to be a fan of 2D.

    jclast on
    camo_sig2.png
  • rayofashrayofash Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    They're going to be in a game together? What?

    Edit: Oh my.

    rayofash on
  • TingleTingle __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    Tingle on
  • RaslinRaslin Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know? A lot of people think different. I wasn''t saying it was the best.

    Raslin on
    I cant url good so add me on steam anyways steamcommunity.com/id/Raslin

    3ds friend code: 2981-6032-4118
  • DirtyDirty Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    If you're saying Twilight Princess isn't good enough to be in the top 5 Zelda games, I disagree (my personal ranking: OOT>WW>TP>ALttP>MM). If you're saying it doesn't deserve to be in the top 5 games of all time, I agree.


    Golden age of gaming? I dunno, ... isn't that something you state retroactively? And if its anything like the "ages" of comics, ... I would say we passed the golden age years ago.

    Dirty on
  • hamburger helperhamburger helper Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Raslin wrote: »
    I'll leave you with one last thing: If Starcraft 2 is announced in the next six months, I will eat my cock.

    Don't do that.
    Raslin wrote: »
    Simply because if I don't, it will explode in anticipation
    They're supposed to.

    hamburger helper on
    statimg.php?id=280&theme=1
  • KuraudoKuraudo Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    The golden age of gaming I pictured didn't have new technology killing the light gun game :x

    Kuraudo on
  • FawfulFawful __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    Fawful on
    hytd.jpg
  • hamburger helperhamburger helper Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

    hamburger helper on
    statimg.php?id=280&theme=1
  • FawfulFawful __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
    Nah I had my say and now I'm all happy happy joy joy again. Love your username btw.

    Fawful on
    hytd.jpg
  • hamburger helperhamburger helper Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Fawful wrote: »
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
    Nah I had my say and now I'm all happy happy joy joy again. Love your username btw.

    <3

    hamburger helper on
    statimg.php?id=280&theme=1
  • JimothyJimothy Not in front of the fox he's with the owlRegistered User regular
    edited March 2007
    You forgot Spore.

    That's another huge reason that one could say it is the best time to be a gamer.

    Jimothy on
  • RaslinRaslin Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    I want to hear whether you agree its the golden age or not. Is there a bunch of glaring problems I'm not seeing here?

    Raslin on
    I cant url good so add me on steam anyways steamcommunity.com/id/Raslin

    3ds friend code: 2981-6032-4118
  • DemerdarDemerdar Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Raslin wrote: »
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    I want to hear whether you agree its the golden age or not. Is there a bunch of glaring problems I'm not seeing here?

    apparently, though I can't see them.

    Demerdar on
    y6GGs3o.gif
  • IllyriaIllyria __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    Demerdar wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    I want to hear whether you agree its the golden age or not. Is there a bunch of glaring problems I'm not seeing here?

    apparently, though I can't see them.
    Well there isn't much on topic stuff being posted either, including by you.

    Illyria on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] alley.jpg
  • hamburger helperhamburger helper Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Illyria wrote: »
    Demerdar wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Fawful wrote: »
    Raslin wrote: »
    Tingle wrote: »
    Twilight Princess is hardly the best Zelda ever, it isn't even in the top 5.

    There's this thing about opinions, y'know?
    Yawn. Why have any discussions at all anymore if you're just gonna end it like this everytime someone says something different from you?

    Anyway I don't get the point of this topic. What is there to talk about? What do you wanna hear from us? Should we just hold hands and start singing halleluja?

    I want to hear whether you agree its the golden age or not. Is there a bunch of glaring problems I'm not seeing here?

    apparently, though I can't see them.
    Well there isn't much on topic stuff being posted either, including by you.

    I like where this is going

    hamburger helper on
    statimg.php?id=280&theme=1
  • Houk the NamebringerHouk the Namebringer Nipples The EchidnaRegistered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Dirty wrote: »
    Golden age of gaming? I dunno, ... isn't that something you state retroactively? And if its anything like the "ages" of comics, ... I would say we passed the golden age years ago.
    This is the only right answer so far. You simply can't say a certain period is better than any other period while you're in that period, especially for a medium as young as video games. Hell, in 75 years, people might group everything up until now into the same 'age'. The age before totally immersive VR, for example, or before true jacked-in virtual worlds.

    Great games have existed in every generation, and every person in that generation can easily make the claim that that was the best generation. Technology continues to grow, of course, but there's also still tons and tons of room for improvement on every aspect of game tech. Basically, the only thing you can say with any accuracy is 'the gaming industry continues to grow and improve'.

    Houk the Namebringer on
  • ElJeffeElJeffe Roaming the streets, waving his mod gun around.Moderator, ClubPA Mod Emeritus
    edited March 2007
    "Golden Age" is subjective. Now is no more a golden age than the 16-bit era was. Then was an awesome time to be a gamer. Now is an awesome time to be a gamer. 10 years from now will be an awesome time to be a gamer. There are stronger years and weaker years, but in general, things are good, they've been good, they'll continue to be good. About the only time I can think of when it was actually a bad time to be a gamer was during the VG Crash of the early 80's. But then a year later, the NES emerged and made things awesome again.

    ElJeffe on
    I submitted an entry to Lego Ideas, and if 10,000 people support me, it'll be turned into an actual Lego set!If you'd like to see and support my submission, follow this link.
  • slacktronslacktron Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    While everything might be golden on the home front, arcades today generally suck ass.

    slacktron on
    slacktron_zombie_fighter_sig.jpg
  • Avoid SpikesAvoid Spikes Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    This is not the golden age of gaming. During the golden age, the people rose up, and spoke with one voice, and demanded that great shrines to gaming be built, and it was so, and those shrines were called "the Arcade." Gathered in those mighty temples, we basked in the monochrome and 8-bit colored light of the CRTs and worshipped the gods called Space Invaders, Berserk, Robotron 2084, Defender, and Galaga, amid a deafening, plinking, electronic roar that would put a casino to shame. And ye, verily, our worship was fervent and caused coin shortages in Japan. And even esteemed, stuck-up, Booker Prize winning authors like Martin Amis caught "Pac-Man Fever" and wrote detailed guides on how to score highly. And you could play games, in public, with your friends, and everybody was doing it, even Walter Cronkite, and it was great. And much pizza was eaten.

    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T." And in their wrath, the gaming gods did unleash the Kool-Aid Man, and strike down the temples, leaving no stone set upon another stone, and gamers were forced to play at home, alone, on office equipment designed by people that thought "cyan" and "magenta" were useful colors.

    So passed the first golden age of gaming. And while we have survived our long exile in the CGA desert, and can once again game with our friends via the new-fangled Internet, and are enjoying a new golden age, let us not forget the mighty temples that were lost. We shall never see their like again.

    Avoid Spikes on
  • Lindsay LohanLindsay Lohan Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    It's a tough call. The 16bit era was certainly an amazing time to be a gamer, but in many ways we have it better now. We have 2 amazing handhelds competing, great PC titles like Spore, movie based games are now occasionally worth playing, great retro compilations, downloadable games, and entirely new ways to game with stylus/motion controls. However, I think we also are at a really nasty impass where budgets are skyrocketing, game machines are trying to evolve into the settop boxes originally attempted by the 3do causing higher sticker prices, and the smaller publishing houses seem to be struggling.

    I'm certain that I'll remember the Ps2/Xbox/Cube generation in the same light as the Genesis/SNES days. Just like the 16 bit era took 2d design to a next level, I think the PS2 generation did the same with 3d design. However, I'm worried that the next step is high def, huge budgets and less publishers taking chances on the niche titles that made the PS2 library so amazing.

    Lindsay Lohan on
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    It's clearly the silver age. You know, like comic books went through. "Golden age" would be the SNES/Genesis days, "silver age" would be the DC/PS2/Gamecube/Xbox days, and I guess we'll see what comes up next.

    Daedalus on
  • hamburger helperhamburger helper Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game? It's generally regarded as a shit game and it seems to be in every "top ten list of olol bad games evar," but how many have us actually experienced it?

    Maybe the learning curve was really steep.

    hamburger helper on
    statimg.php?id=280&theme=1
  • DaedalusDaedalus Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game? It's generally regarded as a shit game and it seems to be in every "top ten list of olol bad games evar," but how many have us actually experienced it?

    Maybe the learning curve was really steep.

    Let's just say that most computers can reliably emulate the friggin' Atari 2600.

    The thing is, games from that era are like silent movies: very very few of them aged well at all. ET was just worse than most, and began the tradition of movie games that suck ass.

    Daedalus on
  • hamburger helperhamburger helper Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game? It's generally regarded as a shit game and it seems to be in every "top ten list of olol bad games evar," but how many have us actually experienced it?

    Maybe the learning curve was really steep.

    Let's just say that most computers can reliably emulate the friggin' Atari 2600.

    The thing is, games from that era are like silent movies: very very few of them aged well at all. ET was just worse than most, and began the tradition of movie games that suck ass.

    I had Ghostbusters for the 2600 and quite liked it :(

    hamburger helper on
    statimg.php?id=280&theme=1
  • GoombaGoomba __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    The Golden Age comes every 5 years.

    Goomba on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Lindsay LohanLindsay Lohan Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game? It's generally regarded as a shit game and it seems to be in every "top ten list of olol bad games evar," but how many have us actually experienced it?

    Maybe the learning curve was really steep.

    I own it. I still play it actually. It's not a bad game, especially in comparison to some of the other horrid games on the 2600. However, it gets included on lists for what it represents. First of all, it was a disappointment to the people who did buy it simply because its connection to the film is pretty much limited to the use of the ET characters, the actual gameplay was pretty much nothing like the flick. Second of all, it represents the downfall of the industry as Atari manufactured far too many (more copies of the game existed than actual consoles to play it on!) and it brought about the crash of the gaming industry.

    Taken on it's own, forgetting that it's supposed to be based on the movie, and forgetting it killed an industry, it's a decent game. It's mildly frustrating, but pretty fun and unlike most Atari games actually is "beatable" and isn't just played for a high score.

    Lindsay Lohan on
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Black Isle are dead.
    Clover are dead.
    Looking Glass are dead.

    The Golden Age was over a while ago.

    All we need is Team Ico and Ice-Pick to fold, and it'll be the flaming dark age of gaming.

    Xagarath on
  • DigDug2000DigDug2000 Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Herby wrote: »
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game? It's generally regarded as a shit game and it seems to be in every "top ten list of olol bad games evar," but how many have us actually experienced it?

    Maybe the learning curve was really steep.

    I own it. I still play it actually. It's not a bad game, especially in comparison to some of the other horrid games on the 2600. However, it gets included on lists for what it represents. First of all, it was a disappointment to the people who did buy it simply because its connection to the film is pretty much limited to the use of the ET characters, the actual gameplay was pretty much nothing like the flick. Second of all, it represents the downfall of the industry as Atari manufactured far too many (more copies of the game existed than actual consoles to play it on!) and it brought about the crash of the gaming industry.

    Taken on it's own, forgetting that it's supposed to be based on the movie, and forgetting it killed an industry, it's a decent game. It's mildly frustrating, but pretty fun and unlike most Atari games actually is "beatable" and isn't just played for a high score.
    My family played the ET game religiously when it came out. PacMan too. Probably because my parents were to cheap to buy anything for more than $5. Both are regarded as these horrible horrible moments in gaming, but taken for what they are, both are playable and we had a great time with 'em. There's even a fansite for the old Atari ET game:

    http://www.randomterrain.com/atari-2600-memories-et.html

    DigDug2000 on
  • XagarathXagarath Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Xagarath wrote: »
    Black Isle are dead.
    Clover are dead.
    Looking Glass are dead.

    The Golden Age was over a while ago.

    All we need is Team Ico and Ice-Pick to fold, and it'll be the flaming dark age of gaming.

    I should add that I am a bitter, bitter man.

    Xagarath on
  • Avoid SpikesAvoid Spikes Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Herby wrote: »
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game?

    Taken on it's own, forgetting that it's supposed to be based on the movie, and forgetting it killed an industry, it's a decent game. It's mildly frustrating, but pretty fun and unlike most Atari games actually is "beatable" and isn't just played for a high score.

    I was there when it happened. There's an OK game in there somewhere, except that every time you get near it, you fall in a pit. And then another pit. And then another pit. And then you die. I might have the patience for it now, but at the time? No.

    Avoid Spikes on
  • LewiePLewieP Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    Golden Ages do not begin unless Alpha Centauri is about.

    LewieP on
  • GoombaGoomba __BANNED USERS regular
    edited March 2007
    Herby wrote: »
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game?

    Taken on it's own, forgetting that it's supposed to be based on the movie, and forgetting it killed an industry, it's a decent game. It's mildly frustrating, but pretty fun and unlike most Atari games actually is "beatable" and isn't just played for a high score.

    I was there when it happened. There's an OK game in there somewhere, except that every time you get near it, you fall in a pit. And then another pit. And then another pit. And then you die. I might have the patience for it now, but at the time? No.
    Then you get revived, and some guy in a trench coat takes you away to the pillar thing, then when you run from that the little thing at the bottom tells you that you have to go to a pillar thing, which when you go to, a guy in a trench coat takes you away then back to the pillar thing, then when you try to follow the odd sign at the bottom you fall in a pit again, then after you get out 10 attempts later you get the sign telling you to go to the pillar thing and then you turn the game off.

    Goomba on
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited March 2007
    ET was neither the first, nor last low budget piece of shit title for the Atari 2600, and that was precisely the problem.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • PheezerPheezer Registered User, ClubPA regular
    edited March 2007
    Goomba wrote: »
    Herby wrote: »
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game?

    Taken on it's own, forgetting that it's supposed to be based on the movie, and forgetting it killed an industry, it's a decent game. It's mildly frustrating, but pretty fun and unlike most Atari games actually is "beatable" and isn't just played for a high score.

    I was there when it happened. There's an OK game in there somewhere, except that every time you get near it, you fall in a pit. And then another pit. And then another pit. And then you die. I might have the patience for it now, but at the time? No.
    Then you get revived, and some guy in a trench coat takes you away to the pillar thing, then when you run from that the little thing at the bottom tells you that you have to go to a pillar thing, which when you go to, a guy in a trench coat takes you away then back to the pillar thing, then when you try to follow the odd sign at the bottom you fall in a pit again, then after you get out 10 attempts later you get the sign telling you to go to the pillar thing and then you turn the game off.

    I actually have a physical copy, and I beat it, as a kid. It wasn't ever a good game, but I was stunned when I found out exactly how lowly it was generally considered. I could swear I've played worse.

    Pheezer on
    IT'S GOT ME REACHING IN MY POCKET IT'S GOT ME FORKING OVER CASH
    CUZ THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE MIDDLE AND IT'S GIVING ME A RASH
  • deadonthestreetdeadonthestreet Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    It's clearly the silver age. You know, like comic books went through. "Golden age" would be the SNES/Genesis days, "silver age" would be the DC/PS2/Gamecube/Xbox days, and I guess we'll see what comes up next.
    Yes, this is correct.

    deadonthestreet on
  • ArdeArde Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    I guess change the thread topic to "Is this another golden age of gaming?" since the exact golden age is more or less subjective to your first venture into the world of obsession with gaming.

    So... is this another golden age of gaming or not yet for this generation?

    Arde on
    Wii code:3004 5525 7274 3361
    XBL Gametag: mailarde

    Screen Digest LOL3RZZ
  • schmadsschmads Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    SNIP the gaming gods did unleash the Kool-Aid Man, and strike down the temples, leaving no stone set upon another stone, and gamers were forced to play at home, alone, on office equipment designed by people that thought "cyan" and "magenta" were useful colors. SNIP

    That entire post was just great, thanks :)

    On topic: The "Golden Age" label is typically nostalgic in nature, and I agree with previous posters who have said that we will only be able to tell later. On top of that, it is subjective and very personal.

    My subjective and personal opinion: for me, this is currently the best time I've had gaming, with the most splendid options for gaming. I owned a GameBoy when I was younger, and after that I was a PC gamer. That was good, but I tended to focus on one game at a time (Full Throttle, Diablo, Counter-Strike, etc.). Now, I'm both a PC gamer and have a 360 and PS2. I have buckets of games that I need to play, or need to finish. There are so many great ones out there, and I am enjoying gaming more than ever. I'm no longer playing Mario Brothers on a GameBoy over and over and over because there wasn't much else for me to play. This has less to do with the industry, though, than my personal experiences.

    It seems interesting, though, that it has taken until now for me to get into console gaming. I've always had a TV and a PC, but it wasn't until I had a full-time job after graduating college that I got a PS2 and starting console-ing. FFX was what got me to finally get a PS2, long after it had come out, but the I found that there was so much more there to play. So I've played tons of wonderful PS2 games (thank god for this forum, or I would never have played Ico), and that got me interested enough in consoles to get a 360. It may not be perfect, but I have had so much fun playing some of those games. It's just great.

    So, on a scale from [glum] to [gleeful], I can certainly say that this time in my gaming life goes to 11.

    On that note, it's almost time to go play some C&C3!

    schmads on
    Battle.net/SC2: Kwisatz.868 | Steam/XBL/PSN/Gamecenter: schmads | BattleTag/D3: Schmads#1144 | Hero Academy & * With Friends: FallenKwisatz | 3DS: 4356-0128-9671
  • DeVryGuyDeVryGuy Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    But lo! Then did Atari blaspheme and anger the gods and createth the sack of crap called "E.T."

    I'm not trying to be an ass, but how many of us actually played this game? It's generally regarded as a shit game and it seems to be in every "top ten list of olol bad games evar," but how many have us actually experienced it?

    Maybe the learning curve was really steep.

    I played it a few years ago, and yes, it is quite bad.

    DeVryGuy on
    Pokemon Diamond: 5369 6910 9799
    FFTSig.jpg
  • augustaugust where you come from is gone Registered User regular
    edited March 2007
    For me, the Golden Age was back when Tribes and Thief were coming out.

    august on
Sign In or Register to comment.