The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.

Birth control: implant?

Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
Got a pretty new infant, and much as I love her, I'm 99.98% sure I don't ever want another one (long story short, pregnancy and delivery were a solid block of Hell). Looking over non-permanent options better than what we were using before - condoms - because surgery seems too drastic and/or expensive before we're 100% sure about it; I suck at taking pills consistently, one of my friends had a bad experience with the patch, and Depo shots sound great except for the bone loss. :o It looks like my insurance would cover the implant--has anyone ever tried it? I plan to ask my doc about it at my followup visit next week, but the pros versus the cons look so awesome that I'm wondering what the catch is, besides the cost.

«1

Posts

  • ceresceres When the last moon is cast over the last star of morning And the future has past without even a last desperate warningRegistered User, Moderator Mod Emeritus
    First, congratulations! Mine is 4 1/2 months and he is amazing. I want to show you a million videos and talk about babies now, but I will spare you.

    Well, you can read the wiki article as well as I can (I assume). You're totally right about the pros vs cons unless you end up being in that statistically insignificant group, and then some of those cons are pretty big. I don't know anyone personally who's had problems with this implant, but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen. I used a hormonal method when I was younger that had a small risk of weight gain, and I really put on some pounds then. Also if you're breastfeeding don't forget to read the part about that, depending on how long ago your daughter was born.

    And it seems like all is dying, and would leave the world to mourn
  • Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
    Facebook has inured me to baby pictures/videos on an epic scale--mine is the fifth baby born in our extended family this year. :D

    Reading is indeed a good place to start. I just haven't talked to anyone who's actually used it, and it sounds so perfect that I'm wondering why no one uses it. Again, probably the cost.

  • flowerhoneyflowerhoney Registered User regular
    edited September 2013
    The implant or an IUD if your insurance covers that are both good options!

    I've got the implant right now (I started about 4 months ago) and I haven't had any serious issues. BUT I have had a lot of spotty bleeding in between periods which, lemme tell ya, is kind of annoying. Its pretty light though so its not the worst thing ever. Also it made my acne a lot worse, the implant only pumps out progesterone (not estrogen) which isn't great for bad skin.

    The first 3 - 6 months is kind of the trial period, so I'm not really in the most stable phase. Its possible that those side effects will go away as my body gets totally used to it, or they might last during the entire usage which would be kind of a bummer. There's no real way to tell sadly. With the exception of the two cons I mentioned, I think the implant is pretty good! Its nice to not worry about taking something every day or month, and you pretty much never notice its there unless you make an active effort to touch it

    I think the cost is the major drawback for most people. Which is too bad! Although again, if your insurance covers IUDs then they're also a great option. I've also had one of those but unfortunately I'm part of a very small minority who IUD doesn't work for. I've got a friend who has an IUD with pretty much zero complaints

    flowerhoney on
  • Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
    I admit, the lure of a 20-30% chance of no period is a big thing for me. :P I also thought about an IUD, but the insertion process for the implant sounds waaaaay better. As for skin, I've got problematic eczema, but not much acne. Hmmmmmmm

  • flowerhoneyflowerhoney Registered User regular
    Yeah I'll be honest, the IUD insertion was PAINFUL. The cervix does not like opening up, it very much likes to not be opened. Even after being numbed up... But it was a pretty quick process (couldn't have lasted more than 10 minutes) and the physician did a great job making me feel like I was a champ lol. Afterwards I had some cramping for the first week but nothing ibuprofen couldn't handle.

    The implant insertion was less painful, since the numbing shot did its job. During the healing process (which I'd say took a few days) there wasn't a lot of pain, but occasionally I would get the weirdest/most uncomfortable pinching sensation in my arm. Its hard to describe, but again, nothing ibuprofen can't fix. I still have a very small scar at the base of the insertion.

    I'm sure your doctor can let you more about the specific pro and cons for you personally!

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    IUDs also run a rather large risk of perforation, so keep that in mind when you make your decision. My girlfriend's sister uses the implant, and she's never complained.

    If it were me, I'd probably opt for the implant.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • zagdrobzagdrob Registered User regular
    I know that the Depo shots worked pretty well for my wife before we were married / getting pregnant. She was on them for years and never had any complications / issues. After our daughter was born she had a DEXA scan and her bone density was excellent - it was attributed to her mixing up cardio and strength training in her exercise routine.

    She's on the pill now, because we're at that 99.9% sure we aren't having another baby, but also don't want to have to wait 6 months to a year (for the Depo to get out of her system) if we change our mind, and she's very uncomfortable with the potential pain / complications of an IUD or implant.

    If bone loss is the only reason you are worried about a Depo shot, you can talk to your doctor about getting a DEXA scan so you have a baseline for your risk of osteoporosis.

  • Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
    zagdrob wrote: »
    If bone loss is the only reason you are worried about a Depo shot, you can talk to your doctor about getting a DEXA scan so you have a baseline for your risk of osteoporosis.

    Huh. I wouldn't have thought of that. I have some family history of osteoporosis, so it'd be good to get an idea of that anyway.

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Yeah definitely consider including strength training in your future there, because regardless of the shot, it's going to happen if you have a family history of it (lack of estrogen after menopause causes osteoporosis).

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    The truth, as I'm sure you read, is there really is no good solution without potential complications or failure rates. You're having to force the body to do something it is fundamentally opposed to.

    The pill is a great solution if you can be perfect at it, but not so great if you can't, as you said.

    The lowest complication, best solution I ended up on after all my research was being confident enough to take the plunge on a vasectomy. Surgical complications are minimal, and as long as you confirm that it took it's got a really, really low failure rate.

    What is this I don't even.
  • DisruptedCapitalistDisruptedCapitalist I swear! Registered User regular
    As a man who had a vasectomy, I can say that is was easy and cheap. Tell your man to man up and get it done and stop putting you through painful BS just for his enjoyment. (Unless you think that 0.02% desire to have another is more like 2%. Believe me, round about 1 and 1/2 years old you think they're so damn adorable you'll want another one. )

    "Simple, real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." -Mustrum Ridcully in Terry Pratchett's Hogfather p. 142 (HarperPrism 1996)
  • jamesrajamesra Chicago, ILRegistered User regular
    I know a great many Ob/Gyns through my wife; three or four of the women she went to med school with ended up in that field. ALL of them have gone for an IUD rather than an implant. My (limited) understanding is that it can be somewhat challenging to insert for some women if they have never been through pregnancy, but that isn't an issue for you. I figure that is at least something of an endorsement.

    "Everything in war is very simple, but the simplest thing is difficult. The difficulties accumulate and end by producing a kind of friction. . . . This tremendous friction . . . is everywhere in contact with chance, and brings about effects that cannot be measured, just because they are largely due to chance" Carl Von Clausezwitz. (1832),
  • UsagiUsagi Nah Registered User regular
    bowen wrote: »
    IUDs also run a rather large risk of perforation, so keep that in mind when you make your decision. My girlfriend's sister uses the implant, and she's never complained.

    If it were me, I'd probably opt for the implant.

    Ok no

    This is a myth

    The risk of perforation is something like 0.2% and the vast majority of those happen during insertion

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited September 2013
    Usagi wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    IUDs also run a rather large risk of perforation, so keep that in mind when you make your decision. My girlfriend's sister uses the implant, and she's never complained.

    If it were me, I'd probably opt for the implant.

    Ok no

    This is a myth

    The risk of perforation is something like 0.2% and the vast majority of those happen during insertion

    Well, that's a pretty large risk compared to no perforation.

    There's also some lawsuits going around for mirena (hormonal IUD) if I recall, so, best to avoid it in general unless you have a preference.

    Edit: Keep in mind if you do happen to have shitty odds, and it does expulse, perforate, or migrate... that could mean expensive surgery.

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • alltheolivealltheolive Registered User regular
    The entirely-unsafe-for-work Oh Joy Sex Toy has run a comic by Lucy Knisley about the implant (you can find it by searching for "oh joy sex toy implant"). Nuvaring might have a similar set-and-forget appeal, if the patch seems like almost what you want but too sticky.

  • UsagiUsagi Nah Registered User regular
    bowen wrote: »
    Usagi wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    IUDs also run a rather large risk of perforation, so keep that in mind when you make your decision. My girlfriend's sister uses the implant, and she's never complained.

    If it were me, I'd probably opt for the implant.

    Ok no

    This is a myth

    The risk of perforation is something like 0.2% and the vast majority of those happen during insertion

    Well, that's a pretty large risk compared to no perforation.

    There's also some lawsuits going around for mirena (hormonal IUD) if I recall, so, best to avoid it in general unless you have a preference.

    Edit: Keep in mind if you do happen to have shitty odds, and it does expulse, perforate, or migrate... that could mean expensive surgery.

    Dude seriously

    You are scare mongering and perpetuating misinformation about a very safe, very effective method of birth control

    Quit it

  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    edited September 2013
    There's no scare mongering and perpetuating anything. It's relatively safe and very effective. Compared to implants, BCP, or condoms, it is probably the least safe depending on proper usage (and which you choose, copper IUD are slightly safer than hormonal IUDs because of what hormones do for clotting and all that).

    I am advising that, unless one has a preference for IUD, it is probably silly to even contemplate it compared to the alternatives because of the higher risks they carry.

    Sure the risk is low, 1 out of 500-1000 or so have complications, and sure, they often only happen during implantation, but the issues that do occur are costly and are not always easy peasy.

    I'm glad you or your loved ones have had success, this is not the case for everyone. Weigh your options and make good choices, not because someone in a message board thinks they're safe because "well you could win the lotto too!"

    bowen on
    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    edited September 2013
    If you are concerned about the safety of any given method of contraception you should talk to your gyno. I was concerned about my wife getting the IUD and several of the doctors and nurses at the practice assured me that for female modes of contraception the IUD is the safest and least prone to side effects as compared to hormone-based BC. I specifically asked about perforation risk and the doctor who was to do the implantation looked at me like I didn't know what I was talking about (granted, I didn't).

    Djeet on
  • DarkewolfeDarkewolfe Registered User regular
    bowen wrote: »
    There's no scare mongering and perpetuating anything. It's relatively safe and very effective. Compared to implants, BCP, or condoms, it is probably the least safe depending on proper usage (and which you choose, copper IUD are slightly safer than hormonal IUDs because of what hormones do for clotting and all that).

    I am advising that, unless one has a preference for IUD, it is probably silly to even contemplate it compared to the alternatives because of the higher risks they carry.

    Sure the risk is low, 1 out of 500-1000 or so have complications, and sure, they often only happen during implantation, but the issues that do occur are costly and are not always easy peasy.

    I'm glad you or your loved ones have had success, this is not the case for everyone. Weigh your options and make good choices, not because someone in a message board thinks they're safe because "well you could win the lotto too!"

    The pill carries higher rates of cancer, mental illness and lowered sex drive.

    You're scaremongering, because the IUD is not "silly to contemplate."

    What is this I don't even.
  • bowenbowen Sup? Registered User regular
    Darkewolfe wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    There's no scare mongering and perpetuating anything. It's relatively safe and very effective. Compared to implants, BCP, or condoms, it is probably the least safe depending on proper usage (and which you choose, copper IUD are slightly safer than hormonal IUDs because of what hormones do for clotting and all that).

    I am advising that, unless one has a preference for IUD, it is probably silly to even contemplate it compared to the alternatives because of the higher risks they carry.

    Sure the risk is low, 1 out of 500-1000 or so have complications, and sure, they often only happen during implantation, but the issues that do occur are costly and are not always easy peasy.

    I'm glad you or your loved ones have had success, this is not the case for everyone. Weigh your options and make good choices, not because someone in a message board thinks they're safe because "well you could win the lotto too!"

    The pill carries higher rates of cancer, mental illness and lowered sex drive.

    You're scaremongering, because the IUD is not "silly to contemplate."

    There are multiple types of pills and multiple types of IUDs. The hormonal IUDs carry the same risk as many of the BCP pills. There are some that are lower in risk (though mental illness is a new one to me, stroke though, for sure). But let me put it this way, BCP raises risk for some cancer but lowers it for others. Copper IUDs are different, of course.

    Trying to paint all IUDs as equals or all BCPs as equals is considerably more likely to be scaremongering.

    Doctors that don't know perforation are a bit weird off, though. They still happen, regardless of how rare it is.

    Ultimately OP needs to decide what is best for them and not what we're all saying. But to paint this as scaremongering is a bit strange.

    not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    What about birth control for him?

  • flowerhoneyflowerhoney Registered User regular
    edited September 2013
    bowen wrote: »

    Well, that's a pretty large risk compared to no perforation.

    There's also some lawsuits going around for mirena (hormonal IUD) if I recall, so, best to avoid it in general unless you have a preference.

    Edit: Keep in mind if you do happen to have shitty odds, and it does expulse, perforate, or migrate... that could mean expensive surgery.

    Every birth control method has a chance, however small, of going horribly wrong. I'm sure even condoms have a way of going terribly awry somehow!

    We all take those chances when we use birth control and your doctor will fill you in on all possible side effects and risks before performing anything. In fact, for both IUD and implants I had to sign a form stating that I understood the procedure and the risks involved.

    Your doctor will know your personal medical history best, but in general both methods are safe. Again, every method has its own potential issues and you can decide for yourself what you think.

    flowerhoney on
  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    Also it's always a good idea to double down on birth control, y'know, if it's feasible. As @flowerhoney said, nothing is perfect so..

  • Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
    edited September 2013
    Birth control for him is a few years down the road, 'cause we're not 100% yet that we absolutely never want any other children, ever.

    I'm actually of both schools of thoughts on IUDs: they're unfairly maligned in the U.S. because of the Dalkon Shield, and I know intellectually that modern ones are really quite safe, effective, etc.--but I can't get over the thought of that tiny percentage that bad shit might happen, plus the thought of someone all up in there with the insertion so soon after having the baby makes me want to staple my legs shut. The bad shit that might happen with the implant seems much more manageable, and quick and easy to remove if I should ever change my mind.

    Aoi Tsuki on
  • Magus`Magus` The fun has been DOUBLED! Registered User regular
    I think there are BC for men that aren't permanent. I'm not 100% on this because I'm unlovable and birth control doesn't affect me.

  • flowerhoneyflowerhoney Registered User regular
    Hey if you're sold on the implant, there's nothing wrong with that. Its a really good option!

    Its secretly really fun to touch the implant in your arm, or watch people freak out when they touch it for the first time =3
    Cant do that with an IUD! lol

  • Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
    There are several pills, vaccines, etc. being tried out for men, but for the moment, it's either condoms or a vasectomy.

    And for the record, now that I think about it, I may go look for a second doc opinion whatever my OB says, because I'm still pissed at her for not checking what size the kid was before I delivered her...8 pounds and 9 ounces. :/ Not the kind of thing I wanted to be a surprise.

  • Mom2KatMom2Kat Registered User regular
    8lbs 9oz is not that big. Even if you had an ultrasound even the night before it would probably been off. My daughter had an estimate of 7lbs 15oz the night before she was born and was 8lbs 7oz the next afternoon when she was born. Eactly 1/2 pound off and only 2oz less than your girl.

    Not that I know your birth circumstances but it sounds like you had a hard time and a doctor who didn't listen. If it is bothering you at all I would talk with your public health nurse about how you feel about your birth. I had some trauma after my son due to him being born at home by accident and my own brain issues. His birth was actually not the problem mostly my brain issues. Or even shoot me a pm I love to listen and chat.

    As for birth control talk with your doctor and do what you feel comfortable with. For me I am probably going to have a tubal since I have a bad gene that doesn't play well with boy babies.

  • CalicaCalica Registered User regular
    bowen wrote: »
    Darkewolfe wrote: »
    bowen wrote: »
    There's no scare mongering and perpetuating anything. It's relatively safe and very effective. Compared to implants, BCP, or condoms, it is probably the least safe depending on proper usage (and which you choose, copper IUD are slightly safer than hormonal IUDs because of what hormones do for clotting and all that).

    I am advising that, unless one has a preference for IUD, it is probably silly to even contemplate it compared to the alternatives because of the higher risks they carry.

    Sure the risk is low, 1 out of 500-1000 or so have complications, and sure, they often only happen during implantation, but the issues that do occur are costly and are not always easy peasy.

    I'm glad you or your loved ones have had success, this is not the case for everyone. Weigh your options and make good choices, not because someone in a message board thinks they're safe because "well you could win the lotto too!"

    The pill carries higher rates of cancer, mental illness and lowered sex drive.

    You're scaremongering, because the IUD is not "silly to contemplate."

    There are multiple types of pills and multiple types of IUDs. The hormonal IUDs carry the same risk as many of the BCP pills. There are some that are lower in risk (though mental illness is a new one to me, stroke though, for sure). But let me put it this way, BCP raises risk for some cancer but lowers it for others. Copper IUDs are different, of course.
    Hormonal IUDs have a much lower dose of hormones than any BCP pill, because it's delivered locally. As my doctor explained to me, with a hormonal IUD, the hormones are at a low enough level that the extra doesn't even show up in a blood test.

  • DjeetDjeet Registered User regular
    Yes, there is a huge difference in amount of hormone and specific method of delivery when it is an implanatble device sitting on the cervix that is good for 5 years vs a pill that is ingested on a monthly basis.

  • TabooPhantasyTabooPhantasy Registered User regular
    Magus` wrote: »
    I think there are BC for men that aren't permanent. I'm not 100% on this because I'm unlovable and birth control doesn't affect me.
    I read about this a few months ago and thought the article had mentioned it is still in the clinical trials. (Note: I did not just go hunting to confirm this, though.)

    I have been on hormonal birth control for over 10 years at this point. At first it was the pill, and then the ring, which was WAY more convenient. I was actually encouraged by my doctor when I got the ring to just skip my period all together. I did several times (like if I was going on vacation and didn't want to have to deal with it). A couple of years ago I started thinking about getting an IUD and after talking to a lot of friends who had gotten them and talking to my doctor, I decided to go with Paraguard, which has no hormones at all and is designed to stay in for approx 10 years (versus 5 for Mirena).
    I had it inserted back in July and, as a previous poster stated, the process is PAINFUL. I was in agony that night and for most of the next day, despite pumping myself full of ibuprofen. Fortunately, the pain subsided as the doctor said it would, and I've been doing well since then. I get slightly worse cramps than I did when I was using hormones, but nothing that I would call debilitating. My period schedule is a bit erratic, but I was told to expect that for the next several months.

    ~Taboo
    BH11Fnk.png
  • spool32spool32 Contrary Library Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited September 2013
    Magus` wrote: »
    What about birth control for him?

    Frankly, the best option in this situation is for her husband to get a vasectomy.

    It's easy, cheap, quick, comes with only a few days of discomfort, doesn't affect sex drive, doesn't affect mood, doesn't change volume of ejaculate or its color, taste, or consistency, and doesn't require the woman screw about with pills, hormones, more serious surgery, or taking any risks whatsoever.

    Also unprotected monogamous sex is incredible after a vasectomy takes away the fear of pregnancy.

    spool32 on
  • spool32spool32 Contrary Library Registered User, Transition Team regular
    Oh, also.

    I'd advise you not to make any permanent decisions until you're sure you aren't going to go through PPD. If you're breastfeeding exclusively you've got a couple months at minimum where you aren't going to have to worry about birth control anyway.

  • DisruptedCapitalistDisruptedCapitalist I swear! Registered User regular
    spool32 wrote: »
    Oh, also.

    I'd advise you not to make any permanent decisions until you're sure you aren't going to go through PPD. If you're breastfeeding exclusively you've got a couple months at minimum where you aren't going to have to worry about birth control anyway.

    FWIW, that method didn't work for my sister-in-law who had 2 kids within 11 months of each other.

    "Simple, real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." -Mustrum Ridcully in Terry Pratchett's Hogfather p. 142 (HarperPrism 1996)
  • spool32spool32 Contrary Library Registered User, Transition Team regular
    edited September 2013
    spool32 wrote: »
    Oh, also.

    I'd advise you not to make any permanent decisions until you're sure you aren't going to go through PPD. If you're breastfeeding exclusively you've got a couple months at minimum where you aren't going to have to worry about birth control anyway.

    FWIW, that method didn't work for my sister-in-law who had 2 kids within 11 months of each other.

    Exclusive is the operative term here. Only breastfeeding, no supplemental anything.

    But yeah, nothing is foolproof.

    spool32 on
  • JuliusJulius Captain of Serenity on my shipRegistered User regular
    spool32 wrote: »
    Magus` wrote: »
    What about birth control for him?

    Frankly, the best option in this situation is for her husband to get a vasectomy.

    It's easy, cheap, quick, comes with only a few days of discomfort, doesn't affect sex drive, doesn't affect mood, doesn't change volume of ejaculate or its color, taste, or consistency, and doesn't require the woman screw about with pills, hormones, more serious surgery, or taking any risks whatsoever.

    Also unprotected monogamous sex is incredible after a vasectomy takes away the fear of pregnancy.

    If the uncertainty over having more children is in the "maybe in the next two or three years" zone then a vasectomy might be a bit too much. It's reversible but not easily and cheap. It's probably wiser to try the implant or UID for at least a few years and then reconsider the vasectomy.

    But yes a vasectomy is basically the shiznit if you're certain about the never having children.

  • SmallLadySmallLady Registered User regular
    I have the Gynefix IUD (frameless) which I'm pretty happy with. It's non-hormonal and I have less cramps and a lighter flow with it.

    The insertion does hurt a lot. Take a couple days off for that, but after that you're fine. Some people experience light cramping until their next period, but after that nothing.

    http://www.willowclinic.ca/?page_id=329

    If you can get it your area, I highly recommend it.

    "we're just doing what smalllady told us to do" - @Heels
  • Aoi TsukiAoi Tsuki Registered User regular
    Welp, my insurance covered it 100%, so I went in today: a poke for the anesthetic, a weird wriggling feeling for insertion, and I was done. (That's what she said?) We'll see how it works.

  • YoSoyTheWalrusYoSoyTheWalrus Registered User regular
    Julius wrote: »
    spool32 wrote: »
    Magus` wrote: »
    What about birth control for him?

    Frankly, the best option in this situation is for her husband to get a vasectomy.

    It's easy, cheap, quick, comes with only a few days of discomfort, doesn't affect sex drive, doesn't affect mood, doesn't change volume of ejaculate or its color, taste, or consistency, and doesn't require the woman screw about with pills, hormones, more serious surgery, or taking any risks whatsoever.

    Also unprotected monogamous sex is incredible after a vasectomy takes away the fear of pregnancy.

    If the uncertainty over having more children is in the "maybe in the next two or three years" zone then a vasectomy might be a bit too much. It's reversible but not easily and cheap. It's probably wiser to try the implant or UID for at least a few years and then reconsider the vasectomy.

    But yes a vasectomy is basically the shiznit if you're certain about the never having children.

    I want them to hurry up and put Vasalgel on the market. Or at least start clinical trials and lemme in.

    tumblr_mvlywyLVys1qigwg9o1_250.png
  • Ana NgAna Ng Registered User regular
    Aoi Tsuki wrote: »
    Welp, my insurance covered it 100%, so I went in today: a poke for the anesthetic, a weird wriggling feeling for insertion, and I was done. (That's what she said?) We'll see how it works.

    Was going to type out a big thing, but glad I scrolled down first and saw that you did decided to have it done.

    I've had mine for about a month, month and a half, and I was just thinking last night how utterly pleased I am that I decided to get it. I've gone through the patch, ring, pill, diaphragm, and finally the implant. My arm felt like crap for about a week, but then at the end of the week cleared up really quickly all of a sudden and now I don't even think about it.

    I also experienced some acne flair up and moodiness at the beginning, but that has now passed and I'm not 100% sure it was caused by the implant or not. YMMV.

    Good luck and I hope it works out for you!

Sign In or Register to comment.