The new forums will be named Coin Return (based on the most recent vote)! You can check on the status and timeline of the transition to the new forums here.
The Guiding Principles and New Rules document is now in effect.
I would definitely go and fight it on those grounds. Keep in mind though, most judges are not sympathetic to people who are caught speeding. That said, the circumstances of this seem a little fishy, and like the cop is making up speeds.
Bring in your witness, it cannot hurt your case to have someone agreeing with you. Also, find data about your car's capabilities through a reliable source (manufacturer's manual, etc.) if you intend to use its capabilities as a defense. Worst case scenario, you still have to pay the ticket.
Can I take this to court and support my case with the information above and plead not guilty and say he had no evidence?
Officer testimony is evidence, so don't say that.
Bowen is right. Points are involved. Talk to a lawyer in your area that specializes in traffic stuff. It'll cost more upfront, but save you huge in the long run.
I think the argument of "the cop didn't show me the radar speed, so he could be lying" is a shaky one. Good luck trying to argue that LEO is crooked, or bad at his job. Also, as has been told to me, very few states require that an LEO show you your speed if you request it. Who knows, maybe your state laws require it. Something to look into. I'm not a lawyer, and by all means get one.
Considering this has the ramification of points on your license, you might want to seek the counsel of a lawyer.
He probably caught you going 45 in a 30 and bumped it up to 50.5 then rounded for the sake of a ticket.
Dunno, depends on the jurisdiction. Here in Massachusetts most lawyers hate doing traffic tickets. The trick though is simply to show up, since traffic tickets are managed by a magistrate (though you can ask to go before a judge) they'll often just knock off part of the penalty just for showing up. Of course it still will go on your record though.
What jurisdiction are you in anyway?
"Simple, real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time." -Mustrum Ridcully in Terry Pratchett's Hogfather p. 142 (HarperPrism 1996)
Dunno, depends on the jurisdiction. Here in Massachusetts most lawyers hate doing traffic tickets.
The reason you get a local lawyer that specializes in traffic tickets is they are likely to have a working relationship with the dude that has judicial discretion.
I think the argument of "the cop didn't show me the radar speed, so he could be lying" is a shaky one. Good luck trying to argue that LEO is crooked, or bad at his job. Also, as has been told to me, very few states require that an LEO show you your speed if you request it. Who knows, maybe your state laws require it. Something to look into. I'm not a lawyer, and by all means get one.
Considering this has the ramification of points on your license, you might want to seek the counsel of a lawyer.
He probably caught you going 45 in a 30 and bumped it up to 50.5 then rounded for the sake of a ticket.
He could write you a ticket for going 31 in a 30. Don't really see the difference here.
There really isn't.
I was just arguing away how he could never reach those speeds in that short of time with 4 cyls. Some states immediately throw out tickets like 31 in a 30 because they're silly.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
Dunno, depends on the jurisdiction. Here in Massachusetts most lawyers hate doing traffic tickets.
The reason you get a local lawyer that specializes in traffic tickets is they are likely to have a working relationship with the dude that has judicial discretion.
And there's no guarantee that the penalty will be removed.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
0
Sir CarcassI have been shown the end of my worldRound Rock, TXRegistered Userregular
Do you know how fast you were going?
If not, it will be hard to argue that you weren't speeding.
0
zepherinRussian warship, go fuck yourselfRegistered Userregular
I would suggest fighting every ticket. There is no incentive not too, and often times the DA offers you a deal.
most places, if you have a clean record, will knock off points for non-egregious violations.
As far as the validity of his radar, as long as he signs something saying the gun has been calibrated properly, they aren't really going to discount his testimony. Maybe take video of driving on that road, if you can show how it's not possible to get to that speed? i don't know how admissible that is.
A lawyer would probably use some law to test the validity of the calibration, for instance, though, and get it thrown on a technicality if it was indeed off.
not a doctor, not a lawyer, examples I use may not be fully researched so don't take out of context plz, don't @ me
0
Deebaseron my way to work in a suit and a tieAhhhh...come on fucking guyRegistered Userregular
I would suggest fighting every ticket. There is no incentive not too, and often times the DA offers you a deal.
It all depends on how much your time is worth. If you have to take a day off to roll the dice, you may very well be better served paying the ticket and getting on with your life. On the other hand, if you're a college student, your time probably aint worth dick and the long term cost of the insurance increase can be burdensome like whoa.
I don't know about your state, but in Illinois it is possible to reply to a ticket and get into a program that lets you take an online course to avoid getting points on your license or suffering increased insurance costs. You should check if that is the case. In your shoes I might be tempted to fight, but I have significantly more resources than a college student the kind of turn of mind that relishes the attempt for its own sake. In your case if they offer an alternative it might be the safest and cheapest bet. If you are mostly animated by a sense of injustice, fire away. But getting a lawyer can get expensive fast and while it might (MIGHT) save you money in the long run my experience is that when your young it is more important to watch your short term debts.
If you do not have a diversion option (if you select that, you would be sacrificing the court option), do go to the court. In all of the jurisdictions I've ever lived if the cop doesn't show up for the court date then the ticket is voided for lack of evidence. In many departments, especially urban ones, that is usually understood as a cost of doing business and not worth the expense as most cops get either OT or at least extra pay for court time. It certainly cannot hurt you.
"Everything in war is very simple, but the simplest thing is difficult. The difficulties accumulate and end by producing a kind of friction. . . . This tremendous friction . . . is everywhere in contact with chance, and brings about effects that cannot be measured, just because they are largely due to chance" Carl Von Clausezwitz. (1832),
Okay so I was pulled over for speeding at my college today, and the cop stated I was going 51 in a 30. Now this road has two stop signs and a yield sign on it and I drive a small four cylinder car, I simply cannot hit that speed in that little time.
1) Unless you've tried, you dont know that. 2) Ive seen many people in court pull the "Theres no way my car can do that" it has never helped them/
Once pulled over I said nothing that would be an admission of guilt and I also had passenger who could be a witness should that be needed, once he gave me the ticket I asked if I could see the radar that he said he had got me with and he replied that he didn't lock the radar. Can I take this to court and support my case with the information above and plead not guilty and say he had no evidence?
I'm not a lawyer, this isnt legal advice.
Many departments, by policy, do not use lock features. Theres no reason to. If you enter my radar at 51, and I lock it, it may not display you going 52, 53, 54, etc. This varies depending on radar model and how it displays of course.
As far as the no evidence thing, again, no. If i'm a cop and I see your friend punch you in the face, I can arrest him. Even if you don't have marks, I can testify that I witnessed it. Thats what the officer is doing in court. He witnessed your driving and measured your speed by a device hes trained on.
So whats going on that causes this disagreement? At the basic level, there are 4 possibilities.
1) You were speeding and didn't realize it
2) You know you were speeding and are intentionally lying
3) The officer thought you were speeding and is honestly mistaken
4) The officer knows you weren't speeding and is intentionally lying
2 and 4 fairly unlikely. You'd have no reason to lie to us, and most people plainly dont speed intentionally. In most states the law enforcement agencies dont get any cut of the tickets they right, and gain literally nothing for writing them, its just their job. Even if there was a gain for doing it, theres about 3,000 traffic/vehicle violations, not alot of need to make it up. Writing tickets are like shooting fish in a barrel.
This brings us to 1 and 3. I have a bias here. I've worked law enforcement for years, and have written thousands of tickets. I, and every other officer I know, have let go tons of drivers that we were 99% sure were the one speeding/violating, because 99% isnt 100%. Its not worth it. If i'm ever caught lying, or am proven by some other means that i goofed up like that, it can mean my career, literally. An officer caught lying on the stand can have that previous dishonesty used against him in court, his testimony is invalid, he cant do his job.
Traffic judges spend all day hearing about how its everyone elses fault but the defendant, how its impossible, the cops out to get him, the cops incompetent, etc. Most judges appreciate it when someone says, "I didnt think I was going that fast, I didnt even think my car could go that fast, heres a copy of my driving record, I'd like to go to driving school if I can to help keep this off my record. I apologize."
You generally want to dress nice, be polite and professional, and take responsibility. You admitted you weren't looking at your speedometer, I doubt your friend was either. Some states accept speedometer calibrations as an acceptable defense. If you get your speedometer tested and it reads 45 when you're going 50, thats a pretty big deal.
Talk to your insurance, see how much points will hurt you, see how much an attorney is. It may be worth it, it may not. Depends on state and insurance company.
Keep in mind that none of us are a good source of information, and laws always vary by location.
The following is how I handle them.
I have never paid a dime in legal fees.
I also only have 2 points on my NY drivers licence for 6 tickets over the last 2 years.
( I should probably have more )
Two of the speeding tickets I was given, were pushed down to traffic violations,
and 4 were dismissed.
What worked for me was writing the district attorney, or their assistant about the incident in a typed letter,
explaining that I was a broke eagle scout college student in the army, with good moral values, and asking for radar calibrations.
Surprisingly the cops not tuning their radars often enough got me completely off the hook twice.
Like CangoFett said, showing up is half the battle.
How you dress is dependent on the image you want to provide.
You either want to look like a homeless man with no money, or somebody that takes this seriously.
Showing up like you would to class in bejeweled jeans and a star wars t-shirt is a big no no.
If it gets to it, and a set court date takes place, (at least for here) the cop has to be present or the charges are also dropped.
Which they may or may not even show up for. (this also happened to me once)
EDIT: And in case your wondering, the other dismissed ticket was thanks to having connections with the judge.
WiFiPunk on
PAX East 2015 Status: Badge[X] Hotel[X] Car[X] Vacation[X]
Some jurisdictions will tack on court fees to your ticket, making it more expensive, if they feel you were being frivolous in fighting it. Doesn't sound like that would really happen here, but IANAL, so it's just worth looking into.
I've prosecuted traffic tickets. Here's my two cents.
Similar to most everyone else in the thread, consider getting a lawyer. The cost of a lawyer will likely end up costing you less than the increase in your insurance premiums if that ticket gets put on your record.
Second, if the lawyer is experienced in traffic tickets, they are probably not going to actually get the judge/magistrate to throw out the ticket. What they are more likely to do is chat up the city/county prosecutor who is in charge of prosecuting the tickets and get a plea deal to change the speeding ticket (which is a moving violation) to a charge that is not a moving violation such as expired license tabs (which doesn't raise insurance rates). But there is going to be a price, and any prosecutor worth their salt will make you 1) agree to a higher fine than you're paying now, and 2) agree to some sort of defensive driving course.
While it will suck to pay a higher fine, as well as pay the lawyer, you'll still save hundreds, if not thousands of dollars on your insurance as a result.
Posts
Bring in your witness, it cannot hurt your case to have someone agreeing with you. Also, find data about your car's capabilities through a reliable source (manufacturer's manual, etc.) if you intend to use its capabilities as a defense. Worst case scenario, you still have to pay the ticket.
He probably caught you going 45 in a 30 and bumped it up to 50.5 then rounded for the sake of a ticket.
Officer testimony is evidence, so don't say that.
Bowen is right. Points are involved. Talk to a lawyer in your area that specializes in traffic stuff. It'll cost more upfront, but save you huge in the long run.
He could write you a ticket for going 31 in a 30. Don't really see the difference here.
Dunno, depends on the jurisdiction. Here in Massachusetts most lawyers hate doing traffic tickets. The trick though is simply to show up, since traffic tickets are managed by a magistrate (though you can ask to go before a judge) they'll often just knock off part of the penalty just for showing up. Of course it still will go on your record though.
What jurisdiction are you in anyway?
The reason you get a local lawyer that specializes in traffic tickets is they are likely to have a working relationship with the dude that has judicial discretion.
There really isn't.
I was just arguing away how he could never reach those speeds in that short of time with 4 cyls. Some states immediately throw out tickets like 31 in a 30 because they're silly.
And there's no guarantee that the penalty will be removed.
If not, it will be hard to argue that you weren't speeding.
As far as the validity of his radar, as long as he signs something saying the gun has been calibrated properly, they aren't really going to discount his testimony. Maybe take video of driving on that road, if you can show how it's not possible to get to that speed? i don't know how admissible that is.
It all depends on how much your time is worth. If you have to take a day off to roll the dice, you may very well be better served paying the ticket and getting on with your life. On the other hand, if you're a college student, your time probably aint worth dick and the long term cost of the insurance increase can be burdensome like whoa.
If you do not have a diversion option (if you select that, you would be sacrificing the court option), do go to the court. In all of the jurisdictions I've ever lived if the cop doesn't show up for the court date then the ticket is voided for lack of evidence. In many departments, especially urban ones, that is usually understood as a cost of doing business and not worth the expense as most cops get either OT or at least extra pay for court time. It certainly cannot hurt you.
I'm not a lawyer, this isnt legal advice.
Many departments, by policy, do not use lock features. Theres no reason to. If you enter my radar at 51, and I lock it, it may not display you going 52, 53, 54, etc. This varies depending on radar model and how it displays of course.
As far as the no evidence thing, again, no. If i'm a cop and I see your friend punch you in the face, I can arrest him. Even if you don't have marks, I can testify that I witnessed it. Thats what the officer is doing in court. He witnessed your driving and measured your speed by a device hes trained on.
So whats going on that causes this disagreement? At the basic level, there are 4 possibilities.
1) You were speeding and didn't realize it
2) You know you were speeding and are intentionally lying
3) The officer thought you were speeding and is honestly mistaken
4) The officer knows you weren't speeding and is intentionally lying
2 and 4 fairly unlikely. You'd have no reason to lie to us, and most people plainly dont speed intentionally. In most states the law enforcement agencies dont get any cut of the tickets they right, and gain literally nothing for writing them, its just their job. Even if there was a gain for doing it, theres about 3,000 traffic/vehicle violations, not alot of need to make it up. Writing tickets are like shooting fish in a barrel.
This brings us to 1 and 3. I have a bias here. I've worked law enforcement for years, and have written thousands of tickets. I, and every other officer I know, have let go tons of drivers that we were 99% sure were the one speeding/violating, because 99% isnt 100%. Its not worth it. If i'm ever caught lying, or am proven by some other means that i goofed up like that, it can mean my career, literally. An officer caught lying on the stand can have that previous dishonesty used against him in court, his testimony is invalid, he cant do his job.
Traffic judges spend all day hearing about how its everyone elses fault but the defendant, how its impossible, the cops out to get him, the cops incompetent, etc. Most judges appreciate it when someone says, "I didnt think I was going that fast, I didnt even think my car could go that fast, heres a copy of my driving record, I'd like to go to driving school if I can to help keep this off my record. I apologize."
You generally want to dress nice, be polite and professional, and take responsibility. You admitted you weren't looking at your speedometer, I doubt your friend was either. Some states accept speedometer calibrations as an acceptable defense. If you get your speedometer tested and it reads 45 when you're going 50, thats a pretty big deal.
Talk to your insurance, see how much points will hurt you, see how much an attorney is. It may be worth it, it may not. Depends on state and insurance company.
The following is how I handle them.
I have never paid a dime in legal fees.
I also only have 2 points on my NY drivers licence for 6 tickets over the last 2 years.
( I should probably have more )
Two of the speeding tickets I was given, were pushed down to traffic violations,
and 4 were dismissed.
What worked for me was writing the district attorney, or their assistant about the incident in a typed letter,
explaining that I was a broke eagle scout college student in the army, with good moral values, and asking for radar calibrations.
Surprisingly the cops not tuning their radars often enough got me completely off the hook twice.
Like CangoFett said, showing up is half the battle.
How you dress is dependent on the image you want to provide.
You either want to look like a homeless man with no money, or somebody that takes this seriously.
Showing up like you would to class in bejeweled jeans and a star wars t-shirt is a big no no.
If it gets to it, and a set court date takes place, (at least for here) the cop has to be present or the charges are also dropped.
Which they may or may not even show up for. (this also happened to me once)
EDIT: And in case your wondering, the other dismissed ticket was thanks to having connections with the judge.
Had a lapsed inspection by a few days. My ticket was $40.
Court fees? $200.
In Kansas the court fees are included in your speeding ticket...so it is pointless NOT to go to court if you want to fight the ticket.
Similar to most everyone else in the thread, consider getting a lawyer. The cost of a lawyer will likely end up costing you less than the increase in your insurance premiums if that ticket gets put on your record.
Second, if the lawyer is experienced in traffic tickets, they are probably not going to actually get the judge/magistrate to throw out the ticket. What they are more likely to do is chat up the city/county prosecutor who is in charge of prosecuting the tickets and get a plea deal to change the speeding ticket (which is a moving violation) to a charge that is not a moving violation such as expired license tabs (which doesn't raise insurance rates). But there is going to be a price, and any prosecutor worth their salt will make you 1) agree to a higher fine than you're paying now, and 2) agree to some sort of defensive driving course.
While it will suck to pay a higher fine, as well as pay the lawyer, you'll still save hundreds, if not thousands of dollars on your insurance as a result.
Get a lawyer.